JOLLYBOT

Jollybot Price Today & AI Analysis

JOLLYBOTSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 22, 2026

Price

$0.000466

+836.50% 24h · FDV $466,158

Contract

Live
9Vkx8JzfdARs59TFJvJbHALjgxSzvttja3kdCTb82HAX

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,649

Market cap

$466,158

More tokens on Solana

WOWWOWWoW Gold$0.001936-31.9%MC $1.93MSTONK10STONK10Stonk10 Index$0.003732+94.7%MC $3.72MTokensTokensTokens$0.000156-31.2%MC $141.8KBABYCATEBABYCATEBaby Catecoin$0.001853-0.5%MC $1.80MCODECCODECCodec Flow$0.009934+12.9%MC $9.93MSAISAISairium$0.053014-87.1%MC $301.4K

Jollybot: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-22 00:15 UTC

Holder addresses

1,649

Top 10 supply share

32.12%

Reported liquidity

$31,814.00
How concentrated is Jollybot ownership?
As of 2026-09-22 00:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 32.12% of supply. It reports 1,649 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Jollybot?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-22 00:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $498,709.00 in buys and $466,795.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Jollybot liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +148.85%, from $14,323.65 (2026-09-21 22:00 UTC) to $35,644.59 (2026-09-22 00:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-22 00:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-21 22:00 UTC$14,323.65
2026-09-21 23:00 UTC$44,363.51
2026-09-22 00:00 UTC$35,644.59

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about JOLLYBOT

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 22, 12:16 AM UTC

FDV

$466,158

Liquidity

$31,814.00

Holders

1,649

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

JOLLYBOT is a newly-active Solana token (mint 9Vkx8...82HAX) trading on a single Raydium CPMM pair, currently priced at $0.000466 with a fully diluted valuation of $466.16K. The token experienced an extreme 836.5% price move within the last 24 hours, visible in the OHLC data as a parabolic spike from roughly $0.0000042 to a peak of $0.00114 followed by a pullback to $0.000466. Liquidity is very shallow at $31.81K, and 24h trading volume was roughly $965K combined (buy+sell), with buy pressure slightly exceeding sell pressure (51.7% vs 48.3%). Holder aggregates show 1,649 holder addresses with the top 10 controlling 32.12% of supply, but no historical holder trend data exists. Mint/freeze authority status is unverified, and no sniper data is available, leaving key rug and bot-dump risks unresolved.

Key points

  • Extreme, recent 836% price spike with a visible parabolic candle followed by a rejection/pullback candle
  • Very shallow liquidity ($31.81K) relative to FDV ($466.16K), implying high slippage and manipulation susceptibility
  • Unverified mint/freeze authority status -- a material unresolved risk, not confirmed safe
  • No sniper coverage available, unlike many tokens with bot-dump visibility
  • Only a single-snapshot holder metric (1,649 holders, 32.12% top-10 concentration) with no growth history

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-48 hours

bearish

Following the parabolic spike and subsequent rejection candle showing a lower close and declining volume, near-term price action likely continues to consolidate or retrace further as momentum fades from the initial pump, though volatility will remain extreme in either direction given the thin liquidity.

Target low

$0.00032 (candle 3 low)

Target high

$0.00079 (candle 3 high)

Support

$0.000322 (candle 3 low), $0.0000219 (candle 1 close / candle 2 open, pre-pump base)

Resistance

$0.000787 (candle 3 high), $0.00114 (candle 2 all-time high in the provided window)

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

neutral

With only 3 hours of candle history and no fundamental catalysts identified beyond a Twitter social link, medium-term direction is highly uncertain. Sustainability will depend on whether new liquidity and organic demand materialize, or whether this proves to be a fading pump-and-dump pattern.

Catalysts

  • Any additional liquidity added to the Raydium pool reducing slippage risk
  • Verification (or lack thereof) of mint/freeze authority status becoming public
  • Continued unique buyer growth vs. seller growth
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market sentiment/rotation

Bullish factors

  • Net positive 24h buy/sell volume ratio (51.7% buy vs 48.3% sell)
  • More unique buyers (2,831) than sellers (1,821) in 24h
  • High volume ($924.9K in the peak candle) shows there is real trading interest/liquidity flow even if the pool itself is shallow

Bearish factors

  • Rejection candle with lower close and sharply declining volume after the pump
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($31.81K) vs FDV ($466.16K) creates high slippage and dump risk
  • Unverified mint/freeze authority leaves rug risk on the table
  • No sniper data to rule out coordinated early-buyer dumping
  • Classic pump-and-dump candle shape (vertical spike followed by immediate retracement)

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because only 3 hourly candles are available (an extremely short history), sniper and holder-history data are entirely absent, and mint/freeze authority status is unverified. The token's price action is dominated by a single extreme volatility event rather than an established trading pattern, making any prediction highly speculative.

