pepemask (PEPEMASK) is an extremely new PumpFun/PumpSwap meme token on Solana (mint: BvfCqsEMSfzoHfTzbFtHakYGemZqyUEsPEiKDKmVpump) with a total supply of ~999.8M tokens and a fully diluted valuation of only ~$15,106. The token launched within the last 24 hours, going from 5 holders to 802 holders in a single day. It experienced a violent price spike — reaching a high near $0.0000433 — followed by a near-total collapse back to ~$0.0000151, representing an ~89% crash from peak within hours. Trading analytics show $687K in buy volume vs $710K in sell volume over 24h, with slightly more sell pressure (50.8%). Liquidity is reported at $0.00 on-chain, indicating extremely shallow or migrated liquidity. This is a high-risk, speculative micro-cap meme token in its earliest lifecycle stage.

Risk: Very High

Sentiment: Bearish

Explosive 24h holder growth: from 5 to 802 holders (+99%) in under 24 hours

Violent price action: +643% 24h gain but -89% crash from intraday peak within hours

Extremely low FDV of ~$15,106 — micro-cap at its most extreme

Zero reported on-chain liquidity despite $1.4M+ in 24h combined volume

One sniper (AgmLJBMDCqWynYnQiPCuj9ewsNNsBJXyzoUhD9LJzN51) achieved +2,360.9% realized PnL, signaling early insider advantage

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish

1–24 hours

The token has already crashed ~89% from its intraday high of ~$0.0000433 (candle [7] high) down to ~$0.0000151. The most recent candles (hours 17–19 UTC) show open and close locked at $0.000001603, suggesting price discovery has collapsed to near-zero levels on low volume. The current reported price of $0.0000151 may reflect a brief bounce or stale quote. With zero reported liquidity, any sell pressure will cause further rapid decline.

Target low$0.0000010

Target high$0.0000433

Support: $0.0000016 (recent candle floor, hours 17–19), $0.0000010 (near-zero floor)
Resistance: $0.0000093 (candle [2] low / prior support zone), $0.0000154 (current price / candle [1] low), $0.0000433 (all-time high, candle [7])

Medium term

bearish

1–7 days

Without a sustained catalyst, renewed liquidity injection, or viral social momentum, the token is likely to continue declining toward its pre-pump baseline near $0.0000016. The holder base is brand new (99% acquired in last 24h) and largely untested. Most snipers are at a loss, reducing the probability of coordinated re-pumping.

Catalysts

Viral social media campaign on Telegram or Twitter driving new buyer inflow
Whale accumulation at current depressed prices
Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all micro-caps
New exchange listing or influencer promotion

Bullish factors

Explosive 24h holder growth from 5 to 802 (+99%) signals viral early adoption
One sniper achieved +2,360.9% realized PnL, showing the token can produce outsized returns
24h buy volume of $687.97K shows genuine market interest
2,076 unique buyers in 24h indicates broad retail participation
+643% 24h price gain despite the crash demonstrates extreme upside volatility potential

Bearish factors

Price crashed ~89% from intraday high within hours of launch
Zero reported on-chain liquidity — extreme slippage and exit risk
50.8% sell pressure with more sellers (3,763) than buyers (3,249) in 24h
14 of 17 snipers are at a loss or flat, with most showing -60% to -96% realized PnL
Token was dormant for 30 days with only 5 holders before sudden activation — suspicious pre-launch behavior
Update authority unknown; mint/freeze authority status unconfirmed
FDV of only $15,106 — any meaningful sell order can collapse price

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) zero reported on-chain liquidity making price discovery unreliable, (2) OHLC data showing anomalous candles where Low > Open/Close (likely data inversion artifacts), (3) the token is less than 24 hours old with no established price history, and (4) meme coin price action is inherently unpredictable and driven by social sentiment rather than fundamentals.

