TrackedBio

TrackedBio Price Today & AI Analysis

TrackedBio
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 1, 2026

7t1T28iMh5GsW8oTMx52x3u3M3hDbaY8psbL3rZ6BMrn

$0.043221

-2.27%

FDV $32,200

LiveContract:7t1T28iMh5GsW8oTMx52x3u3M3hDbaY8psbL3rZ6BMrnChain:SolanaHolders:3,580Market cap:$32,200

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about TrackedBio

Report snapshotas of May 1, 06:17 AM
FDV

$128,505

Liquidity

$49,856

Holders

3,676

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

TrackedBio (TrackedBio) is a Solana-based token associated with Tracked Biotechnologies, a woman- and minority-owned small business focused on AI-driven phenotyping services for biomedical research and drug discovery. The token trades at $0.0001285 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$128.5K and total liquidity of ~$49.86K on Raydium. The token experienced a sharp 24h price decline of ~45.8%, following a spike to highs near $0.000366 in the prior session. With 3,676 holders, moderate concentration risk (top 10 hold 40.43%), and no sniper activity detected, the token presents a mixed risk profile dominated by extreme volatility and thin liquidity.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Real-world utility narrative: AI-driven phenotyping for biomedical research and drug discovery
No sniper activity detected in the first 1,000 blocks — clean launch
Verified contract with mutable=false metadata, reducing rug risk from metadata manipulation
Presence across multiple social channels (Reddit, Telegram, Twitter, Website, Moralis)
55.5% buy pressure over 24h despite significant price decline

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
24–72 hours

The token has shed ~45.8% in 24 hours after a sharp spike to ~$0.000366. Price is currently consolidating near $0.0001285. The hourly candles show a clear downtrend from the $0.000257–$0.000364 range down to current levels. A short-term bounce is possible given the 1h +14.4% move and 5m +2.0% uptick, but the dominant trend remains bearish. Thin liquidity (~$49.86K) amplifies downside risk.

Target low$0.000101
Target high$0.000165
Support: $0.000112 (candle [3] low), $0.000102 (candle [5] low / candle [20] low)
Resistance: $0.000165 (candle [22] open / candle [11] low), $0.000196 (candle [15] open / candle [16] low)

Medium term

neutral
1–4 weeks

Medium-term direction depends heavily on whether the project delivers on its AI biotech narrative and whether broader Solana memecoin/utility token sentiment improves. Holder count has been largely stagnant for most of April 2026, with a notable +78 spike on Apr 30 coinciding with the price pump. Sustained holder growth and volume are needed to establish a new base.

Catalysts
  • Project announcements or partnerships in the AI/biotech space
  • Broader Solana ecosystem rally driving speculative inflows
  • Sustained holder growth above 3,700+
  • Increased DEX liquidity depth reducing slippage risk

Bullish factors

  • No sniper activity — clean launch with no early predatory accumulation
  • 55.5% buy pressure (302 buys vs 315 sells, $21.26K buy vs $17.04K sell volume)
  • Verified contract, mutable=false metadata
  • Real-world utility narrative (AI biotech) with social presence
  • Short-term momentum: +14.4% in the last 1h and +2.0% in 5m

Bearish factors

  • Severe 24h price decline of ~45.8% following a spike — classic pump-and-dump pattern risk
  • Extremely thin liquidity ($49.86K) with high slippage risk
  • Top 10 holders control 40.43% of supply; top 100 control 82%
  • Holder count declined -39 (-1.10%) in 24h
  • FDV of only ~$128.5K — micro-cap with limited institutional interest
  • Update authority not renounced (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM)
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the token's extremely thin liquidity (~$49.86K), high price volatility (45.8% 24h decline after a spike), very small market cap (~$128.5K FDV), and limited on-chain history. Price targets are derived from recent OHLC levels but can be invalidated quickly given the shallow order book.

Deep Analysis

The 24-hour OHLC series (hourly) reveals a sharp pump-and-dump pattern. Price spiked from ~$0.000120 at candle [20] (Apr 30 11:00) to a high of ~$0.000366 at candle [12/13] (Apr 30 12:00–13:00), then sold off aggressively through the session. By candle [1] (May 1 06:00), price had settled at ~$0.0001285. The highest volume candle was [19] (10,177 USD volume) coinciding with the peak and reversal — a classic blow-off top. Subsequent candles show lower highs and lower lows confirming a downtrend. The most recent candles [1]–[3] show very low volume (1.86–315 USD), suggesting the selling pressure is exhausting but buyers have not yet stepped in meaningfully.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 56%Sell 45%

