Cybercab

Cybercab piece of art Price Prediction 2026

Cybercab
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 8, 2026

CknZ23kwx5HYBcyNUH5FCxrzhoam19KFiLWr1579pump

$0.051862

-4.61%

FDV $1,862

LiveContract:CknZ23kwx5HYBcyNUH5FCxrzhoam19KFiLWr1579pumpChain:SolanaHolders:95Market cap:$1,862

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Cybercab

Report snapshotas of Jul 8, 01:47 AM
FDV

$1,819

Liquidity

$19,882

Holders

95

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Cybercab (CknZ23kwx5HYBcyNUH5FCxrzhoam19KFiLWr1579pump) is an unverified PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana that experienced a catastrophic price collapse of ~98.2% within 24 hours. The token launched on PumpSwap and saw a brief speculative spike before an overwhelming sell-off. With only $19.88K in liquidity, a fully diluted valuation of just $1,819, 93% sell pressure, and 4,869 sells vs. 773 buys in 24h, the on-chain data paints a clear picture of a token in severe distress. The holder base exploded from 8 to 99 in a single day — almost certainly driven by the speculative pump — and is now contracting. No top holder data is available, sniper data is absent, and the contract is unverified.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Catastrophic 98.2% price decline in 24 hours — one of the most severe single-day drops observable
Extreme sell/buy imbalance: 93% sell pressure ($462K sells vs $34.7K buys)
Holder base was dormant at 8 for 30 days, then spiked to 99 on pump day — classic pump-and-dump pattern
Liquidity of only $19.88K against $462K+ in sell volume signals near-total liquidity drain
Fully diluted valuation of $1,819 — effectively a micro-cap shell with negligible market depth
Unverified contract, unknown update authority, mutable=false — limited transparency

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–72 hours

The token is in near-freefall. Price has dropped from a candle high of ~$0.000297 (candle [8]) to ~$0.00000182 at time of analysis — a collapse of over 99% from peak. With 93% sell pressure, only $19.88K liquidity, and holders declining (-3 in the last hour), further downside is the base expectation. Any bounce would be a dead-cat rally in the absence of new catalysts.

Target low$0.0000005
Target high$0.0000030
Support: $0.00000182 (current price / recent floor), $0.0000010 (psychological round number)
Resistance: $0.00000235 (candle [5] close), $0.00000213 (candle [4] close), $0.00000186 (candle [2] open)

Medium term

bearish
1–4 weeks

Given the token's history of 30 days of dormancy at 8 holders, a single-day pump-and-dump, and near-zero fundamental value ($1,819 FDV), sustained recovery is extremely unlikely without a coordinated new campaign. Liquidity is nearly depleted and the holder base is contracting.

Catalysts
  • A new coordinated social media campaign (speculative, no evidence)
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all micro-caps (macro, not token-specific)
  • Liquidity injection by insiders (no evidence, would be suspicious)

Bullish factors

  • 24h holder count grew from 8 to 99 (+92%), suggesting some new interest entered
  • Buy volume of $34.72K in 24h shows some buyers are still active
  • 773 buy transactions in 24h indicates residual speculative interest

Bearish factors

  • Price down 98.2% in 24h — catastrophic collapse already underway
  • 93% sell pressure ($462.42K sells vs $34.72K buys)
  • 4,869 sells vs 773 buys — sellers outnumber buyers 6:1 by transaction count
  • Liquidity only $19.88K — insufficient to support meaningful price recovery
  • FDV of $1,819 — near-zero market cap
  • Holder count declining: -3 in last hour
  • 30 days of dormancy at 8 holders before pump — no organic growth history
  • Unverified contract with unknown update authority
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) no top holder data available, (2) no sniper data available, (3) the token is a micro-cap meme with no verified fundamentals, and (4) the extreme volatility (candle [7] open $0.000241 vs close $0.00000216 — a 99%+ intra-candle collapse) makes price modeling unreliable.

Cybercab call history

Full track record →
Jul 8bearish
24h-1.9%
7d-7.8%
30d-18.4%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

The 8 available hourly candles tell a stark story of a pump-and-dump. Candle [8] (18:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000250 and reached a high of $0.000297 before closing at $0.000237 — a massive wick candle with enormous volume ($354K). Candle [7] (19:00 UTC) opened at $0.000241, hit a high of $0.000291, then collapsed to close at $0.00000216 — a catastrophic bearish engulfing/crash candle with $138K volume. Candles [6] through [2] show price stabilizing in the $0.00000186–$0.00000236 range with sharply declining volume ($100K → $1.79 → $0.07). Candle [1] (01:00 UTC) shows a flat doji at $0.00000182 with only $0.13 volume — the market has effectively died.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 7%Sell 93%

Both short-term and medium-term trends are firmly bearish. The token peaked in candles [7]–[8] and has been in a sustained downtrend since, with lower highs and lower lows across candles [7] through [1]. Volume is collapsing alongside price, confirming distribution is complete and buyers have largely exited.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.00000182 (current price, recent floor across candles [1]–[3])
Major$0.0000010 (psychological level below current price)
Resistance
Immediate$0.00000213 (candle [4] close)
Major$0.00000236 (candle [5] open/candle [6] close area)

The token is trading at its post-crash floor near $0.00000182. Immediate resistance sits at the candle [4] close of $0.00000213, with stronger resistance at $0.00000236. The major resistance zone is the $0.00000235–$0.00000362 range from candles [4]–[5]. The all-time high from candle [8] at $0.000297 is effectively unreachable without a new coordinated pump.

