SI

Super Inu Price Today & AI Analysis

SISolanaAnalysis as of Sep 21, 2026

Price

$0.001581

+3152.91% 24h · FDV $1,580,981

Contract

Live
DEW9dSN6QpWyNthphCpMmAbZP1Q4cEKR9xQXAri98WDP

Chain

Solana

Holders

4,273

Market cap

$1,580,981

More tokens on Solana

ACATACATAvax Cat$0.000788+969.9%MC $787.5KPUMPPUMPPump$0.004035-3.5%MC $3.36BCATECATECatecoin$0.1033-15.6%MC $99.59MUURAGlobal X Uranium ETF - Backpack Securities$43.9-6.3%MC $1.38MANTFUNANTFUNAntFun$0.0816-2.0%MC $723.80MSAISAISairium$0.053014-87.1%MC $301.4K

Super Inu: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-21 17:15 UTC

Holder addresses

4,273

Top 10 supply share

25.19%

Reported liquidity

$63,745.00
How concentrated is Super Inu ownership?
As of 2026-09-21 17:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 25.19% of supply. It reports 4,273 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Super Inu?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-21 17:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $2,663,173.00 in buys and $2,567,035.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Super Inu liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +27.70%, from $82,160.67 (2026-09-21 15:00 UTC) to $104,919.87 (2026-09-21 17:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-21 17:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-21 15:00 UTC$82,160.67
2026-09-21 16:00 UTC$107,280.21
2026-09-21 17:00 UTC$104,919.87

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about SI

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 21, 05:16 PM UTC

FDV

$1,580,981

Liquidity

$63,745.00

Holders

4,273

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Super Inu (SI) is a Solana meme token (mint DEW9dS...98WDP) trading on a Raydium CPMM pool with a fully diluted valuation of ~$1.58M and total liquidity of just $63.74K. It has experienced an extreme 24h price surge (+3152.9%) that is now reversing sharply in the short term (-21.8% over 5 minutes, -12.8% over 1 hour), a pattern consistent with a fading speculative pump rather than sustainable fundamentals. Mint/freeze authority status, sniper wallet positioning, and holder history are all unavailable in the provided data, leaving significant blind spots in the risk picture.

Key points

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($63.74K) against very large 24h trading volume (~$5.2M combined), producing an ~82x volume-to-liquidity ratio and high slippage risk
  • Top-10 holders control ~25.19% of supply per current snapshot, with no historical or wallet-classification data to assess whether this is stable or building risk
  • No sniper/early-buyer data and unknown mint/freeze authority status, both material gaps for rug and dump risk assessment
  • Sharp intraday reversal (-21.8% in 5m) directly following a +3152.9% 24h spike, suggesting a fast-fading pump-and-dump-style price pattern
  • Narrative built around an unverified claim about a public figure's terminology, a marketing/meme hook rather than a fundamental driver

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-48 hours

bearish

Short-term momentum has already reversed sharply from the intraday high of $0.0034, with 5m (-21.8%) and 1h (-12.8%) declines and a fading volume profile (hourly volume down from ~$4.19M to ~$254K). Absent a fresh catalyst, continued downside toward recent support levels is more likely than a resumption of the pump.

Target low

$0.00090

Target high

$0.00210

Support

$0.00134, $0.0000067

Resistance

$0.00210, $0.00340

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

neutral

Medium-term direction is highly uncertain given the token's brand-new, narrative-driven nature, thin liquidity, and lack of historical holder/authority data. Absent sustained narrative momentum or liquidity growth, the token is likely to trade erratically with a bias toward decay typical of meme-token pumps, but a renewed viral catalyst could reverse this quickly.

Catalysts

  • Further social/media amplification of the 'Super Intelligence' narrative
  • Any liquidity injections or exchange listings that deepen the pool
  • Large holder (top-10 currently ~25.19%) behavior — accumulation vs. distribution, though this cannot currently be tracked due to lack of historical data
  • Resolution of unknown mint/freeze authority status, which could materially change risk perception if disclosed

Bullish factors

  • Nearly balanced 24h buy/sell volume (50.9% vs 49.1%) with more unique buyers (8,000) than sellers (5,389)
  • Massive 24h price appreciation reflects strong initial speculative demand and narrative pull

Bearish factors

  • Sharp short-term reversal already underway (-21.8% 5m, -12.8% 1h) off the recent high
  • Collapsing hourly volume (from ~$4.19M to ~$254K) indicating fading interest
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($63.74K) relative to volume, amplifying downside volatility
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status and no sniper data, leaving key dump/dilution risks unassessed

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to only 3 hourly OHLC candles being available (insufficient for robust technical pattern confirmation), no sniper/early-buyer data, no holder history, and unknown mint/freeze authority status. The extreme volatility already observed (+3152.9% 24h, -21.8% 5m) makes short-term forecasting inherently unreliable.

