GUM

GUM Price Prediction 2026

GUM
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 9, 2026

DBYp1sxGP5VhEri6NHPytSTnpx7vQvDguwNxyAWEjupx

$0.055307

+3.56%

FDV $4,677

LiveContract:DBYp1sxGP5VhEri6NHPytSTnpx7vQvDguwNxyAWEjupxChain:SolanaHolders:221Market cap:$4,677

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about GUM

Report snapshotas of Jun 9, 04:20 PM
FDV

$10,658

Liquidity

$0

Holders

35

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

GUM (DBYp1sxGP5VhEri6NHPytSTnpx7vQvDguwNxyAWEjupx) is an extremely new, micro-cap Solana token launched on Meteora DBC with a fully diluted valuation of approximately $10,657. The token has only 35 holders, virtually all acquired within the last 24 hours via swap, and exhibits extreme supply concentration — the top holder alone controls 73.56% of total supply. The token is in its very earliest stage of existence, with no description, no verified contract, and a price that dropped ~18.3% in the past 24 hours. Update authority is the system program (11111...1), indicating mutable metadata authority is effectively renounced. Liquidity data reports $0.00, signaling extremely shallow or unreported on-chain liquidity. This is a very high-risk, speculative micro-cap token.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Update authority set to Solana system program (burn address), suggesting metadata is immutable/renounced
Explosive 24h holder growth from 1 to 35 holders (+97%), but from an extremely low base
Top holder controls 73.56% of supply — extreme concentration risk
Micro-cap FDV of ~$10,658 with only $23.47K in 24h combined volume
No sniper data available; token appears to have launched within the last 24 hours

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The most recent hourly candle (15:00 UTC) shows a sharp drop from open $0.0000153 to close $0.0000121, a decline of ~21% within the hour, after the prior candle (14:00 UTC) saw an extreme range from $0.0000071 to $0.0000265. Price is highly volatile and trending down from the intra-session high. With only 35 holders, $0 reported liquidity, and the top holder controlling 73.56% of supply, any sell pressure could be catastrophic. Short-term bias is bearish.

Target low$0.0000071 (recent candle low / session floor)
Target high$0.0000265 (recent candle high / session peak)
Support: $0.0000096 (candle [1] low), $0.0000071 (candle [2] low / absolute recent floor)
Resistance: $0.0000154 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close), $0.0000265 (candle [2] high / session peak)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

With only 35 holders, a micro-cap FDV, extreme supply concentration, and no established liquidity, the medium-term outlook is bearish unless significant organic adoption occurs. The token has existed with only 1 holder for at least 30 days prior to a sudden burst of activity, suggesting a coordinated or manufactured launch event. Sustained price appreciation requires meaningful holder growth, liquidity deepening, and distribution of the dominant whale position.

Catalysts
  • Broader holder base expansion beyond 35 wallets
  • Liquidity pool deepening on Meteora DBC
  • Reduction in top-holder concentration (73.56%)
  • Any verifiable utility or community development

Bullish factors

  • Update authority renounced (system program), reducing rug-via-metadata risk
  • 54.1% buy pressure vs 45.9% sell pressure in 24h — slight buy dominance
  • 176 buys vs 126 sells in 24h — more buy transactions
  • Holder count grew from 1 to 35 in 24h, showing initial interest

Bearish factors

  • Top holder controls 73.56% of supply — extreme dump risk
  • Price already down 18.3% in 24h
  • Reported total liquidity of $0.00 — extremely shallow market
  • Only 35 total holders — near-zero organic adoption
  • No token description, unverified contract, micro-cap FDV of ~$10,658
  • Token had only 1 holder for 30+ days prior to launch activity — suspicious pre-launch behavior
  • FDV and liquidity data inconsistency suggests unreliable market depth
Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, liquidity is reported as $0, there are only 35 holders, no sniper data exists, and the token is less than 24 hours old in terms of meaningful activity. Predictions are highly speculative.

