πŸ‚πŸ€„

Ansem's Army Price Today & AI Analysis

πŸ‚πŸ€„SolanaAnalysis as of Jun 28, 2026

Price

$0.041690

+4.38% 24h

Contract

Live
7jrazSKnCU2vbyVPJ8dfEF2TMYLcUiDBsFaEGvqopump

Chain

Solana

Holders

19,159

Market cap

$16,705

More tokens on Solana

BLOCKBLOCKBlockFall$0.056307+2.9%MC $6.0KbikecatebikecateBIKE CATE$0.053251+2.9%MC $3.2KMOODANGMOODANGMoo Dang$0.041196-0.6%MC $11.8Kpopdogpopdogpopdog$0.054235+1.8%MC $4.2KSyraxSyraxThe Flying Dragon$0.053797+5.1%MC $3.6Ke/acce/accEffective Accelerationism$0.0126+706.8%MC $12.43M

Ansem's Army: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-28 13:19 UTC

Holder addresses

11,825

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$78,095.86
How concentrated is Ansem's Army ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 11,825 addresses (2026-06-28 13:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Ansem's Army?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Ansem's Army liquidity falling?
As of 2026-06-28 13:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $78,095.86. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-28 13:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Ask Unhosted AI about πŸ‚πŸ€„

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Jun 28, 01:19 PM UTC

FDV

$912,923

Liquidity

$78,095.86

Holders

11,825

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Ansem's Army (πŸ‚πŸ€„) is a PumpSwap-listed Solana memecoin (mint: 7jrazSKnCU2vbyVPJ8dfEF2TMYLcUiDBsFaEGvqopump) with ~999.99M total supply and a current price of ~$0.000913. The token exhibits extreme red flags: a reported 703% 24h price gain is contradicted by all 5m/1h/6h/24h price-change fields showing 0%, suggesting data inconsistency or manipulation. Sell pressure is overwhelming (73.4% sell volume, 7,754 sells vs 1,088 buys). Historical holder data shows exactly 29 holders for 30 consecutive days, then a sudden spike to 11,825 holders β€” almost certainly from a mass airdrop or wash activity. Top holder data is unavailable, supply concentration shows 0% for top 10 and top 100 (anomalous). The token description claims 'All airdropped to ALL holders,' which is consistent with the transfer-based acquisition (11,056 transfers, 0 airdrops on-chain). Update authority is unknown and the contract is unverified. This token presents very high risk.

Key points

  • Claimed 703% 24h price surge contradicted by 0% change across all timeframes β€” severe data inconsistency
  • Holder count jumped from 29 to 11,825 in a single day via 11,056 transfers β€” mass airdrop/wash pattern
  • 73.4% sell pressure with 7,754 sells vs 1,088 buys in 24h β€” heavy distribution
  • Top holder data unavailable and supply concentration reports 0% β€” anomalous and unverifiable
  • Only $78.1K total liquidity against $750K+ FDV β€” extremely shallow market

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term Β· 24–72 hours

bearish

The two available hourly OHLC candles reveal extreme volatility. Candle [2] (12:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000300, spiked to $0.000495, and closed at $0.000279. Candle [1] (13:00 UTC) opened at $0.000297, spiked to $0.000746 (the session high), then collapsed to close at $0.0000300 β€” a near-total retracement forming a bearish shooting-star/gravestone pattern. Current price of $0.000913 is well above both candle closes, suggesting either a subsequent pump or data lag. With 73.4% sell pressure and 7x more sellers than buyers, short-term direction is strongly bearish.

Target low

$0.000030

Target high

$0.000913

Support

$0.000030 (candle floor / session low), $0.000229 (candle [1] low)

Resistance

$0.000746 (candle [1] high), $0.000495 (candle [2] high)

Medium term Β· 1–4 weeks

bearish

With only $78.1K liquidity, no verified contract, unknown update authority, overwhelming sell pressure, and a holder base that appeared almost entirely via mass transfer in a single day, sustained price appreciation is highly unlikely. The token lacks any disclosed utility, roadmap, or social presence. Medium-term outlook is bearish absent a major catalyst.