Deep Analysis

The 7 available hourly OHLC candles reveal an extreme pump-and-dump pattern. Candle [7] (13:00 UTC) shows the launch spike: O=$0.0000376, H=$0.0000433, L=$0.0000018, C=$0.0000019 — a massive bearish engulfing/shooting star with a wick from $0.0000433 down to $0.0000018, on the highest volume of the series ($8,609). Candles [6]–[4] (14:00–16:00 UTC) show price stabilizing in the $0.0000016–$0.0000019 range on minimal volume ($0.02–$105). Candles [3]–[1] (17:00–19:00 UTC) show open=high=close=$0.0000016 with lows anomalously reported below open (likely data artifact or inverted field), on very low to moderate volume. NOTE: The OHLC data appears to have Low and High fields potentially inverted in candles [1] and [2], where 'L' values ($0.0000154, $0.0000093) are higher than 'O' and 'C' values ($0.0000016). This is treated as a data quality issue; true lows are likely near $0.0000016.

Trend

Short-term

downtrend

Medium-term

downtrend

Momentum

Status

oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing

Buy 49%Sell 51%

The token is in a sharp short-term downtrend following the initial pump. Price has fallen from the $0.0000433 all-time high to ~$0.0000016 in the most recent candles, representing a ~96% decline from peak. The medium-term trend is also bearish given the token's age and lack of liquidity support.

Key Price Levels

Support

Immediate$0.0000016 (recent candle floor, hours 15–19 UTC)

Major$0.0000010 (near-zero psychological floor)

Resistance

Immediate$0.0000154 (candle [1] anomalous low / current price zone)

Major$0.0000433 (all-time high, candle [7] high)

The key support is the post-pump floor at ~$0.0000016 where price has consolidated for several hours. Major resistance is the all-time high at $0.0000433. The current reported price of $0.0000151 sits between these levels, possibly reflecting a partial recovery bounce or stale data.

Notable patterns

Shooting star / bearish engulfing on candle [7]: massive upper wick from $0.0000433 to close at $0.0000019 — classic pump-and-dump signature
Volume climax on candle [7] followed by near-zero volume — exhaustion pattern
Flat price consolidation at $0.0000016 across candles [3]–[5] — dead cat floor or accumulation base
Possible data artifact: Low > Open/Close in candles [1] and [2], suggesting OHLC field inversion in source data

Total holders802

24h Δ+797

7d Δ+797

30d Δ+797

Accelerating Growth

Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth is perfectly correlated with the price spike event. The token had exactly 5 holders for the entire 30-day historical period (April 7 – May 6, 2026), then exploded to 802 holders within 24 hours on May 7, 2026 — coinciding precisely with the price pump. This is a classic viral meme coin launch pattern where a dormant token is suddenly activated.

Holder growth is technically 'accelerating' in the sense that 797 of 802 total holders (99.4%) were acquired in a single 24-hour window. However, this is not organic growth — it is a single-event burst driven by the pump. The token was dormant with 5 holders for at least 30 days prior. The 1h growth of +781 holders (+97%) indicates the bulk of new holders arrived during or immediately after the price spike. Distribution shows 198 whales, 261 sharks, 333 dolphins, 53 fish, and 21 octopus — a surprisingly whale-heavy distribution for a brand-new token, suggesting many buyers acquired significant positions during the pump.

Top 10 hold29.97%

Top 100 hold60.29%

Sentiment

Mixed

Notable holders

CDiC87hAeN2cuG9MwNNUSghpueykAkFj6txfRycRfxAZ

DEX liquidity pool (PumpSwap pair address — matches the trading pair address listed in price data)

14.28%

52f5WHAnjui813D8F5F5eWftsJK5nByRg2Pxm8AgTUth

Individual whale

2.69%

HcHwbUSqfJbohJUwtF8Mi2SQaEL5khasdv5vUpE36Zxm

Individual whale

2.03%

B5BTGQxu498PjvSHKhMnzvDTAVA3tm98TFrcwJN7W7KS

Individual whale

1.91%

5WqM15TkwTkJPXFfWtbmrRoazrMkYPE7MjQfAE1N4sHD

Individual whale

1.80%

The top 10 holders control 29.97% of supply and the top 100 control 60.29%. The largest single holder (14.28%, address CDiC87hAeN2cuG9MwNNUSghpueykAkFj6txfRycRfxAZ) is the PumpSwap liquidity pool — this is expected and not a red flag in isolation. Excluding the LP, the next 9 holders each control 1.28%–2.69%, suggesting relatively distributed individual whale positions. However, with zero reported liquidity and 60.29% concentrated in the top 100, any coordinated selling by top holders could be catastrophic. Sentiment is mixed: the LP holder is neutral, while individual whales acquired during the pump and their intentions are unknown.

