Man vs Chimp Price Today & AI Analysis

MvCSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 3, 2026

$0.0₅3512

Contract

Live

7XGqEgFsHTMZyf1GkCeR4cY5w9nhgh2xwQJhdwiqpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

343

Market cap

$3,398

At a $1M market cap, $MVC would be $0.001034 (294x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is MvC a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 17

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

0.02%1 insider still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about MvC

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

HOMEBOYhomeboy$0.0₅3424+0.0%MC $3.4K

BULLUNCbull unc$0.0₅2534+0.0%MC $2.5K

BLKJCKBLKJCK$0.0₅2745+0.0%MC $2.7K

RampageThe Bull Run$0.0₅2278+0.0%MC $2.2K

PiccolaPiccola$0.0₅3388+0.0%MC $3.4K

EterniaEternia$0.000247+475.7%MC $240.9K

Man vs Chimp: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-03 07:18 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$15,776.00

How concentrated is Man vs Chimp ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Man vs Chimp?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Man vs Chimp liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-03 07:18 UTC, reported liquidity was $15,776.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-03 07:18 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 3, 07:18 AM UTC

FDV

$129,740

Liquidity

$15,776.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Man vs Chimp (MvC) is a Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap (pair 9w1VxLrbSdz5BXrxBvhLBVUfRSB7gHVF9LYkCDGgD9R8) with a circulating supply of ~967.9M tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$129.7K. The token has experienced an explosive 223% price surge in the past 24 hours, driven by a massive volume spike in candle [11] (~$251K volume in a single hour). Liquidity is extremely shallow at $15.78K, creating significant slippage risk. Metadata completeness is poor — update authority, mutability, and contract verification status are all unknown, raising meaningful rug-pull concerns.

Key points

Explosive 223% 24h price surge driven by a single high-volume candle
Extremely low liquidity ($15.78K) relative to FDV ($129.7K) and 24h volume ($305K+)
Near-balanced buy/sell pressure (51.2% buys vs 48.8% sells) despite the price spike
No sniper data available, limiting early-buyer risk assessment
Critical metadata gaps: update authority, mutability, and contract verification all unknown

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

After a parabolic 223% move driven by a single explosive candle (candle [11]: O:$0.0000203, H:$0.000165, C:$0.000103), the token is showing early signs of distribution in candle [12] (H:$0.000156, C:$0.000134 — a bearish close below the open). Volume is collapsing from $251K in candle [11] to $67K in candle [12], suggesting the initial momentum is fading. With only $15.78K in liquidity, even modest sell pressure can cause sharp drawdowns.

Target low

$0.0000945

Target high

$0.000156

Support: $0.0000945 (candle [12] low), $0.0000203 (pre-spike consolidation zone, candles [9]–[10])
Resistance: $0.000156 (candle [12] high / near candle [11] high of $0.000165), $0.000165 (candle [11] all-time high in dataset)

Medium term · 1–7 days

bearish

Without sustained buying interest, new catalysts, or a significant liquidity injection, the token is likely to retrace toward pre-spike levels (~$0.000018–$0.000020). Meme tokens with sub-$20K liquidity and unknown metadata frequently fail to hold post-pump gains. A return to the $0.000018–$0.000020 consolidation range (candles [4]–[10]) is the base expectation.

Catalysts

New social media viral moment or influencer promotion
Liquidity pool deepening by team or whales
Broader Solana meme token market rally
Sustained buy volume above $50K/hour

Bullish factors

Strong 24h buy volume of $156.23K with 3,706 buy transactions
Near-balanced buy/sell pressure (51.2%/48.8%) suggesting genuine two-sided interest
1,536 unique buyers vs 1,085 unique sellers — more participants buying than selling
Price holding above the $0.000094 candle [12] low after the spike
Twitter social presence exists

Bearish factors

Extremely shallow liquidity ($15.78K) — entire liquidity pool could be drained with minimal capital
Volume collapsed from $251K (candle [11]) to $67K (candle [12]) — momentum fading
Candle [12] is a bearish candle: O:$0.000103, C:$0.000134 (though green, the high of $0.000156 was not held)
Unknown update authority and mutability — rug pull risk cannot be ruled out
No verified contract, no description, minimal metadata
FDV of only $129.7K limits upside and signals very early/speculative stage
Post-parabolic moves on low-liquidity tokens historically retrace 70–90%

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) extremely shallow liquidity making price highly manipulable, (2) unknown token metadata preventing authority/rug risk assessment, (3) no sniper data to gauge early-buyer sell pressure, (4) only 12 hourly candles of price history available, and (5) meme token dynamics are inherently unpredictable.

