threehalves Price Today & AI Analysis

threehalvesSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 30, 2026

$0.0₅4227

Contract

Live

ETEEXPnv6mmC3mxtCd7GaNTwxMardyZrcUGqY75Lpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

460

Market cap

$4,151

At a $1M market cap, $THREEHALVES would be $0.001018 (241x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is threehalves a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 25

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about threehalves

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

CHIPOTLAICHIPOTLAI MAX$0.0₅2743+0.0%MC $2.7K

kawadogeChiikawa Doge$0.0₅2123+0.0%MC $2.0K

XNSXNS.name$0.0₅2682+0.0%MC $2.6K

PAYDAYPAYDAY$0.0₅3248-0.8%MC $3.1K

CASHLESSCASHLESS$0.0₅2458+0.0%MC $2.4K

FrongusFrongus$0.000223+439.8%MC $215.3K

threehalves: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-30 03:17 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$53,343.51

How concentrated is threehalves ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling threehalves?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is threehalves liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-30 03:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $53,343.51. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-30 03:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 30, 03:17 AM UTC

FDV

$232,336

Liquidity

$53,343.51

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

threehalves (threehalves) is a PumpFun-launched Solana memecoin (mint: ETEEXPnv6mmC3mxtCd7GaNTwxMardyZrcUGqY75Lpump) trading on PumpSwap. The token has experienced an extreme 328% price spike in 24 hours, but the on-chain data reveals severe structural weaknesses: holder data returns zero across all metrics (likely a data-provider gap or very new token), liquidity is extremely thin at $53.34K, and sell pressure dominates at 77.1% of 24h volume ($530K sells vs $157K buys). The token was promoted via a Discord server, has no verified contract, and its update authority is unknown. These factors combine to create a very high risk profile.

Key points

Extreme 328% 24h price spike driven by speculative trading, not fundamentals
Severely lopsided sell pressure: 77.1% sell volume ($530K) vs 22.9% buy volume ($157K)
Critically thin liquidity at $53.34K against $226K FDV — high slippage risk
Holder data entirely zeroed out — data provider gap or token is extremely new
No verified contract, unknown update authority, Discord-only promotion

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token has already pumped 328% in 24h with sell pressure at 77.1% of volume. The most recent hourly candle (03:00 UTC) shows a high of $0.000258 with a close of $0.000231, forming a potential shooting-star/bearish wick. The prior candle (02:00 UTC) was a massive bull candle from $0.0000286 open to $0.000149 close. With sells vastly outpacing buys (8,251 sells vs 2,732 buys) and only $53K liquidity, a sharp retracement is the most probable near-term outcome.

Target low

$0.000045

Target high

$0.000258

Support: $0.000103 (candle [1] low), $0.0000286 (candle [2] low / launch area)
Resistance: $0.000258 (candle [1] high / 24h peak), $0.000235 (candle [2] high)

Medium term · 1–7 days

bearish

Without a genuine holder base (data shows 0 holders), meaningful liquidity, or verified fundamentals, sustaining price gains beyond the initial pump is extremely unlikely. Most PumpFun tokens with this sell-pressure profile retrace 80–95% from peak within days.

Catalysts

Any new Discord/social promotion could trigger a secondary pump
Liquidity additions by the team could temporarily stabilize price
Broader Solana memecoin market sentiment could provide short-term tailwind

Bullish factors

Strong 328% 24h price momentum
5m price change of +1.87% suggests very short-term buying interest
1h price change of +172% shows explosive upward move
2,732 unique buy transactions in 24h indicates some genuine interest

Bearish factors

77.1% sell pressure ($530K sells vs $157K buys)
8,251 sells vs only 2,732 buys — sellers outnumber buyers 3:1
Only $53.34K total liquidity — extremely shallow
Zero holder data across all timeframes — data integrity concern
No verified contract, unknown update authority
Discord-only promotion — no established community proof
Token launched on PumpFun with 'pump' suffix in mint address — high rug risk profile

