mama

mama Price Prediction 2026

mama
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 9, 2026

DE2bhKYeUFqCy2ohJ492YizLsNSHcpMo2Qynv3Gepump

$0.051830

-0.63%

FDV $1,829

LiveContract:DE2bhKYeUFqCy2ohJ492YizLsNSHcpMo2Qynv3GepumpChain:SolanaHolders:298Market cap:$1,829

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about mama

Report snapshotas of May 9, 11:17 AM
FDV

$155,303

Liquidity

$32,030

Holders

1,548

Snipers

39

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

mama (MAMA) is a PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana with mint address DE2bhKYeUFqCy2ohJ492YizLsNSHcpMo2Qynv3Gepump. The token has a total supply of ~999.99M and a fully diluted valuation of ~$155K–$159K. It is extremely new — holder count was flat at 95 for the entire month of April 2026, then exploded to 1,548 within the last 24 hours (+94%), indicating a very recent viral or coordinated launch event. The 24h price change is +83.5%, but sell pressure dominates (59.7% sell vs 40.3% buy volume). Liquidity is very shallow at $32K, making this a high-risk, speculative micro-cap.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive holder growth: from 95 to 1,548 holders (+94%) in a single 24h window
Strong 24h price appreciation of +83.5% driven by a rapid influx of new participants
Extremely shallow liquidity of $32K against $249K in 24h sell volume — severe slippage risk
Top 10 holders control 22.34% of supply; top 100 control 88.55%, indicating high concentration risk
20 identified snipers, majority in realized loss — early buyers largely underwater

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token surged ~83.5% in 24h but is now showing signs of exhaustion. The most recent candles (hours 1–3) show prices collapsing from the ~$0.000125 peak back toward $0.000050–$0.000054, with sell pressure at 59.7% of volume. The 5m change is -1.46% and the price is well below the intraday high of ~$0.000140. A retest of the $0.000050 support zone is likely in the near term.

Target low$0.000042
Target high$0.000090
Support: $0.000050 (recent multi-candle low cluster), $0.000049 (candle 4 & 5 lows), $0.000042 (estimated breakdown level)
Resistance: $0.000085 (candle 6 close / candle 12 open zone), $0.000103 (candle 11 high / candle 10 close), $0.000140 (intraday all-time high, candle 1 & 10 highs)

Medium term

bearish
3–14 days

Without a sustained catalyst, new social narrative, or significant liquidity injection, the token is likely to retrace sharply. The holder base is brand new (95% acquired in 24h), the liquidity is thin, and the top 100 hold 88.55% of supply. Meme tokens of this profile typically see 70–90% drawdowns from peak within 1–2 weeks unless a new wave of buyers arrives.

Catalysts
  • Viral social media campaign or influencer promotion
  • Listing on a mid-tier CEX or aggregator
  • Sustained buy pressure from a coordinated community
  • Broader Solana meme season momentum

Bullish factors

  • 83.5% price gain in 24h demonstrates strong initial momentum
  • 1,453 new holders acquired in a single day — rapid community formation
  • 6h price change of +101.3% shows explosive buying interest
  • Low FDV (~$155K) leaves room for significant upside if narrative catches on
  • Most snipers are at a loss, reducing near-term coordinated dump risk from early buyers

Bearish factors

  • Sell volume ($249K) significantly exceeds buy volume ($168K) in 24h — net outflow
  • Liquidity of only $32K is dangerously thin relative to trading volumes
  • Top 100 holders control 88.55% of supply — extreme concentration
  • Price has already retraced from intraday high of ~$0.000140 to ~$0.000050–$0.000055
  • No social links, no verified contract, no utility — pure speculative meme
  • Token was dormant for ~30 days before this event, suggesting possible coordinated pump
Confidence: low. The token is less than 48 hours old in terms of active trading, has no verified contract, no social links, and extremely thin liquidity. Price action is highly volatile and driven by speculative momentum rather than fundamentals. Prediction confidence is inherently low for assets of this profile.

