ZEBRA

Zebra Price Today & AI Analysis

ZEBRASolanaAnalysis as of Sep 20, 2026

Price

$0.000403

+790.06% 24h · FDV $390,031

Contract

Live
EqFG72Z35r8cAV8mKu3UK2L8NUTR1ZNyMr88E4BnwN8Q

Chain

Solana

Holders

2,476

Market cap

$390,031

More tokens on Solana

DOGEDOGEDogecoin$0.0855-3.6%MC $1.01MTROLLTROLLTROLL$0.0474-4.3%MC $47.30MANSEMANSEMThe Black Bull$0.1693+6.3%MC $168.85MALLINUALLINUALLINU$0.0161-7.9%MC $16.05Mfomopayfomopayfomo pay$0.000424+817.4%MC $406.2KEVOEVOEvorum$0.056903+2.0%MC $690.3K

Zebra: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-20 23:15 UTC

Holder addresses

2,476

Top 10 supply share

18.95%

Reported liquidity

$31,312.00
How concentrated is Zebra ownership?
As of 2026-09-20 23:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 18.95% of supply. It reports 2,476 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Zebra?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-20 23:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $1,305,544.00 in buys and $1,271,892.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Zebra liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +76.20%, from $20,454.89 (2026-09-20 21:00 UTC) to $36,042.02 (2026-09-20 23:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-20 23:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-20 21:00 UTC$20,454.89
2026-09-20 22:00 UTC$36,318.44
2026-09-20 23:00 UTC$36,042.02

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about ZEBRA

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 20, 11:16 PM UTC

FDV

$390,031

Liquidity

$31,312.00

Holders

2,476

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

ZEBRA is a very new, thinly-liquid token trading on PumpSwap that has posted an extreme +790% 24h price gain accompanied by highly volatile, wick-heavy hourly candles and a recent sharp decline in trading volume. Critical due-diligence data - mint/freeze authority status, sniper activity, top-100 holder concentration, and historical holder trends - are all unavailable, leaving significant blind spots. With only $31.3K in total liquidity against a $390K FDV and $2.58M in 24h volume, the token carries very high manipulation, slippage, and volatility risk typical of a freshly launched speculative memecoin-style asset.

Key points

  • Extreme 24h price move (+790%) on a brand-new, low-liquidity PumpSwap pair
  • Total liquidity of only $31.3K versus $2.58M in 24h trading volume, a highly unusual and risky mismatch
  • Major data gaps: unknown mint/freeze authority, no sniper data, no historical holder trend, unknown contract verification status
  • Nearly balanced 24h buy/sell pressure (50.7%/49.3%) despite the huge price spike, indicating no clear one-sided conviction
  • Token metadata description field literally reads 'test', consistent with an unpolished or very early-stage launch

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 1-24 hours

neutral

Given the extreme volatility, near-balanced buy/sell pressure (50.7%/49.3%), and a sharp volume decline in the most recent candle, short-term direction is highly uncertain. The most likely near-term outcome is continued high volatility within the recent trading range rather than a sustained clean trend in either direction.

Target low

$0.0000914

Target high

$0.000680

Support

$0.000313, $0.0000914

Resistance

$0.000545, $0.000680

Medium term · 3-7 days

bearish

Tokens that experience extreme parabolic moves (+790% in 24h) on thin liquidity ($31.3K) with unknown authority safeguards and no verifiable sniper/holder history historically face elevated risk of significant mean-reversion once initial speculative interest fades, though this cannot be stated with high confidence given the very limited data window (only 3 hourly candles).

Catalysts

  • Potential liquidity additions or removals by the deployer
  • Resolution of unknown mint/freeze authority status (positive if renounced, negative if not)
  • Continued or fading unique buyer momentum
  • Any social/marketing catalysts given active twitter/website links

Bullish factors

  • Unique buyers (6,202) exceed unique sellers (4,908) over the 24h window
  • Nearly balanced 24h buy/sell volume (50.7% vs 49.3%) rather than one-sided dumping
  • Active social presence (twitter, website) may sustain retail attention

Bearish factors

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($31.3K) versus $2.58M 24h volume creates high manipulation and slippage risk
  • Sharp 87% volume decline in the most recent hourly candle suggests fading momentum
  • Classic large-wick, high-volatility candle pattern typical of pump-and-dump dynamics
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority and no sniper data leave major unquantified downside risks

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because the dataset contains only 3 hourly candles (a 3-hour window), no sniper data, no historical holder trend, and unknown mint/freeze authority status. These gaps make it impossible to distinguish organic growth from bot-driven or manipulated price action with any reliability.

