wrappedcat Price Today & AI Analysis

wCatSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 18, 2026

$0.0₅4087

+0.50% 24h

Contract

Live

CMMtMtYqsELs4PNvGRM76eVuKFEsDCXzUNQuLEH97ebL

Chain

Solana

Holders

518

Market cap

$4,086

At a $1M market cap, $WCAT would be $0.001000 (245x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is wCat a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 2

Transfer fee

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 1% fee and the owner can still raise it.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token blocks a sell

Transfer fee

1%Every buy and sell · can be raised

The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about wCat

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

TeslaJustice For Tesla$0.0₅2208+0.6%MC $2.1K

NECTARHiveBits$0.007755-0.0%MC $100.0K

HYPEDOGHypeDog$0.0₅1847+0.1%MC $1.8K

MegatronThe Autistic Cat$0.0₅3601-3.6%MC $3.5K

memestonkmemestonk$0.0₅2904-1.4%MC $2.9K

uniuni$0.009802-62.7%MC $9.80M

wrappedcat: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-18 03:17 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$38,717.00

How concentrated is wrappedcat ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling wrappedcat?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is wrappedcat liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-18 03:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $38,717.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-18 03:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 18, 03:17 AM UTC

FDV

$744,396

Liquidity

$38,717.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

wCat (wrappedcat) is a Solana meme token trading on a Raydium CPMM pool that has experienced an extreme +1,674.7% price surge in the last 24 hours, taking its price from near-zero to $0.000744 with a $744.4K fully diluted valuation. The move has occurred on very thin liquidity ($38.72K) with declining hourly volume ($502K→$310K→$112K) even as price hit new highs — a bearish divergence within an otherwise bullish-looking buy/sell pressure split (52.4%/47.6%). No holder distribution data or sniper data is available, and key contract authority fields (mint, freeze, update authority) are all unknown, leaving major due-diligence questions unanswered.

Key points

Extreme, freshly-parabolic price action (+1,674% in 24h) with only 3 hours of candle history available
Very thin liquidity ($38.72K) relative to 24h trading volume (~$784K combined), implying high slippage/manipulation risk
Complete absence of holder and sniper visibility, and unknown mint/freeze/update authority status — significant transparency gaps
Modestly positive net buy pressure and buyer/seller count skew (2,725 buyers vs 2,215 sellers) offering a partial bullish counterweight

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48 hours

neutral

Given the parabolic run-up, declining volume on the last candles, and razor-thin liquidity, short-term price action is likely to remain highly volatile with elevated pullback risk, even though buy-side flow has been modestly dominant. A move in either direction of 30-50%+ within hours would not be surprising.

Target low

$0.00035

Target high

$0.0011

Support: $0.00035, $0.00013
Resistance: $0.000807, $0.0011 (extrapolated)

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

bearish

Absent sustained volume growth, deeper liquidity, and verified contract authorities, tokens exhibiting this kind of one-day parabolic spike on Raydium CPMM pairs with sub-$40K liquidity frequently mean-revert substantially as early buyers and any latent insiders realize gains and liquidity providers withdraw.

Catalysts

Liquidity providers adding or removing liquidity from the pool
Confirmation (or lack thereof) of mint/freeze authority renouncement
Social media/community momentum sustaining or fading
Broader market conditions for Solana micro-cap meme tokens

Bullish factors

Net positive buy pressure (52.4% vs 47.6%) and more unique buyers than sellers in the 24h window
Active social presence (Twitter, website) that could sustain retail attention
Low FDV ($744K) leaves theoretical room for further speculative expansion

Bearish factors

Volume declining across the last three candles while price makes new highs (bearish divergence)
Extremely shallow liquidity ($38.72K) relative to volume, raising slippage and manipulation risk
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status increases tail risk of dilution or freezing
No holder/sniper visibility to rule out concentrated selling pressure
Parabolic +1,674% moves in thin markets statistically tend to retrace significantly

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because the dataset spans only 3 hourly candles with no historical baseline, no holder or sniper data, and unknown contract authority status. Predictions here are necessarily speculative extrapolations from a very short, extreme-volatility window rather than a robust trend analysis.