MvC call history

Full track record →

Sep 3bearish@ $0.000134

24h-33.1%

7d-81.8%

30d-97.0%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 7XGqEg...pump
Total Supply: 967,904,105.34

Key Risks

Critically shallow liquidity ($15.78K) — price highly manipulable and exit liquidity is minimal
All key metadata (update authority, mint authority, freeze authority, mutability) unknown — rug risk unquantifiable
Post-parabolic price action with volume exhaustion — high probability of sharp retracement
No sniper data — early buyer dump risk cannot be assessed

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 12-hour OHLC dataset reveals a classic low-liquidity pump pattern. Candles [1]–[10] show a gradual grind from ~$0.0000055 up to ~$0.0000203 with very low volume (ranging from $102 to $53K). Candle [11] is the defining event: an explosive move from O:$0.0000203 to H:$0.000165, closing at $0.000103 on $251.6K volume — a ~8x intra-candle range. Candle [12] opens at $0.000103, reaches $0.000156, but closes at $0.000134, printing a bearish upper-wick candle suggesting distribution near the highs.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

The short and medium-term trend is technically uptrend given the 223% 24h gain, but the trend is fragile. The price action shows a near-vertical pump followed by a pullback candle with a long upper wick, which is a classic distribution/exhaustion signal. Higher highs were made (candle [11] H:$0.000165 > all prior highs), but the close failed to hold near the high.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000945 (candle [12] low)

Major support

$0.0000179–$0.0000203 (candles [4]–[10] consolidation zone)

Immediate resistance

$0.000156 (candle [12] high)

Major resistance

$0.000165 (candle [11] all-time high in dataset)

The $0.0000945 level is the first line of defense — a break below this would signal a full retracement toward the pre-spike consolidation zone of $0.0000179–$0.0000203. On the upside, $0.000156 and $0.000165 are the key resistance levels from the recent spike highs. Given the shallow liquidity, these levels can be breached quickly in either direction.

Notable patterns

Parabolic pump candle [11]: ~8x intra-candle range with massive volume spike — classic low-liquidity pump
Bearish upper-wick candle [12]: price rejected from $0.000156 high, closing at $0.000134 — distribution signal
Volume exhaustion: 73% volume decline from candle [11] to [12], with near-zero volume in candles [4]–[10] prior to spike
Higher highs established (candle [11] H > all prior highs) but close failed to hold near high
Pre-spike consolidation (candles [4]–[10]): tight range ~$0.0000179–$0.0000203 with very low volume — accumulation or dormancy phase

Liquidity

$15,776.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $15.78K — this is the most significant structural risk for MvC. The 24h trading volume of ~$305K is approximately 19x the total liquidity pool, meaning the pool is being turned over many times per day. This creates extreme slippage risk: a sell order of even $1,000–$2,000 could move the price by 10%+ given the pool depth. The net flow is marginally positive (51.2% buy pressure, $156.23K buys vs $148.96K sells), and there are more unique buyers (1,536) than sellers (1,085), which is a mild positive signal. However, the liquidity situation means any large holder exiting could collapse the price rapidly. The FDV-to-liquidity ratio of ~8.2x is extremely unfavorable and typical of early-stage PumpSwap meme tokens.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

967,904,105.34

FDV

$129,740

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
223% price surge in 24 hours driven by a single candle with an 8x intra-candle range. The token is in a post-parabolic state with high probability of sharp retracement. 5-minute price change of +23.4% confirms ongoing extreme volatility.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $15.78K against $305K+ in 24h volume. The liquidity-to-volume ratio is ~0.05, meaning the pool turns over ~19x daily. Any meaningful exit by a large holder will cause severe price impact and slippage.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Critically shallow liquidity ($15.78K) — price highly manipulable and exit liquidity is minimal
All key metadata (update authority, mint authority, freeze authority, mutability) unknown — rug risk unquantifiable
Post-parabolic price action with volume exhaustion — high probability of sharp retracement
No sniper data — early buyer dump risk cannot be assessed
No token description, no whitepaper, minimal social presence (Twitter only)
FDV of $129.7K is extremely low — token is in the highest-risk early speculative phase
PumpSwap meme tokens have historically high failure/rug rates

