minecat Price Today & AI Analysis

minecatSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 11, 2026

$0.0₄1069

-16.38% 24h

Contract

Live

DrHDDvxdmLEpb4d1DiCgiAnLNATiw2MC7EEuiyqfHGpg

Chain

Solana

Holders

643

Market cap

$10,690

At a $1M market cap, $MINECAT would be $0.001000 (93.5x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is minecat a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 26

Transfer fee

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 1% fee and the owner can still raise it.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token blocks a sell

Transfer fee

1%Every buy and sell · can be raised

The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about minecat

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

cccreator capital$0.0₄4505+0.7%MC $42.9K

RoyalPopSwatch AP$0.0₅7118-8.0%MC $7.1K

CAESARSlop Caesar$0.0₄1407-2.7%MC $13.8K

CATWIFcatwifhat$0.0₄4235-0.9%MC $42.3K

HeyGrokHeyGrok$0.0₅4653-2.7%MC $4.5K

ZECZcash$1,219.94+2.1%MC $125.53M

minecat: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-11 19:16 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$50,149.00

How concentrated is minecat ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling minecat?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is minecat liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-11 19:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $50,149.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-11 19:16 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 11, 07:16 PM UTC

FDV

$858,752

Liquidity

$50,149.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

minecat (minecat) is a newly-surged Solana microcap token trading on a Raydium CPMM pool with an extreme reported 24h price gain of +1,910.95%, reaching a fully diluted valuation of ~$858.75K on a total supply of ~1 billion tokens. The token exhibits classic high-risk microcap characteristics: razor-thin liquidity ($50.15K) against heavy daily volume (~$2.29M combined), wildly volatile hourly candles with large wick rejections, and near-total absence of verifiable fundamental data — no holder distribution, no sniper analysis, and unknown mint/freeze/update authority status.

Key points

Extreme 24h price appreciation (+1,910.95%) on very short observable history (only 3 hourly candles available)
Liquidity-to-volume ratio under 3%, indicating unusually shallow depth for the trading activity observed
Complete absence of holder and sniper data, unlike more mature tokens with transparent distribution metrics
Unknown authority/mint/freeze status leaves open dilution and freeze risks that cannot be ruled out

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 1-24 hours

neutral

Given the token's extreme recent volatility — moving from a low of $0.0000057 to a high of $0.00165 within the last three tracked hours before settling near $0.000859 — short-term direction is highly uncertain. Momentum in the most recent candle was bullish (close near the high), but the shallow $50.15K liquidity pool means price can swing sharply in either direction on modest trade sizes.

Target low

$0.00042

Target high

$0.00165

Support: $0.000427 (recent hourly low), $0.000337 (prior hourly low)
Resistance: $0.000860 (recent hourly high), $0.00165 (prior hourly high)

Medium term · 3-7 days

bearish

Parabolic moves of this magnitude (+1,910% in 24h) on thin liquidity typically mean-revert as early buyers take profit and speculative interest fades, absent sustained new catalysts. Without holder/sniper transparency or confirmed authority renouncement, downside risk outweighs the case for sustained appreciation.

Catalysts

Potential liquidity additions or removals that could sharply alter price stability
Resolution of unknown mint/freeze authority status (positive if renounced, negative if not)
Continued or waning social media momentum on Twitter/website channels
Broader Solana microcap/meme-coin market sentiment shifts

Bullish factors

Slight net buy-side volume dominance (51.2% vs 48.8%)
More unique buyers (5,115) than sellers (4,290) in the last 24h
Most recent hourly candle closed near its high, showing short-term bullish momentum

Bearish factors

Extremely thin liquidity ($50.15K) relative to volume, elevating crash and manipulation risk
Unverified/unknown mint, freeze, and update authorities
No holder or sniper data to assess concentration or insider dumping risk
Unsustainable +1,910.95% 24h price move historically prone to sharp reversion
Large intra-hour wick ranges (e.g., candle 1: low $0.0000057 to high $0.000664) show erratic, thin-book price action

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because critical inputs — holder distribution, sniper concentration, contract authority verification, and even basic 6h price change data — are missing or marked unknown. The available OHLC history spans only three hourly candles, which is insufficient to establish a reliable trend, and the token's liquidity is so shallow that price data may not reflect a stable, tradable market.

