UNISWAP Price Today & AI Analysis

PAWSINUSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 18, 2026

$0.0₅3793

+20.68% 24h

Contract

Live

9Gf5csKmAiSbvoCPAdMxXonDo1V5fq9RQeY8MZEBb3zt

Chain

Solana

Holders

414

Market cap

$3,791

At a $1M market cap, $PAWSINU would be $0.001000 (264x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is PAWSINU a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 2

Transfer fee

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 3% fee and the owner can still raise it.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token blocks a sell

Transfer fee

3%Every buy and sell · can be raised

Creator holds

0.01%

The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about PAWSINU

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

HABIBINUHABIBINU$0.0₄1100+10.1%MC $11.0K

BOWIESpace Dog$0.0₅2673-2.2%MC $2.7K

bcatbanana cat $0.0₄1592+11.2%MC $15.9K

CATOSHICatoshi Rush$0.000120-2.6%MC $120.3K

backpackBear 89 Backpack$0.0₄1073-4.5%MC $10.7K

uniuni$0.009481-63.9%MC $9.48M

UNISWAP: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-18 04:46 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$11,153.00

How concentrated is UNISWAP ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling UNISWAP?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is UNISWAP liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-18 04:46 UTC, reported liquidity was $11,153.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-18 04:46 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 18, 04:46 AM UTC

FDV

$72,161

Liquidity

$11,153.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

PAWSINU (ticker mismatched with the 'UNISWAP' name field, itself a likely spoof/impersonation red flag) is a micro-cap Solana token trading on a single Raydium CPMM pool with only ~$11.15K total liquidity against a $72.16K fully diluted valuation. The token experienced an extreme, highly volatile hourly candle sequence (price spiking from ~$0.0000036 to over $0.0011 and crashing back to ~$0.00007 within a single hour), a hallmark of a low-liquidity pump-and-dump pattern rather than organic price discovery. 24h price is up 136% but this figure is distorted by the massive one-hour spike; more recent candles show the price stabilizing in the $0.00004-$0.00008 range. No holder or sniper data is available from upstream sources, which materially limits distribution and early-buyer risk assessment.

Key points

Name field says 'UNISWAP' but symbol is 'PAWSINU' — a mismatch that suggests possible impersonation or metadata manipulation
Extremely thin liquidity (~$11.15K) relative to $72.16K FDV creates high slippage and manipulation risk
Massive intra-candle volatility (single hourly candle ranged from $0.0000032 to $0.00112, a ~350x range) consistent with a sniper/bot-driven pump-and-dump
Nearly balanced 24h buy/sell volume (50.6%/49.4%) despite the huge price swing, suggesting heavy two-sided churn rather than sustained accumulation
No holder distribution or sniper wallet data available, leaving concentration risk unverifiable

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

After an explosive spike to $0.00112 and a violent retracement, price has been consolidating in a tight $0.00004-$0.00008 band over the last several candles. Given the extreme volatility already exhibited and thin liquidity, further sharp moves in either direction are likely, but the balanced 50/50 buy-sell split and lack of fresh upward momentum favor continued consolidation or a slow bleed lower absent a new catalyst.

Target low

$0.000035

Target high

$0.000090

Support: $0.0000549 (candle 9 low), $0.0000371 (candle 8 low), $0.0000322 (candle 1 low, pre-spike base)
Resistance: $0.0000984 (candle 6 high), $0.000166 (candle 4 high), $0.00112 (candle 2 spike high, unlikely to retest short-term)

Medium term · 3-7 days

bearish

Tokens exhibiting this kind of parabolic spike-and-collapse pattern on razor-thin liquidity ($11.15K) very rarely sustain elevated valuations. Without new liquidity injections, holder growth data, or credible utility/catalysts, the base case is a gradual decay toward pre-spike levels or lower as speculative interest fades.