Liquidity$0.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

high

Volume (24h)

Buy$687,970

Sell$710,850

Net flow

outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers2,076

Unique sellers1,741

Despite $1.4M+ in combined 24h trading volume, on-chain liquidity is reported at $0.00. This is a critical red flag — it suggests liquidity may have been removed, migrated, or the data reflects a post-migration state on PumpSwap. The pair CDiC87hAeN2cuG9MwNNUSghpueykAkFj6txfRycRfxAZ on PumpSwap is the trading venue, but with zero depth, any trade will face extreme slippage. Net flow is slightly negative (sell volume $710.85K > buy volume $687.97K), confirming mild distribution pressure. There are more unique buyers (2,076) than sellers (1,741), but sellers transacted more total volume, indicating larger average sell sizes. The 5-minute price change of -89.3% confirms catastrophic liquidity conditions in real-time.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,818,066.75

FDV$15,106.06

Authorities

Mint authority

Active

Freeze authority

Active

Total supply is ~999.8M tokens with an FDV of only $15,106 — an extremely low market cap. The token was created via PumpFun (indicated by the 'pump' suffix in the mint address), which typically auto-renounces mint and freeze authorities upon bonding curve graduation. However, the metadata lists update authority as 'unknown' and the contract is unverified. Mutable is set to 'false', which is a positive signal suggesting metadata cannot be changed. Since the exact mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the provided data, both are marked 'unknown'. The PumpFun launch mechanism provides some structural protection, but without explicit confirmation of authority renouncement, rug risk from authorities remains unknown. No description, no verified contract, and social links limited to Telegram and Moralis.

Volatility

high

Price moved +643% in 24h but crashed -89% from intraday peak within hours. The 5-minute price change of -89.3% demonstrates extreme intraday volatility. This is one of the most volatile risk profiles possible.

Liquidity

high

On-chain liquidity is reported at $0.00 despite $1.4M+ in 24h volume. Any attempt to exit a meaningful position will face catastrophic slippage. The PumpSwap pair may have had liquidity removed or migrated.

Concentration

medium

Top 10 holders control 29.97% of supply; top 100 control 60.29%. The largest holder (14.28%) is the LP pool. Excluding LP, individual whale concentration is moderate but could still cause significant price impact if coordinated selling occurs.

SniperDump

medium

17 snipers identified. Most (10/14 with known PnL) are at a loss ranging from -7.8% to -95.8%, reducing their incentive to dump further. However, 4 snipers with 0% realized PnL and unknown balances may still hold positions. One sniper already extracted $1,399 at +2,360.9% PnL.

Authority

medium

Update authority is listed as 'unknown'. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. Mutable=false is a positive signal. PumpFun tokens typically renounce authorities at graduation, but this cannot be verified from available data.

Key risks

Zero reported on-chain liquidity — impossible to exit positions without extreme slippage
Token was dormant for 30+ days with 5 holders before sudden activation — possible pre-planned pump
Unverified contract with unknown authority status
Price already crashed 89% from all-time high — late buyers are deeply underwater
FDV of $15,106 means even small sell orders can collapse price
No project description, whitepaper, or verifiable team information
50.8% sell pressure with net outflow in 24h trading

Mitigating factors

Mutable=false prevents metadata manipulation
PumpFun launch mechanism provides some structural safeguards
Broad retail participation (2,076 unique buyers) suggests genuine interest beyond insiders
Most snipers are at a loss, reducing coordinated dump risk from early buyers
Top holder is the LP pool (14.28%), not a team/insider wallet