minecat call history

Full track record →

Sep 11neutral@ $0.000859

24h—

7d—

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: DrHDDv...HGpg
Total Supply: 999,996,554.90 minecat

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($50.15K) relative to daily volume (~$2.29M), creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Unverified mint/freeze/update authorities — dilution or freeze risk cannot be ruled out
No holder or whale distribution data available — concentration risk is unquantifiable and could be severe
No sniper data available — early insider dumping risk cannot be assessed

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only three hourly candles are available. Candle 1 opened at $0.0000057, spiked to a high of $0.000664, then collapsed back to close near its open ($0.000345) — a massive wick suggesting an initial price discovery spike followed by a sharp reversal, likely low liquidity or early sniping. Candle 2 opened at $0.000345, spiked further to $0.00165 (the highest print in the dataset) before pulling back to close at $0.000438, again showing a long upper wick and rejection from highs. Candle 3 opened at $0.000438 and closed strongly near its high of $0.000860, indicating renewed buying pressure and a more constructive close relative to the prior two candles.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

The most recent candle shows a clear short-term uptrend with a strong close near the high, recovering from the pullback seen in candles 1 and 2. However, viewed across all three candles, price is essentially oscillating within a wide range ($0.0000057 to $0.00165) rather than establishing a clean directional trend, making the medium-term picture sideways/choppy.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000427 (candle 3 low)

Major support

$0.0000057 (candle 1 open/low, extreme downside)

Immediate resistance

$0.000860 (candle 3 high/close)

Major resistance

$0.00165 (candle 2 high, all-time high in dataset)

Immediate support sits at the candle 3 low of $0.000427, with a major/extreme downside level at the candle 1 low of $0.0000057 (unlikely near-term but represents the observed floor). Immediate resistance is the current price area near $0.000860 (candle 3 close/high), with major resistance at $0.00165, the highest price printed in candle 2. A break above $0.00165 would signal renewed bullish continuation; a break below $0.000427 would suggest the recent bullish close was a false breakout.

Notable patterns

Long upper-wick rejection candles in candles 1 and 2, suggesting repeated failure to hold spike highs
Bullish marubozu-like close in candle 3 (closed near its high), suggesting a shift in short-term momentum
Volume divergence: price up in candle 3 while volume fell ~87.5% versus candle 2, a caution flag for sustainability

Liquidity

$50,149.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $50.15K against a 24h trading volume of roughly $2.29M (buy+sell) represents an extremely thin liquidity base relative to turnover — a liquidity-to-volume ratio under 2.5%. This mismatch signals very high slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade and suggests the pool could be easily manipulated or drained. Buy volume ($1.17M) slightly exceeds sell volume ($1.12M), producing a marginal net inflow (51.2% vs 48.8% pressure), but the gap is narrow given the volume size. Unique buyers (5,115) modestly outnumber unique sellers (4,290), consistent with net accumulation, but the buy/sell count ratio (13,957 buys vs 11,505 sells) shows persistent two-sided activity typical of a highly speculative, actively traded micro-liquidity pool. Given the shallow liquidity, price impact per trade is likely severe and the market is fragile.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,996,554.90 minecat

FDV

$858.75K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price change of +1,910.95% and intra-hour swings from lows near $0.0000057 to highs near $0.00165 within a single hour (candle [2]) indicate extreme, near-vertical volatility typical of a freshly launched or thinly traded microcap.
Liquidityhigh
Only $50.15K total liquidity versus ~$2.29M in 24h combined volume creates severe slippage risk and makes the pool vulnerable to large-holder exits or manipulation.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($50.15K) relative to daily volume (~$2.29M), creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Unverified mint/freeze/update authorities — dilution or freeze risk cannot be ruled out
No holder or whale distribution data available — concentration risk is unquantifiable and could be severe
No sniper data available — early insider dumping risk cannot be assessed
Extreme volatility (+1,910.95% 24h, large intra-hour wicks) typical of pump-and-dump microcap patterns
Verified contract status and spam classification are both 'unknown', reducing overall trust in the token's legitimacy

