NAMI

Backpacknami-chan Price Today & AI Analysis

NAMISolanaAnalysis as of Sep 27, 2026

Price

$0.000324

+539.81% 24h

Contract

Live
FGoHcBuWfy6XGGkXwTLe9AuXAQEUmDR5g1LkxK98d1vJ

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,031

Market cap

$324,006

More tokens on Solana

EEWYiShares MSCI South Korea ETF - Backpack Securities$194.97-7.7%MC $526.4KSKHYSKHYSK Hynix - Backpack Securities$192.27+3.2%MC $2.16Mroonroonroon$0.000295+521.6%MC $290.2KFranklinFranklinFranklin The Turtle$0.000264+446.5%MC $250.9Kai/maxxiai/maxxiai/maxxi$0.000191+282.9%MC $184.9Ke/acce/accEffective Accelerationism$0.0126+706.8%MC $12.43M

Backpacknami-chan: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-27 12:16 UTC

Holder addresses

1,031

Top 10 supply share

25.30%

Reported liquidity

$28,474.00
How concentrated is Backpacknami-chan ownership?
As of 2026-09-27 12:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 25.30% of supply. It reports 1,031 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Backpacknami-chan?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-27 12:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $776,610.00 in buys and $743,409.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Backpacknami-chan liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +27.96%, from $23,870.88 (2026-09-27 11:00 UTC) to $30,545.80 (2026-09-27 12:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-27 12:16 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-27 11:00 UTC$23,870.88
2026-09-27 12:00 UTC$30,545.80

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about NAMI

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 27, 12:18 PM UTC

FDV

$324,006

Liquidity

$28,474.00

Holders

1,031

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

NAMI (Backpacknami-chan) is a Solana memecoin trading on a Raydium CPMM pool that just experienced an extreme, likely bot/sniper-influenced price spike of +540% in the past hour/24h, immediately followed by a -17.4% 5-minute pullback. Total liquidity is very shallow at $28.47K against a ~$324K FDV and over $1.5M in 24h trading volume, and key risk indicators — mint/freeze authority status, sniper concentration, and holder growth history — are all unavailable in the provided data, leaving major due-diligence gaps unresolved rather than assumed benign.

Key points

  • Extreme single-hour candle range (>100x from low to high) suggesting bot/sniper-driven price action
  • Very shallow liquidity ($28.47K) relative to FDV and volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Top-10 holders control 25.30% of supply per the current snapshot, with no historical or classification data available
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, and sniper data are all unknown/unavailable, representing significant unresolved risk rather than confirmed safety
  • Already-fading momentum: lower high, declining volume, and negative 5-minute price change immediately after the spike

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

Following an extreme +540% spike, the token is already showing reversal signs: a -17.4% drop in the most recent 5 minutes, a lower high on the second candle versus the first, and a ~68% drop in hourly volume. Short-term price action favors continued mean-reversion/downside risk toward recent support levels, though extreme volatility could produce sharp counter-moves in either direction given the thin $28.47K liquidity base.

Target low

$0.000188

Target high

$0.000539

Support

$0.000188 (candle 2 low), $0.00000573 (candle 1 low / pre-pump base)

Resistance

$0.000539 (candle 2 high), $0.000603 (candle 1 high)

Medium term · 3-14 days

neutral

With only two hours of candle history available, medium-term direction cannot be reliably projected. The token's trajectory will likely depend heavily on whether sustained community/social interest (Twitter presence) can offset the thin liquidity and unresolved authority-risk concerns; absent new catalysts, a fade back toward pre-spike levels is a plausible base case.

Catalysts

  • Any liquidity additions to the Raydium CPMM pool that would reduce slippage and support price stability
  • Confirmation (or lack thereof) of mint/freeze authority renouncement, which could materially shift risk perception
  • Continued social media momentum or influencer attention tied to the 'Backpacknami-chan' branding
  • Potential large holder (top-10, 25.30% of supply) selling activity, which cannot be monitored without further data

Bullish factors

  • Slight net positive buy volume (51.1% vs 48.9% sell) in the 24h window
  • More unique buyers (2,625) than sellers (2,184) in 24h
  • Active Twitter social presence could sustain speculative interest

Bearish factors

  • 5-minute price change of -17.4% immediately following the pump, suggesting reversal has begun
  • Lower high on the most recent candle versus the prior candle (bearish divergence)
  • ~68% decline in hourly trading volume between the two candles
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($28.47K) relative to FDV (~$324K) and 24h volume (~$1.5M), amplifying downside moves
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status and no sniper coverage leave significant unresolved rug/dump risk

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extremely limited dataset: only 2 hourly candles, no sniper data, no holder history, and unknown authority status. The observed price action is also unusually extreme (>100x intra-candle range), which is inherently difficult to forecast and may reflect low-float/bot-driven dynamics rather than organic price discovery.

