RUNGELES

Rungeles Price Prediction 2026

RUNGELES
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 23, 2026

C5Ux7VQee9feRARZbuH6yZn9kWjo35suFkKCgHeCpump

$0.051690

FDV $1,690

LiveContract:C5Ux7VQee9feRARZbuH6yZn9kWjo35suFkKCgHeCpumpChain:SolanaHolders:76Market cap:$1,690

More tokens on Solana

SC

SC

Stable Cat

$0.0518150.0%
MC $1.8K
S-Surprise

S-Surprise

Solana Surprise

$0.0519750.0%
MC $2.0K
cooking

cooking

got something cooking

$0.0519430.0%
MC $1.9K
KFC

KFC

Killer Flying Croc

$0.0513890.0%
MC $1.4K
SENSE

SENSE

SENSE

$0.0521040.0%
MC $2.1K
CATE

CATE

Catecoin

$0.035950.8%
MC $34.61M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about RUNGELES

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jun 23, 10:17 PM
FDV

$104,019

Liquidity

$36,683

Holders

848

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

RUNGELES (Rungeles) is a PumpFun-launched Solana memecoin (mint: C5Ux7VQee9feRARZbuH6yZn9kWjo35suFkKCgHeCpump) with a total supply of 1 billion tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$104K–$118K. The token experienced an explosive 81% price surge in the past 24 hours, but the on-chain data reveals severe anomalies: the historical holder series shows a flat 20 holders for 30 consecutive days, then a sudden jump to 848 holders within the last hour — a pattern inconsistent with organic growth. Top holder data is unavailable, supply concentration metrics report 0% for top 10 and top 100 (likely a data gap), and liquidity is extremely thin at $36.68K. The token has no verified contract, no social links, no description, and an unknown update authority. These signals collectively point to a very high-risk, likely manipulated token.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive 81% 24h price gain followed by a -44% 5-minute crash, indicating extreme pump-and-dump volatility
Holder count was frozen at exactly 20 for 30 days, then surged +828 in a single hour — a highly anomalous and suspicious pattern
Extremely thin liquidity of only $36.68K against $730K+ in 24h trading volume, creating severe slippage risk
No social links, no description, no verified contract, and unknown update authority — minimal transparency
Near-perfectly balanced buy/sell volume (49.7% vs 50.3%) with more sellers than buyers, suggesting wash trading or coordinated activity

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token has already crashed -44.3% in the last 5 minutes from its recent peak, following an 81% pump. The most recent hourly candle (22:00 UTC) opened at $0.000252, hit a high of $0.000285, then collapsed to close at $0.000118 — a bearish engulfing/shooting star pattern. Current price of ~$0.000104 is well below both recent candle opens. With only $36.68K in liquidity and 2,944 sell transactions vs 2,570 buy transactions in 24h, further downside is the most probable near-term outcome.

Target low$0.000025
Target high$0.000150
Support: $0.000085 (hourly candle [1] low), $0.000025 (hourly candle [2] low)
Resistance: $0.000244 (hourly candle [2] close), $0.000285 (hourly candle [1] high / recent peak), $0.000356 (hourly candle [2] all-time high in data)

Medium term

bearish
1–30 days

Given the token's lack of fundamentals, no social presence, no verified contract, and the suspicious holder growth pattern, sustained medium-term price appreciation is unlikely. The token appears to be in a post-pump distribution phase. Without new catalysts or genuine community development, price is expected to trend toward its pre-pump lows near $0.000025–$0.000034.

Catalysts
  • Any genuine community or project development (currently none visible)
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifting all tokens
  • Listing on a centralized exchange (highly unlikely at this stage)
  • Renewed speculative interest from social media (no current social presence detected)

Bullish factors

  • 81% 24h price gain demonstrates speculative demand exists
  • High 24h trading volume ($730K+) relative to market cap shows active interest
  • Near-equal buy/sell volume (49.7%/50.3%) could indicate price stabilization at current levels
  • 848 holders acquired in a short burst could represent genuine new community formation

Bearish factors

  • -44.3% price drop in the last 5 minutes signals active distribution
  • Extremely thin liquidity ($36.68K) means large sells will crater the price
  • More sellers (1,145) than buyers (1,654) in unique wallet count, but more sell transactions (2,944) than buy transactions (2,570)
  • Holder count frozen at 20 for 30 days is a major red flag for token legitimacy
  • No social links, description, or verified contract — no fundamental support
  • Unknown update authority introduces rug pull risk
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available, providing minimal price history; (2) severe data anomalies in holder metrics that undermine on-chain signal reliability; (3) top holder data is unavailable, preventing whale behavior analysis; (4) the token's extreme volatility makes any price target highly uncertain.

