RUNGELES

Rungeles Price Today & AI Analysis

RUNGELESSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 23, 2026

Price

$0.052344

FDV $2,343

Contract

Live
C5Ux7VQee9feRARZbuH6yZn9kWjo35suFkKCgHeCpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

70

Market cap

$2,343

More tokens on Solana

SCSCStable Cat$0.052740+0.0%MC $2.7KS-SurpriseS-SurpriseSolana Surprise$0.052501+0.0%MC $2.5KXLKXLKX Link$0.052004+0.0%MC $2.0KKFCKFCKiller Flying Croc$0.051908+0.0%MC $1.9KTralapeTralapePepeLero$0.051838+0.0%MC $1.8KSAISAISairium$0.053014-87.1%MC $301.4K

Rungeles: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-23 22:17 UTC

Holder addresses

848

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$36,682.65
How concentrated is Rungeles ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 848 addresses (2026-06-23 22:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Rungeles?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Rungeles liquidity falling?
As of 2026-06-23 22:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $36,682.65. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-23 22:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about RUNGELES

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Jun 23, 10:17 PM UTC

FDV

$104,019

Liquidity

$36,682.65

Holders

848

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

RUNGELES (Rungeles) is a PumpFun-launched Solana memecoin (mint: C5Ux7VQee9feRARZbuH6yZn9kWjo35suFkKCgHeCpump) with a total supply of 1 billion tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$104K–$118K. The token experienced an explosive 81% price surge in the past 24 hours, but the on-chain data reveals severe anomalies: the historical holder series shows a flat 20 holders for 30 consecutive days, then a sudden jump to 848 holders within the last hour — a pattern inconsistent with organic growth. Top holder data is unavailable, supply concentration metrics report 0% for top 10 and top 100 (likely a data gap), and liquidity is extremely thin at $36.68K. The token has no verified contract, no social links, no description, and an unknown update authority. These signals collectively point to a very high-risk, likely manipulated token.

Key points

  • Explosive 81% 24h price gain followed by a -44% 5-minute crash, indicating extreme pump-and-dump volatility
  • Holder count was frozen at exactly 20 for 30 days, then surged +828 in a single hour — a highly anomalous and suspicious pattern
  • Extremely thin liquidity of only $36.68K against $730K+ in 24h trading volume, creating severe slippage risk
  • No social links, no description, no verified contract, and unknown update authority — minimal transparency
  • Near-perfectly balanced buy/sell volume (49.7% vs 50.3%) with more sellers than buyers, suggesting wash trading or coordinated activity

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token has already crashed -44.3% in the last 5 minutes from its recent peak, following an 81% pump. The most recent hourly candle (22:00 UTC) opened at $0.000252, hit a high of $0.000285, then collapsed to close at $0.000118 — a bearish engulfing/shooting star pattern. Current price of ~$0.000104 is well below both recent candle opens. With only $36.68K in liquidity and 2,944 sell transactions vs 2,570 buy transactions in 24h, further downside is the most probable near-term outcome.

Target low

$0.000025

Target high

$0.000150

Support

$0.000085 (hourly candle [1] low), $0.000025 (hourly candle [2] low)

Resistance

$0.000244 (hourly candle [2] close), $0.000285 (hourly candle [1] high / recent peak), $0.000356 (hourly candle [2] all-time high in data)

Medium term · 1–30 days

bearish

Given the token's lack of fundamentals, no social presence, no verified contract, and the suspicious holder growth pattern, sustained medium-term price appreciation is unlikely. The token appears to be in a post-pump distribution phase. Without new catalysts or genuine community development, price is expected to trend toward its pre-pump lows near $0.000025–$0.000034.

Catalysts

  • Any genuine community or project development (currently none visible)
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifting all tokens
  • Listing on a centralized exchange (highly unlikely at this stage)
  • Renewed speculative interest from social media (no current social presence detected)

Bullish factors

  • 81% 24h price gain demonstrates speculative demand exists
  • High 24h trading volume ($730K+) relative to market cap shows active interest
  • Near-equal buy/sell volume (49.7%/50.3%) could indicate price stabilization at current levels
  • 848 holders acquired in a short burst could represent genuine new community formation

Bearish factors

  • -44.3% price drop in the last 5 minutes signals active distribution
  • Extremely thin liquidity ($36.68K) means large sells will crater the price
  • More sellers (1,145) than buyers (1,654) in unique wallet count, but more sell transactions (2,944) than buy transactions (2,570)
  • Holder count frozen at 20 for 30 days is a major red flag for token legitimacy
  • No social links, description, or verified contract — no fundamental support
  • Unknown update authority introduces rug pull risk

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available, providing minimal price history; (2) severe data anomalies in holder metrics that undermine on-chain signal reliability; (3) top holder data is unavailable, preventing whale behavior analysis; (4) the token's extreme volatility makes any price target highly uncertain.

