How concentrated is zarvis ownership?

As of 2026-09-28 13:15 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 30.38% of supply, out of 1,149 holder addresses.

Are large holders selling zarvis?

In the 24 hours to 2026-09-28 13:15 UTC, DEX buys were $916,443.00 and sells $889,587.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.

Is zarvis liquidity falling?

Liquidity fell 27.92%, from $29,019.53 (2026-09-28 12:00 UTC) to $20,916.70 (2026-09-28 13:00 UTC).

zarvis Price Today & AI Analysis

ZARVISSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 28, 2026

$0.0₅1915

Contract

Live

B5HJCUbAztsKaQW38rUcQp2he9s75kGvT68Eh1mMBNY3

Chain

Solana

Holders

296

Market cap

$1,914

At a $1M market cap, $ZARVIS would be $0.001001 (522x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is ZARVIS a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 12

Transfer fee

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 1% fee and the owner can still raise it.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token blocks a sell

Transfer fee

1%Every buy and sell · can be raised

Launch wallets hold

1.5%9 insiders still holding

The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about ZARVIS

3 free answers a day

zarvis: holders, selling & liquidity

Saved with the report, 2026-09-28 13:15 UTC

Holder addresses

1,149

Top 10 supply share

30.38%

Reported liquidity

$18,190.00

How concentrated is zarvis ownership?: As of 2026-09-28 13:15 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 30.38% of supply, out of 1,149 holder addresses.
Are large holders selling zarvis?: In the 24 hours to 2026-09-28 13:15 UTC, DEX buys were $916,443.00 and sells $889,587.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.
Is zarvis liquidity falling?: Liquidity fell 27.92%, from $29,019.53 (2026-09-28 12:00 UTC) to $20,916.70 (2026-09-28 13:00 UTC).

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Unhosted token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-28 13:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)	Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-28 12:00 UTC	$29,019.53
2026-09-28 13:00 UTC	$20,916.70

A liquidity change compares the first and last samples, which may be less than 24 hours apart. USD liquidity also moves with asset prices, not only with deposits and withdrawals.

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

2026-09-28 13:15 UTCBuy · $23.86sdrF1M5A…4NVmgpWallet 3UpAv9NA…hwKMdZ
2026-09-28 13:15 UTCBuy · $59.66nrF7vafb…wvq96rWallet AEeJUPCi…c2kJMX
2026-09-28 13:15 UTCBuy · $118.212EWMMivy…jp29NFWallet 3EbkVABn…3LAgjV
2026-09-28 13:15 UTCSell · $12.28beyY8yRC…q3KiHuWallet 8z6echJS…Zz5X3Z
2026-09-28 13:15 UTCSell · $44.483DBUX2UY…JSN3wJWallet 9Lpbcd4C…eepWak
2026-09-28 13:15 UTCSell · $17.448xBiJSdK…P9SuszWallet A4UYCNMm…eBwK6k
2026-09-28 13:15 UTCBuy · $2.244xuuERm6…JMbJG9Wallet EXcT1K2o…n3Y9ts
2026-09-28 13:15 UTCSell · $1.91WR5PDWyi…CgxWryWallet 66HTz8ky…NDd4tc
2026-09-28 13:15 UTCSell · $63.735i4MBkYW…5twBD5Wallet DdqP6c5c…XJzjNh
2026-09-28 13:15 UTCSell · $3.404EQavuN2…JJzkDdWallet ConVdKs2…vvuHSs

Report snapshot

as of Sep 28, 01:16 PM UTC

FDV

$134,910

Liquidity

$18,190.00

Holders

1,149

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

ZARVIS (B5HJCUbAztsKaQW38rUcQp2he9s75kGvT68Eh1mMBNY3) is a newly-traded Solana token on Raydium CPMM with a $134.91K fully diluted valuation and only $18.19K in total liquidity. Recent hourly candles show an extreme pump from near-zero to a $0.000552 high followed by a sharp ~76% retracement to the current $0.0001349, accompanied by a ~90% volume collapse. Top-10 holders control 30.38% of the 1,149-address holder base, but critical data — mint/freeze authority status, sniper activity, and holder history — is entirely unavailable, leaving major risk dimensions unresolved.

Key points

Extreme intra-hour volatility (near-100x candle range) followed by a sharp retracement
Severely thin liquidity ($18.19K) relative to $1.8M+ in 24h volume, implying high slippage risk
Unknown mint/freeze authority status — a material unresolved rug-risk factor
No sniper data available, leaving early-buyer dump risk completely unquantified
Top-10 holder concentration of 30.38% with no visibility into deeper (top-100) distribution or wallet identities

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

Momentum in the most recent data (-25.69% in the last 5 minutes, ~76% retracement from the intra-hour high, and a ~90% volume drop between the two available hourly candles) points to continued short-term downward pressure, though the extremely shallow liquidity means sharp reversals in either direction remain possible.

