CLIP

CLIPBACK Price Today & AI Analysis

CLIPSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 21, 2026

Price

$0.000515

+963.42% 24h · FDV $503,082

Contract

Live
9DdHxVe1BSPaTy3iGEwvWsooRchNLK61XFAvzot59FwD

Chain

Solana

Holders

2,852

Market cap

$503,082

More tokens on Solana

JUPJUPJupiter$0.3064+12.9%MC $2.10BCRCLxCRCLxCircle xStock$96.78+7.5%MC $79.47MNEARNEARNEAR$3.58-1.8%MC $5.06MXMRXMRMonero$578.26+7.9%MC $1.47MBOMEBOMEBOOK OF MEME$0.001055+17.0%MC $72.68MSAISAISairium$0.053014-87.1%MC $301.4K

CLIPBACK: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-21 15:15 UTC

Holder addresses

2,852

Top 10 supply share

19.22%

Reported liquidity

$36,455.00
How concentrated is CLIPBACK ownership?
As of 2026-09-21 15:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 19.22% of supply. It reports 2,852 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling CLIPBACK?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-21 15:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $1,572,577.00 in buys and $1,531,173.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is CLIPBACK liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -1.07%, from $41,794.94 (2026-09-21 14:00 UTC) to $41,348.59 (2026-09-21 15:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-21 15:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-21 14:00 UTC$41,794.94
2026-09-21 15:00 UTC$41,348.59

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about CLIP

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 21, 03:16 PM UTC

FDV

$503,082

Liquidity

$36,455.00

Holders

2,852

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

CLIP (CLIPBACK) is a micro-cap token on Solana trading via a single PumpSwap pair, currently priced at $0.000515 after an extreme +963% 24h move, with a fully diluted valuation of ~$503K against only $36.45K of total liquidity. The token's on-chain risk profile is largely unverifiable from available data: mint/freeze authority status is unknown, sniper wallet data is completely absent, and holder analytics are limited to a single snapshot (2,852 holder addresses, 19.22% held by the top 10) with no historical trend. Recent price action shows a parabolic spike followed by a sharp partial reversal and fading volume, consistent with a high-risk, momentum-driven speculative asset.

Key points

  • Extreme 24h price move (+963%) combined with a >20,000% intra-candle high-low range in the most recent hourly candle, indicating exceptional volatility even by micro-cap standards
  • Severe liquidity-to-volume mismatch: $36.45K liquidity vs. ~$3.1M in combined 24h volume, implying high slippage and manipulation susceptibility
  • Complete absence of sniper wallet data and holder history, leaving material blind spots around insider/bot concentration and organic growth verification
  • Unresolved mint/freeze authority status, an unquantified but potentially significant rug/dilution risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

Following a parabolic spike and partial reversal, momentum indicators (fading volume, negative 5m change, rejection near $0.00077-$0.00081) suggest near-term downside or consolidation risk is elevated. A break below immediate support could accelerate selling given the shallow liquidity base.

Target low

$0.00035

Target high

$0.00078

Support

$0.000393, $0.0000035 (extreme/illiquid tail)

Resistance

$0.000777, $0.000809

Medium term · 3-14 days

neutral

With only two hourly candles of data and no medium-term OHLC history, a reliable medium-term directional call cannot be made with confidence. The token's trajectory will likely hinge on whether liquidity deepens, whether authority/rug risks are clarified, and whether the burn-mechanic narrative sustains organic demand.

Catalysts

  • Any confirmation (positive or negative) of mint/freeze authority status
  • Liquidity pool growth or withdrawal on the PumpSwap pair
  • Continued social/community engagement around the 'Clipback' attention-to-burn narrative
  • Emergence of sniper/whale wallet data revealing concentrated sell risk

Bullish factors

  • Nearly balanced 24h buy/sell volume (50.7%/49.3%) with slightly more unique buyers than sellers
  • Deflationary burn narrative (20% of creator fees burned) could reduce supply if adopted
  • Active social presence (Twitter, website) providing a channel for community-driven demand

Bearish factors

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($36.45K) vs. $3.1M 24h volume creates high manipulation/slippage risk
  • Sharp ~82% volume decline between the two available candles, suggesting fading initial pump interest
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves rug/dilution risk unresolved
  • No sniper data to rule out concentrated early-holder dumping risk

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because only two hourly candles are available (insufficient for robust technical analysis), sniper and deep holder concentration data are entirely absent, and mint/freeze authority status is unverified. Predictions are based on a very short and volatile price history that may not be representative of future behavior.