SI call history

Full track record →

Sep 21bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
DEW9dS...8WDP
Total Supply
999,993,565.68 SI

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($63.74K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out further dilution or freeze capability by the deployer
  • No sniper/early-buyer data available, obscuring whether launch snipers hold large positions poised to dump
  • Sharp short-term reversal (-21.8% in 5m, -12.8% in 1h) following a 24h +3152.9% spike, consistent with a fading pump-and-dump pattern

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available (2026-09-21 15:00–17:00 UTC). Candle 1 opened at $0.00000667, spiked intra-candle to a high of $0.00227, and closed at $0.00216 — an extreme low-to-high range suggesting an initial illiquid launch-style pump. Candle 2 opened at $0.00216, pushed to the sequence high of $0.00340, but then collapsed to a low of $0.00134 before closing at $0.00197, forming a long-wick candle indicative of a sharp rejection after the high. Candle 3 opened at $0.00197, made a modest higher-low structure attempt with a high of $0.00210, but closed lower at $0.00159, continuing the pullback. Volume fell sharply from candle 1/2 (~$2.65M and ~$4.19M) to candle 3 (~$254K), suggesting fading momentum after the initial surge.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Medium-term (24h) the token is up a massive 3152.9%, reflecting an explosive launch/pump phase, but short-term price action (5m: -21.8%, 1h: -12.8%) and the most recent candle's lower close show a sharp pullback from the local high of ~$0.0034 to ~$0.00158, indicating the pump is losing steam and short-term momentum has turned down.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00134 (candle 2 intra-hour low)

Major support

$0.00000667 (candle 1 open, pre-pump baseline — effectively the launch floor)

Immediate resistance

$0.00210–$0.00216 (candle 1 close / candle 3 high zone)

Major resistance

$0.00340 (sequence high in candle 2)

With only 3 hourly candles visible, support/resistance levels are provisional. The $0.00134 level from candle 2's low is the nearest support that, if broken, could expose the much lower pre-pump base near $0.0000067. On the upside, price would need to reclaim the $0.0021 zone before challenging the $0.0034 high. Given the shallow $63.74K liquidity pool, these levels can be violated quickly with modest trade sizes.

Notable patterns

  • Long upper-wick candle in hour 2 (spike to $0.0034 rejected down to $0.00134) suggesting exhaustion at highs
  • Sequential lower closes across candles 2 and 3 despite an overall massive 24h gain, indicating a fading pump
  • Sharp volume decay from ~$4.19M to ~$254K between consecutive hours, consistent with momentum loss

Liquidity

Liquidity

$63,745.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of only $63.74K against a reported 24h combined volume of over $5.2M represents an extreme volume-to-liquidity ratio (~82x), a strong indicator that this pool is thin and highly susceptible to large slippage and price manipulation on even modest-sized trades. Buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (50.9% vs 49.1%), and buyers (8,000) outnumber sellers (5,389) in unique wallet count, suggesting broad speculative interest on both sides, but the tiny liquidity base means the price action seen in the OHLC candles (single-hour swings from ~$0.0000067 to ~$0.0034) is very likely a function of low liquidity rather than durable demand. Any single meaningfully-sized sell could disproportionately crater price given this liquidity depth.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,993,565.68 SI

FDV

$1.58M

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +3152.9% alongside 5m (-21.8%) and 1h (-12.8%) drawdowns, plus intra-hour swings from $0.00000667 to $0.0034 in the visible candles, demonstrate extreme volatility typical of a freshly-pumped, thinly-traded token.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $63.74K against 24h volume exceeding $5.2M combined — a roughly 82x volume-to-liquidity ratio — meaning large trades can cause severe slippage and the pool could be drained or destabilized easily.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top-10 holders control ~25.19% of supply per the current snapshot; top-100 concentration and wallet classifications are unavailable, so the true breadth of distribution is unknown. 25% in ten wallets on a token with only $63.74K liquidity is a real but not extreme concentration given available data.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($63.74K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out further dilution or freeze capability by the deployer
  • No sniper/early-buyer data available, obscuring whether launch snipers hold large positions poised to dump
  • Sharp short-term reversal (-21.8% in 5m, -12.8% in 1h) following a 24h +3152.9% spike, consistent with a fading pump-and-dump pattern
  • Meme/narrative-driven token (riding an 'AI to Super Intelligence' rebranding narrative attributed to a public figure) with no fundamental utility disclosed
  • Top-10 wallets hold ~25.19% of supply with no visibility into whether these are insiders, exchanges, or organic holders

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy/sell volume is nearly balanced (50.9%/49.1%) and unique buyers (8,000) exceed unique sellers (5,389), suggesting broad-based two-sided participation rather than one-sided dumping at this snapshot
  • Holder base of 4,273 addresses provides some breadth, though this is address count, not verified unique-person count

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand meme-token dynamics, thin-liquidity slippage, and the potential for rapid, severe drawdowns. Not suitable for risk-averse investors or anyone seeking capital preservation; position sizing should assume potential total loss.