Notable patterns

  • Massive pump-and-dump: candle [8] high $0.000297 → candle [7] close $0.00000216 (99%+ collapse in 2 hours)
  • Bearish engulfing/crash candle [7]: opened at $0.000241, closed at $0.00000216 — extreme bearish momentum
  • Volume exhaustion: $354K → $138K → $100K → near-zero across 5 candles — classic post-dump volume death
  • Flat doji candle [1]: O=H=L=C=$0.00000182 with $0.13 volume — market effectively frozen
  • Lower highs and lower lows from candle [7] onward — confirmed downtrend structure

Total holders95
24h Δ+87
7d Δ+87
30d Δ+87
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

The explosive holder growth (+91 on July 7, +92%) is directly correlated with the pump event — new buyers entered during the price spike. However, holders are now declining (-3 in the last hour), and the growth is not organic or sustained. The holder count is expected to continue declining as bag-holders exit or abandon positions.

The historical holder data shows 8 holders for the entire 30-day period from June 8 to July 6 — zero organic growth for a full month. On July 7, holders spiked from 8 to 99 (+91, +92%) coinciding with the pump-and-dump event. Current holders are 95 (down from 99), with -3 in the last hour. This pattern is a textbook pump-and-dump holder signature: dormant base, sudden spike on pump day, immediate contraction. The 'growth' is entirely artificial and driven by the speculative event, not genuine adoption. No top holder distribution data is available (top holders list returned empty, supply concentration shows 0% for top 10 and top 100 — likely a data gap rather than true distribution).

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

Data unavailable

No top holder data returned by API

0.00%

No top holder data is available — the API returned an empty list and supply concentration shows 0% for both top 10 and top 100, which is almost certainly a data gap rather than genuine distribution. Given the pump-and-dump pattern observed in price and volume data, it is highly likely that a small number of early wallets (the original 8 holders) held concentrated positions and distributed during the pump. The 'distributing' sentiment is inferred from the overwhelming sell pressure (93%, $462K sells) and the price collapse pattern, not from direct holder data. Investors should treat the absence of holder data as a red flag, not a positive signal.

Liquidity$19,880
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$34,720
Sell$462,420
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers176
Unique sellers1,185

Market health is critically poor. Total liquidity of $19.88K is negligible — the token saw $462K in sell volume in 24 hours, meaning the liquidity pool has been nearly entirely drained by sellers. The buy/sell ratio is 7%/93%, with 1,185 unique sellers vs 176 unique buyers. The net flow is massively negative (outflow). Slippage risk is high: any meaningful trade against $19.88K liquidity will move the price significantly. The FDV of $1,819 is lower than the liquidity pool itself, which is an anomalous and deeply unhealthy market structure. The pair trades on PumpSwap (9frYSgyV848yXeHE969NiUaddAtcBo8ALVLzqX5uNjem), which is a permissionless DEX with no market maker support.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,919,818.97
FDV$1,819.39

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is ~999.9M tokens (standard PumpFun 1B supply with minor burns). FDV is $1,819.39 — an extremely low valuation reflecting the post-dump price. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the contract is unverified, meaning mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the provided data. The token is marked as mutable=false, which is a minor positive (metadata cannot be changed), but this does not address mint/freeze authority risks. The token was launched via PumpFun (indicated by the 'pump' suffix in the mint address), which typically uses a bonding curve mechanism. The contract is not verified and is flagged as possible spam=false by the data provider, though the trading pattern strongly suggests coordinated manipulation. The description 'Cybercab is truly a piece of art' provides no utility or fundamental value proposition.

Volatility
high

Price dropped 98.2% in 24 hours, from a candle high of $0.000297 to $0.00000182. Intra-candle volatility in candle [7] shows a 99%+ collapse within a single hour. This is extreme volatility by any measure.

Liquidity
high

Only $19.88K in total liquidity. $462K in sell volume in 24h has nearly drained the pool. Any attempt to exit a meaningful position will face severe slippage. The FDV ($1,819) is lower than the liquidity pool value, creating an anomalous and fragile market structure.

Concentration
high

No top holder data is available, but the 30-day dormancy at 8 holders followed by a pump strongly implies extreme concentration among original holders. The absence of holder distribution data is itself a risk signal.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data is available. However, the trading pattern — 30 days dormant, sudden pump, immediate 98%+ collapse, $462K in sells — is consistent with coordinated sniper/insider dumping. The risk of further dumps from remaining early holders is high.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown' and the contract is unverified. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. Mutable=false provides some protection on metadata, but the overall authority picture is opaque.

