FIM

fast internet money Price Today & AI Analysis

FIM
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 21, 2026

BFt16XkqxTfuJEwTYftTLtHgXFsQHnYPevgArKDiXRvn

$0.052881

FDV $2,675

LiveContract:BFt16XkqxTfuJEwTYftTLtHgXFsQHnYPevgArKDiXRvnChain:SolanaHolders:117Market cap:$2,675

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about FIM

Report snapshotas of Jul 21, 08:17 PM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$26,123

Holders

395

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

FIM (fast internet money) is an extremely early-stage Solana meme token on PumpSwap with a total supply of 1 (likely a 0-decimal token representing a single indivisible unit), a fully diluted valuation of ~$15.62K, and only $26.12K in total liquidity. The token launched with virtually no holders for at least 30 days (7 holders flat), then exploded to 395 holders within the last 24 hours — a 98% surge. This rapid, sudden activity combined with overwhelming sell pressure (75.7%), a -41.9% 24h price drop, unverified contract, mutable metadata, and unknown update authority raises significant red flags. The token is extremely high risk and suitable only for highly speculative participants who can afford total loss.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals — an unusual tokenomic structure that may indicate a novelty/meme construct or a data anomaly
Holder count was frozen at exactly 7 for 30+ days before exploding +388 holders in a single day — highly anomalous launch pattern
Sell pressure dominates at 75.7% of 24h volume ($128.90K sells vs $41.44K buys)
Price dropped -41.9% in 24h despite a brief 27% 5-minute spike, suggesting pump-and-dump dynamics
Metadata is mutable with unknown update authority — elevated rug risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token is in a sharp downtrend after a violent pump-and-dump pattern. The most recent hourly candle (Candle 1) opened at $0.0000726, hit a high of $0.0000913, and collapsed to close at $0.0000168 — a massive bearish engulfing/shooting star pattern. Sell pressure at 75.7% and 3,382 sell transactions vs 1,303 buys confirm continued distribution. The brief 5m/1h uptick (+27%/+22%) may be a dead-cat bounce.

Target low$0.000009
Target high$0.000035
Support: $0.0000118 (Candle 1 low), $0.0000097 (Candle 2 low)
Resistance: $0.0000727 (Candle 1 open / Candle 2 close), $0.0000913 (Candle 1 all-time high in data)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

Without a verified contract, meaningful liquidity depth, or organic holder growth prior to the last 24 hours, the medium-term outlook is bearish. The token has no demonstrated utility, no description, and mutable metadata. If early holders (who held through 30 days of stagnation) continue distributing, price could approach zero.

Catalysts
  • Continued sell-off by early holders who accumulated during the 30-day dormant period
  • Any positive social media catalyst could trigger a short-lived pump given the meme nature
  • Liquidity withdrawal by pool providers would be catastrophic given only $26.12K TVL

Bullish factors

  • 5-minute price up +27.2% and 1-hour up +22.1% suggest short-term buying interest
  • Rapid holder growth from 7 to 395 in 24h shows viral attention
  • Meme tokens can experience multiple pump cycles regardless of fundamentals

Bearish factors

  • Price down -41.9% in 24h with 75.7% sell pressure
  • Only $26.12K liquidity — extremely shallow, large slippage risk
  • Token was dormant for 30+ days with only 7 holders before sudden activity
  • Unverified contract, mutable metadata, unknown update authority
  • FDV of only $15.62K — minimal market cap with high manipulation risk
  • 3,382 sell transactions vs 1,303 buy transactions in 24h
Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, providing minimal technical data. The token's total supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates unusual price mechanics. Holder and volume data are very recent (sub-24h), making trend extrapolation unreliable. Confidence is low.

