Satori AI Agent Price Today & AI Analysis

SAARSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 2, 2026

$0.0₄4138

Contract

Live

7EKiUxCj2HbgELouKKVdnHstQG65TUnBsn7TNjtXuhat

Chain

Solana

Holders

337

Market cap

$41,348

At a $1M market cap, $SAAR would be $0.001001 (24.2x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Ask Unhosted AI about SAAR

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

RupertRupert The Dog$0.0₅2754+0.0%MC $2.6K

BOBBitcoin Bob$0.0₅5949+0.0%MC $5.4K

BOUNTREEBountree$0.0₅2528+0.0%MC $2.5K

GuidoI'm Not Fucking Leaving$0.0₅2701+0.0%MC $2.7K

HABIBINUHABIBINU$0.0₅5491+0.0%MC $5.5K

EterniaEternia$0.000214+399.4%MC $208.9K

Satori AI Agent: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-02 23:17 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$14,223.00

How concentrated is Satori AI Agent ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Satori AI Agent?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Satori AI Agent liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-02 23:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $14,223.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-02 23:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 2, 11:17 PM UTC

FDV

$96,233

Liquidity

$14,223.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Satori AI Agent (SAAR) is a self-described 'useless' meme/joke token on Solana, deployed on the Raydium DEX. The token's own description explicitly states it was 'deployed just for fun' and calls itself 'a mistake.' Despite this, candle [23] shows an extraordinary single-hour price spike of ~4,300% (from ~$0.0000153 to a high of ~$0.000678), driving a 24h gain of ~639%. Total liquidity is extremely thin at $14.22K against an FDV of ~$96K. The token exhibits extreme volatility, negligible liquidity, and carries very high risk.

Key points

Explicit self-deprecating description by creator admitting the token is 'useless' and 'a mistake'
Extraordinary single-candle pump: candle [23] high of $0.000678 vs open of $0.0000153 — ~4,300% intra-candle move
Extremely thin liquidity at $14.22K total, creating severe slippage risk
Near-balanced buy/sell pressure (51.4% buy vs 48.6% sell) in 24h despite massive price move
No sniper data available, limiting smart money analysis

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

Following the explosive pump in candle [23] (high $0.000678) and partial retracement to close ~$0.0000963 in candle [24], the token is in a post-pump bleed phase. The 5-minute change of -11.28% confirms immediate selling pressure. With only $14.22K in liquidity, any moderate sell order will cause severe downward slippage. The current price of ~$0.0000963 is well below the candle [23] high of $0.000678, suggesting the pump has largely unwound.

Target low

$0.0000130

Target high

$0.000111

Support: $0.0000903 (candle [24] low), $0.0000154 (candles [7],[21],[22] cluster), $0.0000130 (candles [17]–[19] base)
Resistance: $0.000111 (candle [24] high), $0.000678 (candle [23] spike high), $0.0000187 (candles [5]–[6] prior range top)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

Given the token's self-described lack of utility, extremely thin liquidity, and the fact that the pump appears to be a single-event spike rather than organic accumulation, medium-term price action is likely to revert toward pre-pump levels (~$0.0000130–$0.0000183). Sustained upside would require new catalysts, community growth, or a second pump event — none of which are supported by current data.

Catalysts

A second speculative pump driven by social media attention
Listing on additional DEXes or aggregators increasing liquidity
Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all small caps
Creator follow-through on any development despite stated intentions

Bullish factors

Strong 24h volume of ~$326K relative to $96K FDV suggests speculative interest
Near-balanced buy/sell ratio (51.4%/48.6%) shows buyers are not yet fully capitulating
More unique buyers (696) than sellers (603) in 24h
Social links (Twitter, Telegram, Discord, website) suggest some community infrastructure
Candle [24] held above $0.0000903 support after the spike, showing partial demand

Bearish factors

Creator explicitly states token is 'useless' and 'a mistake' — no utility or roadmap
Liquidity of only $14.22K is dangerously thin for any meaningful position
Candle [23] spike to $0.000678 followed by immediate 85%+ retracement within one hour
5-minute price change of -11.28% confirms active selling post-pump
Candles [7]–[19] show a sustained downtrend from ~$0.0000187 to ~$0.0000130 before the pump
No verified contract, unknown update authority, unknown mutability — elevated rug risk
FDV of only $96K with ~999M token supply leaves little room for price appreciation

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) extreme price volatility making targets unreliable, (2) no holder or sniper data to assess distribution, (3) $14.22K liquidity means price is easily manipulated by small actors, and (4) the token's own creator describes it as purposeless.