Mitigating factors

Near-balanced buy/sell pressure (51.2%/48.8%) suggests genuine two-sided market participation
More unique buyers (1,536) than sellers (1,085) in 24h — broader participation than a pure pump
Price holding above candle [12] low of $0.0000945 at time of analysis
Twitter social link exists — some minimal community presence
24h buy volume of $156.23K shows real capital inflow

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand the risks of early-stage meme tokens on PumpSwap, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of monitoring positions in real-time. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose completely. This is NOT financial advice.

MvC is a high-risk, early-stage Solana meme token that has experienced a parabolic 223% pump driven by a single explosive candle. The core tension is between genuine short-term momentum (1,536 unique buyers, near-balanced buy/sell pressure) and severe structural risks (sub-$16K liquidity, unknown metadata, post-parabolic exhaustion). This is a pure speculative play with no fundamental backing.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral momentum continues: the token gains traction on Twitter/social media, attracting new buyers who push volume above $100K/hour sustained. Liquidity deepens as the team or whales add to the pool. Price breaks above $0.000165 (candle [11] high) and targets $0.0003–$0.0005 range.

Sustained social media virality and influencer promotion
Liquidity pool deepening (team or organic LP addition)
Broader Solana meme token market rally
Continued buy-side dominance with new unique wallet growth
No rug/dump from early holders

Base Case

Token retraces 50–70% from current levels over the next 24–72 hours as initial excitement fades and early buyers take profits. Price stabilizes in the $0.000040–$0.000070 range with low volume, then either fades to near-zero or finds a new catalyst.

No rug pull or authority exploit occurs
Early buyers gradually exit rather than dumping all at once
No major new catalyst or viral moment emerges
Liquidity remains at current shallow levels
Broader Solana market remains neutral

Bear Case

High probability

Liquidity is drained by early holders exiting, price collapses back to pre-spike levels of $0.0000179–$0.0000203 (a ~85–87% drawdown from current price). In the worst case, unknown authorities are used to rug the token entirely.

Early accumulator sell pressure from 6–7x unrealized gains
Shallow liquidity amplifying any sell orders
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority enabling potential rug
Volume exhaustion and momentum fade post-pump
Typical PumpSwap meme token lifecycle ending in near-zero price

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 3, 07:18 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-03 07:18 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (Mint: 7XGqEgFsHTMZyf1GkCeR4cY5w9nhgh2xwQJhdwiqpump)
PumpSwap pair data (9w1VxLrbSdz5BXrxBvhLBVUfRSB7gHVF9LYkCDGgD9R8)
12 hourly OHLC candles (2026-09-02T20:00Z to 2026-09-03T07:00Z)
24h trading analytics (volume, buy/sell counts, unique wallets)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 12 hours of OHLC price history available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
Holder distribution data entirely unavailable — concentration risk cannot be quantified
Sniper/early-buyer data unavailable — dump risk from early holders cannot be assessed
Token metadata (update authority, mint authority, freeze authority, mutability) all unknown — rug risk unquantifiable
No 6h price change data provided
24h unique wallet count unavailable
No on-chain program verification data
Extremely low liquidity makes all price levels highly unstable and subject to rapid change

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially early-stage meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed is sourced from on-chain activity and may be incomplete or subject to manipulation. Never invest more than you can afford to lose completely. Always conduct your own research (DYOR).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Man vs Chimp (MvC) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 17, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Man vs Chimp (MvC)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 17, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Man vs Chimp ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Man vs Chimp?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Man vs Chimp liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-03 07:18 UTC, reported liquidity was $15,776.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Man vs Chimp (MvC)?

Is MvC a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand the risks of early-stage meme tokens on PumpSwap, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of monitoring positions in real-time. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose completely. This is NOT financial advice.

What are the key risks of holding MvC?

Critically shallow liquidity ($15.78K) — price highly manipulable and exit liquidity is minimal • All key metadata (update authority, mint authority, freeze authority, mutability) unknown — rug risk unquantifiable • Post-parabolic price action with volume exhaustion — high probability of sharp retracement