SUICAT

SUI CAT Price Today & AI Analysis

SUICATSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 21, 2026

Price

$0.000405

+575.99% 24h · FDV $404,758

Contract

Live
AP5YnCZRFHayveJ1zSSWeGpB1Hps4v8pLJ6ASmXLMD6M

Chain

Solana

Holders

2,148

Market cap

$404,758

More tokens on Solana

ZIRONZIRONZiron$0.049040+17.8%MC $87.4KLEANLEANLean$0.000201+291.1%MC $201.0KOTCOTCOTC$0.006301-10.7%MC $4.39Mfonefoneapeonfone$0.005161+9.0%MC $5.11MMETAMETAMetaDAO$5.46-7.6%MC $123.94MSAISAISairium$0.053014-87.1%MC $301.4K

SUI CAT: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-21 13:15 UTC

Holder addresses

2,148

Top 10 supply share

30.37%

Reported liquidity

$32,834.00
How concentrated is SUI CAT ownership?
As of 2026-09-21 13:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 30.37% of supply. It reports 2,148 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling SUI CAT?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-21 13:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $375,508.00 in buys and $348,115.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is SUI CAT liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +5922.49%, from $647.87 (2026-09-21 02:00 UTC) to $39,017.82 (2026-09-21 13:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-21 13:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-21 02:00 UTC$647.87
2026-09-21 08:00 UTC$752.78
2026-09-21 09:00 UTC$30,255.49
2026-09-21 10:00 UTC$33,442.82
2026-09-21 11:00 UTC$17,353.92
2026-09-21 12:00 UTC$44,074.16
2026-09-21 13:00 UTC$39,017.82

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about SUICAT

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 21, 01:16 PM UTC

FDV

$404,758

Liquidity

$32,834.00

Holders

2,148

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

SUICAT is a newly-active Solana meme token trading on a Raydium CPMM pool that just underwent an extreme parabolic price spike (+575.99% in the reported 24h window, briefly exceeding +9,000% intra-window) on very thin liquidity of only $32.83K against a 24h trading volume near $723.6K and FDV of $404.76K. The candle history shows ~18 hours of near-total dormancy followed by a vertical breakout and a subsequent ~58% pullback from the intraday high, a pattern commonly associated with unsustainable pumps. Critical risk inputs - mint/freeze authority status, sniper/insider activity, and holder history/classification - are all unavailable, and only a current-snapshot top-10 concentration figure (30.37%) and holder count (2,148 addresses) could be sourced.

Key points

  • Extreme, recent parabolic price move (+575.99% 24h) with clear pump-and-dump candle structure already showing a sharp intraday reversal
  • Very shallow liquidity ($32.83K) relative to both trading volume (~$723.6K/24h) and FDV ($404.76K), implying high slippage and manipulability
  • Top-10 holders control 30.37% of supply per current snapshot, with no historical or classification context available
  • Complete absence of sniper analysis data and mint/freeze authority verification, representing major unresolved risk blind spots rather than confirmed safety

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-48 hours

bearish

Given the sharp -58% pullback already visible from the candle [23] peak ($0.000964) to the candle [24] close ($0.000404), and a negative 5m reading (-5.08%), short-term momentum looks fragile. A continued retracement toward the immediate support of $0.0003125 or lower is plausible unless fresh buy volume re-emerges.

Target low

$0.00020

Target high

$0.00048

Support

$0.0003125 (candle 24 low), $0.0000445-0.0000525 (pre-breakout base)

Resistance

$0.000477 (candle 24 high), $0.000964 (parabolic peak)

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

bearish

Absent new catalysts, parabolic meme-token spikes on thin liquidity pools historically tend to fade substantially as early buyers and any concentrated top-10 holders realize gains. The medium-term bias leans bearish/mean-reverting toward pre-spike levels, though meme-coin volatility means sharp counter-trend rallies are also possible.

Catalysts

  • Potential further liquidity additions or CEX/DEX listings (unconfirmed, would be bullish)
  • Continued social/narrative momentum around the SUI ecosystem meme theme (unconfirmed)
  • Large top-10 holder sales given 30.37% concentration (would be bearish)
  • Resolution of unknown mint/freeze authority status - negative confirmation would be strongly bearish

Bullish factors

  • 24h buyers (3,099) outnumber sellers (2,040)
  • Buy volume ($375.51K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($348.12K)
  • 2,148 holder addresses show some distribution breadth

Bearish factors

  • 58% pullback already realized from the intraday peak
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($32.83K) relative to volume and FDV, prone to sharp downside moves
  • Classic pump-and-dump candle structure (long dormancy, vertical spike, rejection)
  • Top-10 holder concentration at 30.37% with unknown intent
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status adds tail risk

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because key risk inputs (mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder history/classification, top-100 concentration) are entirely missing, and the available OHLC history is only 24 hourly candles dominated by a single extreme pump event, which is not enough data to reliably project forward price behavior.