Deep Analysis

16 hourly candles analyzed (May 8 20:00 – May 9 11:00 UTC). The token launched from a base around $0.000083–$0.000091 (candles 14–16), then staged a strong rally peaking at $0.000140 intraday high (candle 10, 02:00 UTC). From that peak, price has been in a sharp downtrend, collapsing through $0.000125 (candle 9), $0.000082 (candle 7), and settling near $0.000050–$0.000054 in the most recent candles (1–5). The OHLC data shows a classic 'pump and dump' pattern: rapid ascent followed by a sustained multi-hour decline. Candle 15 had the highest volume at $70,796, coinciding with the initial pump phase. Recent candles show dramatically lower volume ($4,937–$30,083), indicating fading interest.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 40%Sell 60%

Short-term trend is clearly bearish — price has fallen from the $0.000140 peak to $0.000050–$0.000054 over 8+ hours, making lower highs and lower lows. The medium-term trend is also bearish given the token was dormant for 30 days and this appears to be a speculative spike rather than a sustained uptrend.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000049–$0.000050 (multi-candle low cluster, candles 4, 5, 8)
Major$0.000042 (estimated breakdown level below recent lows)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000082–$0.000087 (candles 6–7 open/close zone)
Major$0.000124–$0.000140 (candle 9–10 highs, intraday peak)

The $0.000049–$0.000050 zone has acted as a floor across multiple candles and represents the key near-term support. A break below this level could accelerate selling toward $0.000042 or lower. On the upside, the $0.000082–$0.000087 zone (former support turned resistance) is the first meaningful hurdle, with the $0.000124–$0.000140 range representing the full recovery target.

Notable patterns

  • Pump-and-dump price structure: rapid ascent followed by sustained multi-hour decline
  • Lower highs and lower lows across candles 9–11 (bearish trend confirmation)
  • High-volume candle at peak (candle 15: $70,796) followed by volume decay — classic distribution signal
  • Candle 1 shows anomalous OHLC where L > O and L > C, suggesting possible data inversion or extreme wick
  • Consolidation doji-like candles near $0.000050–$0.000054 in candles 1–5 may indicate temporary base-building
  • Candle 16 (earliest) shows very tight range ($0.000090–$0.000091) — pre-pump accumulation phase

Total holders1,548
24h Δ+94
7d Δ+94
30d Δ+94
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth is strongly correlated with the price spike. The token had exactly 95 holders for the entire 30-day period from April 9 to May 7, 2026 — zero net change. On May 8, holders jumped by 663 (+87%) to 758, and within the following 24 hours grew to 1,548 (a further +790 holders). The 1h growth of +67 holders (+4.3%) shows the influx is still ongoing at time of analysis. This explosive, concentrated growth pattern is characteristic of a viral meme token event or coordinated promotion.

The holder data tells a stark story: 95 holders for 30 consecutive days (April 9 – May 7), then a sudden explosion to 1,548 holders in approximately 48 hours. The 30d and 7d growth figures are identical (both +94%, +1,453 holders) because all growth occurred within the last 2 days. Growth is clearly accelerating — the 1h rate of +67 holders (+4.3%) extrapolates to ~1,600 new holders per day if sustained. However, this rapid influx of new holders during a price spike is a classic sign of FOMO-driven buying, and many of these new holders may be entering at or near the top. The acquisition method is almost entirely via swap (1,541 of 1,548), confirming organic market buying rather than airdrops or team distributions.