GUM call history

Full track record →
Jun 9bearish
24h
7d-64.2%
30d-17.2%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (14:00 UTC): O=$0.0000071, H=$0.0000265, L=$0.0000071, C=$0.0000153 — a massive bullish candle with a 273% range from low to high, closing near the midpoint. Volume was $20,844. Candle [1] (15:00 UTC): O=$0.0000153, H=$0.0000154, L=$0.0000096, C=$0.0000121 — a bearish candle opening at the prior close, with a tight upper wick and a significant lower wick, closing down ~21% from open. Volume dropped sharply to $3,027. The pattern suggests an initial pump followed by immediate distribution/selling pressure. The high of $0.0000265 from candle [2] is the dominant resistance level.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 54%Sell 46%

With only 2 candles, the short-term trend is a clear downtrend from the session high of $0.0000265 to the current price of $0.0000121. Medium-term trend is indeterminate but classified as sideways given insufficient data. The token is in price discovery with extreme volatility.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000096 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.0000071 (candle [2] low — absolute session floor)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0000154 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close)
Major$0.0000265 (candle [2] high — session peak)

The session floor at $0.0000071 represents the absolute support level. The session peak at $0.0000265 is the dominant resistance. Current price of $0.0000121 sits between these extremes. A break below $0.0000096 would signal further downside toward $0.0000071.

Notable patterns

  • Pump-and-dump candle structure: massive bullish candle followed by immediate bearish reversal
  • Volume exhaustion: 85.5% volume drop from candle [2] to candle [1]
  • Upper wick rejection at $0.0000265 — sellers absorbed all buying above $0.0000154
  • Bearish engulfing structure relative to candle [2] close — candle [1] opened at prior close and sold off
  • Extremely wide candle [2] range (273%) typical of low-liquidity launch pumps

Total holders35
24h Δ+34
7d Δ+34
30d Δ+34
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The explosive holder growth from 1 to 35 (+97%) occurred simultaneously with the token's price launch event on June 9, 2026. However, price is already down 18.3% despite this holder growth, suggesting the initial buyers are not sustaining price. The correlation between holder growth and price is currently negative — more holders have not translated into price appreciation.

The historical holder data shows the token had exactly 1 holder for the entire 30-day lookback period (May 10 – June 8, 2026), with all 34 new holders acquired within the last 24 hours via swap. This is a classic launch pattern where a token sits dormant with a single deployer wallet before a coordinated or marketed launch event. Growth is technically 'accelerating' from zero, but the base is so small (35 holders total) that this metric is not meaningful. The distribution data flags 42 'whales' which exceeds the total holder count of 35 — this is likely a data artifact. The top 10 holders control 87.93% of supply, and top 100 = 100.1% (rounding artifact), confirming near-total concentration among a tiny holder base.

Top 10 hold87.93%
Top 100 hold100.10%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

FhVo3mqL8PW5pH5U2CN4XE33DokiyZnUwuGpH2hmHLuM

Project deployer / team wallet or dominant whale — holds 735.6M of 882.6M total supply (73.56%). This is almost certainly the token creator or a closely affiliated party. Its behavior is the single most important price driver.

73.56%

782b3GRyDEtYPHknCMBC58qmPgds7DkyjnYiNAGEQD8B

Individual whale — second largest holder at 2.62%, likely an early swap buyer.

2.62%

286CHN57Km41GsAnDv866WKd6YB6HPSjFgF4rGDJTRLf

Individual whale — third largest holder at 2.55%, likely an early swap buyer.

2.55%

4hxs4rFC2s19sEiGZ8PjPJEi4gM3dttrW3eGGKGMUPhK

Individual whale — fourth largest holder at 2.50%, likely an early swap buyer.

2.50%

FAHx7CHFiT2Li1xw9KMxMi8xFvaLwfpmL8yqrmWSP3JX

Individual whale — fifth largest holder at 2.11%, likely an early swap buyer.

2.11%

Supply distribution is extremely concentrated. The top holder alone controls 73.56% of the 882.55M total supply (735.6M tokens). Holders 2–5 each hold between 2.11% and 2.62%, suggesting a cluster of early swap buyers. Holders 6–20 each hold under 1.5%. The top 10 collectively hold 87.93% of supply. This level of concentration is a severe red flag — a single sell decision by the top wallet could collapse the price entirely. The remaining 34 holders collectively control only 26.44% of supply. No exchange wallets, burn addresses, or identifiable DEX LP wallets are apparent among the top holders based on available data.