Suitable for: Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Absolutely not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep experience in micro-cap meme coin trading. Position sizing should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket). This is not an investment — it is speculation.

pepemask is a brand-new PumpFun meme token that experienced a classic pump-and-dump pattern within its first 24 hours. The token went from 5 dormant holders to 802 active holders, spiked to $0.0000433, then crashed 96% to ~$0.0000016. The current reported price of $0.0000151 may represent a partial recovery or stale data. With zero liquidity, an unverified contract, and a $15K FDV, this is pure speculation. The only viable thesis is a second viral wave driven by social momentum — which is possible but highly unlikely without a coordinated campaign.

Bull case (low)

A second viral wave on Telegram/Twitter drives renewed buying interest, liquidity is re-injected into the PumpSwap pool, and the token re-tests or exceeds its all-time high of $0.0000433. With 802 existing holders as a base and the PumpFun ecosystem's viral mechanics, a 10x–100x from current depressed levels is theoretically possible.

Viral social media campaign driving new retail FOMO
Influencer promotion on Telegram or Twitter/X
Broader Solana meme coin market rally
Whale accumulation at current depressed prices creating a new floor
Re-injection of liquidity into PumpSwap pool

Base case

The token stabilizes at a very low price (~$0.0000016–$0.0000050) with minimal trading activity. A small community forms around the Telegram channel, generating occasional volume spikes but no sustained trend. The token survives but never recaptures its all-time high, slowly losing holders over weeks.

Some residual community activity on Telegram maintains minimal awareness
No major liquidity injection but also no complete abandonment
Price finds a floor near the post-pump consolidation zone of ~$0.0000016
Occasional micro-pumps driven by small buy orders in the zero-liquidity environment

Bear case (high)

Liquidity remains at zero, remaining holders gradually sell or abandon positions, and the token fades into obscurity. Price drifts toward $0.0000001 or lower. The token joins the vast majority of PumpFun launches that fail to sustain momentum beyond the initial pump.

Zero on-chain liquidity prevents meaningful price recovery
No project fundamentals, description, or team to sustain long-term interest
Most snipers and early buyers are at a loss with no incentive to hold
Token was dormant 30+ days before pump — suggests manufactured rather than organic launch
Declining volume trend post-pump confirms fading interest

GeneratedMay 7, 07:17 PM

Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-05-07T19:00:00Z. The token is less than 24 hours old. OHLC data covers the last 7 hours only. Historical holder data covers 30 days but shows no activity until the last 24 hours.

Model confidence

low

Data sources

On-chain Solana token metadata (mint: BvfCqsEMSfzoHfTzbFtHakYGemZqyUEsPEiKDKmVpump)
PumpSwap DEX trading pair data (CDiC87hAeN2cuG9MwNNUSghpueykAkFj6txfRycRfxAZ)
Hourly OHLC candle data (7 candles, USD-denominated)
24h trading analytics (volume, buyers, sellers, wallet counts)
Holder metrics and distribution data (802 total holders)
30-day historical holder series (daily snapshots)
Sniper analysis (17 snipers, first 1,000 blocks)
Top 20 holder wallet addresses and balances
Moralis token metadata API

Limitations

Zero reported on-chain liquidity makes price discovery unreliable and FDV calculations meaningless
OHLC candles [1] and [2] appear to have inverted Low/High fields (Low > Open/Close), suggesting a data quality issue
Sniper USD amounts sniped are all 'unknown', preventing precise sniper concentration calculation
Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are all unknown — cannot confirm rug risk from authorities
Token is less than 24 hours old — all metrics are based on a single event window with no historical baseline
The 24h price change of +643% and 6h/24h changes of 0% are contradictory, suggesting data inconsistency in the price feed
No social sentiment data, team information, or project documentation available for qualitative analysis

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Investing in micro-cap meme tokens carries extreme risk of total loss. The analyst and platform bear no responsibility for investment decisions made based on this report. Always conduct your own due diligence and never invest more than you can afford to lose completely.

