GUM

GUM Price Today & AI Analysis

GUMSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 9, 2026

Price

$0.041278

-38.17% 24h · FDV $11,262

Contract

Live
DBYp1sxGP5VhEri6NHPytSTnpx7vQvDguwNxyAWEjupx

Chain

Holders

277

Market cap

$11,262

More tokens on Solana

GUM: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-09 16:20 UTC

Holder addresses

35

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

Not available
How concentrated is GUM ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 35 addresses (2026-06-09 16:20 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling GUM?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is GUM liquidity falling?
Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-09 16:20 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Ask Unhosted AI about GUM

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Jun 9, 04:20 PM UTC

FDV

$10,658

Liquidity

Not available

Holders

35

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

GUM (DBYp1sxGP5VhEri6NHPytSTnpx7vQvDguwNxyAWEjupx) is an extremely new, micro-cap Solana token launched on Meteora DBC with a fully diluted valuation of approximately $10,657. The token has only 35 holders, virtually all acquired within the last 24 hours via swap, and exhibits extreme supply concentration — the top holder alone controls 73.56% of total supply. The token is in its very earliest stage of existence, with no description, no verified contract, and a price that dropped ~18.3% in the past 24 hours. Update authority is the system program (11111...1), indicating mutable metadata authority is effectively renounced. Liquidity data reports $0.00, signaling extremely shallow or unreported on-chain liquidity. This is a very high-risk, speculative micro-cap token.

Key points

  • Update authority set to Solana system program (burn address), suggesting metadata is immutable/renounced
  • Explosive 24h holder growth from 1 to 35 holders (+97%), but from an extremely low base
  • Top holder controls 73.56% of supply — extreme concentration risk
  • Micro-cap FDV of ~$10,658 with only $23.47K in 24h combined volume
  • No sniper data available; token appears to have launched within the last 24 hours

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The most recent hourly candle (15:00 UTC) shows a sharp drop from open $0.0000153 to close $0.0000121, a decline of ~21% within the hour, after the prior candle (14:00 UTC) saw an extreme range from $0.0000071 to $0.0000265. Price is highly volatile and trending down from the intra-session high. With only 35 holders, $0 reported liquidity, and the top holder controlling 73.56% of supply, any sell pressure could be catastrophic. Short-term bias is bearish.

Target low

$0.0000071 (recent candle low / session floor)

Target high

$0.0000265 (recent candle high / session peak)

Support

$0.0000096 (candle [1] low), $0.0000071 (candle [2] low / absolute recent floor)

Resistance

$0.0000154 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close), $0.0000265 (candle [2] high / session peak)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

With only 35 holders, a micro-cap FDV, extreme supply concentration, and no established liquidity, the medium-term outlook is bearish unless significant organic adoption occurs. The token has existed with only 1 holder for at least 30 days prior to a sudden burst of activity, suggesting a coordinated or manufactured launch event. Sustained price appreciation requires meaningful holder growth, liquidity deepening, and distribution of the dominant whale position.

Catalysts

  • Broader holder base expansion beyond 35 wallets
  • Liquidity pool deepening on Meteora DBC
  • Reduction in top-holder concentration (73.56%)
  • Any verifiable utility or community development

Bullish factors

  • Update authority renounced (system program), reducing rug-via-metadata risk
  • 54.1% buy pressure vs 45.9% sell pressure in 24h — slight buy dominance
  • 176 buys vs 126 sells in 24h — more buy transactions
  • Holder count grew from 1 to 35 in 24h, showing initial interest

Bearish factors

  • Top holder controls 73.56% of supply — extreme dump risk
  • Price already down 18.3% in 24h
  • Reported total liquidity of $0.00 — extremely shallow market
  • Only 35 total holders — near-zero organic adoption
  • No token description, unverified contract, micro-cap FDV of ~$10,658
  • Token had only 1 holder for 30+ days prior to launch activity — suspicious pre-launch behavior
  • FDV and liquidity data inconsistency suggests unreliable market depth

Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, liquidity is reported as $0, there are only 35 holders, no sniper data exists, and the token is less than 24 hours old in terms of meaningful activity. Predictions are highly speculative.