Catalysts

  • Any coordinated social media promotion (e.g., Ansem mention) could trigger a short-lived pump
  • Liquidity removal by insiders would accelerate price collapse
  • Broader Solana memecoin market sentiment

Bullish factors

  • Reported 703% 24h price gain indicates prior strong momentum
  • 11,825 holders provides a broad distribution base if genuine
  • PumpSwap listing provides some baseline accessibility

Bearish factors

  • 73.4% sell volume ($283.48K sells vs $102.79K buys) in 24h
  • 7,754 sells vs 1,088 buys β€” 7:1 seller-to-buyer ratio
  • Only 224 unique buyers vs 1,163 unique sellers
  • Candle [1] shows a shooting-star collapse from $0.000746 high back to $0.000030 close
  • All price-change timeframes (5m/1h/6h/24h) report 0% β€” data anomaly raises manipulation concerns
  • Only $78.1K total liquidity β€” extreme slippage risk
  • Holder base appeared almost entirely in one day via mass transfers
  • No social links, unverified contract, unknown update authority

Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, price-change fields all read 0% despite a reported 703% 24h gain, top holder data is missing, and supply concentration data is anomalous (0% for top 10/100). These inconsistencies severely limit analytical confidence.

πŸ‚πŸ€„ call history

Full track record β†’

Jun 28bearish
24h-91.8%
7d-88.0%
30d-98.3%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later β€” hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
7jrazS...pump
Total Supply
999,987,091.54

Key Risks

  • Unknown mint/freeze authority β€” potential for supply inflation or account freezing
  • Overwhelming sell pressure: 73.4% sell volume, 7,754 sells vs 1,088 buys in 24h
  • Holder count jumped from 29 to 11,825 in one day via mass transfers β€” artificial distribution
  • Only $78.1K liquidity β€” extreme slippage and exit risk

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (12:00 UTC): O=$0.0000300, H=$0.000495, L=$0.0000300, C=$0.000279, V=$266,907 β€” a strong bullish candle with a long upper wick, suggesting initial buying followed by partial profit-taking. Candle [1] (13:00 UTC): O=$0.000297, H=$0.000746, L=$0.000230, C=$0.0000300, V=$114,243 β€” a classic bearish shooting star / gravestone doji pattern. Price opened near prior close, surged to a new high of $0.000746, then collapsed entirely back to the session low of $0.0000300. This is a textbook pump-and-dump candle structure. Volume was higher in candle [2] ($266K) than candle [1] ($114K), consistent with buy-side exhaustion. Current price of $0.000913 is above both candle highs, suggesting a subsequent move not captured in these two candles.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

The two-candle window shows an initial spike followed by a full collapse, then apparently another pump to current price ($0.000913). With only 2 candles and contradictory price-change data (all showing 0%), trend determination is unreliable. The medium-term (30-day) holder history shows complete stagnation at 29 holders until a sudden single-day explosion, suggesting no organic trend development.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

27%

Sell

73%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000229 (candle [1] low)

Major support

$0.000030 (session floor, repeated candle low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000495 (candle [2] high)

Major resistance

$0.000746 (candle [1] all-time high in dataset)

The $0.000030 level acted as both the open of candle [2] and the close of candle [1], making it a critical floor. The $0.000746 level represents the peak of the available data and is the primary resistance. Current price ($0.000913) is above all observed candle levels, suggesting either a post-candle pump or data inconsistency.