Top 10 hold22.34%
Top 100 hold88.55%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

ARJchzYWP2fMRVwXLjoxhkRPvdmEpEuAtv1HURFYJozd

DEX Liquidity Pool (PumpSwap pair address matches the trading pair ARJchzYWP2fMRVwXLjoxhkRPvdmEpEuAtv1HURFYJozd)

10.80%

6Bu9qbbKJfJk2MkvvhGHCJF9pi5hsw2cwVoxYRZfnoxs

Individual whale / early accumulator

1.78%

DmTbdYNLEb2rqabAm7kjxaAiXvMT1eAWZx6cMmpgG2iH

Individual whale / early accumulator

1.62%

HvZdvQLcr9zxvqHjSyDQPu9ziJRQzFP269hC15JsLvyf

Individual whale / early accumulator

1.49%

fq9rKwR9kWG5vT7YedoAo526d4qgm7yhcpMkypddzZH

Individual whale / early accumulator

1.37%

The largest single holder at 10.80% (ARJchzYWP2fMRVwXLjoxhkRPvdmEpEuAtv1HURFYJozd) is the PumpSwap liquidity pool pair address — this is protocol-locked liquidity, not a selling threat. Holders 2–10 are individual wallets ranging from 0.83% to 1.78%, suggesting a relatively dispersed top-10 outside of the LP. However, the top 100 controlling 88.55% of supply is a major red flag — the vast majority of the circulating supply is concentrated in a small number of wallets. Notably, holders 10–20 all hold nearly identical balances (~8.25–8.33M tokens, ~0.83% each), which is suspicious and may indicate bot activity, a coordinated buy, or a single entity splitting holdings across wallets. The distribution is classified as 'concentrated' rather than 'very concentrated' only because the top 10 figure (22.34%) is relatively modest, but the top 100 figure of 88.55% is alarming.

Liquidity$32,030
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$168,200
Sell$249,210
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers9,538
Unique sellers3,986

Liquidity is critically shallow at $32K against a 24h trading volume of ~$417K (buy + sell combined). This means the liquidity-to-volume ratio is approximately 1:13, indicating extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position size. Despite having more unique buyers (9,538) than sellers (3,986), sell volume ($249K) significantly exceeds buy volume ($168K), meaning sellers are transacting in larger average sizes. The net flow is clearly outflow — $81K more was sold than bought in 24h. The 12,106 unique wallets active in 24h is impressive for a token of this size but reflects the FOMO-driven nature of the event. Any large holder attempting to exit would face severe slippage given the $32K liquidity pool depth.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,992,009.07
FDV$155,302.58

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a total supply of ~999.99M (effectively 1 billion), which is standard for PumpFun-launched meme tokens. The FDV is ~$155K–$159K at current prices. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the contract is not verified. The token is marked as 'mutable: false', which is a positive signal suggesting the metadata cannot be changed. However, mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data — these are listed as 'unknown'. The '.pump' suffix in the mint address confirms this was launched via PumpFun. No social links, no whitepaper, no utility description beyond 'mama' — this is a pure meme/speculative token. The lack of verified contract and unknown authority status means rug risk cannot be fully assessed, though the PumpFun launch mechanism provides some baseline protections.

Volatility
high

Price moved +83.5% in 24h and +101.3% in 6h, then retraced sharply from the $0.000140 intraday high to $0.000050–$0.000054. Extreme intraday volatility makes position sizing and risk management very difficult.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only $32K. With 24h sell volume of $249K, any moderate-sized exit will cause severe slippage. A $5K sell order could move the price by 15%+ given current pool depth.

Concentration
high

Top 100 holders control 88.55% of supply. Holders 10–20 all hold suspiciously identical balances (~0.83% each), suggesting possible wallet splitting by a single entity. If these are coordinated, a single actor could control a significant portion of supply.

SniperDump
low

20 snipers identified; 16 of 20 are already in realized losses and have largely exited. Only 2 snipers hold remaining balances ($12 and $9 respectively). Sniper dump risk is low as most early buyers have already sold at a loss.

Authority
medium

Mint and freeze authority status is unknown. The token is marked 'mutable: false' which is positive, but without confirmed authority renouncement, there remains theoretical risk of supply manipulation. PumpFun launch provides some structural protections.

