Bountities

Bountities Price Today & AI Analysis

Bountities
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 4, 2026

B8MuXS59fohq9ZT3JLLpvk3HhgSqbFzH44Ya6SfBpump

$0.052344

FDV $2,343

LiveContract:B8MuXS59fohq9ZT3JLLpvk3HhgSqbFzH44Ya6SfBpumpChain:SolanaHolders:100Market cap:$2,343

More tokens on Solana

KEY

KEY

Key

$0.0527920.0%
MC $2.8K
AMC

AMC

AMC

$0.0423370.0%
MC $23.0K
ALONSEM

ALONSEM

alonsem

$0.0516210.0%
MC $1.6K
HexStarUFO

HexStarUFO

Hexagonal UFO

$0.0521610.0%
MC $2.2K
PAINTWHALE

PAINTWHALE

The Scribble Whale

$0.0522280.0%
MC $2.2K
fone

fone

apeonfone

$0.018211.4%
MC $18.05M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Bountities

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jun 4, 04:47 PM
FDV

$48,687

Liquidity

$16,678

Holders

520

Snipers

32

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Bountities (Bountities) is a PumpFun-launched Solana memecoin (mint: B8MuXS59fohq9ZT3JLLpvk3HhgSqbFzH44Ya6SfBpump) with a total supply of ~999.9M tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$48.7K–$61.6K. The token has experienced an explosive 24h price surge of ~362% (303% by some metrics), driven by a sudden spike in buyer activity. However, the token exhibits severe structural weaknesses: extremely thin liquidity ($16.68K), overwhelming sell pressure (83.4% of 24h volume), a highly concentrated holder base (top 10 hold 50.24%), and a dormant history of only 21 holders for nearly a month before a sudden activation event around May 31. The token has no verified contract, no social links, no description, and unknown update authority — all hallmarks of a high-risk speculative asset.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive 362% 24h price pump from a very low base (~$0.0000087 to ~$0.0000487)
Launched on PumpFun/PumpSwap with only $16.68K total liquidity — extremely shallow
Dormant for ~26 days (21 holders, zero activity) before sudden activation on May 31
Top 10 holders control 50.24% of supply; top 100 control 99.92%
83.4% sell pressure in 24h ($274K sells vs $54.5K buys) despite price being up

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token is already showing signs of exhaustion after its parabolic pump. The 1h price change is -16.6%, sell pressure is 83.4% of 24h volume, and liquidity is only $16.68K. The OHLC data shows candles [1] and [2] with anomalous Low values higher than Open/Close (likely data artifacts), but the broader pattern shows a sharp spike from ~$0.0000098 (candle [23] low) to a recent high near ~$0.0000487, followed by heavy selling. Short-term price is likely to retrace toward the $0.000020–$0.000022 range or lower.

Target low$0.000010
Target high$0.000055
Support: $0.000022 (recent consolidation zone, candles [1]–[4]), $0.000013 (candles [12]–[14] cluster), $0.000010 (candle [23] low / launch-era support)
Resistance: $0.000035 (candle [1] anomalous high / spike zone), $0.000049 (current price / 24h high zone), $0.000055 (FDV-implied ceiling at current liquidity)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

Without meaningful liquidity injection, community development, or a credible use case, the token is likely to revert toward pre-pump levels. The 30-day holder history shows the token was essentially dormant (21 holders) for 26 days before a sudden activation. This pattern is consistent with a coordinated pump. Sustained price appreciation requires organic demand that is not currently evident.

Catalysts
  • Any new exchange listing or liquidity addition could temporarily support price
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally could lift all boats
  • If the 'Bountities' concept gains social media traction, new buyers could enter
  • Failure to attract new buyers or liquidity will accelerate decline

Bullish factors

  • 362% 24h price gain demonstrates strong short-term momentum
  • 24h holder count grew by +397 (76%), showing rapid new adoption
  • 5m price change is +10.98%, suggesting very short-term buying pressure
  • 6h price change of +191% shows the pump is recent and may have residual momentum
  • 1,244 buys in 24h from 248 unique buyers shows some genuine interest