CLIP call history

Full track record →

Sep 21bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
9DdHxV...9FwD
Total Supply
977,292,605.82 CLIP

Key Risks

  • Extreme short-term volatility: +963% in 24h with intra-hour swings exceeding 20,000% high-to-low range in a single candle
  • Very shallow liquidity ($36.45K) relative to volume (~$3.1M/24h) and FDV ($503K), creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Mint/freeze authority status unknown — cannot rule out supply inflation or account-freezing risk
  • No sniper data available — cannot assess whether early buyers/bots hold concentrated positions poised to dump

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (14:00 UTC) opened at $0.00000349, spiked to a high of $0.000809, dipped back to its open as the low, and closed at $0.000615 — a massive bullish expansion candle with volume of ~2.82M. Candle 2 (15:00 UTC) opened at $0.000615, pushed higher to $0.000777, then reversed sharply down to a low of $0.000393, closing at $0.000515 — effectively giving back roughly half of the prior gain and printing a long-upper-wick/long-lower-wick indecision candle on much lower volume (~508K, an ~82% drop from the prior candle). This pattern resembles an initial parabolic pump candle followed by a wide-range reversal/distribution candle, a classic pattern seen in newly-listed low-liquidity tokens.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term price action within the two available candles shows a fade from the intra-period high near $0.00081 down toward $0.0005, indicating short-term downward momentum after the initial spike. With only two candles, no reliable medium-term trend can be established, so medium-term is characterized as sideways/undetermined pending more data.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000393 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.00000349 (candle 1 open/low — extreme downside if liquidity vanishes)

Immediate resistance

$0.000777 (candle 2 high)

Major resistance

$0.000809 (candle 1 high, all-time high in the provided data)

With only two candles of data, key levels are necessarily provisional. Immediate support sits at the candle 2 low of ~$0.000393; a break below could expose the token to much lower levels given the extreme low printed in candle 1 ($0.0000035), though that level likely reflects an illiquid opening tick rather than a durable support. Immediate resistance is the candle 2 high of ~$0.000777, with the candle 1 high of ~$0.000809 marking the highest print observed and acting as major resistance.

Notable patterns

  • Parabolic spike candle followed by wide-range reversal candle (pump-and-partial-dump pattern)
  • Long upper wick on candle 2 suggesting rejection near $0.00077–$0.00081 zone
  • Sharp volume decay (~82%) between candle 1 and candle 2, indicating fading momentum/interest after the initial spike

Liquidity

Liquidity

$36,455.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $36.45K stands in stark contrast to reported 24h volumes of ~$3.1M combined (buy+sell), implying an extremely high volume-to-liquidity ratio (~85x) typical of a highly volatile, thinly-liquid PumpSwap pair. This mismatch means even modest trade sizes can move price dramatically, as evidenced by the intra-hour swing from a low of $0.0000035 to a high of $0.00081 in the most recent candle. Buy vs sell volume is nearly balanced (50.7%/49.3%), and buyer count (7,895) modestly exceeds seller count (6,090), suggesting mild net inflow pressure, but the shallow liquidity pool makes this pair highly susceptible to slippage and rapid reversals in either direction.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

977,292,605.82 CLIP

FDV

$503,082

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +963.4%, with the most recent hourly candle alone swinging from open $0.00000349 to a high of $0.000809 (a >23,000% intra-candle range) before closing at $0.000615, then the following candle collapsing to a low of $0.000393. This is extreme, erratic volatility consistent with a very early-stage, thinly traded pump-style token.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $36.45K against a 24h combined volume near $3.1M and FDV of $503K, an extreme volume/liquidity imbalance that creates high slippage risk and vulnerability to sharp price dislocations on relatively small trades.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Only top-10 holder concentration (19.22%) is available; top-100 concentration and any wallet classification (team, insiders, bots, exchanges) are unavailable. Without this deeper data, true concentration risk (e.g., whether a few large holders control disproportionate supply beyond the top 10) cannot be assessed and is marked unknown rather than assumed safe.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extreme short-term volatility: +963% in 24h with intra-hour swings exceeding 20,000% high-to-low range in a single candle
  • Very shallow liquidity ($36.45K) relative to volume (~$3.1M/24h) and FDV ($503K), creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Mint/freeze authority status unknown — cannot rule out supply inflation or account-freezing risk
  • No sniper data available — cannot assess whether early buyers/bots hold concentrated positions poised to dump
  • Holder history and wallet classification unavailable — cannot verify organic growth vs. bot/insider activity despite 2,852 current holder addresses
  • Token narrative (creator-fee-to-burn mechanism) is unverified and relies on off-chain 'Whop' integration claims not confirmed on-chain

Mitigating factors

  • Top-10 holder concentration of 19.22% is not unusually high on its face compared to many newly launched tokens
  • Buy/sell volume is roughly balanced (50.7%/49.3%) with slightly more unique buyers (7,895) than sellers (6,090) in the last 24h, suggesting no immediate one-sided dumping evident in aggregate flow data
  • Token trades on PumpSwap with an active, liquid-enough trading pair to generate substantial daily volume despite small liquidity pool

Suitable for

Given extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, unresolved mint/freeze authority status, and a complete absence of sniper and deep holder concentration data, this token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders who can tolerate total loss of capital and who are prepared for significant slippage on entry/exit. It is not appropriate for risk-averse investors or those seeking stable exposure.