SUICAT call history

Full track record →

Sep 21bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
AP5YnC...MD6M
Total Supply
999,999,999.999999 SUICAT (6 decimals)

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($32.83K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and price manipulation risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing
  • Top-10 holders control over 30% of supply with no visibility into who they are or their recent activity
  • Parabolic, likely unsustainable price action (flat for ~19 hours then +9,000%-plus spike) is a classic pump pattern that often precedes sharp reversals

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 24-candle hourly series shows the token essentially flat at $0.00000422 for candles [1]-[12] (roughly 12 hours, near-zero volume), a small uptick to $0.00000486 at candle [13] on modest volume, continued flatness through candle [18], then an explosive breakout beginning at candle [19]-[23]: price rocketed from ~$0.00000525 to an intra-candle high of $0.000964 at candle [23] on volume of $725.7K, before pulling back to close candle [24] at $0.000404. This is a textbook parabolic pump pattern - long dormancy followed by vertical price discovery and a sharp pullback from the peak.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Medium-term (24h) trend is sharply up (+575.99%) driven entirely by the last ~5 hours of candles, but short-term price action shows a pullback from the candle [23] high of $0.000964 to the candle [24] close of $0.000404 (-58% from peak), and the most recent 5m change is -5.08%, indicating short-term momentum has turned down after the parabolic spike.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

52%

Sell

48%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0003125 (candle [24] low)

Major support

$0.0000445-0.0000525 (candle [19]-[21] range, pre-breakout base)

Immediate resistance

$0.000477 (candle [24] high)

Major resistance

$0.000964 (candle [23] all-time high in this window)

Immediate support sits at the candle [24] low of $0.0003125, with a much lower structural support zone in the $0.0000445-0.0000525 area representing the pre-breakout consolidation base - a retracement that deep would erase most of the recent gains. Immediate resistance is the candle [24] high of $0.000477, while the major resistance/ceiling is the parabolic peak of $0.000964 set in candle [23], which the token has already failed to hold, closing 58% below that level.

Notable patterns

  • Long flat/dormant base (candles 1-18) with near-zero volume, typical of an illiquid or newly-seeded pool before a pump
  • Vertical breakout candle [23] with extreme range (low $0.000113 to high $0.000964) on outsized volume - a blow-off-top style candle
  • Sharp rejection/pullback from the high into candle [24] close, suggesting distribution/profit-taking after the spike
  • Most recent 5m reading of -5.08% indicates the pullback may be continuing into the very short term

Liquidity

Liquidity

$32,834.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity is only $32.83K against a 24h combined trading volume of roughly $723.6K - a volume/liquidity ratio above 20x, which is extremely thin and indicates high slippage risk for any meaningfully-sized trade in either direction. Buy volume ($375.51K, 51.9%) modestly exceeds sell volume ($348.12K, 48.1%), and there were more unique buyers (3,099) than sellers (2,040), suggesting net inflow and more distributed buying interest than selling on a wallet-count basis. However, with liquidity this shallow, a handful of large sells could sharply move price downward, and the FDV of $404.76K is more than 12x total liquidity, a classic low-liquidity/high-FDV imbalance typical of newly-launched, thinly traded meme tokens.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,999.999999 SUICAT (6 decimals)

FDV

$404,758

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price moved from ~$0.0000042 to ~$0.0004 within the observed 24h candle window - a >9,000% move in the underlying candles culminating in a reported 575.99% 24h change, with intra-hour swings such as candle [23] showing a low of $0.000113 and high of $0.000964 in a single hour. The most recent 5m change is -5.08%, and 1h change is +132.26%, indicating extreme ongoing volatility.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is just $32.83K against 24h volume near $723.6K and an FDV of $404.76K, meaning the pool is very shallow relative to trading activity and market cap, creating high slippage and high risk of sharp price dislocation from moderate-sized trades.

  • Concentrationhigh

    Top-10 holders control 30.37% of total supply per the current snapshot. Top-100 concentration and wallet classification data are unavailable, so the true extent of concentration (e.g., whether more whales exist beyond the top 10) cannot be assessed; the known top-10 figure alone is high enough to pose material dump risk given the shallow liquidity.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($32.83K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and price manipulation risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing
  • Top-10 holders control over 30% of supply with no visibility into who they are or their recent activity
  • Parabolic, likely unsustainable price action (flat for ~19 hours then +9,000%-plus spike) is a classic pump pattern that often precedes sharp reversals
  • No sniper/bot activity data available to assess early-buyer dumping risk
  • No holder history to confirm whether new buyers are being distributed to broadly or concentrated further

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buyer count (3,099) exceeds seller count (2,040), and buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume, suggesting net demand in the last 24h
  • Holder base of 2,148 addresses provides some breadth, though this is an address count, not a verified unique-person count

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders explicitly comfortable with total loss of capital; unsuitable for risk-averse or long-term investors given the combination of unknown contract authorities, shallow liquidity, extreme volatility, and concentrated holder base.