Liquidity$0.00 (reported — likely a data gap or extremely shallow pool on Meteora DBC)
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$12,710
Sell$10,760
Net flow
inflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers121
Unique sellers95

The reported total liquidity of $0.00 is a critical red flag, though it may reflect a data reporting gap for the Meteora DBC pair (6DWUwhnW6L5EMFUCnhz7BVv9gw7bp8iqtYxcoRwJ42Xv). Even if liquidity exists, the FDV of only ~$10,658 and the 24h combined volume of ~$23.47K implies the volume-to-FDV ratio exceeds 2x — highly unusual and suggestive of wash trading or extremely thin markets. With 121 unique buyers and 95 unique sellers over 24h, there is some genuine activity, but the average trade size is very small (~$105 per buyer, ~$113 per seller). Slippage risk is high given the micro-cap size and shallow liquidity. The net flow is technically inflow (buy volume > sell volume), but the margin is narrow and the price still declined 18.3%, suggesting sell pressure is disproportionately impactful.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply882,554,446.41 GUM
FDV$10,657.69

Authorities

Mint authority
Renounced
Freeze authority
Renounced

The update authority is set to 11111111111111111111111111111111 — the Solana system program, which is effectively a burn/null address. This means the token's metadata is immutable and cannot be changed by any party, which is a positive signal. The token is also marked as 'Mutable: false', further confirming immutability. Mint and freeze authority are inferred as renounced based on the system program update authority and immutable flag. Total supply is 882,554,446.41 GUM with a micro-cap FDV of $10,657.69 at the current price of $0.0000121. There is no token description, no verified contract, and the token is not flagged as spam. The authority structure is the strongest positive signal for this token, but it does not mitigate the extreme concentration and liquidity risks.

Volatility
high

Price ranged from $0.0000071 to $0.0000265 within a single hour (candle [2]) — a 273% intra-candle range. Price is already down 18.3% in 24h from a session high. Extreme volatility is expected given the micro-cap size and thin liquidity.

Liquidity
high

Reported liquidity is $0.00. Even if this is a data artifact, the Meteora DBC pool for a $10,658 FDV token will have extremely shallow depth. Large trades will cause severe slippage. Exit liquidity is a major concern.

Concentration
high

The top holder controls 73.56% of supply (735.6M of 882.6M tokens). The top 10 holders control 87.93%. A single sell by the dominant wallet would be catastrophic for price. This is the single largest risk factor.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available. However, with 34 holders all entering via swap in the last 24h and a price already down 18.3%, early buyers near the session high ($0.0000265) are likely underwater and may sell. The lack of sniper data prevents precise assessment.

Authority
low

Update authority is the Solana system program (11111...1), metadata is immutable (Mutable: false). Mint and freeze authorities are inferred as renounced. This is the strongest positive signal — the creator cannot change token metadata or mint new supply.

Key risks

  • Top holder controls 73.56% of supply — single-entity dump risk is existential
  • Reported liquidity of $0.00 — exit liquidity may not exist
  • Only 35 holders total — near-zero organic adoption
  • Token had 1 holder for 30+ days before launch — suspicious pre-launch behavior
  • Micro-cap FDV of ~$10,658 — extremely easy to manipulate price
  • No token description or verified contract — anonymous and unvetted project
  • Price already down 18.3% in first 24h of trading activity
  • 24h volume ($23.47K) exceeds FDV ($10,658) by 2.2x — possible wash trading signal

Mitigating factors

  • Update authority renounced to system program — metadata cannot be altered
  • Token marked immutable (Mutable: false) — no rug via metadata changes
  • 54.1% buy pressure vs 45.9% sell pressure — slight net buying activity
  • 176 buy transactions vs 126 sell transactions in 24h
  • Not flagged as spam by data provider
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, risk-averse participants, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of extreme concentration, zero reported liquidity, micro-cap size, and anonymous launch makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

GUM is a newly launched micro-cap Solana token with an FDV of ~$10,658, 35 holders, and extreme supply concentration (top holder: 73.56%). The only meaningful positive is the renounced update authority. The token is in pure price discovery with no established fundamentals, no description, and no verifiable utility. Any investment thesis is entirely speculative.

Bull case (low)

GUM gains viral traction within the Solana memecoin ecosystem, attracting hundreds of new holders and deepening liquidity on Meteora DBC. The dominant whale (73.56%) holds or distributes gradually, allowing price to appreciate organically.

  • Viral social media spread via Twitter/website links in metadata
  • Solana memecoin season driving speculative capital into micro-caps
  • Dominant whale choosing to hold rather than dump
  • Liquidity pool deepening to support larger trades

Base case

GUM remains a micro-cap speculative token with modest holder growth (50–200 holders over 30 days), price oscillating in the $0.000007–$0.000020 range with high volatility. The dominant whale gradually reduces position, creating persistent sell pressure. Token survives but does not achieve meaningful adoption.