FIM call history

Full track record →
Jul 21bearish
24h-80.6%
7d-86.5%
30d

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle 2 (19:00 UTC): O=$0.0000284, H=$0.0000741, L=$0.00000974, C=$0.0000727 — a strong bullish candle with a long lower wick, suggesting a sweep of lows followed by aggressive buying. Candle 1 (20:00 UTC): O=$0.0000726, H=$0.0000913, L=$0.0000119, C=$0.0000168 — a classic shooting star / bearish engulfing pattern. Price opened near the prior close, spiked to a new high of $0.0000913, then collapsed to close near the session low at $0.0000168. This is a textbook pump-and-dump candle. Volume dropped from 86,644 (Candle 2) to 38,556 (Candle 1), confirming declining buying interest on the dump.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 24%Sell 76%

The two-candle sequence shows a sharp reversal from bullish momentum to a bearish shooting star collapse. The current price of $0.0000168 is near the Candle 1 low, confirming a short-term downtrend. No medium-term data exists beyond these 2 candles, but the 30-day dormancy followed by a single-day spike-and-crash is consistent with a downtrend continuation.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000119 (Candle 1 low)
Major$0.00000974 (Candle 2 low — deepest wick in available data)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0000727 (Candle 1 open / Candle 2 close)
Major$0.0000913 (Candle 1 high — session peak)

The $0.0000119–$0.00000974 zone represents the only tested support in available data. A break below $0.00000974 would leave no technical floor in the dataset. Resistance at $0.0000727 aligns with the prior candle's close and the current candle's open — a key level that must be reclaimed for any bullish reversal.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish engulfing on Candle 1 — classic pump-and-dump reversal signal
  • Long lower wick on Candle 2 suggesting initial capitulation and sweep of lows before the pump
  • Volume declining on the down-close candle — sellers dominating but volume fading
  • Price currently near session lows with no established base

Total holders395
24h Δ+388
7d Δ+388
30d Δ+388
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth is inversely correlated with price in this case — the 98% surge in holders over 24h coincided with a -41.9% price drop, indicating new buyers are entering into a declining market while early holders distribute. This is a bearish divergence.

The historical holder data shows a completely flat 7-holder count from at least June 21 through July 20, 2026 — 30 consecutive days of zero net change. Then, in a single day (July 21), holders exploded from 7 to 395 (+388, +98%). This is an extremely anomalous pattern consistent with a coordinated launch event or viral social media moment. The 391 holders who acquired via swap vs 4 via transfer confirms this is driven by trading activity, not organic distribution. The sudden spike with no prior organic growth is a significant red flag — it suggests the token was dormant/pre-loaded and then activated for a pump event.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

No top holder data available

Data unavailable — top holders endpoint returned no results

0.00%

Top holder data is unavailable for this token. The supply concentration metrics report top10=0% and top100=0%, which is anomalous and likely a data artifact given the token's total supply of 1 with 0 decimals. With only 395 total holders and a total supply of 1 indivisible unit, the token's ownership structure is fundamentally unusual — it is mathematically impossible for 395 wallets to each hold a meaningful fraction of a supply of 1 with 0 decimals. This suggests either the supply data is misleading, the token uses a non-standard structure, or the holder count reflects associated accounts rather than direct token holders. Distribution health is flagged as very_concentrated given the 30-day dormancy with only 7 holders and the absence of verifiable distribution data.

Liquidity$26,120
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$41,440
Sell$128,900
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers506
Unique sellers1,340

Liquidity is critically shallow at $26.12K on a single PumpSwap pool (81xu4n48dj6UiiDe6gyxzquYdZYNeL3xwRcMgcioiaj9). The 24h sell volume of $128.90K is nearly 5x the total liquidity pool — meaning the pool has been turned over multiple times, indicating extreme price impact and slippage. Net flow is strongly negative (outflow): sell volume is 3.1x buy volume, with 1,340 unique sellers vs 506 unique buyers. The FDV of $15.62K is actually lower than the total liquidity ($26.12K), which is unusual and may reflect price discovery issues or data inconsistencies with the 0-decimal supply. Overall market health is very poor — shallow liquidity, dominant sell pressure, and a single pool create extreme vulnerability to price manipulation and liquidity withdrawal.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (0 decimals)
FDV$15,620

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

FIM has a total supply of 1 with 0 decimals — an extremely unusual tokenomic structure. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the metadata is marked as mutable, meaning the token's metadata can be changed by whoever holds the update authority. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data. The combination of unknown authority, mutable metadata, unverified contract, and no description creates a high rug risk profile. The FDV of $15.62K is extremely low, making this token trivially easy to manipulate. No social links beyond Twitter and Moralis are listed, and there is no project description, whitepaper, or verifiable team information.