Both short- and medium-term trends are bearish. The token peaked at ~$0.000366 and has been making lower highs and lower lows across the 24-hour window. The current price of ~$0.0001285 is near the lower end of the observed range. No reversal confirmation has emerged yet.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000112 (candle [3] low: $0.000112349956509791)
Major$0.000102 (candle [5] low: $0.000101816876030336 / candle [20] low: $0.000101937660162676)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000165 (candle [22] open: $0.000165084160248845)
Major$0.000196 (candle [15] open: $0.000196098276690548)

Immediate support sits at ~$0.000112, the low of candle [3]. A break below this opens the door to ~$0.000102, the session low. Immediate resistance is at ~$0.000165 (candle [22] open), with stronger resistance at ~$0.000196 (candle [15] open). The $0.000257–$0.000364 zone represents the pump range and is now heavy overhead resistance.

Notable patterns

  • Blow-off top at candle [19] (Apr 30 12:00): highest volume ($10,177) with close well below open — bearish reversal candle
  • Consistent lower highs from candle [14] ($0.000196) through candle [7] ($0.000134) to candle [1] ($0.0001285)
  • Candle [18] (Apr 30 13:00): extremely wide range ($0.000192–$0.000364) with high volume ($2,779) — distribution candle
  • Candle [4] (May 1 03:00): bullish recovery candle with wide range ($0.000105–$0.000126) and high relative volume ($737) — potential base forming
  • Volume exhaustion in candles [1]–[3] suggesting selling pressure diminishing

Total holders3,676
24h Δ-1.1
7d Δ+2.3
30d Δ+1.1
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

The +78 holder spike on Apr 30 (2.10% daily growth) coincided directly with the price pump to $0.000366, suggesting the price action attracted new buyers. However, the subsequent -39 holder decline in 24h mirrors the price crash, indicating many of those new entrants exited at a loss or took profits. Prior to Apr 29, the holder count was largely stagnant or slightly declining for most of April (Apr 1–28 showed net negative or zero growth on most days).

Holder trends are essentially flat over the 30-day period, with a net gain of only +42 holders (+1.1%) from ~3,634 to 3,676. The 7-day gain of +84 holders (+2.3%) is almost entirely attributable to the Apr 30 pump event (+78 in one day). Before that event, the token was experiencing slow, steady holder attrition from Apr 1–28. The holder distribution shows 138 whales, 63 sharks, 428 dolphins, 744 fish, and 755 octopus-tier holders, suggesting a broad base of small holders but meaningful whale concentration. Growth is not accelerating on a structural basis — the Apr 30 spike appears event-driven rather than organic.

Top 10 hold40.43%
Top 100 hold82.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

5Q544fKrFoe6tsEbD7S8EmxGTJYAKtTVhAW5Q5pge4j1

DEX liquidity pool or project treasury — holds 19.81% (198M tokens); address format and size suggest this may be a Raydium liquidity pool or project-controlled wallet

19.81%

9Ehk8Y4vZY538ZMApynfrvj5XtQuVNpRfwnJfjZX4ndb

Individual whale — holds 4.96% (49.5M tokens); second-largest holder with no obvious exchange pattern

4.96%

EC2f5DnHzuNRit1ExqghSifDbp1wgrzktsRRZCtU92MJ

Individual whale — holds 3.02% (30.2M tokens)

3.02%

9S1DFuXoCT82KosD813NnkcxCgMsYAPV5ESe9i1uTwa4

Individual whale — holds 2.23% (22.3M tokens)

2.23%

9kjkfq3RAA4UFRz5LtNSjm75zAP4o8AWUuQzH8WRoqmU

Individual whale — holds 2.00% (19.99M tokens); round-ish balance may indicate OTC or structured allocation

2.00%

The top 10 holders control 40.43% of supply and the top 100 control 82%, indicating significant concentration risk. The largest holder at 19.81% (198M tokens) is likely the Raydium liquidity pool (5Q544fKrFoe6tsEbD7S8EmxGTJYAKtTVhAW5Q5pge4j1 is a known Raydium AMM authority address), which is a positive sign as it represents locked liquidity rather than a whale ready to dump. Holders 2–10 each hold 1.57%–4.96%, representing individual whales. Several holders (e.g., #9 with exactly 16,000,000 and #16 with exactly 10,000,000) have round-number balances suggesting structured allocations or team/early investor wallets. The mixed sentiment reflects that some whales appear to be holding while the price decline suggests others distributed into the Apr 30 pump.

