NPC

NPCs Price Today & AI Analysis

NPCSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 24, 2026

Price

$0.000170

+265.69% 24h · FDV $162,389

Contract

Live
7GUnr7krtQhJwd6ASY2VUprd9t4c64zcgCsjdmZepump

Chain

Solana

Holders

4,740

Market cap

$162,389

More tokens on Solana

BOMEBOMEBOOK OF MEME$0.001033-7.5%MC $71.16MSPCXxSPCXxSpaceX xStock$148.16-3.4%MC $82.97MMUMUMicron Technology - Backpack Securities$1,054.63-2.8%MC $4.49MFartcoin Fartcoin Fartcoin $0.1848-13.1%MC $184.83MGMEXGMEXGameStop xStock$24.11+0.9%MC $17.35MRAYRAYRaydium$1.99+8.6%MC $1.10B

NPCs: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-24 10:45 UTC

Holder addresses

4,740

Top 10 supply share

16.66%

Reported liquidity

$20,745.00
How concentrated is NPCs ownership?
As of 2026-09-24 10:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 16.66% of supply. It reports 4,740 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling NPCs?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-24 10:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $1,682,424.00 in buys and $1,654,409.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is NPCs liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +82.72%, from $12,246.18 (2026-09-24 02:00 UTC) to $22,376.34 (2026-09-24 10:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-24 10:45 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-24 02:00 UTC$12,246.18
2026-09-24 03:00 UTC$49,706.16
2026-09-24 04:00 UTC$38,346.91
2026-09-24 05:00 UTC$28,802.34
2026-09-24 06:00 UTC$34,442.26
2026-09-24 07:00 UTC$35,086.68
2026-09-24 08:00 UTC$33,339.69
2026-09-24 09:00 UTC$28,081.54
2026-09-24 10:00 UTC$22,376.34

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about NPC

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 24, 10:46 AM UTC

FDV

$162,389

Liquidity

$20,745.00

Holders

4,740

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

NPC (NPCs) is a very low-cap Solana meme token (FDV ~$162,389, price $0.00017) trading against a PumpSwap pool with only $20.75K total liquidity. The token just underwent an explosive spike (+265.7% 24h) followed by a sharp ~82% reversal within the same observed window, and now shows a -52.1% move in just the last hour. 4,740 holder addresses were recorded with the top 10 holding 16.66% of supply, but no historical holder data, sniper data, or mint/freeze authority verification was available, leaving significant gaps in the risk picture.

Key points

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($20.75K) relative to $3.33M+ in 24h trading volume, indicating high slippage and manipulation susceptibility
  • Textbook pump-and-dump hourly candle pattern: vertical spike to $0.000989 followed by a steady multi-hour decline back to ~$0.00017
  • Critical data gaps: mint/freeze authority unknown, no sniper wallet data, no holder history - all elevate uncertainty beyond what raw metrics alone suggest
  • Near-balanced but very high 24h trading activity (29,143 buys vs 20,826 sells) reflecting intense, two-sided retail speculation

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

Short-term momentum is bearish given the -52.1% 1h move and consecutive lower closes over the last several hourly candles, though the tiny +2.58% 5m reading could indicate an early, unconfirmed stabilization attempt near current support.

Target low

$0.000100

Target high

$0.000300

Support

$0.000138 (candle 9 low), $0.0000082-0.0000085 (pre-spike base, unlikely near-term but structurally relevant)

Resistance

$0.000274-$0.000408 (recent candle range), $0.000989 (spike high, distant resistance)

Medium term · 3-7 days

neutral

Medium-term direction is highly uncertain given the extremely limited historical window (9 hourly candles) and total absence of authority/sniper/holder-history data; the token could either stabilize into a new range or continue bleeding if the pump-and-dump pattern typical of similar tokens plays out.

Catalysts

  • Any resolution of mint/freeze authority status (positive if renounced, negative if active and exploited)
  • Continued or renewed social media attention driving speculative volume
  • Liquidity pool changes (additions could stabilize price, removals/rug risk could crash it)
  • Sniper/early-buyer wallet behavior if that data becomes available

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because only 9 hourly candles are available (a very short lookback), key risk datasets (mint/freeze authority, sniper wallets, holder history) are entirely missing, and the token's extreme volatility (+265.7% 24h, -52.1% 1h) makes near-term price behavior inherently difficult to forecast reliably.