Volatility
high

Price swung from $0.00000974 to $0.0000913 and back to $0.0000168 within 2 hours — a ~838% intra-session range. 24h change is -41.9%. Extreme volatility.

Liquidity
high

Only $26.12K in total liquidity on a single PumpSwap pool. Sell volume of $128.90K in 24h is nearly 5x the pool size. Any meaningful exit will cause severe slippage or pool drainage.

Concentration
high

Token was held by only 7 wallets for 30+ days. Top holder data is unavailable. The 7 original holders are likely highly concentrated and represent the primary distribution risk. Supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates fundamental concentration questions.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available. However, the 7 early holders who accumulated during 30 days of dormancy represent a de facto sniper/insider cohort. Their distribution into the 24h retail influx is the most likely explanation for the -41.9% price drop.

Authority
high

Update authority is unknown, metadata is mutable, contract is unverified. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. This creates maximum rug risk — the token's metadata and potentially supply could be altered without warning.

Key risks

  • Unknown update authority with mutable metadata — rug pull vector
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($26.12K) relative to trading volume ($170K+ in 24h)
  • 7 original holders distributing into 388 new retail buyers — classic dump pattern
  • No verified contract, no project description, no whitepaper
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals — anomalous structure that may indicate data issues or manipulation
  • Single liquidity pool on PumpSwap — no diversified market depth
  • Price already down -41.9% in 24h with 75.7% sell pressure continuing

Mitigating factors

  • Token is listed as 'possible spam: false' by the data provider
  • Social links (Twitter, Moralis) exist, suggesting some minimal public presence
  • Brief 5m/1h price recovery (+27%/+22%) suggests some residual buying interest
  • 395 holders in 24h shows viral attention that could sustain short-term trading activity
Suitable for: Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who treat this as a lottery ticket and can afford 100% total loss. Not suitable for any investor seeking capital preservation, income, or medium/long-term growth. Position sizing should be minimal (well under 1% of any portfolio).

FIM is a high-risk meme token on Solana's PumpSwap with an anomalous tokenomic structure (supply of 1, 0 decimals), 30 days of dormancy followed by a single-day viral spike, and overwhelming sell pressure. The token exhibits multiple characteristics of a pump-and-dump: early insider accumulation, sudden retail influx, price spike followed by sharp collapse, and shallow liquidity. Any investment thesis is purely speculative.

Bull case (low)

Viral meme momentum drives a second pump cycle. The token's unusual supply structure and 'fast internet money' branding attract speculative attention on social media, driving a new wave of buyers that temporarily overwhelms sellers.

  • Continued viral social media attention on Twitter/Solana meme communities
  • Short-term oversold bounce from current price levels near session lows
  • Meme token market conditions favoring speculative micro-cap plays

Base case

The token experiences continued volatility with intermittent pump-and-dump cycles driven by social media attention, gradually losing value as early holders exit. Price stabilizes at a fraction of the current level with declining volume and holder attrition.

  • Some residual meme interest sustains sporadic trading activity
  • No immediate rug pull but continued slow distribution by early holders
  • Liquidity remains thin, causing high volatility on low volume
  • No new fundamental catalysts emerge

Bear case (high)

Early holders (the original 7) continue distributing into retail buyers, liquidity is withdrawn from the PumpSwap pool, and the token price approaches zero. The mutable metadata could be exploited for a rug pull.

