TWINE Price Today & AI Analysis

TWINESolanaAnalysis as of Sep 12, 2026

$0.0₄1493

-1.74% 24h

Contract

Live

CNWxmoBSQZo2Sgp5KSAK5m9FwSqDbXQRP4CNMuoe78Gm

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,571

Market cap

$10,784

At a $1M market cap, $TWINE would be $0.001384 (92.7x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is TWINE a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 17

Watch insiders

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 22% of the supply.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

22%31 insiders still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about TWINE

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

TschunaTschuna the Tiger $0.0₅3700-2.2%MC $3.5K

PMUPPMUP$0.0₄1799-4.0%MC $18.0K

MEMECARDSMeme Cards$0.0₅7265+12.9%MC $7.0K

XPADXPad$0.0₅3566-1.1%MC $3.5K

sollysolly$0.0₅6646+1.0%MC $6.2K

simulatorsimulator$0.001155+804.8%MC $1.15M

TWINE: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-12 20:16 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$58,458.00

How concentrated is TWINE ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling TWINE?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is TWINE liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-12 20:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $58,458.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-12 20:16 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 12, 08:16 PM UTC

FDV

$1,556,188

Liquidity

$58,458.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

TWINE is a newly-surged pump.fun/PumpSwap token (mint CNWxmoBSQZo2Sgp5KSAK5m9FwSqDbXQRP4CNMuoe78Gm) marketed as a dual-chain asset (pump.fun + 'Robinhood Chain') pegged within 5% via a market maker. Price is $0.00157, up a claimed 3663.99% in 24h/1h (likely reflecting the token's very recent launch/first hours of trading rather than a mature move). Liquidity is thin at $58.46K against a $1.56M FDV, and only two hourly candles of OHLC history exist, indicating extreme immaturity. Buy/sell volume is roughly balanced (50.9%/49.1%) on very high turnover (~$3.6M) relative to liquidity, a hallmark of a highly volatile, low-liquidity micro-cap. No holder or sniper data is available from upstream sources, and authority/verification metadata is entirely unknown, which materially raises risk and uncertainty.

Key points

Dual-chain narrative (pump.fun + 'Robinhood Chain') pegged by a market maker within 5% band
Extremely fresh token with only 2 hourly candles of price history
Massive reported 24h/1h price change (3663.99%) suggesting a brand-new listing or data artifact from launch
Very thin liquidity ($58.46K) relative to FDV ($1.56M) and 24h volume (~$3.6M combined)
No holder or sniper analytics available, leaving concentration and insider risk completely opaque

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48h

neutral

Price action is extremely volatile with only two hourly candles observed. The most recent candle opened at $0.00127 and closed at $0.00157, with an intra-candle range from $0.00097 to $0.00202 — a ~2x swing within a single hour. This is consistent with an early post-launch price discovery phase rather than an established trend. Given the tiny liquidity pool ($58.46K), price is highly susceptible to sharp moves in either direction on modest trade sizes.

Target low

$0.0008

Target high

$0.0022

Support: $0.00097 (candle 2 low), $0.0000060 (candle 1 low - likely launch print, treat cautiously)
Resistance: $0.00202 (candle 2 high), $0.00242 (candle 1 high)

Medium term · 7-30 days

neutral

With only hours of trading history and no established holder or sniper base visible in the data, medium-term direction cannot be reliably projected. Sustainability will depend on whether the dual-chain market-maker peg mechanism (pump.fun vs Robinhood Chain, kept within 5%) holds up and whether liquidity deepens meaningfully beyond the current $58.46K.