Key risks

  • Extreme liquidity shallowness ($32K) relative to trading volume ($417K/day) — severe slippage on exit
  • Top 100 holders control 88.55% of supply — coordinated dump could be catastrophic
  • Suspicious identical balances among holders 10–20 suggest possible wallet splitting / single entity control
  • Token was dormant for 30 days before sudden activation — possible coordinated pump scheme
  • No social links, no utility, no verified contract — pure speculative meme with no fundamental floor
  • Sell volume exceeds buy volume by $81K in 24h — net capital outflow despite price appreciation
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out supply manipulation

Mitigating factors

  • PumpFun launch mechanism provides baseline anti-rug protections
  • Token marked 'mutable: false' — metadata cannot be changed
  • Most snipers (16/20) already exited at a loss — reduced early-buyer dump overhang
  • Rapid holder growth (1,548 in 48h) shows genuine community interest forming
  • Low FDV (~$155K) means absolute loss is capped for small position sizes
  • More unique buyers (9,538) than sellers (3,986) suggests broad retail participation
Suitable for: Suitable only for highly experienced crypto traders who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring positions. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than a very small speculative allocation. This token exhibits multiple characteristics of a pump-and-dump scheme.

mama (MAMA) is a classic PumpFun meme token that experienced a sudden viral event after 30 days of dormancy, generating explosive holder growth (+94% in 24h) and a significant price spike (+83.5%). The investment case is purely speculative — there is no utility, no verified team, no social presence, and no fundamental value proposition. The token's fate depends entirely on whether the current momentum can attract sustained buying interest before the concentrated holder base exits.

Bull case (low)

Viral meme adoption: The 'mama' narrative catches on across Solana meme communities, driving a second wave of buyers. Liquidity deepens, the token lists on aggregators, and the FDV expands from $155K toward $1M–$5M (6x–32x from current levels).

  • Viral social media spread of the 'mama' meme narrative
  • Influencer or KOL promotion on Twitter/Telegram
  • Broader Solana meme season with rising tide lifting all boats
  • Community formation around the brand driving sustained buy pressure
  • Low FDV entry point attracting speculative capital

Base case

Gradual deflation: The initial excitement fades over 3–7 days. Price stabilizes 60–80% below the intraday high (~$0.000028–$0.000056), with a small core community remaining. The token survives but fails to achieve meaningful adoption, trading at low volumes with occasional speculative spikes.

  • Some portion of new holders (10–20%) become long-term community members
  • Liquidity remains at current levels without significant additions or removals
  • No major coordinated dump from the concentrated top-100 holders
  • Broader Solana market remains stable without a major downturn
  • No new viral catalyst emerges to drive a second pump

Bear case (high)

Pump collapses: The concentrated holder base (top 100 = 88.55%) begins distributing, liquidity is insufficient to absorb selling, and the price retraces 80–95% from the current level back toward or below the pre-pump price of ~$0.000050–$0.000083.

  • Net sell pressure already dominant ($249K sell vs $168K buy in 24h)
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($32K) cannot support sustained selling
  • No fundamental value or utility to attract long-term holders
  • Suspicious wallet concentration among holders 10–20 suggests coordinated actors
  • Token dormancy for 30 days before sudden activation is a classic pump setup signal
  • FOMO-driven holder base likely to panic-sell on first significant dip

GeneratedMay 9, 11:17 AM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-05-09T11:00:00Z. Most recent candle is the 11:00 UTC hour. Holder data includes 1h change of +67 holders.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint: DE2bhKYeUFqCy2ohJ492YizLsNSHcpMo2Qynv3Gepump)
  • PumpSwap DEX trading data (pair: ARJchzYWP2fMRVwXLjoxhkRPvdmEpEuAtv1HURFYJozd)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (16 candles, May 8–9 2026)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder time series (30-day daily)
  • Top 20 holder wallet data with balance percentages
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers)
  • 24h trading analytics including buy/sell volume and unique wallet counts