wCat call history

Full track record →

Sep 18neutral@ $0.000744

24h—

7d—

30d-99.2%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: CMMtMt...7ebL
Total Supply: 999,999,803.83 wCat

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($38.72K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Parabolic +1,674% 24h price move with declining volume on the most recent candles — classic pump pattern that can reverse sharply
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status — cannot rule out further dilution or account freezes
No holder or sniper data available — concentration and insider positioning cannot be verified, a significant transparency gap

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available (Sept 18, 01:00-03:00 UTC), all showing extreme volatility. Candle 1 opened at $0.0000037 and rocketed intra-candle to a high of $0.000359 before closing at $0.0002955 — an enormous wick-driven range. Candle 2 opened at $0.0002955, spiked to $0.000643 high, dumped to $0.00013 low, then closed at $0.00036 — a huge whipsaw with a long upper and lower wick, indicative of violent two-way volatility. Candle 3 opened at $0.00036, pushed to a new high of $0.000807, dipped to $0.00035, then closed near the high at $0.00074 — a strong bullish candle closing near its top, suggesting renewed buying pressure after the candle 2 shakeout.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Price has gone from ~$0.0000037 to ~$0.00074 in three hours — a parabolic short-term uptrend. With only 3 candles of data, 'medium-term' trend is effectively the same window and should be read as extremely early-stage and unproven.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

52%

Sell

48%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00035 (candle 2 & 3 lows)

Major support

$0.000130 (candle 2 low) / $0.0000037 (candle 1 open, effective floor pre-rally)

Immediate resistance

$0.000807 (candle 3 high, current ATH in dataset)

Major resistance

$0.000807 (no higher historical print in available data)

With only 3 hourly candles, support/resistance levels are provisional. Immediate support sits around $0.00035, which held as the low on both candle 2 and candle 3. Below that, $0.00013 (candle 2 low) is a deeper support/air-pocket zone. To the upside, $0.000807 (candle 3 high) is the only resistance reference point in the dataset — a break above would put the token into uncharted territory for this window, while a rejection here or a sell-through of $0.00035 support would validate the volume-divergence concern.

Notable patterns

Parabolic move up (~200x within 3 hours based on candle 1 open to candle 3 close)
Long-wick whipsaw candle (candle 2: high $0.000643 vs low $0.00013) signaling high volatility/possible manipulation or thin-book price discovery
Bullish close near high on candle 3 ($0.00074 close vs $0.000807 high) after a shakeout low
Declining volume on rising price (bearish divergence) across the 3 available candles

Liquidity

$38,717.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $38.72K against a 24h trading volume north of $784K (buy+sell combined) implies the pool is being turned over roughly 20x daily — a classic sign of a thin, highly reflexive Raydium CPMM pair where even modest trades can move price double-digit percentages. Buy volume ($411.44K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($373.33K), producing a mild net inflow (52.4% vs 47.6% pressure), and buyers (2,725) outnumber sellers (2,215) in unique wallet count 24h, suggesting more distinct participants are buying than selling right now. However, with liquidity this shallow, slippage on any meaningfully sized order is likely to be high in either direction, and the pool could be drained or manipulated by a single large actor.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,803.83 wCat

FDV

$744.40K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price change of +1,674.7% and intra-hour swings of hundreds of percent (e.g., candle 1 low $0.0000034 to high $0.000359) represent extreme, casino-like volatility.
Liquidityhigh
Only $38.72K total liquidity against $784K+ combined daily volume creates a shallow pool highly susceptible to slippage, single-wallet manipulation, and rapid price collapse if liquidity is pulled.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($38.72K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Parabolic +1,674% 24h price move with declining volume on the most recent candles — classic pump pattern that can reverse sharply
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status — cannot rule out further dilution or account freezes
No holder or sniper data available — concentration and insider positioning cannot be verified, a significant transparency gap
Very short price/candle history (only 3 hourly candles) means there is essentially no track record to assess sustainability
Token metadata (verified contract, mutability, master edition) all unknown, reducing overall due-diligence confidence

