fast internet money Price Today & AI Analysis

FIMSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 21, 2026

$0.0₅3161

Contract

Live

BFt16XkqxTfuJEwTYftTLtHgXFsQHnYPevgArKDiXRvn

Chain

Solana

Holders

108

Market cap

$2,935

At a $1M market cap, $FIM would be $0.001077 (341x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is FIM a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 18

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

3.4%1 bundler still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about FIM

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

Oniichanお兄ちゃん$0.0₅2420-0.1%MC $2.3K

ETFElon Terminated Fund$0.0₅2332+0.0%MC $2.3K

NOUSNOUS$0.0₅2514+0.0%MC $2.5K

CHILLDOGJust a Chill Dog$0.0₅4416+0.5%MC $4.3K

wrdogWorld Record Dog$0.0₅3274+0.0%MC $3.3K

CARDSCollector Crypt$0.3378+22.8%MC $304.89M

fast internet money: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-21 20:17 UTC

Holder addresses

395

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$26,123.15

How concentrated is fast internet money ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 395 addresses (2026-07-21 20:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling fast internet money?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is fast internet money liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-21 20:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $26,123.15. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-21 20:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 21, 08:17 PM UTC

FDV

Liquidity

$26,123.15

Holders

395

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

FIM (fast internet money) is an extremely early-stage Solana meme token on PumpSwap with a total supply of 1 (likely a 0-decimal token representing a single indivisible unit), a fully diluted valuation of ~$15.62K, and only $26.12K in total liquidity. The token launched with virtually no holders for at least 30 days (7 holders flat), then exploded to 395 holders within the last 24 hours — a 98% surge. This rapid, sudden activity combined with overwhelming sell pressure (75.7%), a -41.9% 24h price drop, unverified contract, mutable metadata, and unknown update authority raises significant red flags. The token is extremely high risk and suitable only for highly speculative participants who can afford total loss.

Key points

Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals — an unusual tokenomic structure that may indicate a novelty/meme construct or a data anomaly
Holder count was frozen at exactly 7 for 30+ days before exploding +388 holders in a single day — highly anomalous launch pattern
Sell pressure dominates at 75.7% of 24h volume ($128.90K sells vs $41.44K buys)
Price dropped -41.9% in 24h despite a brief 27% 5-minute spike, suggesting pump-and-dump dynamics
Metadata is mutable with unknown update authority — elevated rug risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token is in a sharp downtrend after a violent pump-and-dump pattern. The most recent hourly candle (Candle 1) opened at $0.0000726, hit a high of $0.0000913, and collapsed to close at $0.0000168 — a massive bearish engulfing/shooting star pattern. Sell pressure at 75.7% and 3,382 sell transactions vs 1,303 buys confirm continued distribution. The brief 5m/1h uptick (+27%/+22%) may be a dead-cat bounce.

Target low

$0.000009

Target high

$0.000035

Support: $0.0000118 (Candle 1 low), $0.0000097 (Candle 2 low)
Resistance: $0.0000727 (Candle 1 open / Candle 2 close), $0.0000913 (Candle 1 all-time high in data)

Medium term · 1–7 days

bearish

Without a verified contract, meaningful liquidity depth, or organic holder growth prior to the last 24 hours, the medium-term outlook is bearish. The token has no demonstrated utility, no description, and mutable metadata. If early holders (who held through 30 days of stagnation) continue distributing, price could approach zero.

Catalysts

Continued sell-off by early holders who accumulated during the 30-day dormant period
Any positive social media catalyst could trigger a short-lived pump given the meme nature
Liquidity withdrawal by pool providers would be catastrophic given only $26.12K TVL

Bullish factors

5-minute price up +27.2% and 1-hour up +22.1% suggest short-term buying interest
Rapid holder growth from 7 to 395 in 24h shows viral attention
Meme tokens can experience multiple pump cycles regardless of fundamentals

Bearish factors

Price down -41.9% in 24h with 75.7% sell pressure
Only $26.12K liquidity — extremely shallow, large slippage risk
Token was dormant for 30+ days with only 7 holders before sudden activity
Unverified contract, mutable metadata, unknown update authority
FDV of only $15.62K — minimal market cap with high manipulation risk
3,382 sell transactions vs 1,303 buy transactions in 24h

Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, providing minimal technical data. The token's total supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates unusual price mechanics. Holder and volume data are very recent (sub-24h), making trend extrapolation unreliable. Confidence is low.