Catalysts

Growth or failure of the cross-chain arbitrage/peg mechanism advertised in the description
Liquidity additions or removals by the market maker
Broader pump.fun/PumpSwap momentum or memecoin sentiment shifts
Any listing, verification, or authority-renouncement announcements

Bullish factors

Slightly positive net buy pressure (50.9% buy vs 49.1% sell) over 24h
High number of unique buyers (5,315) vs sellers (3,873), suggesting more distinct wallets are entering than exiting
Novel dual-chain narrative could attract speculative attention if the peg mechanism is credible

Bearish factors

Liquidity of only $58.46K is very shallow relative to $1.56M FDV, enabling high slippage and easy price manipulation
Massive volume-to-liquidity ratio (~$3.6M vs $58.46K) signals extreme churn/speculation rather than durable demand
No verified contract status, unknown update authority, and no mint/freeze authority confirmation
Complete absence of holder concentration and sniper data prevents assessment of insider dumping risk
Extreme volatility already visible within single hourly candles (2x range)

Confidence: low. Only two hourly candles and no multi-day price/volume history are available; liquidity is extremely shallow; holder and sniper data are entirely absent. The reported 3663.99% 24h change is almost certainly an artifact of the token's very recent launch (first candle open near-zero at $0.0000060), not a genuine trend signal. Any prediction here is low-confidence speculation.

TWINE call history

Full track record →

Sep 12neutral@ $0.00157

24h—

7d—

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: CNWxmo...78Gm
Total Supply: 989,001,316.13 TWINE

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($58.46K) relative to FDV and trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Total absence of holder concentration and sniper/insider data, removing key due-diligence visibility
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status and unverified contract, leaving rug-pull mechanics unconfirmed
Extreme, likely launch-driven volatility (3663.99% reported 24h move) that may not reflect sustainable price action

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly USD candles are available. Candle 1 (19:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000060 (likely the initial launch tick) and rallied intraday to a high of $0.00242 before closing at $0.00127 — a huge single-candle expansion typical of a fresh pump.fun listing. Candle 2 (20:00 UTC) opened at $0.00127, dipped to $0.000967, spiked to $0.00202, and closed at $0.00157, indicating continued two-sided volatility without a clear directional resolution.

Trend

Short-term

Sideways

Medium-term

Sideways

With just two candles, no reliable trend can be established. Price is oscillating within a wide band ($0.00097–$0.00242) shortly after what appears to be a launch spike, best characterized as choppy/sideways-volatile rather than a confirmed uptrend or downtrend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000967 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.0000060 (candle 1 open/launch print — not a reliable technical support)

Immediate resistance

$0.00202 (candle 2 high)

Major resistance

$0.00242 (candle 1 high)

Given only two candles, support/resistance levels are provisional. The $0.000967–$0.00242 range brackets nearly all observed trading and should be treated as the current trading channel until more price history accumulates.

Notable patterns

Launch-spike candle (candle 1) with an extreme low-to-high range typical of new pump.fun listings
Wide-range indecision candle (candle 2) with both a lower low and failure to exceed candle 1's high, suggesting consolidation after the initial spike
Volume declining sequentially across the only two available candles

Liquidity

$58,458.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $58.46K is extremely shallow, especially set against a $1.56M FDV and ~$3.63M in combined 24h volume — a volume-to-liquidity ratio above 60x, which is a strong indicator of high churn, thin order books, and elevated slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade. Buy volume ($1.85M) modestly exceeds sell volume ($1.78M), producing a slight net inflow (50.9%/49.1% split), and unique buyers (5,315) outnumber unique sellers (3,873), which is a mildly encouraging sign of net new demand. However, with such shallow liquidity, even this level of volume can produce large price swings, as evidenced by the intra-hour range from $0.000967 to $0.00242.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

989,001,316.13 TWINE

FDV

$1.56M

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Observed intra-hour price swings from $0.000967 to $0.00242 (roughly 2.5x) and a reported 24h change of over 3600% indicate extreme volatility, consistent with a token in its first hours of trading.
Liquidityhigh
Only $58.46K in total liquidity against $1.56M FDV and ~$3.63M in 24h volume creates a high risk of severe slippage and price manipulation with relatively small trade sizes.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($58.46K) relative to FDV and trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Total absence of holder concentration and sniper/insider data, removing key due-diligence visibility
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status and unverified contract, leaving rug-pull mechanics unconfirmed
Extreme, likely launch-driven volatility (3663.99% reported 24h move) that may not reflect sustainable price action
Unverifiable cross-chain peg claim ('Robinhood Chain' market maker) that is creator-supplied marketing rather than confirmed infrastructure