RUNGELES call history

Full track record →
Jun 23bearish
24h-98.2%
7d-96.7%
30d-98.3%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (21:00 UTC): O=$0.0000341, H=$0.000356, L=$0.0000251, C=$0.000244 — a massive bullish candle with a long lower wick, indicating a violent pump from near-zero levels with strong buying. Candle [1] (22:00 UTC): O=$0.000252, H=$0.000285, L=$0.0000859, C=$0.000118 — a large bearish candle that opened near the prior close, briefly extended higher, then collapsed sharply, closing near the lows. This is a classic 'shooting star' / bearish reversal pattern. The current price of ~$0.000104 is below candle [1]'s close, confirming continued selling pressure. The two-candle sequence (pump followed by sharp reversal) is a textbook pump-and-dump signature.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 50%Sell 50%

The short-term trend has reversed sharply from bullish to bearish. The 22:00 UTC candle formed a shooting star/bearish engulfing pattern after the pump candle, and the current price is below that candle's close. With only 2 candles of data, medium-term trend is also assessed as downtrend given the -44% 5-minute move and the overall post-pump structure.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000085 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.000025 (candle [2] low — pre-pump base)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000244 (candle [2] close / candle [1] open area)
Major$0.000356 (candle [2] all-time high in available data)

The most critical support is the candle [2] low at $0.000025, which represents the pre-pump price floor. Immediate support at $0.000085 (candle [1] low) is the first line of defense. If $0.000085 breaks, the next meaningful support is the $0.000025–$0.000034 range. Resistance is stacked from $0.000244 (prior close) up to $0.000356 (recent peak). Reclaiming $0.000244 would be needed to suggest any bullish continuation.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish reversal on candle [1] after the pump candle
  • Classic two-candle pump-and-dump sequence: explosive bullish candle followed by bearish distribution candle
  • Volume declining from pump candle ($507K) to distribution candle ($220K) — distribution on lower volume
  • Current price below both candle closes, confirming downtrend continuation
  • -44.3% 5-minute price drop indicating active large-scale selling or liquidity exit

Total holders848
24h Δ+828
7d Δ+828
30d Δ+828
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The +828 holder surge occurred simultaneously with the 81% price pump, strongly suggesting the holder growth is directly correlated with — and likely caused by — the same coordinated event that drove the price spike. This is not organic holder accumulation over time but rather a sudden burst of activity. The 30-day historical data shows exactly 20 holders with zero change every single day from May 24 to June 22, 2026, then a jump to 848 within the last hour of data. This extreme discontinuity is a major red flag.

The holder trend data reveals a deeply anomalous pattern. For 30 consecutive days (May 24 – June 22, 2026), the token maintained exactly 20 holders with zero net change — a statistically improbable flatline suggesting the token was either dormant, held by insiders, or the data was suppressed. Then, within a single hour, 828 new holders were added (a +4,140% increase), bringing the total to 848. This pattern is inconsistent with organic growth and is more consistent with a coordinated pump event, bot activity, or airdrop/distribution to wallets. The acquisition method shows 846 of 848 holders acquired via swap, which is consistent with a sudden trading event. Holder growth is technically 'accelerating' but in a highly suspicious, non-organic manner.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token — the API returned no top 20 holders. The supply concentration metrics report 0% for both top 10 and top 100, which is almost certainly a data gap rather than a genuine reflection of perfectly distributed supply. Given the token's PumpFun origin, 30-day dormancy with only 20 holders, and the sudden pump event, it is highly probable that a small number of wallets (the original 20 holders) control a significant portion of supply. The distribution is assessed as 'very_concentrated' based on circumstantial evidence, but this cannot be confirmed without actual holder data. The whale sentiment is assessed as 'mixed' — original holders are likely distributing (bearish) while new holders from the pump may be holding or accumulating. Investors should treat the absence of top holder data as a risk factor, not a neutral signal.

Liquidity$36,680
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$363,150
Sell$367,530
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers1,654
Unique sellers1,145

Liquidity is critically shallow at $36.68K on PumpSwap (pair: AtuNBB3mkcmshaFFvpPiij4bmvoY1jwTE3wrxhY9gFY7). This means the 24h trading volume of ~$730K is approximately 20x the available liquidity — an extreme ratio indicating that most trades are causing significant price impact and slippage. Any moderately sized sell order will move the price dramatically. The net flow is marginally negative (sell volume $367.53K vs buy volume $363.15K, a $4.38K net outflow), but the near-parity suggests possible wash trading. Notably, there are more unique buyers (1,654) than unique sellers (1,145), yet sell transactions (2,944) outnumber buy transactions (2,570) — suggesting sellers are executing more transactions per wallet, consistent with distribution behavior. The FDV of $118.34K vs $36.68K liquidity gives a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~31%, which is low but not the worst seen in memecoins. The primary concern is the absolute liquidity level: a single $5K–$10K sell could move the price 10–30%.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1,000,000,000 (1 billion)
FDV$104,018.77 (metadata) / $118,340 (trading analytics)