Liquidity$49,860
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$21,260
Sell$17,040
Net flow
inflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers88
Unique sellers82

Total liquidity of ~$49.86K is extremely shallow relative to the 24h trading volume of ~$38.3K combined. This means a single moderately-sized trade can move the price significantly, as evidenced by the spike to $0.000366 and rapid collapse. The FDV of ~$128.5K with only $49.86K in liquidity represents a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~39%, which is low. Slippage risk is high for any trade above a few hundred dollars. The 24h net flow is technically positive (more buy volume than sell volume: $21.26K vs $17.04K), but the price still declined 45.8%, indicating that the sell orders were larger on average. With 88 unique buyers and 82 unique sellers across 113 unique wallets, trading activity is thin and concentrated among a small group of participants.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,764,878.999881
FDV$128,504.81

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The total supply is approximately 999.76M tokens (effectively 1 billion). The FDV at current price is ~$128.5K, making this an ultra-micro-cap token. The update authority is TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM — this is NOT the burn address (111...111) and has not been renounced, meaning the update authority retains the ability to modify token metadata. However, the metadata field 'mutable: false' indicates the token metadata itself is frozen and cannot be changed, which partially mitigates this risk. Mint authority and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the data, so they are marked as unknown. The verified contract flag is positive. The 'mutable: false' flag is a meaningful safety signal. Overall authority risk is medium — the update authority is not renounced but metadata is immutable. Investors should verify mint and freeze authority status independently on-chain.

Volatility
high

The token experienced a ~45.8% decline in 24 hours after spiking to $0.000366 (a ~185% intraday move from the $0.000120 base). This extreme volatility is characteristic of ultra-micro-cap tokens with thin liquidity.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $49.86K on a single Raydium pool. Any trade above ~$500–$1,000 will incur significant slippage. Exit liquidity for larger holders is severely limited.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 40.43% of supply; top 100 control 82%. While the largest holder (19.81%) appears to be the Raydium LP, the remaining top holders represent significant concentration. Several round-number balances suggest structured/team allocations.

SniperDump
low

Zero snipers detected in the first 1,000 blocks. This is a positive signal — no bot-driven early accumulation that could lead to coordinated dumps.

Authority
medium

Update authority (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM) has not been renounced. However, metadata is set to mutable=false, limiting the practical impact. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown and should be verified independently.

Key risks

  • Extreme price volatility — 45.8% 24h decline following a pump-and-dump pattern
  • Ultra-thin liquidity ($49.86K) making large exits nearly impossible without significant price impact
  • High supply concentration — top 100 hold 82% of tokens
  • Update authority not renounced — potential for future contract changes
  • Mint and freeze authority status unknown — potential hidden rug vectors
  • Ultra-micro-cap FDV (~$128.5K) with limited institutional or retail interest
  • Holder count declining 24h post-pump, suggesting exit behavior

Mitigating factors

  • Zero sniper activity at launch — clean token distribution
  • Verified contract with mutable=false metadata
  • Real-world utility narrative (AI biotech) providing fundamental story
  • Multiple social channels indicating active project communication
  • 55.5% buy pressure in 24h despite price decline
  • Largest holder (19.81%) likely represents Raydium LP rather than a dump-ready whale
  • Broad holder base: 755 octopus + 744 fish tier holders
Suitable for: Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose their entire investment. Not suitable for conservative investors, those seeking stable returns, or anyone investing more than a very small speculative allocation. Due diligence on mint/freeze authority status is strongly recommended before any investment.

TrackedBio presents a high-risk, speculative micro-cap opportunity on Solana with a real-world AI biotech narrative. The token had a clean launch (no snipers), verified contract, and immutable metadata. However, the Apr 30 pump-and-dump pattern, extreme price volatility, ultra-thin liquidity, and high supply concentration make this suitable only for small speculative positions. The project's legitimacy hinges on actual delivery of its AI phenotyping platform.

Bull case (low)

The project delivers meaningful progress on its AI-driven phenotyping platform, attracting biotech/research community attention. Increased social media visibility drives new holder acquisition, liquidity deepens on Raydium, and the token re-tests the $0.000196–$0.000257 resistance zone. A broader Solana bull run amplifies gains.

  • Verifiable product development milestones in AI phenotyping
  • Partnership announcements with biomedical research institutions
  • Sustained holder growth above 4,000+
  • Liquidity pool expansion above $200K
  • Broader Solana ecosystem momentum

Base case

The token stabilizes in the $0.000100–$0.000150 range with low trading volume and slow holder attrition. The project maintains its social presence but fails to generate significant new interest. Price remains range-bound with occasional volatility spikes driven by thin liquidity.