Target low

$0.0000916

Target high

$0.000278

Support: $0.0000916 (candle 2 low), $0.00000558 (candle 1 low, less likely to be retested)
Resistance: $0.000278 (candle 2 high), $0.000552 (candle 1 high)

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

neutral

With only two hours of candle history available, medium-term direction cannot be reliably projected. Sustainability will depend heavily on whether liquidity deepens, whether authority risks are clarified, and whether trading volume stabilizes rather than continuing its current sharp decay.

Catalysts

Any liquidity additions to the shallow $18.19K pool
On-chain confirmation (or denial) of mint/freeze authority renouncement
Continued social/Twitter-driven speculative interest or its absence
Emergence (or lack) of sniper/early-holder selling pressure once such data becomes available

Bullish factors

Slightly more unique buyers (3,690) than sellers (3,069) in the 24h window
Near-balanced 24h buy/sell volume split (50.7%/49.3%)

Bearish factors

~76% price retracement from the recent intra-hour high
-25.69% move in the last 5 minutes indicating active selling
~90% volume decay between the two most recent hourly candles
Extremely shallow $18.19K liquidity relative to volume and FDV, amplifying downside moves

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because the dataset contains only two hourly candles, no historical holder or sniper data, and unknown authority status. The extreme volatility already observed (nearly 100x intra-candle range) makes any price projection highly uncertain, and the very small liquidity pool means price can be disproportionately moved by relatively small trades.

ZARVIS call history

Full track record →

Sep 28bearish@ $0.000135

24h-90.8%

7d-94.2%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: B5HJCU...BNY3
Total Supply: 999,996,432.21 ZARVIS

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($18.19K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Violent price volatility with a ~76% retracement from the recent intra-hour high, and continued -25.69% decline in the last 5 minutes
Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out supply inflation or wallet freezing
No sniper data available, so early-buyer dumping risk is entirely unquantified

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles were provided. Candle 1 (12:00 UTC) opened at $0.00000748, spiked to a high of $0.000552, dropped to a low of $0.00000558, and closed at $0.000275 — an extreme intra-candle range spanning nearly 100x from low to high, on volume of ~$1.81M. Candle 2 (13:00 UTC) opened at $0.000275 (matching prior close), made a marginal new high of $0.000278, fell to a low of $0.0000916, and closed at $0.0001349, on much lower volume of ~$181K. This pattern shows a violent pump-and-partial-dump within a single hour followed by continued downward drift and fading volume.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term (within the last two 1h candles) price action shows a sharp reversal from the candle-1 high of $0.000552 down to the current $0.0001349, a decline of roughly 76% from peak. The 24h and 1h change is reported as +170.76% (measured from a much lower base earlier in the window), but the most recent 5m change of -25.69% signals continued short-term weakness. With only two candles of data, a medium-term trend cannot be reliably established and is treated as sideways/undetermined.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000916 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.00000558 (candle 1 low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000278 (candle 2 high)

Major resistance

$0.000552 (candle 1 high)

With only two hourly candles available, support/resistance levels are provisional. The immediate resistance at $0.000278 (near the candle-2 high) sits well above the current price of $0.0001349, while immediate support around $0.0000916 (candle-2 low) is the closest downside level. The much wider candle-1 range ($0.00000558–$0.000552) frames the extreme volatility possible for this token but those levels are less reliable given they occurred during the initial spike/discovery candle.

Notable patterns

Extreme wick/spike candle (candle 1) suggesting a pump followed by rapid partial reversal — consistent with low-liquidity price discovery or a possible pump-and-dump pattern
Lower high formed in candle 2 ($0.000278) versus candle 1 ($0.000552), while candle 2 low ($0.0000916) is higher than candle 1 low ($0.00000558) — a narrowing but still highly volatile range
Sharp volume decay (~90% drop) between the two candles, indicating fading momentum

Liquidity

$18,190.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $18.19K is extremely shallow relative to the $134.91K FDV and the enormous $1.8M+ combined 24h volume (916.44K buy + 889.59K sell). This mismatch between thin liquidity and high volume implies a high risk of severe slippage on even moderately sized trades and suggests the pool could be easily manipulated or drained. Buy/sell volume is nearly balanced (50.7%/49.3%), and buyer count (3,690) modestly exceeds seller count (3,069), producing a marginal net inflow bias, but this is not a strong signal given the volatility. The combination of massive volume against tiny liquidity is a classic marker of a highly volatile, likely newly-launched or thinly-traded pair on Raydium CPMM.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,996,432.21 ZARVIS

FDV

$134.91K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price moved from a low of $0.00000558 to a high of $0.000552 within a single hourly candle (nearly 100x range), then retraced roughly 76% from that high to the current $0.0001349, with an additional -25.69% move in just the last 5 minutes. This is extreme, largely unprecedented volatility for a normal asset.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $18.19K against a $134.91K FDV and over $1.8M in combined 24h volume — a severe mismatch that implies high slippage on modest trade sizes and susceptibility to liquidity removal or pool manipulation.
Concentrationmedium
Top-10 holders control 30.38% of supply, a moderate concentration. Top-100 concentration and wallet classification data are unavailable, so the full concentration picture (e.g., whether the top-10 includes team/insider wallets) cannot be assessed; this data gap itself adds uncertainty beyond the stated 30.38% figure.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($18.19K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Violent price volatility with a ~76% retracement from the recent intra-hour high, and continued -25.69% decline in the last 5 minutes
Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out supply inflation or wallet freezing
No sniper data available, so early-buyer dumping risk is entirely unquantified
Top-10 holders control 30.38% of supply with no visibility into top-100 concentration or wallet identities
Rapidly decaying volume (~90% drop between the two most recent hourly candles) suggests fading speculative interest
Only 'twitter' listed as a social link with no other verifiable project information; description field is 'none'

