Jupiter Cat Price Today & AI Analysis

JUPCATSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 11, 2026

$0.000144

-5.39% 24h

Contract

Live

AaEhFTX4naHSWSXz9TVe5QgLbtSLT8ZqYJGZzDDcoroh

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,487

Market cap

$143,901

At a $1M market cap, $JUPCAT would be $0.001000 (6.95x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is JUPCAT a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 26

Transfer fee

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 3% fee and the owner can still raise it.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token blocks a sell

Transfer fee

3%Every buy and sell · can be raised

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about JUPCAT

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

ASTEROIDAsteroid The Space Shiba Inu$0.000317+3.3%MC $317.4K

AloooongAloooong$0.0₄1267-26.5%MC $12.2K

$1Barron $1 Coin$0.0₅6580-26.9%MC $6.1K

HIREHire Agents$0.0₄2864-11.7%MC $26.9K

SHARTCOINShartcoin$0.000112-8.9%MC $89.3K

PumptachePump Baby$0.000794+1491.2%MC $782.1K

Jupiter Cat: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-11 04:19 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$54,813.00

How concentrated is Jupiter Cat ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Jupiter Cat?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Jupiter Cat liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-11 04:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $54,813.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-11 04:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 11, 04:19 AM UTC

FDV

$1,437,064

Liquidity

$54,813.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

JUPCAT is a micro-cap Solana meme token (Jupiter Cat) trading on a single Raydium CPMM pool with roughly $54.8K total liquidity and a $1.44M fully diluted valuation. The token has seen an extreme +864.7% price move over the trailing 24h, driven by a volatile parabolic candle sequence with hourly ranges exceeding 100% in places. Volume is heavy relative to liquidity ($525K buy vs $478K sell over 24h against just $54.8K liquidity), indicating a highly speculative, thinly-liquidated trading environment typical of early-stage meme coins. No holder distribution or sniper data is available from upstream sources, which is a material transparency gap for risk assessment.

Key points

Extreme 24h price appreciation (+864.7%) on a very small liquidity base ($54.8K)
Trading volume (~$1M combined buy+sell) is roughly 19x total liquidity, signaling high volatility and thin-market dynamics
No holder or sniper distribution data available, limiting concentration risk visibility
Single Raydium CPMM pair is the only observable liquidity venue
Price action shows a strong parabolic run followed by an early pullback (-5.1% in the last 5 minutes)

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 1-24 hours

neutral

Price has just completed a parabolic run from ~$0.00015 to a high near $0.00257 before pulling back to $0.00144 in the most recent candle, and the last 5-minute reading shows a -5.1% dip. This pattern (rapid vertical expansion followed by a sharp reversal) is typical of meme-coin blow-off tops. Continuation is possible given the still-positive 1h reading (+22%), but downside volatility risk is elevated as early buyers may take profit.

Target low

$0.00090

Target high

$0.00210

Support: $0.00144 (last close), $0.000908 (candle 23 low), $0.000722 (candle 22 low)
Resistance: $0.00206 (candle 24 high), $0.00256 (candle 23 high), $0.00138 (candle 22 high)

Medium term · 3-7 days

bearish

Parabolic meme-token moves of this magnitude (nearly 9x in 24h) on such thin liquidity ($54.8K) historically mean-revert as early holders and momentum traders exit into strength. Absent new catalysts (listings, influencer promotion, liquidity additions), medium-term risk skews toward retracement toward pre-pump levels unless volume and liquidity depth expand meaningfully.