Bearish factors

  • 83.4% sell pressure ($274.14K sells vs $54.54K buys) — sellers dominate overwhelmingly
  • Only $16.68K total liquidity — any meaningful sell order will crater the price
  • Top 10 holders control 50.24% of supply; top 100 control 99.92% — extreme concentration
  • 1h price already down -16.6% — pump may be reversing
  • Token was dormant for 26 days with only 21 holders before sudden activation — suspicious pattern
  • No verified contract, no description, no social links — zero fundamental backing
  • 4,006 sells from 1,497 unique sellers vs 1,244 buys from 248 buyers — 6:1 sell/buy ratio by transaction count
  • Holder count dropped -30 (-5.8%) in the last 1 hour — rapid exit
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) extremely thin liquidity making price highly manipulable, (2) missing sniper cost-basis data preventing precise PnL modeling, (3) no fundamental information (no description, no socials, unknown update authority), and (4) the token's behavior is consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump, making price trajectory highly unpredictable.

Deep Analysis

The 23-hour OHLC series reveals a classic pump-and-dump pattern. From candle [23] (June 3, 17:00) the token opened at ~$0.0000123 with a low of ~$0.0000098, establishing the base. Price gradually climbed through candles [22]–[18] with modest volume, then saw a sharp spike in candle [17] (June 4, 00:00) with a high of $0.0000173 on $9,434 volume. Candle [15] (02:00) showed a wide-range bar (H: $0.0000167, L: $0.0000123) on $2,150 volume. The major breakout occurred between candles [8]–[6] (09:00–11:00) with accelerating volume and higher highs. Candles [1] and [2] show anomalous data where Low > Open/Close (likely data feed artifacts or inverted fields), but the current price of ~$0.0000487 represents a ~5x move from the base. The most recent candles show declining volume and a -16.6% 1h retrace, suggesting the pump peak may be in.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
uptrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 17%Sell 83%

Short and medium-term trends are technically uptrend given the 24h price surge of 362%, but the trend is showing early reversal signals with the -16.6% 1h decline and dominant sell pressure. The uptrend is fragile and liquidity-constrained.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000022 (candles [1]–[4] consolidation zone)
Major$0.000010 (candle [23] low — pre-pump base)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000035 (candle [1]/[2] anomalous high zone)
Major$0.000049 (current price / 24h peak area)

The $0.000022 level served as a consolidation zone across candles [1]–[4] and represents the first meaningful support. Below that, the $0.000013 cluster (candles [12]–[14]) is the next support. The pre-pump base around $0.000010 is major support. On the upside, the current price near $0.000049 is the major resistance, with thin liquidity making it easy to breach in either direction.

Notable patterns

  • Parabolic pump pattern: ~5x price increase in under 24 hours from base of ~$0.0000098
  • Higher highs and higher lows from candle [23] through candle [6], confirming the pump phase
  • Volume declining on recent candles while price remains elevated — bearish divergence
  • Potential shooting star / exhaustion candle pattern at the top given the -16.6% 1h retrace
  • Dormant-to-explosive activation pattern: 26 days of zero activity followed by sudden volume surge
  • Candles [1] and [2] show data anomalies (Low > Open/Close) suggesting possible data feed issues or extreme volatility

Total holders520
24h Δ+76
7d Δ+96
30d Δ+96
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth is strongly correlated with the price pump. The token had exactly 21 holders for 26 consecutive days (May 5–May 30) with zero net change, then spiked to 138 on May 31 (+117, +85%) coinciding with the first activation event. The current 520 holders represents a 96% increase over 7 days and 30 days (same figure, as all growth occurred in the last 7 days). However, the most recent 1h data shows -30 holders (-5.8%), suggesting the holder base is already beginning to contract as the pump fades.

The holder growth pattern is highly suspicious. 21 holders held static positions for 26 days (May 5–30), then the token suddenly activated with 117 new holders on May 31, followed by a further surge to 520 total holders as of the analysis date. The 24h growth of +397 holders (+76%) is extraordinary but coincides with the price pump, suggesting many are momentum chasers rather than organic adopters. The -30 holder decline in the last hour is an early warning sign of rapid exit. The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical (both +499, +96%) because all meaningful growth occurred within the last 7 days. Distribution shows 80 whales, 6 sharks, 20 dolphins, 9 fish, and 9 octopus — the whale-heavy distribution is concerning.