Mitigating factors

24h buy/sell volume is roughly balanced (50.7%/49.3%), not showing one-sided panic selling at the aggregate 24h level
24h unique buyers (3,690) slightly exceed unique sellers (3,069), a marginal positive signal
Token trades on a recognizable venue (Raydium CPMM) rather than an obscure or unverified pool type

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of near-total capital loss. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking stable exposure, or anyone unable to independently verify contract authorities before entry. Position sizing should be minimal given the shallow liquidity and unresolved authority/sniper data gaps.

ZARVIS is an extremely early-stage, highly volatile Solana token trading on a shallow-liquidity Raydium CPMM pool. The available data shows a violent price spike followed by a sharp retracement, near-balanced but massive 24h volume relative to tiny liquidity, moderate top-10 holder concentration (30.38%), and critical unknowns around mint/freeze authority and sniper activity. This profile is characteristic of a newly launched, speculative token where outcomes could range from a rebound rally to a rapid collapse toward zero.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy pressure re-accumulates and liquidity providers add depth, the token could stabilize above current support ($0.0000916) and attempt to reclaim the $0.000278 resistance, driven by speculative momentum and social media (Twitter) attention typical of newly launched meme-style tokens.

Slight positive net flow in 24h buyer/seller counts (3,690 vs 3,069)
Near-balanced 24h buy/sell volume (50.7%/49.3%) rather than one-sided dumping
Recognizable trading venue (Raydium CPMM) providing straightforward on-chain accessibility

Base Case

Given the extreme volatility already observed and thin data window (only two hourly candles), the most likely near-term path is continued high volatility with a downward bias as the initial pump fades, with price oscillating within the $0.0000916–$0.000278 range absent new catalysts.

No major liquidity injection or authority renouncement announcement occurs in the near term
Speculative trading interest continues to fade in line with the observed volume decay
No verified project fundamentals (description is 'none', only a Twitter link) emerge to support a sustained valuation

Bear Case

High probability

Continued volume decay and the already-observed ~76% retracement from the intra-hour high could extend into a fuller collapse, especially given the extremely thin $18.19K liquidity pool, unknown authority status, and no sniper-dump visibility — any concentrated selling from the 30.38% top-10 holder base could crater the price further.

Volume dropped ~90% between the two most recent hourly candles, signaling fading interest
Last 5-minute price move of -25.69% shows active downward momentum right now
Shallow liquidity means even moderate sell orders could cause outsized price impact
Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or wallet freezes
No sniper data means early-holder dump risk is completely unquantified

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 28, 01:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-28 13:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Token metadata (mint, supply, FDV, social links)
USD price and 24h change data
OHLC hourly candle data (2 most recent candles)
Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % change at 5m/1h/24h)
Sniper analysis (reported as no data available)
Holder aggregates (Unhosted current snapshot: holder count and top-10 supply share only)

Limitations

Only two hourly OHLC candles were available, severely limiting technical analysis depth and trend confirmation
No sniper wallet data was available, so sniper concentration, PnL, and dump-risk metrics could not be computed and are marked unknown/0 placeholders per methodology
No holder history data was available — only a current snapshot of holder count (1,149) and top-10 concentration (30.38%); growth trends and whale behavior could not be assessed
Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and mutability status were all unknown, preventing a full rug-risk assessment from authority data
Top-100 holder concentration was not provided, limiting the completeness of the concentration risk picture
6h price % change was unavailable, limiting the granularity of momentum assessment

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, potentially incomplete on-chain data and is provided for informational purposes only. It is NOT financial advice and should not be relied upon as the sole basis for any investment decision. Cryptocurrency, and especially newly-launched low-liquidity tokens, carry a very high risk of substantial or total loss. Always conduct independent research and verify on-chain authority settings before transacting.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is zarvis (ZARVIS) a scam?

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 1% fee and the owner can still raise it. The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply. Checked Nov 12, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell zarvis (ZARVIS)?

Yes. Every buy and sell pays a 1% transfer fee, and the owner can still raise it. Checked Nov 12, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for zarvis (ZARVIS)?

Is ZARVIS a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of near-total capital loss. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking stable exposure, or anyone unable to independently verify contract authorities before entry. Position sizing should be minimal given the shallow liquidity and unresolved authority/sniper data gaps.

What are the key risks of holding ZARVIS?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($18.19K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Violent price volatility with a ~76% retracement from the recent intra-hour high, and continued -25.69% decline in the last 5 minutes • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out supply inflation or wallet freezing