FIM call history

Full track record →

Jul 21bearish@ $0.0000168

24h-80.6%

7d-86.5%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: BFt16X...XRvn
Total Supply: 1 (0 decimals)

Key Risks

Unknown update authority with mutable metadata — rug pull vector
Critically shallow liquidity ($26.12K) relative to trading volume ($170K+ in 24h)
7 original holders distributing into 388 new retail buyers — classic dump pattern
No verified contract, no project description, no whitepaper

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle 2 (19:00 UTC): O=$0.0000284, H=$0.0000741, L=$0.00000974, C=$0.0000727 — a strong bullish candle with a long lower wick, suggesting a sweep of lows followed by aggressive buying. Candle 1 (20:00 UTC): O=$0.0000726, H=$0.0000913, L=$0.0000119, C=$0.0000168 — a classic shooting star / bearish engulfing pattern. Price opened near the prior close, spiked to a new high of $0.0000913, then collapsed to close near the session low at $0.0000168. This is a textbook pump-and-dump candle. Volume dropped from 86,644 (Candle 2) to 38,556 (Candle 1), confirming declining buying interest on the dump.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

The two-candle sequence shows a sharp reversal from bullish momentum to a bearish shooting star collapse. The current price of $0.0000168 is near the Candle 1 low, confirming a short-term downtrend. No medium-term data exists beyond these 2 candles, but the 30-day dormancy followed by a single-day spike-and-crash is consistent with a downtrend continuation.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

24%

Sell

76%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000119 (Candle 1 low)

Major support

$0.00000974 (Candle 2 low — deepest wick in available data)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000727 (Candle 1 open / Candle 2 close)

Major resistance

$0.0000913 (Candle 1 high — session peak)

The $0.0000119–$0.00000974 zone represents the only tested support in available data. A break below $0.00000974 would leave no technical floor in the dataset. Resistance at $0.0000727 aligns with the prior candle's close and the current candle's open — a key level that must be reclaimed for any bullish reversal.

Notable patterns

Shooting star / bearish engulfing on Candle 1 — classic pump-and-dump reversal signal
Long lower wick on Candle 2 suggesting initial capitulation and sweep of lows before the pump
Volume declining on the down-close candle — sellers dominating but volume fading
Price currently near session lows with no established base

Liquidity

$26,123.15

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $26.12K on a single PumpSwap pool (81xu4n48dj6UiiDe6gyxzquYdZYNeL3xwRcMgcioiaj9). The 24h sell volume of $128.90K is nearly 5x the total liquidity pool — meaning the pool has been turned over multiple times, indicating extreme price impact and slippage. Net flow is strongly negative (outflow): sell volume is 3.1x buy volume, with 1,340 unique sellers vs 506 unique buyers. The FDV of $15.62K is actually lower than the total liquidity ($26.12K), which is unusual and may reflect price discovery issues or data inconsistencies with the 0-decimal supply. Overall market health is very poor — shallow liquidity, dominant sell pressure, and a single pool create extreme vulnerability to price manipulation and liquidity withdrawal.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1 (0 decimals)

FDV

$15,620

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price swung from $0.00000974 to $0.0000913 and back to $0.0000168 within 2 hours — a ~838% intra-session range. 24h change is -41.9%. Extreme volatility.
Liquidityhigh
Only $26.12K in total liquidity on a single PumpSwap pool. Sell volume of $128.90K in 24h is nearly 5x the pool size. Any meaningful exit will cause severe slippage or pool drainage.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Unknown update authority with mutable metadata — rug pull vector
Critically shallow liquidity ($26.12K) relative to trading volume ($170K+ in 24h)
7 original holders distributing into 388 new retail buyers — classic dump pattern
No verified contract, no project description, no whitepaper
Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals — anomalous structure that may indicate data issues or manipulation
Single liquidity pool on PumpSwap — no diversified market depth
Price already down -41.9% in 24h with 75.7% sell pressure continuing