CLIP is a newly-surged PumpSwap-listed token exhibiting extreme short-term price momentum (+963% 24h) built on very thin liquidity ($36.45K) and a largely unverified risk profile (unknown mint/freeze authority, no sniper data, no holder history). The nearly balanced 24h buy/sell flow (50.7%/49.3%) and moderate top-10 concentration (19.22%) offer a few grains of reassurance, but the overwhelming picture is one of a highly speculative, momentum-driven micro-cap with material data gaps that prevent a full risk clearance.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy-side momentum continues and the creator-fee-burn narrative ('80% to clippers, 20% burns CLIP') attracts sustained community and social attention (leveraging its Twitter/website presence), the token could see further volume growth and price appreciation, especially if liquidity is added and volatility compresses.

  • Continued viral/social momentum given the token's attention-economy narrative
  • Deflationary burn mechanic (20% of creator fees) reducing effective supply over time if adopted at scale
  • Nearly balanced current buy/sell flow suggesting demand has not yet collapsed

Base Case

Price likely continues to exhibit high volatility and mean-reversion behavior typical of freshly pumped low-liquidity tokens, oscillating within the recently established range ($0.0004–$0.0008) without a clear sustained trend until liquidity conditions or narrative catalysts materially change.

  • No major liquidity injections or authority-related events occur in the near term
  • Social/narrative momentum neither fully collapses nor meaningfully expands
  • Trading remains concentrated on the single PumpSwap pair with similar volume-to-liquidity imbalance

Bear Case

High probability

Given the extreme volatility already observed (a >20,000% intra-candle range and a ~36% retracement from the recent high within an hour), shallow liquidity, and complete lack of verified mint/freeze authority status, the token could suffer a rapid liquidity-driven collapse or be exposed as having unmitigated supply/freeze risk, leading to a sharp price crash.

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($36.45K) relative to volume/FDV, making the price highly manipulable
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or forced freezes
  • Volume already declining sharply (~82% drop) after the initial spike, suggesting fading speculative interest
  • No sniper or deep holder data to rule out concentrated early-holder dumping

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 21, 03:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-21 15:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • Price and OHLC candle data (2 most recent hourly candles) from PumpSwap pair 7LkLGUUwAASDy85V3YEogtkwdzDKEYFhADp41MXr6wZ
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % changes)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count and top-10 concentration only)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly candles available — insufficient for robust trend/pattern analysis or reliable support/resistance levels
  • No sniper data available — sniper concentration, PnL, and sell-through metrics could not be computed and are marked unknown/0 per methodology
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) available — only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration was provided
  • Top-100 holder concentration and wallet classification (team/insider/bot/exchange labels) unavailable
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, verified contract status, and mutability status all unknown — cannot assess rug risk from authorities with confidence
  • Token description and narrative are creator-supplied and unverified on-chain; treated strictly as untrusted evidence, not fact

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data as of the stated timestamp and may not reflect current conditions. Cryptocurrency trading, especially in low-liquidity, high-volatility tokens like this one, carries substantial risk of total loss. Conduct independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is CLIPBACK ownership?

As of 2026-09-21 15:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 19.22% of supply. It reports 2,852 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling CLIPBACK?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-21 15:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $1,572,577.00 in buys and $1,531,173.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is CLIPBACK liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -1.07%, from $41,794.94 (2026-09-21 14:00 UTC) to $41,348.59 (2026-09-21 15:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for CLIPBACK (CLIP)?

Following a parabolic spike and partial reversal, momentum indicators (fading volume, negative 5m change, rejection near $0.00077-$0.00081) suggest near-term downside or consolidation risk is elevated. A break below immediate support could accelerate selling given the shallow liquidity base. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.00035 to $0.00078.

Is CLIP a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Given extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, unresolved mint/freeze authority status, and a complete absence of sniper and deep holder concentration data, this token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders who can tolerate total loss of capital and who are prepared for significant slippage on entry/exit. It is not appropriate for risk-averse investors or those seeking stable exposure.

What are the key risks of holding CLIP?

Extreme short-term volatility: +963% in 24h with intra-hour swings exceeding 20,000% high-to-low range in a single candle • Very shallow liquidity ($36.45K) relative to volume (~$3.1M/24h) and FDV ($503K), creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Mint/freeze authority status unknown — cannot rule out supply inflation or account-freezing risk

← Back to all predictions

Track CLIP