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) holder data entirely zeroed out preventing distribution analysis, (2) no sniper data available, (3) only 2 hourly candles of OHLC data, and (4) extreme volatility (price ranged from $0.0000286 to $0.000258 within 2 hours) making any price target highly speculative.

threehalves call history

Full track record →

Jul 30bearish@ $0.000232

24h-66.6%

7d-93.9%

30d-97.6%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: ETEEXP...pump
Total Supply: 1,000,000,000

Key Risks

Critically thin liquidity ($53.34K) with high slippage risk on any meaningful exit
Overwhelming sell pressure: 77.1% of 24h volume is sells, 1,909 sellers vs 351 buyers
Zero verifiable holder data — distribution and concentration cannot be assessed
Unknown update/mint/freeze authority — rug pull mechanism cannot be ruled out

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (02:00 UTC): O=$0.0000292, H=$0.0000235, L=$0.0000286, C=$0.000149 — a massive bullish candle with a 5x+ move from open to close, representing the initial pump. Candle [1] (03:00 UTC): O=$0.000146, H=$0.000258, L=$0.000103, C=$0.000231 — a wide-range candle with a significant upper wick (high $0.000258 vs close $0.000231), suggesting selling pressure at the top and a potential bearish shooting-star formation. The close at $0.000231 is below the high, indicating sellers stepped in near the peak.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is technically up given the 328% 24h gain, but the upper wick on the most recent candle and overwhelming sell volume suggest the uptrend is exhausting. Medium-term is effectively unknown given only 2 candles of data — classified as sideways pending more data.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

23%

Sell

77%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000103 (candle [1] low)

Major support

$0.0000286 (candle [2] low — launch/pre-pump level)

Immediate resistance

$0.000235 (candle [2] high)

Major resistance

$0.000258 (candle [1] all-time high)

The $0.000103 level represents the intra-hour low during the consolidation candle and is the first line of defense. A break below this opens a path to the pre-pump origin around $0.0000286. On the upside, $0.000258 is the only established high and acts as major resistance. Given the thin liquidity, price can move violently through these levels.

Notable patterns

Shooting star / bearish upper wick on candle [1] — high of $0.000258 with close at $0.000231 suggests rejection at highs
Massive bullish engulfing candle [2] — price moved from $0.0000286 to $0.000149 in one hour (pump initiation)
Volume climax on candle [2] ($552K) followed by sharp volume decline on candle [1] ($125K) — classic pump exhaustion pattern
Only 2 candles available — pattern analysis is severely limited

Liquidity

$53,343.51

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically thin at $53.34K against a $226.62K FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of approximately 23.5%. This means any moderately sized sell order will cause severe slippage. The 24h trading volume of ~$687K is nearly 13x the available liquidity, indicating extreme churn and wash-trading risk. Net flow is strongly negative: $530K in sells vs $157K in buys represents a $372K net outflow. The seller-to-buyer ratio of 1,909:351 (5.4:1) is alarming and indicates the token is in active distribution. The single trading pair on PumpSwap (8JbosUsaE9DZHwm5MiyJ2wdJcNvr7C2TPByJ9TRp6Tvj) provides no alternative exit routes, concentrating all liquidity risk in one pool.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000

FDV

$232,335.53

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
328% price spike in 24h with price ranging from $0.0000286 to $0.000258 — an 8x range within 2 hours. Extreme volatility makes position sizing and exit planning nearly impossible.
Liquidityhigh
Only $53.34K total liquidity against $226K FDV and $687K 24h volume. Liquidity-to-volume ratio of ~7.8% means the pool is being drained rapidly. Large exits will cause catastrophic slippage.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Critically thin liquidity ($53.34K) with high slippage risk on any meaningful exit
Overwhelming sell pressure: 77.1% of 24h volume is sells, 1,909 sellers vs 351 buyers
Zero verifiable holder data — distribution and concentration cannot be assessed
Unknown update/mint/freeze authority — rug pull mechanism cannot be ruled out
Unverified smart contract — no independent audit or verification
Discord-only promotion with no established social proof or utility
PumpFun launch token with 'pump' suffix — statistically high failure/rug rate
Only $232K FDV with no fundamental value proposition identified