NAMI call history

Full track record →

Sep 27bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
FGoHcB...d1vJ
Total Supply
999,994,084.19 NAMI

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($28.47K) relative to trading volume and FDV, enabling high slippage and easy price manipulation
  • Unconfirmed mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezes
  • Violent, likely bot/sniper-driven price action (>100x single-hour candle range) with signs of momentum exhaustion (lower high, declining volume, negative 5m move)
  • Top-10 holders control over a quarter (25.30%) of total supply, a meaningful concentration in a low-liquidity market

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (11:00 UTC) opened at $0.00000627, spiked to a high of $0.000603, dropped to a low of $0.00000573, and closed at $0.000218 on volume of ~$1.25M — an extreme range candle indicative of a violent pump-and-partial-dump within a single hour. Candle 2 (12:00 UTC) opened at $0.000218, ran up to $0.000539, pulled back to $0.000188, and closed at $0.000325 on lower volume of ~$393K, showing continued high volatility but a smaller range and decaying volume versus the prior candle.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term price action shows a sharp reversal: after an approximately 540% 1h/24h spike, the most recent 5-minute change is -17.4%, and candle 2's close ($0.000325) is well below its high ($0.000539), suggesting the parabolic move is fading. With only two candles available, medium-term trend cannot be reliably characterized beyond 'sideways/uncertain' given extreme volatility in both directions within the observed window.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000188 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.00000573 (candle 1 low, pre-spike base)

Immediate resistance

$0.000539 (candle 2 high)

Major resistance

$0.000603 (candle 1 high, all-time high in observed window)

With only two candles of history, support/resistance levels are provisional. The candle 1 low of $0.00000573 represents the pre-pump base and would be a catastrophic downside level if fully retraced. The candle 2 low of $0.000188 is a more relevant near-term support given recent price action, while $0.000539 and $0.000603 mark recent swing highs that would need to be reclaimed to confirm renewed bullish momentum.

Notable patterns

  • Extreme-range single-hour candle suggestive of a sniper/bot-driven pump on candle 1 (low $0.00000573 to high $0.000603, a >100x range)
  • Lower high formed on candle 2 ($0.000539) versus candle 1 ($0.000603), an early bearish divergence signal
  • Close well below the high on both candles, indicating sellers stepping in after each rally attempt
  • Declining volume from candle 1 to candle 2 (~68% drop) alongside continued high volatility, consistent with fading momentum

Liquidity

Liquidity

$28,474.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $28.47K is extremely shallow relative to the ~$324K FDV and the enormous 24h trading volume (~$1.52M combined buy+sell). This liquidity-to-volume mismatch implies that large trades will experience severe price impact/slippage, consistent with the token's own OHLC data showing single-hour swings from a low of $0.00000573 to a high of $0.0006 (a >100x intra-candle range). Buy volume ($776.61K, 51.1%) slightly exceeds sell volume ($743.41K, 48.9%), producing a modest net inflow, and buyers (2,625) outnumber sellers (2,184) in the 24h window, suggesting net buying pressure amid extremely high volatility. However, with liquidity this thin, even moderate-sized sell orders could crater the price rapidly, and the 5-minute change of -17.4% right after a +540% 1h/24h move suggests the pump is already reversing.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,994,084.19 NAMI

FDV

$324,006

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Observed price action includes a >100x intra-candle range in a single hour and a +540% 24h move followed immediately by a -17.4% 5-minute drop. This is extreme, casino-like volatility even by memecoin standards.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $28.47K against a $324K FDV and over $1.5M in combined 24h volume, creating a severe liquidity-to-volume mismatch that produces high slippage and makes the price highly manipulable with relatively small capital.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top-10 holders control 25.30% of supply based on the current snapshot. This is a meaningful but not extreme concentration; however, top-100 concentration and wallet classifications are unavailable, limiting full assessment. Treated as medium given the partial data available, not as unknown, since the top-10 figure is directly measured.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($28.47K) relative to trading volume and FDV, enabling high slippage and easy price manipulation
  • Unconfirmed mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezes
  • Violent, likely bot/sniper-driven price action (>100x single-hour candle range) with signs of momentum exhaustion (lower high, declining volume, negative 5m move)
  • Top-10 holders control over a quarter (25.30%) of total supply, a meaningful concentration in a low-liquidity market
  • No sniper coverage or holder history data available, creating significant blind spots in risk assessment
  • Symbol/name references a third-party media property ('Backpacknami-chan'), which combined with 'none' description and minimal social presence (only a Twitter link) suggests low project substance

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume ($776.61K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($743.41K), a mild positive net flow signal
  • Buyer count (2,625) exceeds seller count (2,184) in the 24h window, suggesting more distinct participants are buying than selling
  • Over 1,000 holder addresses exist per the current snapshot, indicating some distribution of ownership beyond a handful of wallets (though this is a count of addresses, not verified unique persons)

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders with strict position sizing and stop-loss discipline who fully understand they may lose their entire position rapidly. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to monitor positions in real time given the extreme volatility and thin liquidity.