Top 10 hold50.24%
Top 100 hold99.92%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

ENAJTVqdk5m1EgmsmDskEhbAx4V5ohwQyp1umcVYMypR

DEX liquidity pool (PumpSwap pair address — this is the trading pair contract holding 28.39% of supply as LP)

28.39%

8n1KsgmMjjCaeNK8TPx4eyb1RqQHBiL7A5zUAm9oX5Lm

Individual whale — unknown wallet holding 3.02% of supply

3.02%

28B4yJV3YVoWCswCEkyrRcBAC6uA4PYkpnzuhjCyikhF

Individual whale — unknown wallet holding 2.95% of supply

2.95%

5qx7yV4Cwg67iEDSuszwMHYrQDJRnSCDF5DS6ZPAFvnV

Individual whale — unknown wallet holding 2.82% of supply

2.82%

9QG2xvPhxT9GuhNLVNbdkMBqDRi2fjzVdMCpU4Ac9odE

Individual whale — unknown wallet holding 2.39% of supply

2.39%

The top 10 holders control 50.24% of supply, and the top 100 control a staggering 99.92% — leaving only 0.08% of supply distributed beyond the top 100 wallets. The largest single holder (28.39%) is the PumpSwap liquidity pool address (ENAJTVqdk5m1EgmsmDskEhbAx4V5ohwQyp1umcVYMypR), which is expected. Excluding the LP, the next 9 holders each control 2.08%–3.02% of supply, totaling ~21.85% among non-LP top holders. The near-uniform distribution among holders #2–#20 (each holding 1.48%–3.02%) is unusual and may suggest coordinated wallet splitting by insiders. The 83.4% sell pressure and -30 holder decline in 1h indicate the whale cohort is actively distributing.

Liquidity$16,680
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$54,550
Sell$274,140
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers248
Unique sellers1,497

Market health is critically poor. Total liquidity of $16.68K is dangerously thin relative to the $274K in 24h sell volume — meaning the pool has been heavily drained by sellers. The buy/sell ratio is 16.6%/83.4%, with 1,497 unique sellers vs only 248 unique buyers — a 6:1 ratio. The net flow is strongly negative (outflow). Any sell order of meaningful size will cause severe slippage given the shallow pool depth. The FDV of $61.58K vs liquidity of $16.68K means the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is only ~27%, which is extremely low. The token trades on PumpSwap (pair ENAJTVqdk5m1EgmsmDskEhbAx4V5ohwQyp1umcVYMypR), a DEX with limited market depth. The combination of thin liquidity, dominant sell pressure, and high seller-to-buyer ratio creates a very unhealthy market structure.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,930,262.87
FDV$48,687–$61,580 (range from metadata vs analytics)

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a total supply of ~999.93M tokens (effectively 1B, a common memecoin supply). The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the contract is not verified. The token is marked as 'mutable: false' which is a positive signal suggesting the metadata cannot be changed, but mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data. The token was launched via PumpFun (indicated by the 'pump' suffix in the mint address), which typically burns mint authority upon bonding curve completion — however, this cannot be confirmed without on-chain authority data. The absence of any description, social links, or verified contract significantly increases rug risk. The FDV of ~$48.7K–$61.6K is extremely small, making the token highly susceptible to price manipulation.

Volatility
high

362% 24h price surge followed by -16.6% 1h decline demonstrates extreme volatility. The token can move 50%+ in either direction within hours given the thin liquidity.

Liquidity
high

Only $16.68K total liquidity on PumpSwap. A single moderate sell order can cause catastrophic slippage. The liquidity-to-FDV ratio is ~27%, critically low.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 50.24% of supply; top 100 control 99.92%. Excluding the LP pool, the top 9 non-LP wallets hold ~21.85% with suspiciously uniform distribution (1.48%–3.02% each), suggesting possible insider wallet splitting.