JOLLYBOT call history

Full track record →

Sep 22bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
9Vkx8J...2HAX
Total Supply
999,946,575.08 JOLLYBOT (6 decimals)

Key Risks

  • Extreme price volatility (836% 24h move) with no established price stability
  • Very shallow liquidity ($31.81K) relative to FDV and volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Mint/freeze authority status entirely unverified -- possible unmitigated rug risk
  • Top-10 wallets hold 32.12% of supply with no visibility into who these holders are

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (22:00 UTC) opened at $0.00000455, spiked to a high of $0.0000370, dipped to a low of $0.00000419, and closed at $0.0000219 on volume of $89.7K. Candle 2 (23:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000219 and exploded upward, hitting a high of $0.00114 (roughly a 50x intra-candle move from the low of $0.0000113) before closing at $0.000688 on massive volume of $924.9K -- this is a huge bullish expansion candle. Candle 3 (00:00 UTC) opened at $0.000688, made a marginally higher high of $0.000787, but then sold off to a low of $0.000323, closing at $0.000466 (down from the prior close) on reduced volume of $187.8K -- this looks like a pullback/distribution candle after the parabolic move, with the closing price roughly in the middle of the range, suggesting indecision after the spike.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Medium-term (across the 3 candles) the trend is sharply upward, with price rising roughly 100x from the candle-1 low near $0.0000042 to the candle-3 high near $0.000787. However, the most recent candle shows a pullback from the peak, with price closing well below the candle-2 close and the candle-3 high, suggesting short-term momentum has stalled or reversed following the parabolic spike.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Stable

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

unknown

Major support

unknown

Immediate resistance

unknown

Major resistance

unknown

No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

Notable patterns

  • Parabolic breakout candle (candle 2) with volume surge to $924.9K
  • Long upper wick on candle 3 indicating rejection at highs (~$0.000787) after the spike
  • Pullback/retracement candle following an extreme vertical move, typical of unsustainable pump patterns
  • Sharp volume decline from candle 2 ($924.9K) to candle 3 ($187.8K), suggesting fading buying interest after the initial spike

Liquidity

Liquidity

$31,814.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $31.81K is extremely shallow relative to a $466.16K fully diluted valuation and ~$965K combined 24h trading volume (buy+sell). This ratio (liquidity roughly 3.4% of 24h volume) implies high slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade and makes the pool highly susceptible to large price swings from modest capital flows. Buy volume ($498.71K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($466.80K), a net inflow with 51.7% buy pressure, and buyer count (2,831) exceeds seller count (1,821), suggesting more net demand than supply in the last 24h. However, given the extreme price volatility already observed (836% swing), this apparent buy-side edge should be treated cautiously as it may reflect momentum-chasing rather than durable demand. The token trades on a single Raydium CPMM pair, meaning there is a single point of liquidity failure -- no diversification across venues.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,946,575.08 JOLLYBOT (6 decimals)

FDV

$466.16K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    The token showed an extraordinary 1h/24h price change of 836.5%, and hourly OHLC candles show intra-hour swings from lows near $0.0000112 to highs near $0.00114 -- roughly two orders of magnitude within a few hours. This is characteristic of an extremely immature, thinly-traded, and highly speculative market.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $31.81K against a $466.16K FDV and ~$965K in 24h combined volume, indicating a shallow pool with high slippage risk on even moderate trade sizes, and reliance on a single Raydium CPMM pair as the sole liquidity venue.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top-10 holders control 32.12% of supply based on the current snapshot. This is a meaningful concentration but not extreme relative to many new tokens. However, no top-100 concentration, wallet classification, or historical trend data is available, limiting full assessment.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extreme price volatility (836% 24h move) with no established price stability
  • Very shallow liquidity ($31.81K) relative to FDV and volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Mint/freeze authority status entirely unverified -- possible unmitigated rug risk
  • Top-10 wallets hold 32.12% of supply with no visibility into who these holders are
  • No sniper data available, so bot-driven dump risk cannot be ruled out or confirmed
  • Single liquidity venue (one Raydium CPMM pair) with no redundancy
  • No holder history to confirm whether growth is organic or bot/wash-trading driven

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume ($498.71K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($466.80K), showing net inflow and more unique buyers (2,831) than sellers (1,821) in the last 24h
  • A moderately large holder base (1,649 addresses) suggests some distribution beyond a tiny insider group, though this cannot be independently verified for authenticity

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can tolerate potential total loss of capital. Not suitable for conservative or medium-risk investors given unresolved authority-renouncement questions, extreme volatility, and shallow liquidity.