Mitigating factors

Token metadata marked as mutable=false, limiting metadata manipulation
Token listed as 'possible spam: false' by the data provider
Active trading with 1,975 unique wallets in 24h suggests genuine market participation
PumpFun tokens typically have mint authority burned at launch (unconfirmed here)
Twitter social link present (though content not verified)

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand memecoin dynamics and can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with PumpFun token risks. Position sizes should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

threehalves is a PumpFun-launched memecoin that has experienced a violent 328% pump within its first hours of trading. The token exhibits all the hallmarks of a classic pump-and-dump pattern: explosive price action, overwhelming sell pressure (77.1%), thin liquidity ($53.34K), no verifiable holder base, unknown authority status, and Discord-only promotion. There is no identifiable fundamental value proposition. The risk-reward is extremely unfavorable for new entrants at current prices.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Secondary pump driven by Discord/social community momentum. If the Uxento Discord community mobilizes additional buyers and the token gains broader Solana memecoin attention, a second wave could push price back toward or above the $0.000258 all-time high.

Coordinated Discord community buying campaign
Broader Solana memecoin market rally
Influencer attention or viral social media moment
Liquidity additions stabilizing the pool

Base Case

Gradual price decay with occasional volatility spikes. The token stabilizes at a fraction of its peak price (likely $0.00003–$0.00008 range) with minimal trading activity, becoming effectively illiquid within 1–2 weeks.

Some residual community activity from Discord maintains minimal buy pressure
Liquidity pool is not fully drained in the immediate term
No major catalyst (positive or negative) emerges in the near term
Price finds a floor near the pre-pump levels around $0.000029–$0.000050

Bear Case

High probability

Rapid collapse back to near-zero. With 77.1% sell pressure, $53K liquidity, and no verifiable holder base, the token retraces 90%+ from its peak within 24–72 hours as early buyers exit and liquidity is drained.

Continued dominant sell pressure (77.1% of volume)
Liquidity pool drainage from high sell volume relative to pool size
No fundamental buyers to absorb distribution
Typical PumpFun token lifecycle ending in near-zero price

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 30, 03:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-30 03:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (Solana blockchain)
PumpSwap trading pair data (pair: 8JbosUsaE9DZHwm5MiyJ2wdJcNvr7C2TPByJ9TRp6Tvj)
Trading analytics API (24h volume, buyer/seller counts, liquidity)
OHLC candle data (hourly, 2 candles available)
Holder metrics API (returned zero data — likely data gap for new token)
Historical holder series (30 days, all zeros — data gap)
Sniper analysis endpoint (no data returned)

Limitations

Holder data entirely zeroed out — cannot assess distribution, concentration, or whale activity
Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — severely limits technical analysis
No sniper data available — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed
Update authority listed as 'unknown' — authority risk cannot be fully quantified
Mint and freeze authority status unconfirmed
No verified contract — on-chain code cannot be audited
Token is very new — limited historical data across all metrics
FDV discrepancy between metadata ($232,335.53) and trading analytics ($226,620) — minor data inconsistency noted

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially newly launched memecoins, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data used is sourced from third-party APIs and may be incomplete, delayed, or inaccurate. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is threehalves a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 25, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell threehalves?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 25, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is threehalves ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling threehalves?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is threehalves liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-30 03:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $53,343.51. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for threehalves (threehalves)?

Is threehalves a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand memecoin dynamics and can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with PumpFun token risks. Position sizes should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

What are the key risks of holding threehalves?

Critically thin liquidity ($53.34K) with high slippage risk on any meaningful exit • Overwhelming sell pressure: 77.1% of 24h volume is sells, 1,909 sellers vs 351 buyers • Zero verifiable holder data — distribution and concentration cannot be assessed