SniperDump
medium

20 snipers identified in the first 1,000 blocks. Most have already sold (near-zero balances). The bulk of selling pressure ($274K) appears to come from non-sniper holders, suggesting broader distribution risk beyond just snipers.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown'. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The token is marked 'mutable: false' which is positive, but without confirmed authority renouncement, there remains residual risk. PumpFun tokens typically burn mint authority, but this is unconfirmed here.

Key risks

  • Extreme liquidity risk: $16.68K pool cannot absorb significant selling
  • Highly concentrated ownership: top 100 hold 99.92% of supply
  • Pump-and-dump pattern: 26 days dormant → sudden activation → 362% pump → heavy selling
  • No fundamentals: no description, no social links, no verified contract, no use case
  • Holder exodus already beginning: -30 holders (-5.8%) in last 1 hour
  • 83.4% sell pressure with 6:1 seller-to-buyer ratio by unique wallets
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status creates potential rug risk
  • Suspicious uniform distribution among top 9–20 holders may indicate coordinated insider activity

Mitigating factors

  • Token marked 'mutable: false' — metadata cannot be altered
  • PumpFun launch mechanism typically burns mint authority upon bonding curve graduation
  • 20 snipers have largely exited, reducing near-term sniper dump pressure
  • Some snipers achieved positive PnL (up to +78.6%), suggesting the token did deliver returns to early buyers
  • 507 of 520 holders acquired via swap (organic trading) vs only 13 via transfer
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who understand memecoin dynamics and can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana DeFi and pump-and-dump mechanics. Position sizing should be minimal (well under 1% of portfolio) if engaging at all.

Bountities is a high-risk, low-liquidity Solana memecoin that has experienced a parabolic pump of 362% in 24 hours from a dormant base. The token exhibits multiple red flags consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump: 26 days of dormancy, sudden activation, extreme concentration, overwhelming sell pressure, and no fundamental backing. The investment thesis is almost entirely speculative momentum trading with a very short time horizon.

Bull case (low)

Continued momentum pump: If the token gains social media traction (Twitter/Telegram viral moment), new retail buyers could push the price to $0.000080–$0.000100, representing another 2x from current levels. This would require significant new liquidity injection.

  • Viral social media moment drives new retail FOMO
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifts all assets
  • Liquidity providers add depth to the PumpSwap pool
  • The 'Bountities' brand resonates with a community niche

Base case

Gradual bleed-out: The token stabilizes at a lower price level ($0.000015–$0.000025) as momentum fades, with declining volume and holder count. The token joins the long tail of dormant PumpFun launches with minimal trading activity.

  • Some buyers hold their positions hoping for a second pump
  • Liquidity remains thin but doesn't completely drain
  • No new catalysts emerge to drive fresh buying
  • The token avoids a complete rug but loses 50–70% of current value over 7–30 days

Bear case (high)

Rapid collapse: The pump reverses as concentrated holders dump their positions into thin liquidity. Price returns to pre-pump levels of $0.000010–$0.000012, representing an 80%+ decline from current price. Given the 83.4% sell pressure and -30 holder decline in 1h, this scenario is already in progress.

  • Dominant sell pressure (83.4%) continues to overwhelm buyers
  • Thin liquidity ($16.68K) cannot absorb continued selling
  • Concentrated holders (top 10 = 50.24%) begin exiting en masse
  • No fundamental catalyst to attract new buyers
  • Holder count already declining (-30 in last 1h)

GeneratedJun 4, 04:47 PM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately June 4, 2026, 16:00–16:30 UTC. Price and volume data is current to within 30 minutes. Holder data may lag by up to 1 hour.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (Solana blockchain)
  • PumpSwap DEX trading data (pair ENAJTVqdk5m1EgmsmDskEhbAx4V5ohwQyp1umcVYMypR)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (23 candles, June 3–4 2026)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data
  • Historical holder series (30 days daily)
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, unique wallets)