GUM call history

Full track record →

Jun 9bearish
24h
7d-64.2%
30d-17.2%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
DBYp1s...jupx
Total Supply
882,554,446.41 GUM

Key Risks

  • Top holder controls 73.56% of supply — single-entity dump risk is existential
  • Reported liquidity of $0.00 — exit liquidity may not exist
  • Only 35 holders total — near-zero organic adoption
  • Token had 1 holder for 30+ days before launch — suspicious pre-launch behavior

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (14:00 UTC): O=$0.0000071, H=$0.0000265, L=$0.0000071, C=$0.0000153 — a massive bullish candle with a 273% range from low to high, closing near the midpoint. Volume was $20,844. Candle [1] (15:00 UTC): O=$0.0000153, H=$0.0000154, L=$0.0000096, C=$0.0000121 — a bearish candle opening at the prior close, with a tight upper wick and a significant lower wick, closing down ~21% from open. Volume dropped sharply to $3,027. The pattern suggests an initial pump followed by immediate distribution/selling pressure. The high of $0.0000265 from candle [2] is the dominant resistance level.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

With only 2 candles, the short-term trend is a clear downtrend from the session high of $0.0000265 to the current price of $0.0000121. Medium-term trend is indeterminate but classified as sideways given insufficient data. The token is in price discovery with extreme volatility.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

54%

Sell

46%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000096 (candle [1] low)

Major support

$0.0000071 (candle [2] low — absolute session floor)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000154 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close)

Major resistance

$0.0000265 (candle [2] high — session peak)

The session floor at $0.0000071 represents the absolute support level. The session peak at $0.0000265 is the dominant resistance. Current price of $0.0000121 sits between these extremes. A break below $0.0000096 would signal further downside toward $0.0000071.

Notable patterns

  • Pump-and-dump candle structure: massive bullish candle followed by immediate bearish reversal
  • Volume exhaustion: 85.5% volume drop from candle [2] to candle [1]
  • Upper wick rejection at $0.0000265 — sellers absorbed all buying above $0.0000154
  • Bearish engulfing structure relative to candle [2] close — candle [1] opened at prior close and sold off
  • Extremely wide candle [2] range (273%) typical of low-liquidity launch pumps

Liquidity

Liquidity

Not available

Depth

Not assessed

Slippage risk

Not assessed

Liquidity depth and slippage risk cannot be assessed without a liquidity observation.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

882,554,446.41 GUM

FDV

$10,657.69

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price ranged from $0.0000071 to $0.0000265 within a single hour (candle [2]) — a 273% intra-candle range. Price is already down 18.3% in 24h from a session high. Extreme volatility is expected given the micro-cap size and thin liquidity.

  • LiquidityNot assessed

    A liquidity observation is not available in the saved inputs.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Top holder controls 73.56% of supply — single-entity dump risk is existential
  • Reported liquidity of $0.00 — exit liquidity may not exist
  • Only 35 holders total — near-zero organic adoption
  • Token had 1 holder for 30+ days before launch — suspicious pre-launch behavior
  • Micro-cap FDV of ~$10,658 — extremely easy to manipulate price
  • No token description or verified contract — anonymous and unvetted project
  • Price already down 18.3% in first 24h of trading activity
  • 24h volume ($23.47K) exceeds FDV ($10,658) by 2.2x — possible wash trading signal

Mitigating factors

  • Update authority renounced to system program — metadata cannot be altered
  • Token marked immutable (Mutable: false) — no rug via metadata changes
  • 54.1% buy pressure vs 45.9% sell pressure — slight net buying activity
  • 176 buy transactions vs 126 sell transactions in 24h
  • Not flagged as spam by data provider

