How concentrated is Planet Destroyer ownership?

The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 683 holder addresses (2026-05-17 16:20 UTC).

Are large holders selling Planet Destroyer ?

Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.

Is Planet Destroyer liquidity falling?

One reading so far, $26,486.39 (2026-05-17 16:20 UTC): not enough to show a trend.

Planet Destroyer Price Today & AI Analysis

Q: Can I sell Planet Destroyer (DESTROYER )?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 8, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

Q: Is DESTROYER a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced meme token traders who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Not suitable for conservative investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token dynamics. Position sizing should be minimal (e.g., <0.5% of portfolio). This is not an investment — it is a speculative trade.

DESTROYER SolanaAnalysis as of May 17, 2026

$0.0₅2248

Contract

Live

Am534dYDkfzWKPNDedQoc7Snvq471GHpVJ1p3EQGpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

215

Market cap

$2,245

At a $1M market cap, $DESTROYER would be $0.001001 (445x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

DESTROYER support and resistance today

From 1-hour candles

DESTROYER trades at $0.000002248 as of Nov 8, 06:54 UTC, +0.0% in 24 hours. No trade has moved the price in 9 days, so there is no fresh support or resistance to mark.

Is DESTROYER a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 8

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about DESTROYER

3 free answers a day

Planet Destroyer : holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-17 16:20 UTC

Holder addresses

683

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$26,486.39

How concentrated is Planet Destroyer ownership?: The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 683 holder addresses (2026-05-17 16:20 UTC).
Are large holders selling Planet Destroyer ?: Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.
Is Planet Destroyer liquidity falling?: One reading so far, $26,486.39 (2026-05-17 16:20 UTC): not enough to show a trend.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-17 16:20 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of May 17, 04:20 PM UTC

FDV

Liquidity

$26,486.39

Holders

683

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Planet Destroyer (DESTROYER) is a Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap, themed around a 'world's deadliest feline' narrative with proceeds purportedly directed to Cameron Park Zoo. The token experienced a dramatic 224% price surge in 24 hours, driven by a viral spike in candle [10] that reached an intraday high of $0.000213. However, sell pressure is overwhelming at 75.9% of 24h volume ($500.47K sells vs $158.82K buys), liquidity is extremely thin at $26.49K, and the token has been dormant for 30 days prior to this spike. The token is very high risk and speculative.

Key points

Charity/zoo narrative (Cameron Park Zoo) as a marketing hook
Extreme 24h price surge of +224% driven by a single viral candle
Holder base grew from 251 to 683 (+63%) entirely within the last 24 hours
Overwhelming sell pressure: 75.9% of volume is sells ($500.47K)
Extremely thin liquidity at $26.49K against $107K FDV — high slippage risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

Price is in a sharp post-spike retracement. After hitting an intraday high of $0.000213 in candle [10], the token has been making lower highs and lower lows across subsequent candles. Current price of ~$0.0001257 is well below the spike high. With 75.9% sell pressure, only $26.49K in liquidity, and holders declining -0.44% in the last hour, the short-term bias is bearish. A retest of the $0.000040–$0.000050 range is plausible if selling continues.

Target low

$0.000035

Target high

$0.000160

Support: $0.000049 (candle [3] low / candle [8] low cluster), $0.000035 (candle [9] low / candle [10] open zone)
Resistance: $0.000137 (candle [10] close / candle [9] open), $0.000187 (candle [9] high), $0.000213 (candle [10] all-time high)

Medium term · 1–7 days

bearish

The token was completely dormant for 30 days (stuck at 251 holders) before this spike. Without sustained organic demand, a new catalyst, or meaningful liquidity injection, the price is likely to fade back toward pre-spike levels. The charity narrative may attract some retail interest but is unverified. Medium-term outlook is bearish unless a new viral catalyst emerges.

Catalysts

Verified partnership or proof of zoo donation could reignite interest
Broader Solana meme season momentum
Influencer promotion or viral social media moment
Liquidity pool deepening by the project team

Bullish factors

224% 24h price gain demonstrates strong viral potential
Holder count surged +63% in 24h (251 → 683), showing new demand
Charity/zoo narrative provides a unique marketing angle
1h price change of +89.9% suggests very recent buying momentum
20 snipers with majority in profit suggests early buyers are still holding some supply

