Stamp

Zcash Shielded Assets Price Today & AI Analysis

StampSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 20, 2026

Price

$0.002182

+2874.06% 24h · FDV $2,161,724

Contract

Live
EKtmPPLaCbEEKiwoHHtV7TsRsmPXs5CMGtQtZFSiinsc

Chain

Solana

Holders

5,998

Market cap

$2,161,724

More tokens on Solana

FOMOFOMOfomo$0.041911+121.1%MC $1.91MTRUMPTRUMPOFFICIAL TRUMP$2.09+0.7%MC $2.09BAPPLAPPLApple$0.041779+169.3%MC $1.78MClaudeClaudeClaude$0.041644+161.7%MC $1.64MFLEXFLEXReflex Monster$0.001934+272.1%MC $1.86MEVOEVOEvorum$0.056903+2.0%MC $690.3K

Zcash Shielded Assets: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-20 20:15 UTC

Holder addresses

5,998

Top 10 supply share

14.10%

Reported liquidity

$94,194.00
How concentrated is Zcash Shielded Assets ownership?
As of 2026-09-20 20:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 14.10% of supply. It reports 5,998 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Zcash Shielded Assets?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-20 20:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $4,406,505.00 in buys and $4,265,988.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Zcash Shielded Assets liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -29.39%, from $206,837.65 (2026-09-20 18:00 UTC) to $146,046.34 (2026-09-20 20:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-20 20:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-20 18:00 UTC$206,837.65
2026-09-20 19:00 UTC$175,057.85
2026-09-20 20:00 UTC$146,046.34

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about Stamp

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 20, 08:16 PM UTC

FDV

$2,161,724

Liquidity

$94,194.00

Holders

5,998

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

Zcash Shielded Assets (Stamp) is a micro-cap SPL token trading on PumpSwap (mint EKtmPPLaCbEEKiwoHHtV7TsRsmPXs5CMGtQtZFSiinsc) with an FDV of ~$2.16M and only ~$94.19K of total liquidity. The token has exhibited extreme volatility in the last 3 hourly candles (moves from ~$0.0000051 to ~$0.0049 and back), and a reported 24h price change of +2874%, which is more consistent with an illiquid, newly-listed or thinly-traded pump.fun/PumpSwap launch than an established asset. There is no verifiable authority, contract-verification, or holder-history data, and no sniper dataset is available, so several standard risk checks cannot be completed and are marked unknown rather than assumed safe.

Key points

  • Extremely thin liquidity (~$94K) relative to FDV (~$2.16M), implying high slippage and fragility
  • Reported 24h price change of +2874% alongside candle ranges spanning nearly 900x within a single hour — signals extreme volatility/possible manipulation or data artifacts
  • No mint/freeze authority, verification, or sniper data available — key rug-risk indicators are unknown, not confirmed safe
  • Roughly balanced 24h buy/sell volume (50.8%/49.2%) despite the violent price swings, suggesting two-sided speculative churn rather than one-directional accumulation or distribution
  • Token naming references 'Zcash Shielded Assets' with symbol 'Stamp' — a mismatched/generic branding pattern common in opportunistic or copy-cat token launches

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 1-24 hours

neutral

Price action over the last three hourly candles is extremely erratic: candle 1 opened at $0.0000051 and closed at $0.0031, candle 2 spiked to a high of $0.00496 before collapsing to a low of $0.00104 and closing at $0.00218, and candle 3 traded in a tight $0.00103-$0.00231 band closing at $0.00221. This pattern (huge initial spike, sharp pullback, then consolidation) is typical of a post-launch blow-off with the market now searching for a short-term equilibrium near $0.0018-$0.0023. Given the tiny $94K liquidity pool, any moderately sized order can move price sharply in either direction.

Target low

0.0010

Target high

0.0035

Support

0.00103 (candle 2 & 3 low), 0.00051 (candle 1 open, extreme low)

Resistance

0.00312 (candle 1 close), 0.00496 (candle 2 high, all-time high in sample)

Medium term · 3-14 days

bearish

Tokens exhibiting this magnitude of hourly volatility and a +2874% 24h move on sub-$100K liquidity typically mean-revert hard once initial speculative/bot interest fades, unless sustained organic volume and liquidity growth follow. Without holder-growth history, authority confirmation, or sniper visibility, there is no evidence base for a durable uptrend thesis.

