SICAT

Super Intelligent Cat Price Today & AI Analysis

SICATSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 28, 2026

Price

$0.000578

+1205.50% 24h

Contract

Live
9pMXEbTjQ5HHiYifGbNBwkMkrQxGyhuSmB8ndKNXpump

Chain

Holders

3,456

Market cap

$559,297

More tokens on Solana

Super Intelligent Cat: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-28 17:15 UTC

Holder addresses

3,456

Top 10 supply share

18.63%

Reported liquidity

$40,543.00
How concentrated is Super Intelligent Cat ownership?
As of 2026-09-28 17:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 18.63% of supply. It reports 3,456 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Super Intelligent Cat?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-28 17:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $674,100.00 in buys and $648,452.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Super Intelligent Cat liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +74.20%, from $24,184.92 (2026-09-28 15:00 UTC) to $42,129.19 (2026-09-28 17:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-28 17:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-28 15:00 UTC$24,184.92
2026-09-28 16:00 UTC$40,726.97
2026-09-28 17:00 UTC$42,129.19

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about SICAT

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Sep 28, 05:16 PM UTC

FDV

$559,297

Liquidity

$40,543.00

Holders

3,456

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

Super Intelligent Cat (SICAT) is a very recently launched Solana meme token on PumpSwap that has experienced an extreme +1205.5% price surge in the last 24 hours, currently trading at $0.000578 with a $559.3K fully diluted valuation but only $40.54K in total liquidity. The token shows a near-balanced 24h buy/sell split (51%/49%) with more unique buyers than sellers, but critical risk data — mint/freeze authority status, sniper wallet activity, and historical holder trends — are all unavailable, making this a high-uncertainty, high-volatility speculative asset.

Key points

  • Extraordinary short-term price action (+1205% 24h, +134.7% 1h) far exceeding typical volatility even for meme tokens
  • Very shallow liquidity ($40.54K) relative to trading volume (~$1.32M 24h) and FDV ($559.3K), implying high slippage/manipulation susceptibility
  • Multiple critical data gaps: unknown mint/freeze authority, no sniper coverage, no holder history — significantly limiting due diligence confidence
  • Top-10 holder concentration of 18.63% is the only concentration metric available and appears moderate, though top-100 and wallet classification data are missing

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · next 1-6 hours

neutral

Given the extreme volatility already exhibited (session high $0.000784, session low $0.00000424) and a recent cooling in both volume and price momentum in the latest candle, short-term direction is highly uncertain. A move toward retesting the $0.000612-$0.000784 resistance zone is plausible if buy pressure (currently 51%) persists, but a breakdown toward the $0.000184-$0.000348 support zone is equally plausible given fading volume.

Target low

$0.000180

Target high

$0.000800

Support

$0.000348, $0.000184

Resistance

$0.000612, $0.000784

Medium term · next 1-7 days

neutral

With only 3 hours of price history and $40.54K in total liquidity, medium-term forecasting carries very low reliability. Tokens exhibiting this magnitude of 24h gain (+1205%) on shallow liquidity often either continue speculative momentum briefly or retrace sharply as early buyers take profit; without authority, sniper, or historical holder data, it is not possible to confidently project a medium-term direction.

Catalysts

  • Potential continued social media/community momentum given active Twitter and website presence
  • Risk of sharp reversal if early buyers or unidentified large holders begin distributing given unknown authority and concentration status beyond top-10
  • Liquidity depth changes (additions or removals) could sharply alter price stability in either direction

Bullish factors

  • 24h buy volume ($674.10K) exceeds sell volume ($648.45K), a mild net inflow
  • More unique buyers (5,521) than sellers (3,194) in the last 24h
  • Top-10 holder concentration (18.63%) is not extreme, based on available data
  • Active social presence (Twitter, website) may support continued community interest

Bearish factors

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($40.54K) relative to volume and FDV creates high risk of sharp reversals and slippage
  • Declining volume into the most recent candle while price stabilizes, a potential warning sign of fading momentum
  • Massive recent volatility and wick patterns are consistent with pump-and-dump dynamics common in newly launched pump.fun tokens
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open supply inflation or freeze risk
  • No sniper data available to assess early-buyer dump risk

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because the dataset provides only 3 hourly candles, no sniper data, no historical holder trends, and unknown mint/freeze authority status. The extreme recent volatility (+1205% 24h) makes any point prediction highly speculative, and the shallow $40.54K liquidity pool means price can be swung dramatically by modest trade sizes, further undermining predictive reliability.