ZEBRA call history

Full track record →

Sep 20neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
EqFG72...wN8Q
Total Supply
968,412,443.39 ZEBRA

Key Risks

  • Extremely low liquidity ($31.3K) relative to volume and FDV creates high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or frozen accounts
  • Parabolic +790% 24h move with sharp intra-hour reversals suggests high likelihood of a pump-and-dump pattern
  • No sniper or historical holder data available to assess early-buyer dumping risk or true distribution

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available, all within a single 3-hour window on 2026-09-20, showing extreme volatility: Candle 1 opened at $0.00000326, spiked to a high of $0.000319, then collapsed back to close at $0.000182 (a huge intra-candle wick suggesting a sniper/bot-driven initial pump and dump). Candle 2 opened at $0.000182, spiked further to $0.000680 (the all-time high in this dataset), dropped to a low of $0.0000914, and closed at $0.000375 - another huge range indicating violent two-way action. Candle 3 opened at $0.000375, ranged between $0.000313 and $0.000545, and closed at $0.000391, showing some stabilization with a narrower range relative to prior candles.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term price action over the last 3 hours is a chaotic uptrend off extremely low starting prices, but the most recent candle shows range contraction and consolidation around $0.00035-$0.00039, suggesting the initial parabolic move may be losing momentum. With only 3 candles of history, a 'medium-term' trend cannot be meaningfully established and is best described as sideways/undetermined.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000313 (candle 3 low)

Major support

$0.0000914 (candle 2 low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000545 (candle 3 high)

Major resistance

$0.000680 (candle 2 high, all-time high in dataset)

With only 3 hours of candle data, support/resistance levels are provisional. The candle 3 range ($0.000313-$0.000545) represents the most immediate zone of interest; a break above $0.000545 could retest the $0.000680 high, while a break below $0.000313 opens the door to a retest of the $0.0000914 low from candle 2's wick.

Notable patterns

  • Large upper and lower wicks in candles 1 and 2 indicating extreme volatility and likely bot/sniper activity around pair launch
  • Volume climax in candle 2 followed by sharp volume decline in candle 3 (possible exhaustion signal)
  • Range contraction in candle 3 relative to candles 1-2, suggesting a potential short-term consolidation after the initial parabolic spike

Liquidity

Liquidity

$31,312.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of only ~$31.3K is extremely shallow relative to the $390K FDV and the $2.58M combined 24h trading volume (a volume/liquidity ratio of roughly 82x), indicating that even moderately sized trades will cause significant price impact and slippage. Buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (50.7% vs 49.3%), and unique buyers (6,202) modestly exceed unique sellers (4,908), suggesting a slight net inflow bias, but this thin liquidity pool means the observed price is highly fragile and easily manipulated by a single large trade in either direction. This liquidity/volume mismatch is a major red flag for a token that just moved +790% in 24h.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

968,412,443.39 ZEBRA

FDV

$390,031

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +790% and 1h change of +76%, with intra-candle wicks spanning from $0.0000033 to $0.00068 within a 3-hour window, represent extreme volatility characteristic of a nascent, thinly traded pair.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of only ~$31.3K against $2.58M in combined 24h volume and $390K FDV means the pool can be easily drained or manipulated; large trades will incur severe slippage.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Only top-10 concentration (18.95%) is available from a single snapshot; top-100 concentration, wallet classification, and historical accumulation/distribution patterns are not available, so true concentration risk (including potential insider or team wallets) cannot be fully assessed.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely low liquidity ($31.3K) relative to volume and FDV creates high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or frozen accounts
  • Parabolic +790% 24h move with sharp intra-hour reversals suggests high likelihood of a pump-and-dump pattern
  • No sniper or historical holder data available to assess early-buyer dumping risk or true distribution
  • Token description field literally says 'test', and pair is on PumpSwap - consistent with a very new, unaudited, low-credibility launch
  • Declining volume in the most recent candle after a volume climax may signal fading momentum

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy/sell volume is nearly balanced (50.7%/49.3%), not showing overwhelming one-sided sell pressure yet
  • Unique buyers (6,202) exceed unique sellers (4,908) in the 24h window, indicating net new participant inflow rather than mass exit
  • Top-10 holder concentration of ~19% is not extreme in isolation, though this must be weighed against the many unknowns noted above

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. This profile (brand-new PumpSwap pair, sub-$35K liquidity, unknown authorities, parabolic and highly volatile price action, and minimal verifiable metadata) is not appropriate for risk-averse investors or anyone seeking capital preservation.