Catalysts

  • Continued PumpSwap volume/liquidity growth could stabilize price above current consolidation range
  • Any liquidity withdrawal or large holder exit given top-10 already holding ~14.1% of supply could trigger a sharp drawdown
  • Loss of speculative attention (typical for pump.fun-style launches) would likely see volume and price decay toward liquidity-pool-implied floor

Bullish factors

  • 24h buy volume ($4.41M) slightly exceeds sell volume ($4.27M), a marginal net buy bias
  • Buyer count (10,774) exceeds seller count (8,007) in the last 24h, suggesting broader participation on the buy side
  • High trading volume relative to liquidity indicates active market interest, at least in the short term

Bearish factors

  • Total liquidity of only $94.19K versus $2.16M FDV is a severe liquidity/FDV mismatch, prone to sharp reversals
  • Extreme intra-hour volatility (candle ranges of up to ~900x low-to-high) indicates a highly unstable, likely manipulated or newly-seeded market
  • No mint/freeze authority confirmation — possibility of further supply dilution or freezing cannot be ruled out
  • No verifiable contract verification, holder history, or sniper coverage to corroborate organic demand

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly candles and no multi-day price/volume history are provided; liquidity is shallow ($94.19K) so price is highly manipulable; authority, verification, and sniper data are all unavailable, materially limiting confidence in any directional call.

Stamp call history

Full track record →

Sep 20neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
EKtmPP...insc
Total Supply
990,545,898.45 (formatted)

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($94.19K) relative to FDV ($2.16M) and 24h volume (~$8.6M combined), creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of further token issuance or account freezing
  • Violent, possibly manipulated price action (+2874% 24h, near-900x intra-candle range) typical of newly launched, thinly traded PumpSwap tokens
  • No sniper coverage means bot-driven early accumulation and coordinated dumping cannot be ruled out or measured

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only three hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (18:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000051, spiked to a high of $0.00454, and closed at $0.00312 on volume of ~4.91M — a massive bullish expansion candle likely marking the token's early trading/launch phase. Candle 2 (19:00 UTC) opened at $0.00312, pushed to a new high of $0.00496, then reversed sharply to a low of $0.00104, closing at $0.00218 on the largest volume of the set (~9.95M) — a long-wick reversal/shooting-star-like candle showing aggressive selling into strength. Candle 3 (20:00 UTC) consolidated in a narrower $0.00103-$0.00231 range, closing at $0.00221 on much lower volume (~922K), suggesting the initial volatility is cooling into a tighter range.

Trend

Short-term

Sideways

Medium-term

Downtrend

After an explosive initial rally and a violent reversal from the $0.00496 high, price has stabilized (barely) around $0.0018-0.0023. The medium-term trajectory from the candle-2 high is clearly down, while the most recent hour shows sideways consolidation with reduced volume.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00103 (low of candles 2 and 3)

Major support

$0.00051 (candle 1 open / launch-level low)

Immediate resistance

$0.00312 (candle 1 close level)

Major resistance

$0.00496 (candle 2 high, highest price in the sample)

With only three candles, support/resistance levels are provisional. The $0.00103 zone has been tested twice (candles 2 and 3) and held, making it the most relevant near-term support; a break below would open room toward the $0.00051 launch low. On the upside, $0.00312 and the $0.00496 spike high represent the key resistance levels that would need to be reclaimed to signal renewed bullish momentum.

Notable patterns

  • Long upper-wick reversal candle (candle 2) after a rapid rally — classic blow-off/distribution signature
  • Sharp volume spike coinciding with the price top, followed by a steep volume decline — indicates exhaustion
  • Narrowing range and declining volume in the most recent candle — early sign of consolidation, direction undetermined

Liquidity

Liquidity

$94,194.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $94.19K against 24h volume of over $8.6M combined (buy + sell) represents an extremely high volume-to-liquidity ratio, indicating the pool is being turned over dozens of times per day — a strong marker of high slippage risk and susceptibility to sharp price impact from individual trades. Buy volume ($4.41M, 50.8%) slightly exceeds sell volume ($4.27M, 49.2%), and unique buyers (10,774) exceed unique sellers (8,007), giving a mild net inflow bias, but the margin is thin enough that this could reverse quickly given the shallow pool depth.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

990,545,898.45 (formatted)

FDV

$2,161,724 (per metadata) / $2.16M (per analytics)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +2874% and intra-hour swings spanning from $0.0000051 to $0.00496 (nearly 900x range within the sampled candles) indicate extreme volatility inconsistent with a stable, mature market.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $94.19K against $2.16M FDV and over $8.6M in combined 24h volume, producing a very high volume/liquidity turnover ratio and high slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top-10 holders control 14.10% of supply per the Codex snapshot; top-100 concentration and wallet classifications are unavailable, so full concentration risk cannot be fully characterized beyond this single data point.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($94.19K) relative to FDV ($2.16M) and 24h volume (~$8.6M combined), creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of further token issuance or account freezing
  • Violent, possibly manipulated price action (+2874% 24h, near-900x intra-candle range) typical of newly launched, thinly traded PumpSwap tokens
  • No sniper coverage means bot-driven early accumulation and coordinated dumping cannot be ruled out or measured
  • No holder history available, so accumulation/distribution trends and holder growth sustainability cannot be verified
  • Top-10 holders control 14.10% of supply with no visibility into top-100 concentration, and pool depth is small enough that this could be destabilizing

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume ($4.41M) marginally exceeds sell volume ($4.27M), and unique buyers (10,774) outnumber unique sellers (8,007), showing some breadth of participation
  • Top-10 concentration of 14.10% is not unusually extreme in isolation compared to many newly launched tokens
  • 5,998 holder addresses suggest some degree of distribution beyond a handful of wallets, though this cannot be corroborated with history or classification data

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced traders comfortable with extreme volatility and total loss of capital; unsuitable for conservative or long-term investors given the shallow liquidity, unresolved authority risk, and unverifiable holder/sniper history.