Token Info

ChainSolana

Contract

Total Supply999,818,066.75

Key Risks

•Zero reported on-chain liquidity — impossible to exit positions without extreme slippage

•Token was dormant for 30+ days with 5 holders before sudden activation — possible pre-planned pump

•Unverified contract with unknown authority status

•Price already crashed 89% from all-time high — late buyers are deeply underwater

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

medium confidence

Low risk

Of 17 identified snipers, 1 achieved exceptional returns (+2,360.9% realized PnL, $1,399 sold), while 10 snipers show negative realized PnL ranging from -7.8% to -95.8%. 4 snipers show 0% realized PnL (either held or no sells recorded). The sell-through rate is low — most snipers either sold at a loss or are still holding underwater positions. The one profitable sniper (AgmLJBMDCqWynYnQiPCuj9ewsNNsBJXyzoUhD9LJzN51) likely sold near the peak, extracting value from later buyers. Exact sniped amounts in USD are unknown, limiting precise concentration calculations; estimated sniper supply concentration is ~1.7% based on available balance data relative to total supply.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration1.70%

PnL stateMostly At Loss

Sell-through rateLow

Profit-taking risk

low

17 snipers identified in first 1,000 blocks. Exact balances unknown for most. One sniper (AgmLJBMDCqWynYnQiPCuj9ewsNNsBJXyzoUhD9LJzN51) sold $1,399 at +2,360.9% realized PnL — the dominant smart money winner. Remaining snipers hold minimal balances ($0–$43) with most showing large realized losses.

Predominantly negative — 10 of 14 snipers with known PnL are at a loss, with losses ranging from -7.8% to -95.8%. Only 1 sniper is significantly profitable. This suggests the pump was brief and most early buyers were unable to exit profitably.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for pepemask (pepemask)?

Is pepemask a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Absolutely not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep experience in micro-cap meme coin trading. Position sizing should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket). This is not an investment — it is speculation.

How are pepemask holders trending?

pepemask currently has 802 holders and is growing (24h: 797, 7d: 797, 30d: 797). Holder growth is technically 'accelerating' in the sense that 797 of 802 total holders (99.4%) were acquired in a single 24-hour window. However, this is not organic growth — it is a single-event burst driven by the pump. The token was dormant with 5 holders for at least 30 days prior. The 1h growth of +781 holders (+97%) indicates the bulk of new holders arrived during or immediately after the price spike. Distribution shows 198 whales, 261 sharks, 333 dolphins, 53 fish, and 21 octopus — a surprisingly whale-heavy distribution for a brand-new token, suggesting many buyers acquired significant positions during the pump.

What does sniper activity look like for pepemask?

Snipers hold roughly 1.70% of supply with PnL state "mostly_at_loss" and sell-through rate "low". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding pepemask?

Zero reported on-chain liquidity — impossible to exit positions without extreme slippage • Token was dormant for 30+ days with 5 holders before sudden activation — possible pre-planned pump • Unverified contract with unknown authority status

← Back to all predictions

Track pepemask — price alerts, watchlist sync, ask the AI

pepemask Price Prediction 2026

More tokens on Solana

Ask Unhosted AI about pepemask

AI Executive Summary

Price Prediction

Short term

Medium term

Catalysts

Bullish factors

Bearish factors

Deep Analysis

Technical Analysis (OHLC)

Trend

Momentum

Volume

Key Price Levels

Notable patterns

Holder Trendsgrowing

Correlation with price

Whale MapConcentrated

Notable holders

Liquidity & Market Health

Volume (24h)

Traders (24h)

Tokenomics & AuthoritiesAuthority risk: Unknown

Supply & Valuation

Authorities

Risk AssessmentVery HighScore: 9.2/100

Key risks

Mitigating factors

Investment Thesis

Bull case (low)

Base case

Bear case (high)

Methodology

Data sources

Limitations

Token Info

Key Risks

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

Sniper details

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for pepemask (pepemask)?

Is pepemask a safe investment on Solana?

How are pepemask holders trending?

What does sniper activity look like for pepemask?

What are the key risks of holding pepemask?