SICAT call history

Full track record →

Sep 28neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
9pMXEb...pump
Total Supply
967,307,180.31 SICAT

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($40.54K) relative to volume and FDV creates high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Explosive, likely unsustainable price action (+1205% in 24h, +134% in 1h) typical of speculative pump-and-dump patterns
  • Mint/freeze authority status unknown, leaving open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing
  • No sniper data available, so early-buyer dump risk is entirely unquantified

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available (2026-09-28 15:00-17:00 UTC). Candle [1] opened at $0.00000424, spiked to a high of $0.0002935, then closed near $0.000186 — a massive wick and huge intra-candle range suggesting an initial pump with a large sell-off. Candle [2] opened at $0.000186, spiked further to $0.000784 (the highest print in the sample), pulled back to a low of $0.000185, and closed at $0.000555 — another large-range candle indicating continued volatile two-way action. Candle [3] opened at $0.000555, made a lower high of $0.000612, dipped to $0.000348, and closed at $0.000579, essentially flat versus its open — showing some stabilization/consolidation after two extremely volatile candles.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Over the very limited 3-hour window, price has trended strongly upward overall (from an open near $0.0000042 to a last close of $0.000579), but the most recent candle shows deceleration and lower highs compared to candle [2]'s peak of $0.000784, suggesting the initial parabolic move may be cooling into consolidation.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000348 (candle [3] low)

Major support

$0.000184 (candle [1]/[2] shared low zone)

Immediate resistance

$0.000612 (candle [3] high)

Major resistance

$0.000784 (candle [2] high, session peak)

Based on the limited 3-candle sample, the session peak of $0.000784 set in candle [2] represents the key resistance to reclaim for continuation of the pump. The $0.000184-$0.000186 zone acted as support/consolidation area between candles [1] and [2] and represents a major downside level if the token loses its recent gains. Given only 3 hours of data, these levels are provisional and could be invalidated quickly given the token's extreme volatility.

Notable patterns

  • Large upper wick on candle [1] indicating a sharp spike-and-reject pattern
  • Candle [2] shows a wide-range 'spike and partial retrace' pattern, consistent with early pump-and-dump-style trading
  • Candle [3] shows a smaller-bodied, more contained candle after two extreme-range candles, suggesting possible short-term consolidation/cooling off
  • Declining volume into candle [3] while price stabilizes — a caution signal for continuation of the uptrend

Liquidity

Liquidity

$40,543.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $40.54K is extremely shallow relative to the ~$559K fully diluted valuation and the enormous 24h trading volume (~$1.32M combined buy+sell). This mismatch (24h volume roughly 32x total liquidity) indicates high slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade and suggests the pool could be easily moved by a single large order. Buy volume ($674.10K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($648.45K), a 51.0%/49.0% split producing a mild net inflow, and buyer count (5,521) outpaces seller count (3,194), suggesting broad-based buying interest with more distinct buyers than sellers over the period. However, given the tiny liquidity base, these volume figures can be significantly inflated by wash trading, bot activity, or rapid in/out flips on a low-liquidity PumpSwap pair, so the apparent bullish buy/sell balance should be treated cautiously.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

967,307,180.31 SICAT

FDV

$559.30K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +1205.5% and a 1h change of +134.7% reflect extreme volatility. The 3 most recent hourly candles show huge intra-candle ranges (e.g., candle [1] ranged from a low of ~0.0000042 to a high of ~0.0002935, over 60x within one hour), indicating violent, unstable price action typical of a very early-stage, thinly-traded token.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $40.54K against ~$1.32M in 24h combined volume and a $559.3K FDV, meaning the pool is easily susceptible to large slippage and price impact from relatively small trades; a large sell could disproportionately crash price.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Only top-10 concentration (18.63%) is available; top-100 concentration, wallet labels, and historical flow data are not provided, so a full concentration risk picture (e.g., insider/team wallets, exchange wallets) cannot be assessed. Treat this gap as an unknown, not a mitigating factor.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($40.54K) relative to volume and FDV creates high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Explosive, likely unsustainable price action (+1205% in 24h, +134% in 1h) typical of speculative pump-and-dump patterns
  • Mint/freeze authority status unknown, leaving open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing
  • No sniper data available, so early-buyer dump risk is entirely unquantified
  • No historical holder data, so it's impossible to verify organic community growth versus bot/wash activity
  • Token and social metadata (verified status, mutability, spam flag) are all marked unknown, reducing overall data trust

Mitigating factors

  • Top-10 holder concentration of 18.63% is not unusually high for a newly launched token, suggesting supply is not extremely concentrated among a tiny handful of wallets (based on limited available data)
  • 24h buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume (51%/49%) with more unique buyers (5,521) than sellers (3,194), suggesting net buying interest over the period
  • Token has established social presence (Twitter, website links present)

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. It is not appropriate for conservative investors, those seeking stable exposure, or anyone unable to withstand extreme volatility and potential illiquidity when exiting a position. The combination of shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, unknown sniper exposure, and parabolic recent price action places this firmly in the highest risk tier.