  • Top holder does not immediately dump entire position
  • Some organic interest continues from Solana memecoin traders
  • Meteora DBC pool maintains minimal liquidity for small trades
  • No major catalyst (partnership, listing, utility) emerges

Bear case (high)

The dominant whale (73.56% holder) sells their position, collapsing the price to near zero. With $0 reported liquidity and only 35 holders, there is insufficient buy-side depth to absorb any significant sell. The token becomes illiquid and worthless.

  • Top holder dumps 73.56% of supply into thin liquidity
  • Failure to attract new holders beyond the initial 35
  • Liquidity pool remains at or near $0
  • No utility or community development materializes

GeneratedJun 9, 04:20 PM
Data freshnessPrice and candle data current as of 2026-06-09T15:00:00.000Z. Holder data reflects 24h snapshot. Historical holders cover May 10 – June 8, 2026.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (Mint: DBYp1sxGP5VhEri6NHPytSTnpx7vQvDguwNxyAWEjupx)
  • Meteora DBC pair data (6DWUwhnW6L5EMFUCnhz7BVv9gw7bp8iqtYxcoRwJ42Xv)
  • Hourly OHLC price candles (2 candles available)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Top 20 holder distribution data
  • 30-day historical holder time series
  • Sniper analysis module (no data returned)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — may be a data gap rather than true zero liquidity
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed
  • Token is less than 24 hours old in terms of meaningful activity — all metrics are nascent
  • Holder distribution data shows 42 'whales' despite only 35 total holders — likely a data classification artifact
  • Top 100 concentration at 100.1% is a rounding artifact, not a data error
  • No token description or whitepaper to assess utility or roadmap
  • FDV reported as both $10,657.69 (metadata) and $0.00 (trading analytics) — inconsistency noted

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The analyst has no position in GUM. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply882,554,446.41 GUM

Key Risks

Top holder controls 73.56% of supply — single-entity dump risk is existential
Reported liquidity of $0.00 — exit liquidity may not exist
Only 35 holders total — near-zero organic adoption
Token had 1 holder for 30+ days before launch — suspicious pre-launch behavior

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for GUM. The token appears to have launched within the last 24 hours with all 34 new holders acquiring via swap. Without sniper data, it is impossible to assess early buyer profitability or coordinated entry behavior. The extreme concentration of 73.56% in the top wallet (FhVo3mqL8PW5pH5U2CN4XE33DokiyZnUwuGpH2hmHLuM) is the dominant smart-money signal — this wallet's behavior will determine price trajectory.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available for this token.

Unknown — no sniper data available. However, given the 18.3% price decline in 24h and the session high of $0.0000265 vs current $0.0000121, early buyers who entered at the peak are likely underwater. Buyers near the session low of $0.0000071 may be in profit.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for GUM (GUM)?

The most recent hourly candle (15:00 UTC) shows a sharp drop from open $0.0000153 to close $0.0000121, a decline of ~21% within the hour, after the prior candle (14:00 UTC) saw an extreme range from $0.0000071 to $0.0000265. Price is highly volatile and trending down from the intra-session high. With only 35 holders, $0 reported liquidity, and the top holder controlling 73.56% of supply, any sell pressure could be catastrophic. Short-term bias is bearish. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.0000071 (recent candle low / session floor) to $0.0000265 (recent candle high / session peak).

Is GUM a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, risk-averse participants, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of extreme concentration, zero reported liquidity, micro-cap size, and anonymous launch makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

How are GUM holders trending?

GUM currently has 35 holders and is growing (24h: 34, 7d: 34, 30d: 34). The historical holder data shows the token had exactly 1 holder for the entire 30-day lookback period (May 10 – June 8, 2026), with all 34 new holders acquired within the last 24 hours via swap. This is a classic launch pattern where a token sits dormant with a single deployer wallet before a coordinated or marketed launch event. Growth is technically 'accelerating' from zero, but the base is so small (35 holders total) that this metric is not meaningful. The distribution data flags 42 'whales' which exceeds the total holder count of 35 — this is likely a data artifact. The top 10 holders control 87.93% of supply, and top 100 = 100.1% (rounding artifact), confirming near-total concentration among a tiny holder base.

What does sniper activity look like for GUM?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding GUM?

Top holder controls 73.56% of supply — single-entity dump risk is existential • Reported liquidity of $0.00 — exit liquidity may not exist • Only 35 holders total — near-zero organic adoption

Track GUM