Bearish factors

75.9% sell pressure ($500.47K sells vs $158.82K buys) is heavily skewed bearish
Only $26.49K total liquidity — extremely thin, high slippage
Token was dormant for 30 days prior to this spike with zero holder growth
Mutable metadata and unknown update authority introduce rug risk
Top holder (DEX pool) holds 12.28%; top 10 hold 27.76% — concentrated
Price making lower highs since candle [10] spike — downtrend forming
Unverified contract and possible mutable supply parameters

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme volatility of this meme token, the very short trading history post-spike (all 10 candles are from a single day), the unverified charity narrative, and the absence of fundamental valuation anchors. Meme tokens can spike unpredictably on social catalysts.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: Am534d...pump
Total Supply: 1,000,000,000 (1B tokens, inferred from holder balances — top holder holds 122.8M = 12.28%)

Key Risks

Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — potential for rug or parameter changes
Overwhelming sell pressure (75.9%) with thin $26.49K liquidity
Token was dormant for 30+ days before this spike — no organic community
All snipers have exited in profit — retail is holding the bag

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

All 10 available hourly candles are from 2026-05-17. Candle [10] (07:00 UTC) was the explosive launch candle: O=$0.0000349, H=$0.000213, L=$0.0000237, C=$0.000138 — a massive bullish engulfing move with $241K volume. Candle [9] (08:00 UTC) opened at the prior close ($0.000135) but sold off hard, closing at $0.0000544 on $164K volume — a bearish engulfing/shooting star. Candles [8]–[5] show continued lower highs and lower lows (downtrend), with candle [5] (12:00) briefly touching $0.000104 before closing at $0.0000525. Candles [4]–[2] show a modest recovery attempt, with candle [2] (15:00) closing at $0.0000695 after a high of $0.0000813. Candle [1] (16:00) opened at $0.0000710 and closed lower at $0.0000504, suggesting renewed selling. Overall pattern: spike-and-dump with a partial recovery, but price remains well below the spike high.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

The token spiked to $0.000213 in candle [10] and has been in a downtrend since, making lower highs (H: $0.000213 → $0.000188 → $0.000126 → $0.000104 → $0.0000739 → $0.0000813 → $0.0000710) and generally lower lows. The medium-term trend is also down given the 30-day dormancy prior to this spike.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

24%

Sell

76%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000049 (cluster of lows from candles [3], [8], [9])

Major support

$0.000024 (candle [10] all-time low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000137 (candle [10] close / candle [9] open)

Major resistance

$0.000213 (candle [10] all-time high)

The $0.000049–$0.000050 zone has acted as support across multiple candles ([3] low: $0.0000483, [8] low: $0.0000350, [9] low: $0.0000492). Immediate resistance is the $0.000137 level where candle [10] closed and candle [9] opened. The all-time high of $0.000213 is major resistance. Below $0.000035, there is little historical support.

Notable patterns

Spike-and-dump: Candle [10] massive bullish engulf followed immediately by bearish engulf in candle [9]
Shooting star / bearish pin bar in candle [9]: H=$0.000188, C=$0.0000544 — long upper wick
Declining volume on declining price — classic distribution pattern
Lower highs sequence: $0.000213 → $0.000188 → $0.000126 → $0.000104 → $0.0000739 → $0.0000813 → $0.0000710
Brief doji-like consolidation in candles [4]–[2] suggesting temporary equilibrium before renewed selling in candle [1]

Liquidity

$26,486.39

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Market health is poor. Total liquidity of $26.49K is extremely thin relative to the $107K FDV and the $659K+ in 24h trading volume. This means large trades will cause severe slippage. The buy/sell ratio is deeply negative: 3,273 unique sellers vs 1,192 unique buyers (2.75:1 seller-to-buyer ratio), and sell volume ($500.47K) is 3.15x buy volume ($158.82K). Net flow is strongly outflow. The 24h unique wallet count of 3,469 shows significant activity, but the overwhelming majority are sellers. This liquidity profile makes it very difficult to exit large positions without significant price impact, and the shallow pool means the price can be moved dramatically with relatively small capital.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000 (1B tokens, inferred from holder balances — top holder holds 122.8M = 12.28%)

FDV

$107,000

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price moved from $0.0000237 to $0.000213 and back to $0.0001257 within a single day — an intraday range of ~800%. Extreme volatility typical of low-cap meme tokens on PumpSwap.
Liquidityhigh
Only $26.49K in total liquidity against $659K+ in 24h volume. Any position of meaningful size will face severe slippage. Exiting a large position could crash the price significantly.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — potential for rug or parameter changes
Overwhelming sell pressure (75.9%) with thin $26.49K liquidity
Token was dormant for 30+ days before this spike — no organic community
All snipers have exited in profit — retail is holding the bag
Unverified charity narrative (Cameron Park Zoo donations unconfirmed on-chain)
Price in downtrend since spike high with declining volume
Holder count already declining (-3 in last hour) after spike-driven growth