Mitigating factors

24h buy pressure (52.4%) modestly exceeds sell pressure (47.6%), and unique buyers (2,725) outnumber unique sellers (2,215), suggesting broad-based demand rather than a single large seller dominating flow
The token has social presence (Twitter, website) suggesting at least a nominal community/marketing effort
Buy/sell pressure is not extremely lopsided, which somewhat tempers (but does not eliminate) immediate dump risk

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand they may lose their entire position. Not appropriate for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to independently verify contract authorities and holder concentration before entry. Position sizing should be minimal given the very_high risk rating.

wCat is a micro-cap Solana token that just underwent an extreme parabolic price move (+1,674% in 24h) on very thin liquidity ($38.72K), with no verifiable holder distribution, sniper, or authority data. The setup has some genuine buy-side demand (more buyers than sellers, net positive volume flow) but carries very high structural risk from illiquidity, unknown contract authorities, and a complete lack of transparency on who holds the supply. This is a high-risk speculative trade, not an investment with fundamentals to underwrite it.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued momentum and community/social traction (Twitter, website presence) attract fresh buyers, sustaining upward price pressure; buy volume continues to outpace sell volume and liquidity gradually deepens as the token gains attention.

Current buy pressure (52.4%) and buyer count (2,725) exceed sell-side metrics
Social channels exist, providing a marketing/community vector for continued attention
Low absolute FDV ($744K) leaves room for further speculative upside if narrative catches on

Base Case

Price remains highly volatile and directionless at a macro level, oscillating sharply around the recent range ($0.00035–$0.0008) as early participants take profits and new speculative buyers rotate in, without a clear sustained trend emerging in the near term.

Liquidity stays roughly at current shallow levels ($30-40K) absent new LP deposits
No major authority action (mint/freeze) occurs in the observed window
Trading remains dominated by short-term speculative flow rather than long-term holding

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic rally (+1,674% in a day) is unwound quickly as the declining-volume-on-rising-price divergence resolves to the downside; thin liquidity amplifies the drop, and unknown/unrenounced authorities or concentrated holders (unverifiable but plausible) enable further dilution or a large dump.

Volume has fallen sharply across the last 3 candles ($502K→$310K→$112K) even as price hit new highs — a bearish divergence
Liquidity of only $38.72K cannot support the current trading volume without major slippage
No confirmation that mint/freeze authorities are renounced
No holder or sniper visibility to rule out concentrated insider selling

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 18, 03:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-18 03:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
Price feed (USD price and % change windows)
Hourly OHLC candle data (3 most recent candles) from Raydium CPMM pair BvcHLM4SEK94d2xwqiJ2btgSSWWzAwDdiJ1KdUXszgJ5
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, liquidity)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

No holder distribution data available — holderTrends and whaleMap sections are placeholders per methodology, not real measurements
No sniper data available — smart money signals could not be computed and are marked unknown
Only 3 hourly OHLC candles provided, giving a very short technical history insufficient for robust trend/pattern confirmation
Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, verified-contract, and mutability status all reported as unknown, preventing a definitive rug-risk determination
6h price % change field was unavailable
Unique wallet 24h figure unavailable, and 24h $ change / native price fields were unavailable

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from a limited, incomplete on-chain dataset with explicitly noted gaps (holder data, sniper data, contract authority status). Cryptocurrency trading, especially in micro-cap/low-liquidity tokens exhibiting parabolic price action, carries a very high risk of substantial or total loss. Independently verify all contract details, authorities, and holder distributions before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is wrappedcat (wCat) a scam?

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 1% fee and the owner can still raise it. The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply. Checked Nov 2, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell wrappedcat (wCat)?

Yes. Every buy and sell pays a 1% transfer fee, and the owner can still raise it. Checked Nov 2, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is wrappedcat ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling wrappedcat?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is wrappedcat liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-18 03:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $38,717.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for wrappedcat (wCat)?

Is wCat a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand they may lose their entire position. Not appropriate for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to independently verify contract authorities and holder concentration before entry. Position sizing should be minimal given the very_high risk rating.

What are the key risks of holding wCat?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($38.72K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Parabolic +1,674% 24h price move with declining volume on the most recent candles — classic pump pattern that can reverse sharply • Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status — cannot rule out further dilution or account freezes