Mitigating factors

24h buy volume ($1.17M) modestly exceeds sell volume ($1.12M), suggesting net buying pressure rather than outright dumping
Unique buyers (5,115) outnumber unique sellers (4,290), indicating broad-based participation rather than a single actor dominating flow
Token has social presence (Twitter, website) which provides at least minimal community footprint

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse investors, retirement-oriented allocations, or anyone unable to independently verify contract authorities and holder concentration before trading. Position sizing should be minimal given the shallow liquidity and unknown fundamentals.

minecat is an extremely volatile, low-liquidity Solana microcap that has seen a reported +1,910.95% 24h price move alongside heavy two-sided volume (~$1.17M buys vs ~$1.12M sells). Critical data — holder distribution, sniper activity, and contract authority status — is entirely unavailable, making this a high-uncertainty, high-risk speculative asset rather than an investable thesis with verifiable fundamentals.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued speculative momentum and social media attention (Twitter, website presence) drive further short-term price appreciation as new buyers chase the trend, with buy volume continuing to outpace sell volume.

Net positive buy/sell volume split (51.2%/48.8%) and more unique buyers than sellers over the last 24h
Strong recent momentum with sequential green candles in the most recent hourly bar (open $0.000438 to close $0.000854)
Active social channels could fuel viral/meme-driven demand typical of Solana microcaps

Base Case

Price remains highly volatile and range-bound at elevated levels relative to its origin, with continued large intra-hour swings as the market searches for equilibrium amid thin liquidity and incomplete fundamental transparency.

Liquidity remains near current ~$50K levels without significant new inflows
No major holder or authority disclosures emerge to resolve current data gaps
Trading volume remains elevated but volatile, with buy/sell pressure roughly balanced near 50/50

Bear Case

High probability

Thin liquidity, unknown authorities, and parabolic price action reverse sharply as early holders or unidentified snipers take profits, causing a rapid drawdown similar to the token's own violent intra-hour swings.

Liquidity of only $50.15K cannot absorb continued volume without major slippage, increasing crash risk on any large sell
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezing
No sniper or holder data to rule out concentrated insider positions poised to dump
Extreme, unsustainable 24h gain (+1,910.95%) historically correlates with sharp mean-reversion in microcap tokens

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 11, 07:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-11 19:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain price feed (USD price, 24h % change)
Hourly OHLC candle data (3 most recent candles) from Raydium CPMM pair
Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, buy/sell pressure)
Token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, FDV)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

No holder distribution data available — holderTrends and whaleMap sections are populated with placeholder zero/empty values per methodology, not actual on-chain measurements
No sniper data available — sniper concentration and PnL metrics could not be computed
Only 3 hourly OHLC candles provided, insufficient for robust technical trend analysis
Contract verification, mutability, update authority, and spam classification are all marked 'unknown' in source metadata, preventing a definitive tokenomics/authority risk determination
24h $ change, native price, and 6h % change fields were marked 'unknown' and could not be incorporated

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data and is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendation, or an endorsement of this token. Cryptocurrency trading, particularly in low-liquidity microcap tokens, carries a high risk of substantial or total loss. Data gaps (holder distribution, sniper activity, contract authorities) mean this assessment cannot be considered comprehensive. Always conduct independent due diligence and verify on-chain authority and holder data directly before making any financial decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is minecat a scam?

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 1% fee and the owner can still raise it. The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply. Checked Oct 26, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell minecat?

Yes. Every buy and sell pays a 1% transfer fee, and the owner can still raise it. Checked Oct 26, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is minecat ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling minecat?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is minecat liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-11 19:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $50,149.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for minecat (minecat)?

Is minecat a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse investors, retirement-oriented allocations, or anyone unable to independently verify contract authorities and holder concentration before trading. Position sizing should be minimal given the shallow liquidity and unknown fundamentals.

What are the key risks of holding minecat?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($50.15K) relative to daily volume (~$2.29M), creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Unverified mint/freeze/update authorities — dilution or freeze risk cannot be ruled out • No holder or whale distribution data available — concentration risk is unquantifiable and could be severe