Catalysts

Potential liquidity additions or LP locking events that could stabilize price
Social media/Twitter-driven momentum continuation given the token's single listed social link
Broader meme-coin market sentiment on Solana
Risk of large holder distribution if concentration is high (unverifiable due to missing holder data)

Bullish factors

Strong 24h buy-side volume dominance ($525.35K buy vs $478.13K sell, 52.4% buy pressure)
More unique buyers (1,166) than sellers (883) in the last 24h
Sustained multi-hour uptrend across candles 13-23 with higher highs and higher lows

Bearish factors

Extremely thin liquidity ($54.8K) relative to volume and FDV ($1.44M), creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Sharp intra-candle reversal in the most recent hour (high $0.00207 down to close $0.00144, a ~30% pullback from the high)
Most recent 5-minute price change is negative (-5.14%), suggesting momentum may be fading
No holder or sniper data to confirm distribution health, raising concentration/rug risk uncertainty

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because holder and sniper distribution data are entirely unavailable, liquidity is very shallow ($54.8K), and the price history is extremely short and volatile (only 24 hourly candles), making trend extrapolation unreliable. The recent 5m reversal adds uncertainty about whether the pump has further room or is already rolling over.

JUPCAT call history

Full track record →

Sep 11neutral@ $0.00144

24h—

7d—

30d-88.4%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: AaEhFT...oroh
Total Supply: 999,974,055.23 JUPCAT

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($54.81K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Parabolic +864.7% 24h price move followed by a sharp intra-candle reversal, suggesting a possible blow-off top
Complete absence of holder concentration and sniper data, preventing verification of distribution health
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status, leaving open the possibility of supply manipulation or account freezes

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Across the 24 hourly candles, price grinds down slightly from ~$0.000153 to a low near $0.000107 (candle 8) before staging a strong, sustained rally from candle 10 onward, climbing from ~$0.000137 to an intraday peak of $0.00257 (candle 23), then closing the most recent hour (candle 24) at $0.00144 after tagging a high of $0.00207 — a sharp pullback within the last candle.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

The medium-term trend across the full 24h window is a strong uptrend (price up ~864% from start to recent high), but the short-term (most recent 1-2 candles) shows loss of upward momentum with a large wick rejection from $0.00257 down to current levels near $0.00144, suggesting the rally is losing steam or entering a corrective phase.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

52%

Sell

48%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00144 (current candle close)

Major support

$0.000908 (candle 23 low) / $0.000722 (candle 22 low)

Immediate resistance

$0.00206 (candle 24 high)

Major resistance

$0.00256 (candle 23 high, session peak)

The session high of $0.00257 set in candle 23 acts as the major resistance/ceiling that has already been rejected once. Immediate support sits at the current price of $0.00144; a break below the $0.000908-$0.000722 zone (candle 22-23 lows) would signal the parabolic move has fully reversed.

Notable patterns

Parabolic breakout from candle 13 through candle 23 with progressively higher highs
Long upper-wick rejection candle at candle 23/24 transition (high $0.00257 vs close $0.00144), indicative of a blow-off top / exhaustion candle
Volume climax coinciding with price peak (candle 23 volume of 224,449 — the highest in the dataset)
Early consolidation/basing pattern in candles 4-9 before the breakout began

Liquidity

$54,813.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $54.81K against 24h combined trading volume of over $1M (buy+sell) represents a volume-to-liquidity ratio of roughly 19x, which is extremely high and indicative of a thin, easily-manipulated market where even moderate-sized trades can cause outsized price swings — consistent with the observed 864.7% 24h price move. Buy volume ($525.35K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($478.13K), and unique buyers (1,166) outnumber unique sellers (883), pointing to a net inflow bias, but the shallow liquidity pool means slippage risk is high for any meaningfully-sized order, in both directions.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,974,055.23 JUPCAT

FDV

$1.44M

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price change of +864.7% with intra-day swings from $0.000107 to $0.00257 (a >20x range) and a sharp reversal in the most recent candle demonstrate extreme volatility inconsistent with stable value storage.
Liquidityhigh
Only $54.81K in total liquidity against a $1.44M FDV and over $1M in 24h trading volume means large orders will move price significantly and exiting sizable positions may be difficult without severe slippage.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($54.81K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Parabolic +864.7% 24h price move followed by a sharp intra-candle reversal, suggesting a possible blow-off top
Complete absence of holder concentration and sniper data, preventing verification of distribution health
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status, leaving open the possibility of supply manipulation or account freezes
Single-pool listing on Raydium CPMM with no diversification of liquidity venues

Mitigating factors

24h buy volume modestly exceeds sell volume ($525.35K vs $478.13K) and unique buyers outnumber sellers (1,166 vs 883), suggesting net demand in the recent window
Sustained volume increase alongside the price rally suggests genuine trading interest rather than a completely illiquid/dead pool
Active social presence (Twitter link) indicates some community engagement, though this cannot be independently verified for authenticity

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand meme-coin dynamics and can absorb total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to actively monitor extremely volatile, thinly-liquidated positions. The lack of holder/authority transparency further elevates the risk profile above typical meme-token norms.