  • 7 original holders with 30 days of accumulation distributing into 388 new retail buyers
  • Liquidity pool withdrawal risk given only $26.12K TVL
  • Unknown update authority could alter metadata or execute rug
  • Continued 75.7% sell pressure with no fundamental catalyst for reversal

GeneratedJul 21, 08:17 PM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of analysis time. OHLC data covers the 2 most recent hourly candles (19:00–21:00 UTC July 21 2026). Historical holder data covers June 21 – July 20 2026 (30 days). Sniper data unavailable.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain metadata (Mint: BFt16XkqxTfuJEwTYftTLtHgXFsQHnYPevgArKDiXRvn)
  • PumpSwap pool data (81xu4n48dj6UiiDe6gyxzquYdZYNeL3xwRcMgcioiaj9)
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buyer/seller counts, price changes)
  • OHLC candle data (2 hourly candles, July 21 2026)
  • Historical holder data (30-day daily series)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • No sniper/smart money data available
  • Top holder data unavailable — whale map cannot be properly constructed
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates anomalous metrics that may not reflect true token economics
  • Update authority is unknown — authority risk cannot be fully assessed
  • Token is less than 24 hours into active trading — all metrics are extremely preliminary
  • Supply concentration reported as 0% for top10/top100 — likely a data artifact
  • No project description, whitepaper, or verifiable team information available

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed was provided by third-party sources and may contain inaccuracies. Always conduct your own research before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (0 decimals)

Key Risks

Unknown update authority with mutable metadata — rug pull vector
Critically shallow liquidity ($26.12K) relative to trading volume ($170K+ in 24h)
7 original holders distributing into 388 new retail buyers — classic dump pattern
No verified contract, no project description, no whitepaper

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for FIM. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. However, the broader trading data tells a concerning story: 1,340 unique sellers vs 506 unique buyers in 24h, with sell volume ($128.90K) more than 3x buy volume ($41.44K). The token was held by only 7 wallets for 30+ days before the sudden activity spike — those early holders are likely the primary distributors. The rapid holder growth from 7 to 395 in a single day, combined with the price collapse, strongly suggests early holders are dumping into new retail buyers.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available for this token.

Highly negative — the 7 early holders who held through 30 days of dormancy are almost certainly distributing into the sudden retail influx. The price collapse of -41.9% in 24h despite 395 new holders confirms early buyer distribution.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for fast internet money (FIM)?

The token is in a sharp downtrend after a violent pump-and-dump pattern. The most recent hourly candle (Candle 1) opened at $0.0000726, hit a high of $0.0000913, and collapsed to close at $0.0000168 — a massive bearish engulfing/shooting star pattern. Sell pressure at 75.7% and 3,382 sell transactions vs 1,303 buys confirm continued distribution. The brief 5m/1h uptick (+27%/+22%) may be a dead-cat bounce. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000009 to $0.000035.

Is FIM a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who treat this as a lottery ticket and can afford 100% total loss. Not suitable for any investor seeking capital preservation, income, or medium/long-term growth. Position sizing should be minimal (well under 1% of any portfolio).

How are FIM holders trending?

fast internet money currently has 395 holders and is growing (24h: 388, 7d: 388, 30d: 388). The historical holder data shows a completely flat 7-holder count from at least June 21 through July 20, 2026 — 30 consecutive days of zero net change. Then, in a single day (July 21), holders exploded from 7 to 395 (+388, +98%). This is an extremely anomalous pattern consistent with a coordinated launch event or viral social media moment. The 391 holders who acquired via swap vs 4 via transfer confirms this is driven by trading activity, not organic distribution. The sudden spike with no prior organic growth is a significant red flag — it suggests the token was dormant/pre-loaded and then activated for a pump event.

What does sniper activity look like for FIM?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding FIM?

Unknown update authority with mutable metadata — rug pull vector • Critically shallow liquidity ($26.12K) relative to trading volume ($170K+ in 24h) • 7 original holders distributing into 388 new retail buyers — classic dump pattern

Track FIM