RUNGELES call history

Full track record →

Jun 23bearish
24h-98.2%
7d-96.7%
30d-98.3%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
C5Ux7V...pump
Total Supply
1,000,000,000 (1 billion)

Key Risks

  • Extreme pump-and-dump pattern: 81% pump followed by -44% crash in 5 minutes
  • Critically thin liquidity ($36.68K) relative to trading volume ($730K+)
  • 30-day holder count frozen at exactly 20 — highly suspicious insider accumulation pattern
  • No top holder data available — cannot assess concentration or whale dump risk

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (21:00 UTC): O=$0.0000341, H=$0.000356, L=$0.0000251, C=$0.000244 — a massive bullish candle with a long lower wick, indicating a violent pump from near-zero levels with strong buying. Candle [1] (22:00 UTC): O=$0.000252, H=$0.000285, L=$0.0000859, C=$0.000118 — a large bearish candle that opened near the prior close, briefly extended higher, then collapsed sharply, closing near the lows. This is a classic 'shooting star' / bearish reversal pattern. The current price of ~$0.000104 is below candle [1]'s close, confirming continued selling pressure. The two-candle sequence (pump followed by sharp reversal) is a textbook pump-and-dump signature.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

The short-term trend has reversed sharply from bullish to bearish. The 22:00 UTC candle formed a shooting star/bearish engulfing pattern after the pump candle, and the current price is below that candle's close. With only 2 candles of data, medium-term trend is also assessed as downtrend given the -44% 5-minute move and the overall post-pump structure.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000085 (candle [1] low)

Major support

$0.000025 (candle [2] low — pre-pump base)

Immediate resistance

$0.000244 (candle [2] close / candle [1] open area)

Major resistance

$0.000356 (candle [2] all-time high in available data)

The most critical support is the candle [2] low at $0.000025, which represents the pre-pump price floor. Immediate support at $0.000085 (candle [1] low) is the first line of defense. If $0.000085 breaks, the next meaningful support is the $0.000025–$0.000034 range. Resistance is stacked from $0.000244 (prior close) up to $0.000356 (recent peak). Reclaiming $0.000244 would be needed to suggest any bullish continuation.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish reversal on candle [1] after the pump candle
  • Classic two-candle pump-and-dump sequence: explosive bullish candle followed by bearish distribution candle
  • Volume declining from pump candle ($507K) to distribution candle ($220K) — distribution on lower volume
  • Current price below both candle closes, confirming downtrend continuation
  • -44.3% 5-minute price drop indicating active large-scale selling or liquidity exit

Liquidity

Liquidity

$36,682.65

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $36.68K on PumpSwap (pair: AtuNBB3mkcmshaFFvpPiij4bmvoY1jwTE3wrxhY9gFY7). This means the 24h trading volume of ~$730K is approximately 20x the available liquidity — an extreme ratio indicating that most trades are causing significant price impact and slippage. Any moderately sized sell order will move the price dramatically. The net flow is marginally negative (sell volume $367.53K vs buy volume $363.15K, a $4.38K net outflow), but the near-parity suggests possible wash trading. Notably, there are more unique buyers (1,654) than unique sellers (1,145), yet sell transactions (2,944) outnumber buy transactions (2,570) — suggesting sellers are executing more transactions per wallet, consistent with distribution behavior. The FDV of $118.34K vs $36.68K liquidity gives a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~31%, which is low but not the worst seen in memecoins. The primary concern is the absolute liquidity level: a single $5K–$10K sell could move the price 10–30%.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000 (1 billion)

FDV

$104,018.77 (metadata) / $118,340 (trading analytics)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    The token pumped 81% in 24 hours then crashed -44.3% in 5 minutes. The hourly candle range spans from $0.000025 to $0.000356 — a 14x range in a single hour. Extreme volatility makes position sizing and exit timing nearly impossible for retail traders.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $36.68K on PumpSwap. With $730K+ in 24h volume, the liquidity-to-volume ratio is dangerously low (~5%). Any significant sell order will cause severe slippage, and a coordinated exit by early holders could drain the pool entirely.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extreme pump-and-dump pattern: 81% pump followed by -44% crash in 5 minutes
  • Critically thin liquidity ($36.68K) relative to trading volume ($730K+)
  • 30-day holder count frozen at exactly 20 — highly suspicious insider accumulation pattern
  • No top holder data available — cannot assess concentration or whale dump risk
  • No social links, description, or verified contract — zero transparency
  • Unknown update/mint/freeze authority status
  • Near-perfectly balanced buy/sell volume may indicate wash trading
  • Token is unverified and has no community infrastructure

Mitigating factors

  • Token marked as 'Mutable: false' reduces metadata manipulation risk
  • PumpFun/PumpSwap launch provides some standardized infrastructure
  • High 24h trading volume ($730K+) shows genuine market interest exists
  • 848 holders (if legitimate) represents some distribution of supply
  • Token not flagged as possible spam by the data provider

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of extreme volatility, thin liquidity, suspicious holder patterns, and lack of transparency makes this one of the highest-risk tokens analyzable.