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

RUNGELES has a standard PumpFun supply of 1 billion tokens with 6 decimals. The FDV is reported as ~$104K–$118K (slight discrepancy between metadata and trading analytics, likely due to price movement). The update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the token is marked as 'Mutable: false', which is a positive signal — immutability reduces the risk of metadata manipulation. However, mint authority and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the data, so they cannot be confirmed as renounced. The token has no verified contract, no description, and no social links. It was launched via PumpFun (indicated by the 'pump' suffix in the mint address), which typically uses a bonding curve mechanism. The token appears to have graduated to PumpSwap given the active trading pair. The combination of unknown authorities and lack of transparency warrants a 'unknown' rug risk from authorities, though the overall token risk profile is very high for other reasons.

Volatility
high

The token pumped 81% in 24 hours then crashed -44.3% in 5 minutes. The hourly candle range spans from $0.000025 to $0.000356 — a 14x range in a single hour. Extreme volatility makes position sizing and exit timing nearly impossible for retail traders.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only $36.68K on PumpSwap. With $730K+ in 24h volume, the liquidity-to-volume ratio is dangerously low (~5%). Any significant sell order will cause severe slippage, and a coordinated exit by early holders could drain the pool entirely.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is unavailable, but the token had exactly 20 holders for 30 days before the pump — strongly implying high insider concentration. The original 20 holders likely control a disproportionate share of supply and represent a significant dump risk.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data is available, but the 30-day dormancy period with 20 holders followed by a sudden pump is consistent with insider/sniper accumulation. The -44.3% 5-minute crash suggests active dumping is already underway. Early holders are almost certainly in significant profit.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown' and mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The token is marked 'Mutable: false' which is a partial positive. No verified contract. The PumpFun launch mechanism provides some standardization, but the unknown authority status prevents a clean 'low' risk rating.

Key risks

  • Extreme pump-and-dump pattern: 81% pump followed by -44% crash in 5 minutes
  • Critically thin liquidity ($36.68K) relative to trading volume ($730K+)
  • 30-day holder count frozen at exactly 20 — highly suspicious insider accumulation pattern
  • No top holder data available — cannot assess concentration or whale dump risk
  • No social links, description, or verified contract — zero transparency
  • Unknown update/mint/freeze authority status
  • Near-perfectly balanced buy/sell volume may indicate wash trading
  • Token is unverified and has no community infrastructure

Mitigating factors

  • Token marked as 'Mutable: false' reduces metadata manipulation risk
  • PumpFun/PumpSwap launch provides some standardized infrastructure
  • High 24h trading volume ($730K+) shows genuine market interest exists
  • 848 holders (if legitimate) represents some distribution of supply
  • Token not flagged as possible spam by the data provider
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of extreme volatility, thin liquidity, suspicious holder patterns, and lack of transparency makes this one of the highest-risk tokens analyzable.

RUNGELES is a high-risk PumpFun memecoin that has exhibited a classic pump-and-dump price pattern. The token's 30-day dormancy with exactly 20 holders followed by a sudden +828 holder surge and 81% price pump is a major red flag for coordinated manipulation. With only $36.68K in liquidity, no social presence, no verified contract, and unknown authority status, there is no fundamental investment case. Any participation is purely speculative and carries a very high probability of total loss.

Bull case (low)

Viral memecoin momentum: RUNGELES catches social media attention, attracts genuine community, and rides a broader Solana memecoin rally to significantly higher prices.

  • Organic viral spread on Twitter/Telegram driving new buyer inflows
  • Broader Solana ecosystem memecoin season lifting all tokens
  • Liquidity deepening as market makers add to the pool
  • The 848 new holders represent genuine community formation rather than bots

Base case

Gradual bleed-out: The token stabilizes briefly near current levels as some speculative buyers hold, but slowly declines over days/weeks as early holders distribute and no new catalysts emerge. Price drifts back toward the $0.000025–$0.000050 range.

  • No major new catalyst or social media attention
  • Early holders distribute gradually rather than in a single dump
  • Some speculative buyers hold positions hoping for another pump
  • Liquidity remains thin but does not completely drain

Bear case (high)

Rug pull or complete collapse: Original 20 insider holders dump remaining supply into the thin liquidity pool, price collapses to near zero, and the token is abandoned.