  • No major positive or negative catalysts in the near term
  • Liquidity remains at current ~$49.86K level
  • Holder count stabilizes around 3,600–3,700
  • Project continues social media activity without major product announcements
  • No mint/freeze authority exploits

Bear case (medium)

The Apr 30 pump was a coordinated manipulation event. Remaining large holders continue to distribute into any price recovery. Liquidity dries up further, holder count continues declining, and the token fades into obscurity. Price drifts toward the $0.000050–$0.000080 range or lower.

  • No verifiable product development or real utility adoption
  • Continued holder attrition post-pump
  • Whale distribution into any price recovery
  • Failure to attract new liquidity or exchange listings
  • Broader crypto market downturn reducing speculative appetite

GeneratedMay 1, 06:17 AM
Data freshnessData current as of 2026-05-01T06:00:00.000Z (most recent candle close). Holder data reflects 24h/7d/30d changes as reported.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (Solana)
  • Raydium DEX pair data (pair: 8zMH6w8e1tvrVwHv2vfXpodBqQUdxEWD5NFhQz9HqZPs)
  • Hourly OHLC price data (24 candles)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data
  • Historical holder series (30 days daily)
  • Top 20 holder wallet data
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)

Limitations

  • Mint authority and freeze authority status not explicitly provided — marked as unknown
  • Sniper data is empty (0 snipers) — smart money analysis is limited
  • Update authority classification is uncertain without additional on-chain verification
  • Top holder wallet classifications are inferred from balance patterns and known address databases, not confirmed
  • FDV and liquidity figures are extremely small, making price predictions highly unreliable
  • No order book depth data available — slippage estimates are approximations
  • 30-day holder history only; longer-term trends unavailable

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially ultra-micro-cap tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,764,878.999881

Key Risks

Extreme price volatility — 45.8% 24h decline following a pump-and-dump pattern
Ultra-thin liquidity ($49.86K) making large exits nearly impossible without significant price impact
High supply concentration — top 100 hold 82% of tokens
Update authority not renounced — potential for future contract changes

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper activity was detected in the first 1,000 blocks of this token's launch. This is a positive signal indicating the token was not targeted by bots or early predatory wallets at launch. However, the absence of sniper data limits smart money analysis. The sharp price spike and subsequent dump pattern visible in the OHLC data suggests that some early holders or whales may have distributed into the pump, but this cannot be confirmed from the available sniper data alone.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

0 snipers detected in the first 1,000 blocks — no sniper concentration

Unknown — no sniper data available. However, the pump-and-dump price pattern (spike to $0.000366 then rapid decline to $0.0001285) suggests early or large holders may have taken profits during the spike. The -39 holder decline in 24h is consistent with profit-taking exits.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for TrackedBio (TrackedBio)?

The token has shed ~45.8% in 24 hours after a sharp spike to ~$0.000366. Price is currently consolidating near $0.0001285. The hourly candles show a clear downtrend from the $0.000257–$0.000364 range down to current levels. A short-term bounce is possible given the 1h +14.4% move and 5m +2.0% uptick, but the dominant trend remains bearish. Thin liquidity (~$49.86K) amplifies downside risk. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.000101 to $0.000165.

Is TrackedBio a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 8.5/100. Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose their entire investment. Not suitable for conservative investors, those seeking stable returns, or anyone investing more than a very small speculative allocation. Due diligence on mint/freeze authority status is strongly recommended before any investment.

How are TrackedBio holders trending?

TrackedBio currently has 3,676 holders and is stable (24h: -1.1, 7d: 2.3, 30d: 1.1). Holder trends are essentially flat over the 30-day period, with a net gain of only +42 holders (+1.1%) from ~3,634 to 3,676. The 7-day gain of +84 holders (+2.3%) is almost entirely attributable to the Apr 30 pump event (+78 in one day). Before that event, the token was experiencing slow, steady holder attrition from Apr 1–28. The holder distribution shows 138 whales, 63 sharks, 428 dolphins, 744 fish, and 755 octopus-tier holders, suggesting a broad base of small holders but meaningful whale concentration. Growth is not accelerating on a structural basis — the Apr 30 spike appears event-driven rather than organic.

What does sniper activity look like for TrackedBio?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding TrackedBio?

Extreme price volatility — 45.8% 24h decline following a pump-and-dump pattern • Ultra-thin liquidity ($49.86K) making large exits nearly impossible without significant price impact • High supply concentration — top 100 hold 82% of tokens

Track TrackedBio