ZEBRA is a newly active, extremely low-liquidity token on PumpSwap that has experienced a parabolic +790% price move in 24 hours accompanied by nearly balanced buy/sell volume and declining momentum in the latest hourly candle. Nearly all of the standard due-diligence data points (mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder history, top-100 concentration) are unavailable, making this a high-uncertainty, high-risk speculative setup rather than an investable thesis with any real conviction.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If genuine organic demand continues (evidenced by unique buyers outpacing sellers 6,202 vs 4,908) and liquidity providers add depth, the token could consolidate its recent gains and attempt a push toward the $0.00068 high seen in candle 2.

  • Continued unique buyer growth outpacing sellers
  • Liquidity additions reducing slippage and attracting larger participants
  • Social media momentum (twitter/website links present) sustaining retail attention

Base Case

Price likely remains highly volatile and range-bound between the recent candle extremes (~$0.00009 to ~$0.00068) over the near term as the market digests the initial parabolic move, with no clear directional edge given balanced 24h buy/sell volume (50.7%/49.3%).

  • No major liquidity injection or withdrawal occurs in the immediate term
  • No new sniper or holder data becomes available to change the risk picture
  • Broader memecoin/PumpSwap market conditions remain roughly stable

Bear Case

High probability

Given the extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, and classic pump-and-dump candle shape (huge wicks, volume climax followed by a sharp volume drop), the token could rapidly retrace toward or below its candle 2 low of $0.0000914, especially if early buyers/snipers begin exiting.

  • Sharp 87% volume decline in the most recent hour signaling fading buyer interest
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority creating tail risk of supply dilution or account freezes
  • Extremely thin $31.3K liquidity making the pool vulnerable to a single large sell order
  • Lack of sniper/holder history data preventing confirmation that early holders are not preparing to dump

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 20, 11:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-20 23:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • PumpSwap pair pricing data
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (3 candles available)
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell counts, unique wallets)
  • Codex holder aggregate snapshot (holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly candles available, providing an extremely limited technical history
  • No sniper analysis data available at all
  • No historical holder count data (24h/7d/30d growth figures are unsupported placeholders, not measured values)
  • No top-100 holder concentration or wallet classification data
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and mutability status all unknown
  • Update authority field present but explicitly cannot be used to infer mint/freeze authority per methodology

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, incomplete on-chain and market data that may not fully capture manipulation, insider activity, or authority-based rug risks. Token metadata and descriptions were supplied by a potentially adversarial source and were treated as untrusted evidence, not instructions. Always conduct independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in newly launched, low-liquidity tokens, carry a very high risk of substantial or total loss.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Zebra ownership?

As of 2026-09-20 23:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 18.95% of supply. It reports 2,476 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Zebra?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-20 23:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $1,305,544.00 in buys and $1,271,892.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Zebra liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +76.20%, from $20,454.89 (2026-09-20 21:00 UTC) to $36,042.02 (2026-09-20 23:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Zebra (ZEBRA)?

Given the extreme volatility, near-balanced buy/sell pressure (50.7%/49.3%), and a sharp volume decline in the most recent candle, short-term direction is highly uncertain. The most likely near-term outcome is continued high volatility within the recent trading range rather than a sustained clean trend in either direction. Short-term outlook is neutral (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.0000914 to $0.000680.

Is ZEBRA a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. This profile (brand-new PumpSwap pair, sub-$35K liquidity, unknown authorities, parabolic and highly volatile price action, and minimal verifiable metadata) is not appropriate for risk-averse investors or anyone seeking capital preservation.

What are the key risks of holding ZEBRA?

Extremely low liquidity ($31.3K) relative to volume and FDV creates high slippage and manipulation risk • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or frozen accounts • Parabolic +790% 24h move with sharp intra-hour reversals suggests high likelihood of a pump-and-dump pattern

← Back to all predictions

Track ZEBRA