Mitigating factors

Unique charity/zoo narrative provides a marketing differentiator
Strong viral momentum demonstrated (224% 24h gain, 3,469 unique wallets)
Relatively even distribution among non-LP top holders (no single whale >2.52%)
Low FDV ($107K) means small capital can move price significantly — upside potential exists
Active social presence (Twitter, website, Moralis links)

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced meme token traders who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Not suitable for conservative investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token dynamics. Position sizing should be minimal (e.g., <0.5% of portfolio). This is not an investment — it is a speculative trade.

DESTROYER is a high-risk, high-volatility Solana meme token that experienced a single-day viral spike driven by its 'planet destroyer cat' narrative and zoo charity angle. The spike attracted 432 new holders and generated $659K+ in volume, but the overwhelming majority of that volume was selling (75.9%). Smart money (snipers) has already exited in profit. The token faces severe headwinds: thin liquidity, mutable/unverified contract, 30 days of prior dormancy, and a deeply negative buy/sell ratio. Any investment thesis must be purely speculative and momentum-based.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

A second viral wave — driven by influencer promotion, verified zoo donation proof, or broader Solana meme season — reignites buying interest. New holders continue to accumulate, liquidity deepens, and the token retests or exceeds its $0.000213 spike high, implying a ~70% gain from current levels.

Viral social media catalyst (Twitter/TikTok influencer)
Verified on-chain proof of Cameron Park Zoo donation
Broader Solana meme token bull market
Liquidity injection by project team or market makers

Base Case

Price consolidates in the $0.000050–$0.000100 range as the initial spike fades. Some retail holders remain, attracted by the zoo narrative. Volume drops significantly from the spike day. The token survives but trades at a fraction of its spike high, with occasional small pumps on social media activity.

Sell pressure moderates as weak hands exit
A small core community forms around the zoo charity angle
No rug pull or authority exploit occurs
Liquidity remains sufficient for small trades

Bear Case

High probability

Sell pressure continues to dominate, liquidity is drained, and the price fades back to pre-spike levels of $0.000035–$0.000050 or lower. The token returns to dormancy with a smaller holder base, and the charity narrative fails to generate sustained interest.

Continued 75.9% sell pressure with no new buying catalyst
Sniper and early buyer distribution already complete — no more smart money support
Thin $26.49K liquidity cannot absorb selling pressure
Token's 30-day dormancy history suggests lack of organic community
Mutable contract risk discourages serious investors

Analysis details

Generated

May 17, 04:20 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-17 16:20 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Solana on-chain token metadata (Mint: Am534dYDkfzWKPNDedQoc7Snvq471GHpVJ1p3EQGpump)
PumpSwap DEX trading data (Pair: 6QZc2KD8JPW3rmM2Q1REEhX833Pqz8bTjLegY7sXADvo)
Hourly OHLC candle data (10 candles, 2026-05-17 07:00–16:00 UTC)
24h trading analytics (volume, buyers, sellers, unique wallets)
Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
Top 20 holder addresses and balances
Sniper analysis (20 snipers, first 1000 blocks)
Moralis token analytics API

Limitations

Total supply metadata shows '1' due to 0 decimals — actual circulating supply inferred from holder balances (~1B tokens)
Sniper 'sniped' amounts and balances are largely unknown, limiting precise concentration calculation
Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are unknown — cannot confirm renouncement
Only 10 hourly candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
Holder history shows zero change for 30 days prior to spike — may reflect data gaps or true dormancy
Charity narrative (Cameron Park Zoo) is unverified on-chain
24h % change shows 0% in analytics but 224% elsewhere — possible data inconsistency in the source

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Meme tokens carry extreme risk of total loss. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. The analyst has no position in DESTROYER.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Planet Destroyer (DESTROYER ) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Nov 8, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Planet Destroyer (DESTROYER )?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 8, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for Planet Destroyer (DESTROYER )?

Is DESTROYER a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced meme token traders who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Not suitable for conservative investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token dynamics. Position sizing should be minimal (e.g., <0.5% of portfolio). This is not an investment — it is a speculative trade.

What are the key risks of holding DESTROYER ?

Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — potential for rug or parameter changes • Overwhelming sell pressure (75.9%) with thin $26.49K liquidity • Token was dormant for 30+ days before this spike — no organic community