JUPCAT is a highly speculative Solana meme token that has just undergone a violent ~9x price expansion in 24 hours on very thin liquidity ($54.81K). The setup offers asymmetric short-term trading opportunity for those chasing momentum, but carries very high risk given the shallow liquidity, missing holder/authority transparency, and signs of an early reversal from the session peak.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy-side momentum persists (buyers already outnumber sellers 1,166 to 883 with 52.4% buy volume share) and social/community attention continues to build around the Jupiter-branded meme narrative, price could retest or exceed the recent high of $0.00257, especially if liquidity is added to reduce slippage and attract larger participants.

Continued net-positive buyer count and buy volume dominance
Potential viral social media traction leveraging the Jupiter ecosystem association
Liquidity additions that reduce volatility and attract confidence from larger traders
Broader meme-coin sector strength on Solana

Base Case

Price consolidates in a wide, volatile range between roughly $0.0009 and $0.0021 over the coming days as the market digests the initial pump, with continued high volume relative to the small liquidity pool causing further sharp swings in both directions before a clearer directional trend emerges.

No major new liquidity injections or authority changes occur in the near term
Trading volume remains elevated but buy/sell pressure stays roughly balanced (currently 52.4%/47.6%)
No confirmed rug-pull or authority-based supply manipulation event takes place
General meme-coin market conditions remain neutral to modestly positive

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic rally exhausts itself, as suggested by the sharp reversal from $0.00257 to $0.00144 in the latest candle and the negative 5-minute price change (-5.14%); price mean-reverts toward pre-pump levels around $0.00015-$0.0002, especially if early holders or unidentified whales distribute into strength given the total lack of holder transparency.

Classic blow-off-top pattern with a large upper wick and volume climax already visible in the candle data
Extremely thin liquidity making the token vulnerable to cascading sell pressure
Unknown mint/freeze authority status raising the possibility of adverse issuer action
No verifiable holder distribution data, elevating the probability of undisclosed concentrated selling

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 11, 04:19 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-11 04:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, FDV)
Raydium CPMM pair pricing data
24 hourly OHLCV candles
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)

Limitations

No holder distribution data available (holder endpoints retired) — holderTrends and whaleMap sections contain placeholder zero/empty values, not actual measurements
No sniper detection data available — smartMoneySignals sniper metrics set to 0/unknown per methodology, not an actual absence of snipers
Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, and contract verification status all unknown, preventing full tokenomics risk assessment
Only 24 hourly candles available, limiting the ability to assess longer-term trend structure
Single liquidity pool observed; unable to assess aggregate liquidity across other venues if any exist

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, possibly incomplete on-chain data that may not reflect real-time conditions. Cryptocurrency, and especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry very high risk including total loss of capital. Conduct your own independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Jupiter Cat (JUPCAT) a scam?

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 3% fee and the owner can still raise it. Checked Oct 26, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Jupiter Cat (JUPCAT)?

Yes. Every buy and sell pays a 3% transfer fee, and the owner can still raise it. Checked Oct 26, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Jupiter Cat ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Jupiter Cat?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Jupiter Cat liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-11 04:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $54,813.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Jupiter Cat (JUPCAT)?

Is JUPCAT a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 85/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand meme-coin dynamics and can absorb total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to actively monitor extremely volatile, thinly-liquidated positions. The lack of holder/authority transparency further elevates the risk profile above typical meme-token norms.

What are the key risks of holding JUPCAT?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($54.81K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Parabolic +864.7% 24h price move followed by a sharp intra-candle reversal, suggesting a possible blow-off top • Complete absence of holder concentration and sniper data, preventing verification of distribution health