Limitations

  • Sniper cost-basis (total sniped USD) is unknown, preventing precise sniper concentration and PnL calculations
  • Mint and freeze authority status is unknown — cannot confirm if authorities are renounced
  • Update authority is listed as 'unknown' — cannot assess full rug risk
  • No social media or community data available to assess organic demand
  • OHLC candles [1] and [2] show anomalous data (Low > Open/Close) which may indicate data feed errors
  • Token has no description or verified contract, limiting fundamental analysis
  • Short data history (token effectively launched ~May 31) limits statistical confidence in trend analysis
  • FDV figures differ between metadata ($48,687) and analytics ($61,580) — likely due to price movement during data collection

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap memecoins, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The analyst has no position in this token. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,930,262.87

Key Risks

•Extreme liquidity risk: $16.68K pool cannot absorb significant selling
•Highly concentrated ownership: top 100 hold 99.92% of supply
•Pump-and-dump pattern: 26 days dormant → sudden activation → 362% pump → heavy selling
•No fundamentals: no description, no social links, no verified contract, no use case

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

20 snipers were identified in the first 1,000 blocks. Sniper PnL is mixed: 9 snipers show positive realized PnL (ranging from +3.6% to +78.6%) and 11 show negative realized PnL (ranging from -2.0% to -38.0%). The highest realized gains are from snipers [17] (+78.6%), [16] (+42.4%), [5] (+36.7%), and [15] (+36.1%). The largest dollar-value sellers include sniper [13] ($1,235 sold, +33.0% PnL), sniper [11] ($548 sold, -2.0%), sniper [15] ($547 sold, +36.1%), and sniper [6] ($499 sold, -18.0%). Most snipers have already exited or are near-zero balance, suggesting early money has largely distributed. The total sniper sell volume is modest relative to the $274K 24h sell volume, indicating the bulk of selling is coming from non-sniper holders.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration2.00%
PnL stateMixed
Sell-through rateModerate
Profit-taking risk
high

Sniper cost-basis data (total sniped USD) is unknown, preventing precise concentration calculation. Estimated <2% of supply based on available balance data (sniper [1] holds ~$1 balance, sniper [2] holds ~$0). Most snipers appear to have sold their positions.

Early buyers (snipers) are predominantly in exit mode — most have sold their positions with mixed results. The fact that profitable snipers (e.g., +78.6%, +42.4%) have already sold suggests the smart money has taken profits. Remaining sniper balances are near zero, indicating distribution is largely complete among this cohort.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Bountities (Bountities)?

The token is already showing signs of exhaustion after its parabolic pump. The 1h price change is -16.6%, sell pressure is 83.4% of 24h volume, and liquidity is only $16.68K. The OHLC data shows candles [1] and [2] with anomalous Low values higher than Open/Close (likely data artifacts), but the broader pattern shows a sharp spike from ~$0.0000098 (candle [23] low) to a recent high near ~$0.0000487, followed by heavy selling. Short-term price is likely to retrace toward the $0.000020–$0.000022 range or lower. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000010 to $0.000055.

Is Bountities a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who understand memecoin dynamics and can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana DeFi and pump-and-dump mechanics. Position sizing should be minimal (well under 1% of portfolio) if engaging at all.

How are Bountities holders trending?

Bountities currently has 520 holders and is growing (24h: 76, 7d: 96, 30d: 96). The holder growth pattern is highly suspicious. 21 holders held static positions for 26 days (May 5–30), then the token suddenly activated with 117 new holders on May 31, followed by a further surge to 520 total holders as of the analysis date. The 24h growth of +397 holders (+76%) is extraordinary but coincides with the price pump, suggesting many are momentum chasers rather than organic adopters. The -30 holder decline in the last hour is an early warning sign of rapid exit. The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical (both +499, +96%) because all meaningful growth occurred within the last 7 days. Distribution shows 80 whales, 6 sharks, 20 dolphins, 9 fish, and 9 octopus — the whale-heavy distribution is concerning.

What does sniper activity look like for Bountities?

Snipers hold roughly 2.00% of supply with PnL state "mixed" and sell-through rate "moderate". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding Bountities?

Extreme liquidity risk: $16.68K pool cannot absorb significant selling • Highly concentrated ownership: top 100 hold 99.92% of supply • Pump-and-dump pattern: 26 days dormant → sudden activation → 362% pump → heavy selling

← Back to all predictions

Track Bountities