NPC call history

Full track record →

Sep 24bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
7GUnr7...pump
Total Supply
952,533,834.61

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($20.75K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Violent price action: +265.7% 24h but -52.1% in the last hour and an ~82% drawdown from the recent intra-window peak, indicating a pump-and-dump-style pattern typical of pump.fun-launched tokens
  • Mint/freeze authority status entirely unknown - cannot rule out ongoing supply inflation or account freezing capability
  • No sniper/early-buyer data available to assess coordinated dumping risk despite price action consistent with such behavior

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 9 available hourly candles show an explosive parabolic spike followed by a sharp multi-candle reversal. Candle [1] opened at $0.0000085 and candle [2] spiked intra-candle to a high of $0.000989 (a >100x wick) before closing at $0.00072 - classic pump.fun-style vertical launch/blow-off behavior. From candle [3] onward the token entered a steady downtrend, printing lower highs and lower closes each hour (0.000517 -> 0.000296 -> 0.000449 -> 0.000457 -> 0.000407 -> 0.000274 -> 0.000170), with candle [9] closing near its low at $0.00017, down roughly 82% from the candle [2] peak.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Short-term (last few hours) and medium-term (since the peak in candle 2) trends are both firmly down after the initial spike; the 1h price change of -52.07% confirms sharp ongoing deterioration even as the 24h change remains +265.7% due to the earlier spike baseline.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000138 (candle [9] low)

Major support

$0.0000082-$0.0000085 (candle [1] open/low, pre-spike base)

Immediate resistance

$0.000274-$0.000408 (recent candle [7]-[8] range)

Major resistance

$0.000989 (candle [2] all-time high in the observed window)

Price has retraced roughly 82% off the candle-2 high of $0.000989 down to the current $0.00017 level, sitting just above the immediate support formed by candle [9]'s low of $0.0001385. A break below that level risks a retest of much lower levels, while any recovery attempt will likely face resistance in the $0.00027-$0.00041 zone where the last three candles topped out.

Notable patterns

  • Vertical spike / blow-off top (candle 2 wick to $0.000989)
  • Series of lower highs and lower closes (candles 3-9), i.e. a downtrend/bearish staircase
  • Sharp volume decay following the initial spike (~90%+ drop from peak volume)
  • Long lower wick on candle 9 suggesting possible short-term seller exhaustion, unconfirmed

Liquidity

Liquidity

$20,745.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $20.75K is extremely shallow relative to a 24h traded volume of roughly $3.33M combined (buy+sell), implying a liquidity turnover ratio in excess of 150x - a strong indicator that the pool is thin and susceptible to severe slippage and price impact on even modestly sized trades. This mismatch between tiny liquidity and huge volume is consistent with the violent hourly price swings seen in the OHLC data (e.g. an hourly candle moving from ~$0.0000085 to ~$0.00015, over 1,600% intra-candle range). Buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (50.4% vs 49.6%), and buyer count (10,436) exceeds seller count (7,053), suggesting broad retail participation on both sides, but the shallow liquidity means the balanced volume figures can mask large realized slippage for individual traders. Overall this looks like a highly speculative, low-liquidity micro-cap trading environment.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

952,533,834.61

FDV

$162,389

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Extreme volatility observed directly in the data: 24h change of +265.7%, a 1h change of -52.1%, and an intra-window drawdown of ~82% from the candle-2 peak ($0.000989) to the current price (~$0.00017). This level of price movement is characteristic of a highly speculative, likely low-cap meme token.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $20.75K against ~$3.33M in combined 24h volume, meaning liquidity turnover is over 150x daily volume - a shallow pool that can produce severe slippage and makes the token vulnerable to sharp price dislocations from relatively small trades.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Only a top-10 concentration figure (16.66% of supply) is available; there is no top-100 figure, no wallet labeling, and no historical data to assess whether concentration is rising or falling, or whether top holders are insiders, LPs, or organic large holders. This gap in coverage means real concentration risk cannot be fully assessed and should not be treated as low risk simply because the visible top-10 number looks moderate.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($20.75K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Violent price action: +265.7% 24h but -52.1% in the last hour and an ~82% drawdown from the recent intra-window peak, indicating a pump-and-dump-style pattern typical of pump.fun-launched tokens
  • Mint/freeze authority status entirely unknown - cannot rule out ongoing supply inflation or account freezing capability
  • No sniper/early-buyer data available to assess coordinated dumping risk despite price action consistent with such behavior
  • No holder history or wallet classification data, limiting ability to detect insider or team wallet concentration beyond the raw top-10 figure of 16.66%
  • Very low FDV (~$162K) and micro-cap nature increase susceptibility to large percentage swings from small dollar flows

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (50.4%/49.6%), and buyer count (10,436) exceeds seller count (7,053), suggesting broad two-sided retail participation rather than a single dominant seller in the aggregate 24h window
  • Top-10 holder concentration of 16.66% is not unusually extreme on its face, though this cannot be fully verified as a mitigating factor given missing top-100 and historical data
  • Token has social presence (Twitter, website) suggesting at least some community/marketing activity, though this does not verify legitimacy

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand pump.fun-style meme token dynamics and can tolerate total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to independently verify on-chain authority and concentration data before trading. Position sizing should be minimal given the shallow liquidity and unresolved authority/sniper unknowns.