NAMI is an extremely high-risk, low-liquidity Solana token that just experienced a violent ~540% price spike followed by immediate signs of reversal (-17.4% in 5 minutes). With only $28.47K in total liquidity, unconfirmed mint/freeze authority status, no sniper coverage, and only a snapshot-level view of holder concentration (top 10 = 25.30%), this token exhibits classic characteristics of a high-volatility speculative memecoin rather than a fundamentally-grounded investment. Any position should be sized as a small, high-risk speculative allocation only.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy pressure continues to outweigh sell pressure (currently 51.1%/48.9%) and the token attracts sustained social/community momentum (it has an active Twitter presence), price could consolidate above recent support ($0.000188) and attempt to reclaim the candle-1 high near $0.000603, delivering substantial short-term gains for risk-tolerant traders.

  • Modest net positive buy/sell volume imbalance in the 24h window
  • More unique buyers (2,625) than sellers (2,184) in 24h
  • Active social presence via Twitter could drive renewed speculative interest
  • Low FDV (~$324K) leaves room for further multiples if narrative catches on

Base Case

Price continues to oscillate with extreme volatility in a wide range roughly between the candle-2 low ($0.000188) and candle-2 high ($0.000539), gradually decaying in volume and volatility as the initial pump fully plays out, absent a fresh catalyst.

  • No major new liquidity injection occurs
  • No confirmation is provided on mint/freeze authority status, keeping rug risk unresolved
  • Trading activity gradually normalizes from the current extreme levels seen in the two available candles
  • Holder base (currently 1,031 addresses) neither meaningfully grows nor shrinks in the near term absent new data

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic spike proves to be a classic pump-and-dump: momentum continues fading (already showing a -17.4% 5-minute drop and a lower high on candle 2), thin liquidity gets drained by early buyers/snipers taking profit, and price retraces sharply toward or below the pre-spike base near $0.00000573-$0.000188.

  • Declining volume (~68% drop) between the two most recent candles signals fading buying interest
  • Lower high on candle 2 versus candle 1 is a bearish divergence
  • Extremely shallow $28.47K liquidity cannot support sustained buying without significant slippage, making dumps easy and rallies hard to sustain
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority and unknown sniper concentration leave room for undisclosed insider dumping
  • 5-minute price change already negative (-17.4%), consistent with post-pump distribution

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 27, 12:18 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-27 12:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, decimals, supply)
  • USD price feed and 24h % change
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (2 most recent candles, Raydium CPMM pair)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers, liquidity, FDV)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data for this token)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles were available, severely limiting technical trend analysis and support/resistance reliability
  • No sniper detection data was available, preventing assessment of sniper concentration, PnL, or dump risk
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was available, only a current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration
  • No wallet-level classification of holders was available, preventing identification of notable holders, exchanges, or insiders
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and mutability status were all unknown, leaving key rug-risk indicators unresolved
  • 24h/6h price % change fields showed identical or missing values, suggesting possible data reporting artifacts rather than fully independent timeframe measurements

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, partial on-chain data and is provided for informational purposes only. It is NOT financial advice and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision. Cryptocurrency, and especially low-liquidity memecoins, carry a very high risk of total loss. Conduct your own independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Backpacknami-chan ownership?

As of 2026-09-27 12:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 25.30% of supply. It reports 1,031 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Backpacknami-chan?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-27 12:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $776,610.00 in buys and $743,409.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Backpacknami-chan liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +27.96%, from $23,870.88 (2026-09-27 11:00 UTC) to $30,545.80 (2026-09-27 12:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Backpacknami-chan (NAMI)?

Following an extreme +540% spike, the token is already showing reversal signs: a -17.4% drop in the most recent 5 minutes, a lower high on the second candle versus the first, and a ~68% drop in hourly volume. Short-term price action favors continued mean-reversion/downside risk toward recent support levels, though extreme volatility could produce sharp counter-moves in either direction given the thin $28.47K liquidity base. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.000188 to $0.000539.

Is NAMI a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders with strict position sizing and stop-loss discipline who fully understand they may lose their entire position rapidly. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to monitor positions in real time given the extreme volatility and thin liquidity.

What are the key risks of holding NAMI?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($28.47K) relative to trading volume and FDV, enabling high slippage and easy price manipulation • Unconfirmed mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezes • Violent, likely bot/sniper-driven price action (>100x single-hour candle range) with signs of momentum exhaustion (lower high, declining volume, negative 5m move)

← Back to all predictions

Track NAMI