Mitigating factors

24h buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume (50.9% vs 49.1%), and unique buyers (5,315) outnumber unique sellers (3,873), suggesting some net organic demand
Token trades on PumpSwap with an identifiable pair address, providing at least a transparent on-chain venue for price discovery

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital; unsuitable for risk-averse or long-term holders given the combination of shallow liquidity, unknown authority settings, and a complete lack of holder/sniper visibility.

TWINE is an extremely early-stage, highly speculative pump.fun-origin token with a novel but unverifiable dual-chain peg narrative. The data shows thin liquidity, extreme volatility, and critical visibility gaps (no holder or sniper data, unknown authorities), making this a high-risk speculative trade rather than an investable asset at this stage.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the advertised cross-chain arbitrage/peg mechanism between pump.fun and 'Robinhood Chain' proves real and durable, and liquidity deepens meaningfully beyond $58.46K while buy pressure persists (currently 50.9% of volume) with buyers outnumbering sellers (5,315 vs 3,873), TWINE could see sustained speculative interest and price appreciation as a novel cross-chain narrative token.

Confirmation and adoption of the dual-chain/market-maker peg mechanism
Growing liquidity and unique buyer base beyond initial launch spike
Positive momentum in broader pump.fun/memecoin market sentiment

Base Case

TWINE continues to trade with high volatility and thin liquidity typical of a freshly launched pump.fun token, with price oscillating within the observed $0.00097–$0.00242 range in the near term while the market digests the cross-chain narrative; direction beyond that remains highly uncertain pending more trading history and data transparency.

No major liquidity injection or removal occurs in the near term
The market-maker peg claim remains unverified but does not immediately collapse
Trading volume continues to normalize down from launch-day highs

Bear Case

High probability

The extreme reported price surge is a launch artifact; as initial speculative volume fades (candle volume already dropped ~52% between the two observed hours), shallow liquidity leaves the token vulnerable to sharp drawdowns, and any undisclosed mint/freeze authority or insider holder concentration could enable a rug pull or rapid sell-off.

Volume already declining sharply between the two most recent candles
No confirmation that mint/freeze authorities are renounced
No holder/sniper transparency to rule out concentrated insider selling
Extremely thin $58.46K liquidity pool vulnerable to being pulled or drained

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 12, 08:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-12 20:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Token metadata block
OHLC hourly candle data (2 candles)
Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell pressure, unique buyers/sellers)
Sniper analysis (unavailable/empty)
Holder analysis (unavailable/empty)

Limitations

No holder data available — holder counts, growth, and distribution could not be assessed
No sniper/early-buyer data available — insider dumping and early PnL risk could not be assessed
Only two hourly OHLC candles provided — insufficient history for robust technical trend analysis
Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, and contract verification status are all unknown
24h % price change figure (3663.99%) likely reflects launch-day price discovery rather than a stable trend and should be interpreted with caution

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, possibly incomplete on-chain data that may include creator-supplied claims which are unverified. Cryptocurrency investments, especially newly launched low-liquidity tokens, carry a high risk of substantial or total loss. Conduct independent due diligence before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is TWINE a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 22% of the supply. Checked Oct 17, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell TWINE?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 17, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is TWINE ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling TWINE?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is TWINE liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-12 20:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $58,458.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for TWINE (TWINE)?

Is TWINE a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital; unsuitable for risk-averse or long-term holders given the combination of shallow liquidity, unknown authority settings, and a complete lack of holder/sniper visibility.

What are the key risks of holding TWINE?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($58.46K) relative to FDV and trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Total absence of holder concentration and sniper/insider data, removing key due-diligence visibility • Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status and unverified contract, leaving rug-pull mechanics unconfirmed