Stamp (Zcash Shielded Assets) presents as a high-volatility, low-liquidity token that appears to be in an early, speculative trading phase on PumpSwap. The available data shows a violent price spike and reversal within the last three hours, near-balanced but very high 24h volume relative to a tiny liquidity pool, and critical unknowns around mint/freeze authority, contract verification, sniper activity, and holder history. Any investment thesis here is necessarily speculative and should weight the very high risk profile heavily against any short-term momentum signals.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If speculative volume continues and buy pressure sustains its slight edge (50.8% vs 49.2%), with buyers outnumbering sellers (10,774 vs 8,007), price could push back toward the recent high of $0.00496 or higher, especially if liquidity is added and social/community attention (e.g., around the Zcash-shielded-assets narrative) grows.

  • Sustained or growing 24h buy volume outpacing sell volume
  • New liquidity additions reducing slippage and stabilizing price
  • Continued high unique-buyer counts signaling broad-based speculative demand
  • Positive narrative attention tied to token branding/theme driving new inflows

Base Case

Price likely continues to consolidate in a wide, choppy range roughly between the $0.00103 support and $0.00312 resistance levels observed in the recent candles, with volume gradually normalizing lower as the initial post-launch volatility subsides, absent a clear new catalyst.

  • No major liquidity withdrawal or addition occurs in the near term
  • Buy/sell volume remains roughly balanced as observed (50.8%/49.2%)
  • No resolution yet on mint/freeze authority or verification status, keeping baseline risk elevated
  • Holder base (5,998 addresses) remains roughly stable without dramatic concentration shifts, though this cannot be confirmed with trend data

Bear Case

High probability

Given the extreme volatility already observed (a nearly 900x intra-candle range and a sharp reversal from $0.00496 to $0.00104), the token could easily continue its downward slide toward the launch-level low of $0.00051 as speculative interest fades, especially with only $94.19K of liquidity unable to absorb concentrated selling from top-10 holders (14.10% of supply) or unknown large wallets.

  • Shallow liquidity unable to absorb sell pressure from concentrated holders
  • Fading speculative/bot-driven volume as seen in the ~90% volume drop from candle 2 to candle 3
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status creating tail risk of dilution or account restrictions
  • Lack of sniper visibility means hidden early-holder dumping could occur without warning

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 20, 08:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-20 20:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, FDV)
  • PumpSwap price and pair data
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (3 most recent candles)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % change)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles were available, insufficient for robust technical/trend analysis
  • No sniper data was available, preventing any sniper concentration, PnL, or dump-risk assessment
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was available, only a current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, and contract verification status were all unknown, preventing rug-risk determination from authorities
  • Top-100 holder concentration and wallet classifications were not provided
  • 6h price % change was not provided
  • 24h $ price change and native price were not provided

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain data that may be adversarially supplied by the token creator. Significant data gaps exist (sniper coverage, holder history, authority status, verification), and all findings should be independently verified before making any investment decision. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in low-liquidity, newly-launched tokens, carry a high risk of total loss.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Zcash Shielded Assets ownership?

As of 2026-09-20 20:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 14.10% of supply. It reports 5,998 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Zcash Shielded Assets?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-20 20:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $4,406,505.00 in buys and $4,265,988.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Zcash Shielded Assets liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -29.39%, from $206,837.65 (2026-09-20 18:00 UTC) to $146,046.34 (2026-09-20 20:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Zcash Shielded Assets (Stamp)?

Price action over the last three hourly candles is extremely erratic: candle 1 opened at $0.0000051 and closed at $0.0031, candle 2 spiked to a high of $0.00496 before collapsing to a low of $0.00104 and closing at $0.00218, and candle 3 traded in a tight $0.00103-$0.00231 band closing at $0.00221. This pattern (huge initial spike, sharp pullback, then consolidation) is typical of a post-launch blow-off with the market now searching for a short-term equilibrium near $0.0018-$0.0023. Given the tiny $94K liquidity pool, any moderately sized order can move price sharply in either direction. Short-term outlook is neutral (1-24 hours), with a target range of 0.0010 to 0.0035.

Is Stamp a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced traders comfortable with extreme volatility and total loss of capital; unsuitable for conservative or long-term investors given the shallow liquidity, unresolved authority risk, and unverifiable holder/sniper history.

What are the key risks of holding Stamp?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($94.19K) relative to FDV ($2.16M) and 24h volume (~$8.6M combined), creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of further token issuance or account freezing • Violent, possibly manipulated price action (+2874% 24h, near-900x intra-candle range) typical of newly launched, thinly traded PumpSwap tokens

← Back to all predictions

Track Stamp