Catalysts

Potential liquidity additions or CEX/DEX aggregator listings could reignite volume
Continued social media (Twitter) promotion could trigger further short-lived pumps
A drain of the shallow liquidity pool by a large holder would cause a severe price crash

Bullish factors

24h buy volume ($1.08M) slightly exceeds sell volume ($1.05M), a marginally positive net flow
Unique buyers (3,234) outnumber unique sellers (2,797) in the last 24h
Active Twitter social presence indicates some community engagement

Bearish factors

Extreme volatility and a 350x intra-hour candle range signal manipulation or bot activity
Total liquidity of only $11.15K makes the token highly susceptible to large-holder dumps and severe slippage
Metadata mismatch (name 'UNISWAP' vs symbol 'PAWSINU') raises credibility and impersonation concerns
No verifiable holder concentration or sniper data to rule out extreme concentration risk
Price has already retraced ~94% from its intra-day high of $0.00112 to current ~$0.0000714

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the complete absence of holder and sniper data, extremely thin liquidity that amplifies noise, and reliance on only 9 hourly candles which capture an anomalous pump event rather than a representative price history.

PAWSINU call history

Full track record →

Sep 18bearish@ $0.0000722

24h-52.5%

7d-83.5%

30d-95.1%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 9Gf5cs...b3zt
Total Supply: 999,794,300.39 PAWSINU

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($11.15K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Already-realized parabolic spike-and-crash pattern suggests speculative mania has likely passed its peak
Unverifiable mint/freeze/update authority status leaves rug-pull and dilution risk unresolved
No holder or sniper data available, preventing verification of concentration and early-buyer dumping risk

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 9 available hourly candles show a violent parabolic spike followed by a sharp collapse and subsequent low-volatility consolidation. Candle 1 opened at $0.0000036 and closed near $0.0000816 with a high of $0.0000862. Candle 2 exploded to a high of $0.00112 (a >13x move within the hour) before closing at $0.000281, then candle 3 continued falling to close at $0.0000778. Candles 4-9 show decaying volume and a tightening range between roughly $0.0000371 and $0.000166, with the most recent candle (9) closing at $0.0000714, essentially flat versus candle 8's close of $0.0000623.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Short-term price action is a clear downtrend/retracement from the candle 2 blow-off top, now stabilizing into a narrow consolidation range. Medium-term (across all 9 candles) the trend is also down from the peak, though the very first candle's low was lower than current price, so the token is technically still above its absolute origin point.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000549

Major support

$0.0000322

Immediate resistance

$0.0000984

Major resistance

$0.000166

Immediate support sits at the candle 9 low ($0.0000549), with major support at the candle 1 low ($0.0000322) which represents the pre-spike base. Immediate resistance is at the candle 6 high ($0.0000984), and major resistance at the candle 4 high ($0.000166). The extreme spike high of $0.00112 (candle 2) is treated as an outlier unlikely to serve as a meaningful near-term resistance level given the collapse that followed.

Notable patterns

Parabolic spike-and-collapse (blow-off top) in candle 2 with a >13x intra-candle range
Long upper wick / doji-like rejection candles in candles 3-4 signaling failed attempts to reclaim highs
Decreasing volume trend across candles 3-9 indicating fading momentum and reduced speculative interest
Recent tight-range consolidation (candles 6-9) suggesting equilibrium between buyers and sellers at lower levels

Liquidity

$11,153.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $11.15K is extremely shallow relative to the $1.08M in 24h buy volume and $1.05M in sell volume, implying that liquidity has been recycled many times over (effective volume/liquidity turnover ratio well above 100x). This mismatch between reported volume and pool depth is a strong indicator of high slippage risk and vulnerability to price manipulation — the earlier observed 13x candle spike is a direct symptom of this shallow liquidity. 24h buyers (3,234) modestly exceed sellers (2,797), and buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume, producing a marginal net inflow, but the balance is close enough that it should not be read as strong sustained accumulation.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,794,300.39 PAWSINU

FDV

$72.16K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price moved from a low of $0.0000036 to a high of $0.00112 and back down to ~$0.00007 within a handful of hourly candles — a swing exceeding 300x — indicating extreme volatility unsuitable for risk-averse participants.
Liquidityhigh
Only $11.15K in total liquidity against $72.16K FDV and over $1M in daily two-sided volume creates a highly fragile market structure prone to severe slippage and price impact from even modest trade sizes.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($11.15K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Already-realized parabolic spike-and-crash pattern suggests speculative mania has likely passed its peak
Unverifiable mint/freeze/update authority status leaves rug-pull and dilution risk unresolved
No holder or sniper data available, preventing verification of concentration and early-buyer dumping risk
Metadata name/symbol mismatch ('UNISWAP' vs 'PAWSINU') is a potential red flag for impersonation or careless/deceptive token deployment