Limitations

  • Sniper USD amounts are unknown — sniperConcentrationPercent estimated from available sell/balance data only
  • Mint and freeze authority status could not be confirmed from provided metadata
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — cannot fully assess rug risk
  • No social media data available to assess community sentiment or viral potential
  • Token is less than 48 hours old in active trading — extremely limited price history for technical analysis
  • The 30-day holder stagnation at exactly 95 may indicate data gaps rather than true zero activity
  • OHLC candle 1 shows anomalous L > O and L > C values which may indicate a data formatting issue (L and H may be swapped in source data)
  • FDV figures show slight discrepancy between metadata ($155,302) and trading analytics ($159,370) — likely due to price movement between data pulls

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The analyst has no position in this token. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research before making any investment decision.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,992,009.07

Key Risks

Extreme liquidity shallowness ($32K) relative to trading volume ($417K/day) — severe slippage on exit
Top 100 holders control 88.55% of supply — coordinated dump could be catastrophic
Suspicious identical balances among holders 10–20 suggest possible wallet splitting / single entity control
Token was dormant for 30 days before sudden activation — possible coordinated pump scheme

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

20 snipers were identified in the first 1,000 blocks. The majority (16/20) have realized losses, with PnL ranging from -1.1% to -37.4%. Only snipers 17 (+7.2%), 20 (+48.2%), and 14 (+0.4%) show positive or breakeven realized PnL. Two snipers (6 and 7) still hold balances of $12 and $9 respectively with 0% realized PnL, suggesting they have not yet sold. The total sold amounts are small ($2–$906 per sniper), indicating snipers did not accumulate large positions. The predominance of losses among early buyers suggests the token did not immediately pump after launch — the price spike came later, after most snipers had already exited at a loss.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.80%
PnL stateMostly At Loss
Sell-through rateModerate
Profit-taking risk
low

20 snipers identified in first 1,000 blocks; individual USD amounts unknown but sell values range from $2 to $906, suggesting modest position sizes. Only 2 of 20 snipers show positive realized PnL (sniper 17: +7.2%, sniper 20: +48.2%), while 16 of 20 are in realized loss ranging from -1.1% to -37.4%.

Mostly negative — 16 of 20 snipers realized losses, suggesting early buyers were shaken out before the main price pump. This is a somewhat bullish signal as it reduces the overhang of profitable early sellers, but the two snipers still holding ($12 and $9 balances) represent minimal sell pressure.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for mama (mama)?

The token surged ~83.5% in 24h but is now showing signs of exhaustion. The most recent candles (hours 1–3) show prices collapsing from the ~$0.000125 peak back toward $0.000050–$0.000054, with sell pressure at 59.7% of volume. The 5m change is -1.46% and the price is well below the intraday high of ~$0.000140. A retest of the $0.000050 support zone is likely in the near term. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000042 to $0.000090.

Is mama a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable only for highly experienced crypto traders who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring positions. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than a very small speculative allocation. This token exhibits multiple characteristics of a pump-and-dump scheme.

How are mama holders trending?

mama currently has 1,548 holders and is growing (24h: 94, 7d: 94, 30d: 94). The holder data tells a stark story: 95 holders for 30 consecutive days (April 9 – May 7), then a sudden explosion to 1,548 holders in approximately 48 hours. The 30d and 7d growth figures are identical (both +94%, +1,453 holders) because all growth occurred within the last 2 days. Growth is clearly accelerating — the 1h rate of +67 holders (+4.3%) extrapolates to ~1,600 new holders per day if sustained. However, this rapid influx of new holders during a price spike is a classic sign of FOMO-driven buying, and many of these new holders may be entering at or near the top. The acquisition method is almost entirely via swap (1,541 of 1,548), confirming organic market buying rather than airdrops or team distributions.

What does sniper activity look like for mama?

Snipers hold roughly 0.80% of supply with PnL state "mostly_at_loss" and sell-through rate "moderate". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding mama?

Extreme liquidity shallowness ($32K) relative to trading volume ($417K/day) — severe slippage on exit • Top 100 holders control 88.55% of supply — coordinated dump could be catastrophic • Suspicious identical balances among holders 10–20 suggest possible wallet splitting / single entity control

Track mama