RUNGELES is a high-risk PumpFun memecoin that has exhibited a classic pump-and-dump price pattern. The token's 30-day dormancy with exactly 20 holders followed by a sudden +828 holder surge and 81% price pump is a major red flag for coordinated manipulation. With only $36.68K in liquidity, no social presence, no verified contract, and unknown authority status, there is no fundamental investment case. Any participation is purely speculative and carries a very high probability of total loss.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral memecoin momentum: RUNGELES catches social media attention, attracts genuine community, and rides a broader Solana memecoin rally to significantly higher prices.

  • Organic viral spread on Twitter/Telegram driving new buyer inflows
  • Broader Solana ecosystem memecoin season lifting all tokens
  • Liquidity deepening as market makers add to the pool
  • The 848 new holders represent genuine community formation rather than bots

Base Case

Gradual bleed-out: The token stabilizes briefly near current levels as some speculative buyers hold, but slowly declines over days/weeks as early holders distribute and no new catalysts emerge. Price drifts back toward the $0.000025–$0.000050 range.

  • No major new catalyst or social media attention
  • Early holders distribute gradually rather than in a single dump
  • Some speculative buyers hold positions hoping for another pump
  • Liquidity remains thin but does not completely drain

Bear Case

High probability

Rug pull or complete collapse: Original 20 insider holders dump remaining supply into the thin liquidity pool, price collapses to near zero, and the token is abandoned.

  • Original 20 holders (likely insiders) selling into the pump-driven liquidity
  • Thin $36.68K liquidity pool unable to absorb sell pressure
  • No community, social presence, or utility to sustain demand
  • Continued -44% per 5-minute candle trajectory toward pre-pump lows of $0.000025

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 23, 10:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-23 22:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint: C5Ux7VQee9feRARZbuH6yZn9kWjo35suFkKCgHeCpump)
  • PumpSwap trading pair data (AtuNBB3mkcmshaFFvpPiij4bmvoY1jwTE3wrxhY9gFY7)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (2 candles available)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buys/sells, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and 30-day historical holder series
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Top 20 holder data is entirely unavailable — whale concentration cannot be quantified
  • Sniper analysis returned no data — smart money signals are inferred, not measured
  • Supply concentration metrics report 0% for top 10/100 — likely a data gap, not reality
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — authority risk cannot be fully assessed
  • Holder count anomaly (20 flat for 30 days then +828 in 1 hour) may reflect data collection issues or genuine manipulation — cannot be definitively distinguished
  • No social links or project description available for fundamental analysis
  • Price change metrics for 1h, 6h, and 24h all show 0% in trading analytics despite 81% 24h change in price metadata — data inconsistency noted

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in unverified memecoins, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed contains multiple anomalies and red flags. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. This analysis is based solely on the on-chain data provided and does not account for information not present in the dataset.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Rungeles ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 848 addresses (2026-06-23 22:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Rungeles?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Rungeles liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-23 22:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $36,682.65. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Rungeles (RUNGELES)?

The token has already crashed -44.3% in the last 5 minutes from its recent peak, following an 81% pump. The most recent hourly candle (22:00 UTC) opened at $0.000252, hit a high of $0.000285, then collapsed to close at $0.000118 — a bearish engulfing/shooting star pattern. Current price of ~$0.000104 is well below both recent candle opens. With only $36.68K in liquidity and 2,944 sell transactions vs 2,570 buy transactions in 24h, further downside is the most probable near-term outcome. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000025 to $0.000150.

Is RUNGELES a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of extreme volatility, thin liquidity, suspicious holder patterns, and lack of transparency makes this one of the highest-risk tokens analyzable.

What are the key risks of holding RUNGELES?

Extreme pump-and-dump pattern: 81% pump followed by -44% crash in 5 minutes • Critically thin liquidity ($36.68K) relative to trading volume ($730K+) • 30-day holder count frozen at exactly 20 — highly suspicious insider accumulation pattern

← Back to all predictions

Track RUNGELES