Mitigating factors

24h buy volume marginally exceeds sell volume and unique buyers outnumber sellers, showing some residual demand
Active social presence (Twitter) suggests at least some organic community awareness
Volume has been consistently high in absolute terms, indicating the token has not been completely abandoned

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand micro-cap Solana meme-token dynamics and are prepared to lose their entire position. Not appropriate for risk-averse investors or anyone seeking capital preservation, given the shallow liquidity, unresolved authority status, and evidence of an already-completed pump-and-dump cycle.

PAWSINU is a micro-cap, extremely thin-liquidity Solana token that has already experienced a dramatic pump-and-dump cycle within its brief observed history. With only $11.15K in liquidity, unresolved authority/rug risk, and no verifiable holder or sniper data, this token carries very high speculative risk with limited fundamental support for its $72.16K FDV.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If renewed social/community momentum (via its Twitter presence) or a fresh marketing push drives another wave of speculative buying, price could stage a short-lived rally back toward the $0.0001-$0.00017 resistance zone, especially given the currently balanced buy/sell volume split.

Renewed viral social media attention
New liquidity additions reducing slippage and enabling larger buys
Listing on additional DEX aggregators or trackers increasing visibility

Base Case

Price likely continues to consolidate in the $0.00004-$0.00009 range in the near term as the market digests the earlier spike, with volume remaining well below the peak levels seen during the pump, absent a major new catalyst.

No major liquidity events (additions or removals) occur in the short term
Social media interest neither meaningfully grows nor completely disappears
No confirmed rug-pull action (mint inflation or freeze) occurs, though this cannot be fully ruled out given unknown authority status

Bear Case

High probability

The token continues its post-spike decay as speculative interest fades, volume keeps declining (already down from $1.69M in the spike hour to under $6K in the most recent hour), and any concentrated holder or the original liquidity provider exits, causing a further sharp drawdown toward or below the pre-spike base near $0.0000032-$0.0000036.

Rapidly decaying volume trend across the last several candles
Extremely shallow liquidity making the pool vulnerable to a single large sell
Unresolved mint/freeze authority risk that could enable further dilution or wallet restrictions
Lack of verifiable holder decentralization

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 18, 04:46 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-18 04:46 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (mint, supply, FDV)
Price feed (USD price and % change metrics)
Hourly OHLCV candle data (9 most recent candles)
Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

No holder distribution data available (upstream endpoints retired) — holderTrends and whaleMap are populated with empty/default values only
No sniper wallet data available — smart money signals could not be computed and are set to unknown/zero defaults
Only 9 hourly candles were provided, limiting the ability to assess longer-term trend context
Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, and mutability status are all listed as unknown, preventing a definitive rug-risk determination
Verified contract status and possible-spam flag are unknown, adding uncertainty to legitimacy assessment

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited on-chain and market data provided at a single point in time and is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency tokens, especially low-liquidity micro-cap tokens on Solana, carry very high risk including total loss of capital. Data gaps (holder data, sniper data, authority status) mean this analysis should not be treated as comprehensive due diligence. Always conduct independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is UNISWAP (PAWSINU) a scam?

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 3% fee and the owner can still raise it. The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply. Checked Nov 2, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell UNISWAP (PAWSINU)?

Yes. Every buy and sell pays a 3% transfer fee, and the owner can still raise it. Checked Nov 2, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is UNISWAP ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling UNISWAP?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is UNISWAP liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-18 04:46 UTC, reported liquidity was $11,153.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for UNISWAP (PAWSINU)?

Is PAWSINU a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand micro-cap Solana meme-token dynamics and are prepared to lose their entire position. Not appropriate for risk-averse investors or anyone seeking capital preservation, given the shallow liquidity, unresolved authority status, and evidence of an already-completed pump-and-dump cycle.

What are the key risks of holding PAWSINU?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($11.15K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Already-realized parabolic spike-and-crash pattern suggests speculative mania has likely passed its peak • Unverifiable mint/freeze/update authority status leaves rug-pull and dilution risk unresolved