SUICAT is a micro-cap Solana meme token that just experienced an extreme parabolic price spike (+575.99% in 24h, briefly touching +9,000%+ intra-window) on a thin $32.83K liquidity pool, and has already pulled back ~58% from its intraday peak. Key data gaps - unknown mint/freeze authority status, no sniper data, and no holder history - mean this thesis relies heavily on the limited real-time trading and holder-snapshot data available, and should be treated as speculative and high-uncertainty.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy-side demand continues (buyers already outnumber sellers 3,099 to 2,040 and buy volume modestly exceeds sell volume), the token could stabilize at a higher plateau above the pre-pump base and attract further speculative momentum trading, especially if liquidity is added and social attention (SUI ecosystem meme narrative) grows.

  • Net positive buyer count and buy volume in the last 24h
  • Broad-based holder count (2,148 addresses) provides some distribution, even if concentration among top 10 is notable
  • Meme-coin momentum and narrative-driven speculative interest can sustain elevated prices longer than fundamentals would suggest

Base Case

Price continues to be highly volatile with large swings in both directions, gradually decaying from the parabolic peak as early buyers take profits, while a core of new holders speculates on short-term momentum; liquidity remains a binding constraint that amplifies moves in both directions.

  • No major liquidity injection or CEX listing occurs in the near term
  • Holder and authority data remain unverified
  • Trading volume gradually normalizes back toward pre-spike levels as speculative interest fades

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic spike proves to be an unsustainable pump that fully mean-reverts toward the pre-breakout base (roughly $0.0000445-0.0000525), especially given the already-visible 58% pullback from the intraday high, shallow liquidity that cannot absorb large sells, unknown mint/freeze authority creating tail risk, and no visibility into sniper or insider selling.

  • Textbook pump-and-dump candle pattern: 18 hours of dormancy followed by a vertical spike and immediate rejection
  • Extremely shallow $32.83K liquidity relative to $723.6K 24h volume and $404.76K FDV, making the price highly manipulable
  • Top-10 holders control 30.37% of supply with unknown intent or identity
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status and unverified contract flags increase tail risk of rug or supply dilution
  • No sniper data to rule out coordinated early-buyer dumping

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 21, 01:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-21 13:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (mint, supply, FDV) - provider unspecified
  • USD price and 24h price-change feed
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (last 24 candles)
  • Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % change at multiple intervals)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count and top-10 supply share only)

Limitations

  • No sniper/bot wallet data was available, preventing assessment of early-buyer dumping or coordinated pump risk
  • No mint or freeze authority verification was provided; rug/dilution risk from authorities is genuinely unknown, not low
  • No holder history exists - only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration; growth trends, whale classification, and accumulation/distribution behavior could not be assessed and were not fabricated
  • Top-100 holder concentration was not available, limiting the full picture of supply distribution beyond the top 10
  • Only 24 hourly candles were available, dominated by a single extreme volatility event, limiting the reliability of technical pattern conclusions
  • Verified contract status, mutability, and master edition metadata flags were all unknown

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision. Cryptocurrency trading, especially in low-liquidity meme tokens, carries substantial risk of total loss. Conduct independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is SUI CAT ownership?

As of 2026-09-21 13:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 30.37% of supply. It reports 2,148 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling SUI CAT?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-21 13:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $375,508.00 in buys and $348,115.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is SUI CAT liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +5922.49%, from $647.87 (2026-09-21 02:00 UTC) to $39,017.82 (2026-09-21 13:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for SUI CAT (SUICAT)?

Given the sharp -58% pullback already visible from the candle [23] peak ($0.000964) to the candle [24] close ($0.000404), and a negative 5m reading (-5.08%), short-term momentum looks fragile. A continued retracement toward the immediate support of $0.0003125 or lower is plausible unless fresh buy volume re-emerges. Short-term outlook is bearish (24-48 hours), with a target range of $0.00020 to $0.00048.

Is SUICAT a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders explicitly comfortable with total loss of capital; unsuitable for risk-averse or long-term investors given the combination of unknown contract authorities, shallow liquidity, extreme volatility, and concentrated holder base.

What are the key risks of holding SUICAT?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($32.83K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and price manipulation risk • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing • Top-10 holders control over 30% of supply with no visibility into who they are or their recent activity

← Back to all predictions

Track SUICAT