NPC is a micro-cap Solana meme token (FDV ~$162K) trading on PumpSwap that has just experienced a violent pump-and-dump cycle: a +265.7% 24h move driven by a vertical spike to $0.000989, followed by an ~82% collapse back to ~$0.00017 with a further -52% move in just the last hour. Liquidity is very shallow ($20.75K) relative to volume, and critical risk inputs (mint/freeze authority, sniper concentration, holder history) are entirely unavailable, making this a high-uncertainty, high-risk speculative setup rather than a fundamentally analyzable investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buying pressure re-emerges (24h buyers already outnumber sellers 10,436 to 7,053) and the token stabilizes above the immediate support near $0.000138, a relief bounce back toward the $0.00027-$0.00041 resistance zone is plausible, especially if social media momentum (Twitter/website presence) reignites speculative interest typical of pump.fun-style tokens.

  • Buyer count exceeds seller count in the 24h window (10,436 vs 7,053)
  • Small dollar inflows can move price significantly given the low FDV (~$162K), which can work in either direction
  • Active social channels (Twitter, website) could drive renewed retail attention

Base Case

Most likely the token continues to exhibit high volatility typical of newly-pumped low-liquidity meme coins, oscillating within a wide range (roughly $0.00013 to $0.00041 based on recent candles) without a clear directional resolution until either a fresh catalyst (viral attention) or a liquidity/authority red flag materializes.

  • No major liquidity injection or removal occurs in the near term
  • No confirmed rug-pull signal (e.g., authority misuse) is discovered
  • Trading remains dominated by short-term speculators rather than long-term holders given the token's very recent, volatile price history

Bear Case

High probability

The steady sequence of lower highs and lower closes across candles 3-9, a -52% move in the last hour, and a >90% collapse in hourly volume from the spike peak all point to continued downside as the speculative pump fades and profit-taking or capitulation selling continues, potentially retesting or breaking the immediate support of $0.000138.

  • Clear downtrend since the candle-2 peak with consistently lower closes
  • Volume has collapsed over 90% from its peak, indicating fading interest
  • Shallow $20.75K liquidity means further selling could cause outsized downside price impact
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority and sniper dump risk leave open the possibility of further supply-side shocks

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 24, 10:46 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-24 10:45 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • PumpSwap pair price feed
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (9 most recent candles)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % change)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 9 hourly candles were available, providing a very short lookback window insufficient for robust technical or trend analysis
  • No sniper detection data was available, preventing assessment of early-buyer concentration, PnL, or dump risk
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was available - only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration, so all holder trend figures are unsubstantiated placeholders
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, verified-contract status, and mutability flags were all unknown, preventing any rug-risk-from-authorities determination
  • No top-100 holder concentration or wallet classification data was available, limiting whale/insider analysis to a single top-10 percentage figure
  • Token metadata (name, description, social links) originates from a potentially adversarial source and was treated as unverified evidence only

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data that may not reflect the full risk profile of the token. Significant data gaps exist (authority status, sniper wallets, holder history) that could materially change the risk assessment if resolved. Cryptocurrency trading, and particularly low-liquidity micro-cap meme tokens, carries a high risk of substantial or total loss of capital. Always conduct independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is NPCs ownership?

As of 2026-09-24 10:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 16.66% of supply. It reports 4,740 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling NPCs?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-24 10:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $1,682,424.00 in buys and $1,654,409.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is NPCs liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +82.72%, from $12,246.18 (2026-09-24 02:00 UTC) to $22,376.34 (2026-09-24 10:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for NPCs (NPC)?

Short-term momentum is bearish given the -52.1% 1h move and consecutive lower closes over the last several hourly candles, though the tiny +2.58% 5m reading could indicate an early, unconfirmed stabilization attempt near current support. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.000100 to $0.000300.

Is NPC a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand pump.fun-style meme token dynamics and can tolerate total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to independently verify on-chain authority and concentration data before trading. Position sizing should be minimal given the shallow liquidity and unresolved authority/sniper unknowns.

What are the key risks of holding NPC?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($20.75K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Violent price action: +265.7% 24h but -52.1% in the last hour and an ~82% drawdown from the recent intra-window peak, indicating a pump-and-dump-style pattern typical of pump.fun-launched tokens • Mint/freeze authority status entirely unknown - cannot rule out ongoing supply inflation or account freezing capability

← Back to all predictions

Track NPC