  • Original 20 holders (likely insiders) selling into the pump-driven liquidity
  • Thin $36.68K liquidity pool unable to absorb sell pressure
  • No community, social presence, or utility to sustain demand
  • Continued -44% per 5-minute candle trajectory toward pre-pump lows of $0.000025

GeneratedJun 23, 10:17 PM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data appears current as of the most recent hourly candle (2026-06-23T22:00 UTC). Historical holder data covers May 24 – June 22, 2026 (30 days). Only 2 hourly OHLC candles were provided, severely limiting technical analysis depth.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint: C5Ux7VQee9feRARZbuH6yZn9kWjo35suFkKCgHeCpump)
  • PumpSwap trading pair data (AtuNBB3mkcmshaFFvpPiij4bmvoY1jwTE3wrxhY9gFY7)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (2 candles available)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buys/sells, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and 30-day historical holder series
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Top 20 holder data is entirely unavailable — whale concentration cannot be quantified
  • Sniper analysis returned no data — smart money signals are inferred, not measured
  • Supply concentration metrics report 0% for top 10/100 — likely a data gap, not reality
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — authority risk cannot be fully assessed
  • Holder count anomaly (20 flat for 30 days then +828 in 1 hour) may reflect data collection issues or genuine manipulation — cannot be definitively distinguished
  • No social links or project description available for fundamental analysis
  • Price change metrics for 1h, 6h, and 24h all show 0% in trading analytics despite 81% 24h change in price metadata — data inconsistency noted

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in unverified memecoins, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed contains multiple anomalies and red flags. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. This analysis is based solely on the on-chain data provided and does not account for information not present in the dataset.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1,000,000,000 (1 billion)

Key Risks

•Extreme pump-and-dump pattern: 81% pump followed by -44% crash in 5 minutes
•Critically thin liquidity ($36.68K) relative to trading volume ($730K+)
•30-day holder count frozen at exactly 20 — highly suspicious insider accumulation pattern
•No top holder data available — cannot assess concentration or whale dump risk

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for RUNGELES. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. However, the broader on-chain picture is concerning: the token sat dormant with exactly 20 holders for 30 consecutive days before exploding to 848 holders in a single hour, coinciding with the price pump. This pattern is consistent with a coordinated launch where insiders held the token quietly before a coordinated pump event. The near-equal buy/sell volume ($363K vs $367K) with more sell transactions (2,944) than buy transactions (2,570) suggests early holders may be distributing into retail buying pressure.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available — the sniper analysis endpoint returned no data for this token.

Highly suspicious — the token had exactly 20 holders for 30 days with zero net change, suggesting a controlled pre-launch phase. The sudden +828 holder surge in one hour coinciding with the price pump is consistent with coordinated insider activity rather than organic discovery. Early buyers (the original 20 holders) are likely in significant profit and represent the primary distribution risk.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Rungeles (RUNGELES)?

The token has already crashed -44.3% in the last 5 minutes from its recent peak, following an 81% pump. The most recent hourly candle (22:00 UTC) opened at $0.000252, hit a high of $0.000285, then collapsed to close at $0.000118 — a bearish engulfing/shooting star pattern. Current price of ~$0.000104 is well below both recent candle opens. With only $36.68K in liquidity and 2,944 sell transactions vs 2,570 buy transactions in 24h, further downside is the most probable near-term outcome. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000025 to $0.000150.

Is RUNGELES a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of extreme volatility, thin liquidity, suspicious holder patterns, and lack of transparency makes this one of the highest-risk tokens analyzable.

How are RUNGELES holders trending?

Rungeles currently has 848 holders and is growing (24h: 828, 7d: 828, 30d: 828). The holder trend data reveals a deeply anomalous pattern. For 30 consecutive days (May 24 – June 22, 2026), the token maintained exactly 20 holders with zero net change — a statistically improbable flatline suggesting the token was either dormant, held by insiders, or the data was suppressed. Then, within a single hour, 828 new holders were added (a +4,140% increase), bringing the total to 848. This pattern is inconsistent with organic growth and is more consistent with a coordinated pump event, bot activity, or airdrop/distribution to wallets. The acquisition method shows 846 of 848 holders acquired via swap, which is consistent with a sudden trading event. Holder growth is technically 'accelerating' but in a highly suspicious, non-organic manner.

What does sniper activity look like for RUNGELES?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding RUNGELES?

Extreme pump-and-dump pattern: 81% pump followed by -44% crash in 5 minutes • Critically thin liquidity ($36.68K) relative to trading volume ($730K+) • 30-day holder count frozen at exactly 20 — highly suspicious insider accumulation pattern

← Back to all predictions

Track RUNGELES