Key risks

  • Pump-and-dump pattern: 30 days dormant → spike → 98.2% collapse in 24h
  • Near-zero liquidity ($19.88K) with massive sell pressure ($462K sells)
  • No top holder data — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Unverified contract with unknown authority status
  • FDV of $1,819 — effectively a dead token by market cap
  • Holder count declining (-3 in last hour) after artificial pump-driven spike
  • 93% sell pressure with sellers outnumbering buyers 6.7:1 by transaction count
  • No utility, no verified team, no audited contract

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable=false prevents metadata manipulation
  • Not flagged as spam by data provider
  • Some residual buy activity (773 buys, 176 buyers in 24h) — though minimal relative to sells
  • Token has social links (Twitter, Moralis) — some minimal public presence
Suitable for: This token is unsuitable for virtually all investors. The data profile matches a completed pump-and-dump scheme. Only highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators with capital they can afford to lose entirely should consider any interaction, and even then the risk/reward is extremely unfavorable given the post-dump price action and near-zero liquidity.

No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

Bull case (low)

No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

Base case

No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

Bear case (low)

No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

GeneratedJul 8, 01:47 AM
Data freshnessOHLC data current to 2026-07-08T01:00:00Z (most recent candle). Holder data current to 2026-07-07. Price data reflects latest available snapshot.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Moralis Solana Token API (metadata, price, OHLC, trading analytics, holder metrics, historical holders)
  • PumpSwap on-chain pair data (9frYSgyV848yXeHE969NiUaddAtcBo8ALVLzqX5uNjem)
  • On-chain mint data (CknZ23kwx5HYBcyNUH5FCxrzhoam19KFiLWr1579pump)

Limitations

  • No top holder data available — concentration risk cannot be quantified
  • No sniper data available — early buyer PnL and concentration unknown
  • Update authority status unknown — mint/freeze authority cannot be confirmed
  • Contract unverified — no audit or source code review possible
  • Only 8 hourly OHLC candles available — limited technical analysis depth
  • Supply concentration shows 0% for top 10/100 — likely a data gap, not genuine distribution
  • FDV of $1,819 makes price targets largely academic

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. The token analyzed exhibits characteristics consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme. Past price action is not indicative of future results. Investing in micro-cap meme tokens carries extreme risk of total loss. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,919,818.97

Key Risks

Pump-and-dump pattern: 30 days dormant → spike → 98.2% collapse in 24h
Near-zero liquidity ($19.88K) with massive sell pressure ($462K sells)
No top holder data — concentration risk cannot be assessed
Unverified contract with unknown authority status

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. However, the broader trading data strongly implies that early buyers (likely insiders or coordinated actors) executed a pump-and-dump: the token was dormant at 8 holders for 30 days, then experienced a massive price spike and immediate collapse within 2 hours, with $462K in sell volume vs $34.7K in buy volume. The pattern is consistent with coordinated distribution by early holders.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — endpoint returned no results.

Strongly negative for late buyers. The 8 holders who held the token for 30 days before the pump were almost certainly the beneficiaries of the price spike. The 91 new holders who entered on July 7 during the pump are likely sitting on severe losses given the 98.2% price decline.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Cybercab piece of art (Cybercab)?

The token is in near-freefall. Price has dropped from a candle high of ~$0.000297 (candle [8]) to ~$0.00000182 at time of analysis — a collapse of over 99% from peak. With 93% sell pressure, only $19.88K liquidity, and holders declining (-3 in the last hour), further downside is the base expectation. Any bounce would be a dead-cat rally in the absence of new catalysts. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–72 hours), with a target range of $0.0000005 to $0.0000030.

Is Cybercab a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.5/100. This token is unsuitable for virtually all investors. The data profile matches a completed pump-and-dump scheme. Only highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators with capital they can afford to lose entirely should consider any interaction, and even then the risk/reward is extremely unfavorable given the post-dump price action and near-zero liquidity.

How are Cybercab holders trending?

Cybercab piece of art currently has 95 holders and is growing (24h: 87, 7d: 87, 30d: 87). The historical holder data shows 8 holders for the entire 30-day period from June 8 to July 6 — zero organic growth for a full month. On July 7, holders spiked from 8 to 99 (+91, +92%) coinciding with the pump-and-dump event. Current holders are 95 (down from 99), with -3 in the last hour. This pattern is a textbook pump-and-dump holder signature: dormant base, sudden spike on pump day, immediate contraction. The 'growth' is entirely artificial and driven by the speculative event, not genuine adoption. No top holder distribution data is available (top holders list returned empty, supply concentration shows 0% for top 10 and top 100 — likely a data gap rather than true distribution).

What does sniper activity look like for Cybercab?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding Cybercab?

Pump-and-dump pattern: 30 days dormant → spike → 98.2% collapse in 24h • Near-zero liquidity ($19.88K) with massive sell pressure ($462K sells) • No top holder data — concentration risk cannot be assessed

Track Cybercab