JOLLYBOT is an extremely young, extremely volatile Solana token that just experienced an 836% price spike within 24 hours, driven by a parabolic hourly candle with nearly $925K in volume. Current price has pulled back meaningfully from the intra-day high. Liquidity is very shallow ($31.81K) relative to FDV ($466.16K), authority renouncement status is entirely unverified, and no sniper or holder-history data exists to confirm whether this move is organic. This is a high-risk, speculative micro-cap play, not an investment with fundamentals to evaluate.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If genuine organic demand continues (net buy pressure was 51.7% over 24h with more unique buyers than sellers) and the token gains social traction beyond its single-platform Twitter presence, price could continue elevated volatility with further upside spikes, especially given the low liquidity base which allows small capital inflows to move price dramatically.

  • Continued net positive buy/sell volume ratio (51.7%/48.3%)
  • More unique buyers (2,831) than sellers (1,821) in the last 24h
  • Shallow liquidity means small new capital inflows can drive outsized price appreciation
  • Social/community momentum following the initial viral price spike

Base Case

Price likely continues to be highly volatile with large swings in both directions as the token works through its post-pump price discovery phase; absent new catalysts, volatility should gradually decay and price may settle at a lower level than the recent peak, but continued unpredictable spikes and drops are the most probable near-term outcome given the extreme thinness of the market.

  • No major new liquidity is added to deepen the pool
  • No verification of mint/freeze authority becomes available
  • Trading activity remains dominated by short-term speculators rather than long-term holders

Bear Case

High probability

The 836% spike was a classic pump pattern (visible in the parabolic candle-2 move followed by a candle-3 rejection at highs and fading volume), and price could continue to retrace sharply toward pre-spike levels as early buyers and any latent snipers/insiders (unverifiable due to lack of sniper data) take profits into the thin liquidity, causing a rapid unwind.

  • Candle 3 already shows rejection from highs ($0.000787) and a lower close ($0.000466)
  • Volume declined sharply from candle 2 to candle 3 (from $924.9K to $187.8K), suggesting fading momentum
  • Very shallow $31.81K liquidity cannot support the current FDV without high slippage on exit
  • Unverified mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezing
  • Top-10 holders control 32.12% of supply with no visibility into whether these are insiders positioned to sell

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 22, 12:16 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-22 00:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • Price feed (USD price, % change)
  • OHLC hourly candle data (3 most recent candles)
  • Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, liquidity)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis (unavailable/empty for this token)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles were provided, insufficient for robust technical analysis or multi-day trend confirmation
  • No sniper data was available, preventing assessment of early-buyer/bot dump risk
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d) was available, only a single current snapshot -- growth/trend/accumulation claims cannot be substantiated
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, verified-contract status, and mutability are all unknown, preventing rug-risk verification from authorities
  • Top-100 holder concentration was not provided, limiting full concentration risk assessment
  • 6h price change and native price change data were unavailable
  • 24h unique wallet total and 24h dollar price change were unavailable

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (sniper data, holder history, authority verification). Cryptocurrency investments, especially in newly launched, low-liquidity tokens, carry very high risk including potential total loss of capital. Conduct independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Jollybot ownership?

As of 2026-09-22 00:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 32.12% of supply. It reports 1,649 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Jollybot?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-22 00:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $498,709.00 in buys and $466,795.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Jollybot liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +148.85%, from $14,323.65 (2026-09-21 22:00 UTC) to $35,644.59 (2026-09-22 00:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Jollybot (JOLLYBOT)?

Following the parabolic spike and subsequent rejection candle showing a lower close and declining volume, near-term price action likely continues to consolidate or retrace further as momentum fades from the initial pump, though volatility will remain extreme in either direction given the thin liquidity. Short-term outlook is bearish (24-48 hours), with a target range of $0.00032 (candle 3 low) to $0.00079 (candle 3 high).

Is JOLLYBOT a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can tolerate potential total loss of capital. Not suitable for conservative or medium-risk investors given unresolved authority-renouncement questions, extreme volatility, and shallow liquidity.

What are the key risks of holding JOLLYBOT?

Extreme price volatility (836% 24h move) with no established price stability • Very shallow liquidity ($31.81K) relative to FDV and volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Mint/freeze authority status entirely unverified -- possible unmitigated rug risk

← Back to all predictions

Track JOLLYBOT