Super Intelligent Cat (SICAT) is a newly-launched, extremely volatile Solana token trading on PumpSwap with a tiny liquidity pool ($40.54K) against a $559.3K FDV, having posted an extraordinary +1205% 24h price gain followed by signs of cooling momentum. The investment case is almost entirely speculative and short-term in nature, given critical data gaps around mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, and holder history. This is a high-risk, momentum-driven trade setup, not a fundamentals-based investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If social/community momentum (active Twitter and website) continues to attract new buyers faster than sellers exit, and if the current net buy-side imbalance (51%/49%) persists or strengthens, price could retest and potentially exceed the session high of $0.000784, extending the parabolic move typical of viral pump.fun-style tokens.

  • Sustained social media attention and viral narrative around the 'Super Intelligent Cat' concept
  • Continued buyer count exceeding seller count (5,521 vs 3,194 in the last 24h)
  • New liquidity inflows that reduce slippage risk and support larger buy orders

Base Case

Price likely continues to trade in a highly volatile, range-bound-to-choppy manner between the observed support ($0.000184-$0.000348) and resistance ($0.000612-$0.000784) zones over the near term, with direction highly sensitive to whichever side (buyers vs sellers) gains temporary dominance in the thin liquidity environment, absent any new catalysts or data resolving the current unknowns.

  • No major liquidity additions or removals occur in the short term
  • Neither confirmed rug-pull mechanics (unrenounced mint/freeze authority exploited) nor a major viral catalyst materializes
  • Current buyer/seller balance (roughly 51%/49%) remains roughly stable

Bear Case

High probability

Given the shallow liquidity, extreme volatility already realized, declining volume into the latest candle, and total lack of visibility into mint/freeze authority and sniper wallet behavior, a sharp reversal or liquidity-driven collapse is a real and arguably more probable outcome, consistent with typical pump.fun token lifecycles where early gains reverse quickly once initial buyers take profit.

  • Shallow $40.54K liquidity pool vulnerable to large sell orders causing outsized price impact
  • Fading volume in the most recent candle despite price stabilization, suggesting weakening conviction
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status creates tail risk of supply inflation or account freezes
  • No sniper data means early insider dumping risk cannot be ruled out
  • Classic 'spike and retrace' candle patterns already visible in the 3-hour sample

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 28, 05:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-28 17:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (mint address, supply, decimals, description, social links)
  • USD price and 24h % change data
  • 3 most recent hourly OHLC candles (PumpSwap pair)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current holder count and top-10 supply share snapshot only)
  • Sniper analysis (explicitly reported as unavailable for this token)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles were available, severely limiting technical pattern reliability and support/resistance validity
  • No sniper data was available at all, preventing any assessment of early-buyer/sniper concentration, PnL, or dump risk
  • No historical holder data (24h/7d/30d growth) was available, only a current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, verified contract status, mutability, and update authority were all marked unknown in the source metadata, preventing rug-risk verification
  • Top-100 holder concentration and wallet classifications (team, exchange, insider) were not available, limiting whale/distribution analysis to a single top-10 metric
  • Extremely high recent volatility (+1205% 24h) makes short-term technical levels highly provisional and subject to rapid invalidation

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited on-chain and market data provided at a single point in time and is for informational purposes only. It does NOT constitute financial advice, investment recommendation, or an endorsement to buy or sell any asset. Cryptocurrency tokens, particularly newly launched, low-liquidity meme tokens like SICAT, carry substantial risk of total capital loss due to volatility, illiquidity, potential rug-pull mechanics, and market manipulation. Several key risk indicators (mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder history) could not be verified in this dataset and were reported as unknown rather than assumed safe. Always conduct independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Super Intelligent Cat ownership?

As of 2026-09-28 17:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 18.63% of supply. It reports 3,456 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Super Intelligent Cat?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-28 17:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $674,100.00 in buys and $648,452.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Super Intelligent Cat liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +74.20%, from $24,184.92 (2026-09-28 15:00 UTC) to $42,129.19 (2026-09-28 17:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Super Intelligent Cat (SICAT)?

Given the extreme volatility already exhibited (session high $0.000784, session low $0.00000424) and a recent cooling in both volume and price momentum in the latest candle, short-term direction is highly uncertain. A move toward retesting the $0.000612-$0.000784 resistance zone is plausible if buy pressure (currently 51%) persists, but a breakdown toward the $0.000184-$0.000348 support zone is equally plausible given fading volume. Short-term outlook is neutral (next 1-6 hours), with a target range of $0.000180 to $0.000800.

Is SICAT a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 85/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. It is not appropriate for conservative investors, those seeking stable exposure, or anyone unable to withstand extreme volatility and potential illiquidity when exiting a position. The combination of shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, unknown sniper exposure, and parabolic recent price action places this firmly in the highest risk tier.

What are the key risks of holding SICAT?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($40.54K) relative to volume and FDV creates high slippage and manipulation risk • Explosive, likely unsustainable price action (+1205% in 24h, +134% in 1h) typical of speculative pump-and-dump patterns • Mint/freeze authority status unknown, leaving open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing

← Back to all predictions

Track SICAT