Notable patterns

  • Bearish shooting star / gravestone doji on candle [1] β€” classic pump exhaustion signal
  • Full retracement to open in candle [1] β€” complete round-trip, no net progress
  • Volume declining on price spike (candle [2] $266K β†’ candle [1] $114K) β€” bearish divergence
  • All price-change fields (5m/1h/6h/24h) report 0% despite reported 703% 24h gain β€” severe data anomaly
  • Current price ($0.000913) exceeds all available OHLC highs β€” possible subsequent pump not captured

Liquidity

Liquidity

$78,095.86

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $78.1K against a reported FDV of $750.56K–$912.9K (two different FDV figures appear in the data, suggesting price data inconsistency). The liquidity-to-FDV ratio of approximately 8.5–10.4% is dangerously low, meaning any moderate sell order will cause severe price impact. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $283.48K in sell volume vs $102.79K in buy volume, a net outflow of ~$180.69K. The seller-to-buyer ratio of 1,163:224 (5.2:1) confirms active distribution. With 7,754 sell transactions vs 1,088 buy transactions, the market microstructure is overwhelmingly bearish. The PumpSwap pair (J8c2wQCZiLoc38GL1uqWsABznXDXgKpxo7Dm4Pnpu311) provides the only liquidity venue, creating single-point-of-failure risk.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,987,091.54

FDV

$912,922.93 (metadata) / $750,560 (trading analytics) β€” discrepancy noted

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Reported 703% 24h price gain with a shooting-star candle showing full retracement from $0.000746 to $0.000030 in a single hour. Extreme intraday volatility with very low liquidity amplifies price swings dramatically.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Only $78.1K total liquidity on a single PumpSwap pool. Any sell order of meaningful size will cause severe slippage. Liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~8.5% is critically low.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Unknown mint/freeze authority β€” potential for supply inflation or account freezing
  • Overwhelming sell pressure: 73.4% sell volume, 7,754 sells vs 1,088 buys in 24h
  • Holder count jumped from 29 to 11,825 in one day via mass transfers β€” artificial distribution
  • Only $78.1K liquidity β€” extreme slippage and exit risk
  • All price-change timeframes report 0% despite claimed 703% gain β€” severe data anomaly suggesting manipulation
  • No top holder data available β€” cannot assess actual concentration
  • Unverified contract, no social links, no disclosed team
  • Token description contains unverifiable claims ('All airdropped to ALL holders')
  • Single liquidity venue (PumpSwap) β€” no fallback if pool is drained
  • FDV discrepancy between data sources ($912K vs $750K) suggests price data unreliability

Mitigating factors

  • Token marked as mutable=false β€” metadata cannot be changed
  • Possible spam flag is false per metadata
  • PumpSwap listing provides some baseline liquidity and price discovery
  • Wide holder distribution (11,825 wallets) if genuine could limit single-actor manipulation

Suitable for

This token is unsuitable for virtually all investors. The combination of unknown authorities, artificial holder growth, overwhelming sell pressure, minimal liquidity, and multiple data anomalies places this firmly in the highest risk category. Only sophisticated traders with full risk capital they can afford to lose entirely, and with specific short-term trading strategies, should consider any exposure β€” and even then, extreme caution is warranted.

Ansem's Army presents as a high-risk, low-credibility memecoin with multiple hallmarks of a coordinated pump-and-dump or exit liquidity scheme. The token experienced a sudden mass distribution event (29 β†’ 11,825 holders in one day via 11,056 transfers), a reported 703% price spike, and is now experiencing overwhelming sell pressure (73.4% sell volume). There is no verifiable utility, no social presence, no verified contract, and no confirmable authority renouncement. The investment thesis is almost entirely speculative and momentum-dependent.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The 'Ansem' branding attracts attention from the crypto influencer's large following, triggering a viral social media moment that drives a new wave of organic buyers. The wide distribution (11,825 holders) creates a community effect, and the low price ($0.000913) attracts retail speculators seeking a 'lottery ticket' play.

  • Viral social media attention from Ansem or related influencers
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally
  • Retail FOMO driven by the reported 703% gain narrative
  • Wide holder base (11,825) creating potential community momentum

Base Case

The initial pump momentum fades as sell pressure continues to dominate. Price gradually declines from current levels ($0.000913) toward the $0.000229–$0.000030 range seen in the OHLC data. Trading volume decreases as interest wanes. The token persists as a low-liquidity, low-activity memecoin with occasional speculative spikes.