Mitigating factors

Token is listed as 'possible spam: false' by the data provider
Social links (Twitter, Moralis) exist, suggesting some minimal public presence
Brief 5m/1h price recovery (+27%/+22%) suggests some residual buying interest
395 holders in 24h shows viral attention that could sustain short-term trading activity

Suitable for

Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who treat this as a lottery ticket and can afford 100% total loss. Not suitable for any investor seeking capital preservation, income, or medium/long-term growth. Position sizing should be minimal (well under 1% of any portfolio).

FIM is a high-risk meme token on Solana's PumpSwap with an anomalous tokenomic structure (supply of 1, 0 decimals), 30 days of dormancy followed by a single-day viral spike, and overwhelming sell pressure. The token exhibits multiple characteristics of a pump-and-dump: early insider accumulation, sudden retail influx, price spike followed by sharp collapse, and shallow liquidity. Any investment thesis is purely speculative.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral meme momentum drives a second pump cycle. The token's unusual supply structure and 'fast internet money' branding attract speculative attention on social media, driving a new wave of buyers that temporarily overwhelms sellers.

Continued viral social media attention on Twitter/Solana meme communities
Short-term oversold bounce from current price levels near session lows
Meme token market conditions favoring speculative micro-cap plays

Base Case

The token experiences continued volatility with intermittent pump-and-dump cycles driven by social media attention, gradually losing value as early holders exit. Price stabilizes at a fraction of the current level with declining volume and holder attrition.

Some residual meme interest sustains sporadic trading activity
No immediate rug pull but continued slow distribution by early holders
Liquidity remains thin, causing high volatility on low volume
No new fundamental catalysts emerge

Bear Case

High probability

Early holders (the original 7) continue distributing into retail buyers, liquidity is withdrawn from the PumpSwap pool, and the token price approaches zero. The mutable metadata could be exploited for a rug pull.

7 original holders with 30 days of accumulation distributing into 388 new retail buyers
Liquidity pool withdrawal risk given only $26.12K TVL
Unknown update authority could alter metadata or execute rug
Continued 75.7% sell pressure with no fundamental catalyst for reversal

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 21, 08:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-21 20:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Solana on-chain metadata (Mint: BFt16XkqxTfuJEwTYftTLtHgXFsQHnYPevgArKDiXRvn)
PumpSwap pool data (81xu4n48dj6UiiDe6gyxzquYdZYNeL3xwRcMgcioiaj9)
Trading analytics (24h volume, buyer/seller counts, price changes)
OHLC candle data (2 hourly candles, July 21 2026)
Historical holder data (30-day daily series)
Holder metrics and distribution data

Limitations

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
No sniper/smart money data available
Top holder data unavailable — whale map cannot be properly constructed
Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates anomalous metrics that may not reflect true token economics
Update authority is unknown — authority risk cannot be fully assessed
Token is less than 24 hours into active trading — all metrics are extremely preliminary
Supply concentration reported as 0% for top10/top100 — likely a data artifact
No project description, whitepaper, or verifiable team information available

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed was provided by third-party sources and may contain inaccuracies. Always conduct your own research before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is fast internet money (FIM) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 18, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell fast internet money (FIM)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 18, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is fast internet money ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 395 addresses (2026-07-21 20:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling fast internet money?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is fast internet money liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-21 20:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $26,123.15. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for fast internet money (FIM)?

Is FIM a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who treat this as a lottery ticket and can afford 100% total loss. Not suitable for any investor seeking capital preservation, income, or medium/long-term growth. Position sizing should be minimal (well under 1% of any portfolio).

What are the key risks of holding FIM?

Unknown update authority with mutable metadata — rug pull vector • Critically shallow liquidity ($26.12K) relative to trading volume ($170K+ in 24h) • 7 original holders distributing into 388 new retail buyers — classic dump pattern