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, risk-averse participants, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of extreme concentration, zero reported liquidity, micro-cap size, and anonymous launch makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

GUM is a newly launched micro-cap Solana token with an FDV of ~$10,658, 35 holders, and extreme supply concentration (top holder: 73.56%). The only meaningful positive is the renounced update authority. The token is in pure price discovery with no established fundamentals, no description, and no verifiable utility. Any investment thesis is entirely speculative.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

GUM gains viral traction within the Solana memecoin ecosystem, attracting hundreds of new holders and deepening liquidity on Meteora DBC. The dominant whale (73.56%) holds or distributes gradually, allowing price to appreciate organically.

  • Viral social media spread via Twitter/website links in metadata
  • Solana memecoin season driving speculative capital into micro-caps
  • Dominant whale choosing to hold rather than dump
  • Liquidity pool deepening to support larger trades

Base Case

GUM remains a micro-cap speculative token with modest holder growth (50–200 holders over 30 days), price oscillating in the $0.000007–$0.000020 range with high volatility. The dominant whale gradually reduces position, creating persistent sell pressure. Token survives but does not achieve meaningful adoption.

  • Top holder does not immediately dump entire position
  • Some organic interest continues from Solana memecoin traders
  • Meteora DBC pool maintains minimal liquidity for small trades
  • No major catalyst (partnership, listing, utility) emerges

Bear Case

High probability

The dominant whale (73.56% holder) sells their position, collapsing the price to near zero. With $0 reported liquidity and only 35 holders, there is insufficient buy-side depth to absorb any significant sell. The token becomes illiquid and worthless.

  • Top holder dumps 73.56% of supply into thin liquidity
  • Failure to attract new holders beyond the initial 35
  • Liquidity pool remains at or near $0
  • No utility or community development materializes

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 9, 04:20 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-09 16:20 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (Mint: DBYp1sxGP5VhEri6NHPytSTnpx7vQvDguwNxyAWEjupx)
  • Meteora DBC pair data (6DWUwhnW6L5EMFUCnhz7BVv9gw7bp8iqtYxcoRwJ42Xv)
  • Hourly OHLC price candles (2 candles available)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Top 20 holder distribution data
  • 30-day historical holder time series
  • Sniper analysis module (no data returned)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — may be a data gap rather than true zero liquidity
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed
  • Token is less than 24 hours old in terms of meaningful activity — all metrics are nascent
  • Holder distribution data shows 42 'whales' despite only 35 total holders — likely a data classification artifact
  • Top 100 concentration at 100.1% is a rounding artifact, not a data error
  • No token description or whitepaper to assess utility or roadmap
  • FDV reported as both $10,657.69 (metadata) and $0.00 (trading analytics) — inconsistency noted

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The analyst has no position in GUM. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is GUM ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 35 addresses (2026-06-09 16:20 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling GUM?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is GUM liquidity falling?

Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for GUM (GUM)?

The most recent hourly candle (15:00 UTC) shows a sharp drop from open $0.0000153 to close $0.0000121, a decline of ~21% within the hour, after the prior candle (14:00 UTC) saw an extreme range from $0.0000071 to $0.0000265. Price is highly volatile and trending down from the intra-session high. With only 35 holders, $0 reported liquidity, and the top holder controlling 73.56% of supply, any sell pressure could be catastrophic. Short-term bias is bearish. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.0000071 (recent candle low / session floor) to $0.0000265 (recent candle high / session peak).

Is GUM a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, risk-averse participants, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of extreme concentration, zero reported liquidity, micro-cap size, and anonymous launch makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

What are the key risks of holding GUM?

Top holder controls 73.56% of supply — single-entity dump risk is existential • Reported liquidity of $0.00 — exit liquidity may not exist • Only 35 holders total — near-zero organic adoption

← Back to all predictions

Track GUM