  • No major new catalyst (influencer mention, exchange listing) emerges
  • Sell pressure from mass-transfer recipients continues at current pace
  • Liquidity remains at ~$78K or declines modestly
  • No rug pull or liquidity removal event in the near term

Bear Case

High probability

Insiders who received tokens via the mass transfer event continue selling into any price strength. Liquidity is drained from the PumpSwap pool, making exit impossible for late buyers. Price collapses back to the $0.000030 floor seen in the OHLC data or lower. The token becomes illiquid and effectively worthless.

  • 73.4% sell pressure with 7,754 sells already executed in 24h
  • Zero-cost holders from mass airdrop/transfer have no incentive to hold
  • Only $78.1K liquidity cannot absorb continued selling
  • No utility, no team disclosure, no social presence to sustain interest
  • Shooting-star candle pattern at price peak signals exhaustion

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 28, 01:19 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-28 13:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, decimals, supply, update authority, mutability)
  • Price feed (USD spot price, 24h change)
  • OHLC candle data (2 hourly candles, June 28 2026)
  • Trading analytics (volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics (total holders, acquisition method, distribution breakdown)
  • Historical holder series (30-day daily snapshots)
  • Top holders list (unavailable β€” no data returned)
  • Sniper analysis (unavailable β€” no data returned)
  • PumpSwap pair data (liquidity, FDV)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available β€” insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • All price-change timeframes (5m/1h/6h/24h) report 0% despite claimed 703% 24h gain β€” data inconsistency undermines price analysis
  • Top holder data entirely unavailable β€” whale map and concentration analysis cannot be completed
  • Supply concentration reports 0% for top 10 and top 100 β€” anomalous, likely indexing failure
  • Sniper data unavailable β€” smart money analysis limited to trading analytics inference
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' β€” mint/freeze authority status unconfirmable
  • Two different FDV figures in the data ($912,922 vs $750,560) β€” price data source inconsistency
  • Token description and name are creator-supplied and unverified β€” treated as untrusted data per methodology
  • No social links or external verification sources available

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. All data is sourced from on-chain and third-party analytics providers and may contain errors or inconsistencies. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly in unverified memecoins, carry extreme risk of total loss. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. This analysis does not endorse or recommend any investment action.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Ansem's Army ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 11,825 addresses (2026-06-28 13:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Ansem's Army?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Ansem's Army liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-28 13:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $78,095.86. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Ansem's Army (πŸ‚πŸ€„)?

The two available hourly OHLC candles reveal extreme volatility. Candle [2] (12:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000300, spiked to $0.000495, and closed at $0.000279. Candle [1] (13:00 UTC) opened at $0.000297, spiked to $0.000746 (the session high), then collapsed to close at $0.0000300 β€” a near-total retracement forming a bearish shooting-star/gravestone pattern. Current price of $0.000913 is well above both candle closes, suggesting either a subsequent pump or data lag. With 73.4% sell pressure and 7x more sellers than buyers, short-term direction is strongly bearish. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.000030 to $0.000913.

Is πŸ‚πŸ€„ a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is unsuitable for virtually all investors. The combination of unknown authorities, artificial holder growth, overwhelming sell pressure, minimal liquidity, and multiple data anomalies places this firmly in the highest risk category. Only sophisticated traders with full risk capital they can afford to lose entirely, and with specific short-term trading strategies, should consider any exposure β€” and even then, extreme caution is warranted.

What are the key risks of holding πŸ‚πŸ€„?

Unknown mint/freeze authority β€” potential for supply inflation or account freezing β€’ Overwhelming sell pressure: 73.4% sell volume, 7,754 sells vs 1,088 buys in 24h β€’ Holder count jumped from 29 to 11,825 in one day via mass transfers β€” artificial distribution

← Back to all predictions

Track πŸ‚πŸ€„