Super Inu (SI) is a meme token riding an opportunistic narrative tying a public figure's alleged terminology shift ('AI' to 'Super Intelligence') to its branding. On-chain data shows an explosive 24h price move (+3152.9%) that is already reversing sharply in the short term (-21.8% over 5m, -12.8% over 1h), against a backdrop of extremely thin liquidity ($63.74K) and unverifiable authority/sniper risk. This profile is characteristic of a high-risk, high-volatility speculative launch rather than a fundamentally-driven investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the 'Super Intelligence' narrative gains further viral traction (e.g., amplified by social media or the referenced public figure), renewed buy pressure could push price back toward or beyond the recent high of ~$0.0034, especially given the nearly balanced 24h buy/sell volume (50.9%/49.1%) and buyer count (8,000) exceeding seller count (5,389) which shows active speculative demand.

  • Continued or intensifying narrative virality around the 'AI to Super Intelligence' theme
  • Sustained buyer-to-seller wallet imbalance (8,000 vs 5,389) if it persists into subsequent periods
  • Any organic liquidity additions that reduce slippage and attract larger buyers

Base Case

Price continues to exhibit high volatility and likely grinds lower or sideways at a fraction of its recent peak as the initial pump narrative cools, with periodic volatile spikes driven by thin liquidity, absent any new catalyst.

  • No material new narrative catalyst emerges in the near term
  • Liquidity remains near current shallow levels (~$63.74K)
  • Buy/sell volume balance persists near current ~50/50 split without a large one-sided sniper dump

Bear Case

High probability

The token continues its current reversal — already down over 20% in 5 minutes and nearly 13% in the last hour — as the initial pump fades, volume dries up (hourly volume fell from ~$4.19M to ~$254K), and thin liquidity ($63.74K) allows further sharp downside moves; price could retrace toward the pre-pump baseline near $0.0000067–$0.00134.

  • Rapid short-term momentum reversal already visible in 5m/1h price changes
  • Collapsing hourly volume suggesting fading speculative interest
  • Extremely thin liquidity magnifying downside moves from any large sell orders
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority and unknown sniper positioning leaving room for undisclosed dump risk

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 21, 05:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-21 17:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (mint, supply, description, social links)
  • USD price and 24h/1h/5m percentage change feed
  • 3 most recent hourly OHLC candles (Raydium CPMM pair)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Codex holder aggregates snapshot (holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis feed (returned empty/unavailable)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles were provided, insufficient for robust multi-timeframe technical analysis or reliable pattern confirmation
  • No sniper/early-buyer wallet data was available, preventing assessment of launch-sniper concentration, PnL, or dump risk
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) or wallet classification data was available, preventing analysis of accumulation/distribution trends or identification of notable holders
  • Mint authority and freeze authority status are unknown; rug risk from authorities cannot be determined
  • Top-100 holder concentration was not provided, limiting concentration risk assessment to the top-10 figure only
  • Token description and social claims are self-reported/untrusted and were not independently verified

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (holder history, sniper data, mint/freeze authority status). Cryptocurrency and meme-token investments carry substantial risk of loss, including total loss of capital. Conduct independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Super Inu ownership?

As of 2026-09-21 17:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 25.19% of supply. It reports 4,273 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Super Inu?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-21 17:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $2,663,173.00 in buys and $2,567,035.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Super Inu liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +27.70%, from $82,160.67 (2026-09-21 15:00 UTC) to $104,919.87 (2026-09-21 17:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Super Inu (SI)?

Short-term momentum has already reversed sharply from the intraday high of $0.0034, with 5m (-21.8%) and 1h (-12.8%) declines and a fading volume profile (hourly volume down from ~$4.19M to ~$254K). Absent a fresh catalyst, continued downside toward recent support levels is more likely than a resumption of the pump. Short-term outlook is bearish (24-48 hours), with a target range of $0.00090 to $0.00210.

Is SI a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand meme-token dynamics, thin-liquidity slippage, and the potential for rapid, severe drawdowns. Not suitable for risk-averse investors or anyone seeking capital preservation; position sizing should assume potential total loss.

What are the key risks of holding SI?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($63.74K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out further dilution or freeze capability by the deployer • No sniper/early-buyer data available, obscuring whether launch snipers hold large positions poised to dump

← Back to all predictions

Track SI