SAAR call history

Full track record →

Sep 2bearish@ $0.0000963

24h-70.1%

7d-69.3%

30d-48.7%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 7EKiUx...uhat
Total Supply: 999,218,888.14

Key Risks

Unknown mint and freeze authority — potential for unlimited token minting or wallet freezing
Critically thin liquidity ($14.22K) — severe slippage on any meaningful trade
Creator explicitly states token is 'useless' with no utility or development intent
Post-pump retracement already underway (-11.28% in 5 minutes) with likely further downside

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 24 hourly candles reveal three distinct phases: (1) a ranging/slight downtrend from candles [1]–[6] between ~$0.0000183–$0.0000189; (2) a sharp sell-off in candle [7] dropping to $0.0000154 (-17.5%), followed by a slow bleed through candles [8]–[19] from ~$0.0000178 down to ~$0.0000130 — a series of lower highs and lower lows; (3) a massive single-candle pump in candle [23] with a high of $0.000678 (volume: $323,741) — a ~4,300% intra-candle spike — followed by candle [24] opening at $0.0000905 and closing at $0.0000963, well below the spike high, indicating a near-complete retracement of the pump within one hour.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Short-term appears bullish only due to the extreme pump candle [23] distorting the 24h view. The underlying medium-term structure (candles [1]–[22]) was a clear downtrend with lower highs and lower lows from ~$0.0000189 to ~$0.0000130. Post-pump price at ~$0.0000963 is above pre-pump levels but well below the spike high, and the -11.28% 5-minute reading suggests continued retracement.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000903 (candle [24] low)

Major support

$0.0000130 (candles [17]–[19] pre-pump base)

Immediate resistance

$0.000111 (candle [24] high)

Major resistance

$0.000678 (candle [23] spike high)

Immediate support sits at the candle [24] low of ~$0.0000903. A break below this level opens a path back toward the pre-pump consolidation zone of $0.0000130–$0.0000154. Immediate resistance is the candle [24] high of $0.000111. The candle [23] spike high of $0.000678 represents a major overhead resistance that would require extraordinary volume to retest.

Notable patterns

Sustained downtrend (lower highs, lower lows) across candles [1]–[19]
Massive long upper wick on candle [23]: open $0.0000153, high $0.000678, close $0.0000905 — classic pump-and-dump wick pattern
Volume climax in candle [23] ($323,741) followed by sharp volume collapse in candle [24] ($3,137) — exhaustion signal
Candle [7] sharp bearish engulfing: dropped from $0.0000187 open to $0.0000154 close on elevated volume ($565)
Candle [20] bullish recovery: open $0.0000130, close $0.0000156 on $489 volume — minor relief rally before pump
Gap in candles: missing hours between candles [3]–[4], [10]–[11], [13]–[14], [14]–[15], [15]–[16], [16]–[17], [17]–[18], [19]–[20], [21]–[22], [22]–[23] suggest very low activity / illiquid periods

Liquidity

$14,223.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $14.22K on a single Raydium pair (AeDsrCUTK8DaeYx1FG7Hp9ksu2mnpfeSHk1PojNR5RyP). This means the 24h trading volume of ~$326K is approximately 23x the total liquidity pool — an extreme ratio indicating the pool is being churned repeatedly and that any moderately-sized trade will cause severe price impact. Slippage risk is high for any position above a few hundred dollars. The net flow is marginally positive (inflow) with $167.98K in buys vs $158.85K in sells and 696 unique buyers vs 603 unique sellers, but this near-balance suggests the pump may be distributing rather than accumulating. The FDV of $96.23K against $14.22K liquidity gives a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~14.8%, which is low but not atypical for micro-cap meme tokens.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,218,888.14

FDV

$96,233

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
The token experienced a ~4,300% intra-candle spike in candle [23] followed by an ~85% retracement within one hour. 24h price change is +639%. The 5-minute change is already -11.28%. This is extreme volatility by any measure.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $14.22K on a single Raydium pool. The 24h volume of ~$326K is ~23x the liquidity, meaning the pool is extremely thin. Any sell of meaningful size will cause catastrophic slippage.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Unknown mint and freeze authority — potential for unlimited token minting or wallet freezing
Critically thin liquidity ($14.22K) — severe slippage on any meaningful trade
Creator explicitly states token is 'useless' with no utility or development intent
Post-pump retracement already underway (-11.28% in 5 minutes) with likely further downside
No verified contract — cannot confirm token contract integrity
Single Raydium pool — no diversified liquidity, single point of failure
Pump-and-dump wick pattern in candle [23] suggests coordinated price manipulation

Mitigating factors

Near-balanced buy/sell pressure (51.4%/48.6%) suggests some genuine two-sided market
More unique buyers (696) than sellers (603) in 24h
Social links present (Twitter, Telegram, Discord, website) — some community infrastructure
Creator paid for DEX listing, suggesting minimal financial commitment
Current price (~$0.0000963) is still above pre-pump base (~$0.0000130), so pre-pump holders are in profit

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for conservative investors, income-seeking investors, or anyone without deep familiarity with micro-cap meme token risks. Position sizes should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket). The creator's own description of the token as 'useless' and 'a mistake' should be taken at face value.

SAAR is a self-described joke token with no stated utility, unknown contract authorities, and $14.22K in liquidity. It experienced a single massive pump event (+639% in 24h) driven by a ~$323K volume candle that has already partially reversed. The investment case is purely speculative — a bet on continued meme/social momentum against a backdrop of extreme risk, thin liquidity, and a creator who explicitly disavows the project.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Meme momentum continues: the pump attracts social media attention, new buyers pile in, and the token rides a broader Solana meme coin wave to retest or exceed the candle [23] high of $0.000678, implying ~7x from current levels.

Viral social media spread of the self-deprecating token description creating ironic appeal
Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting micro-caps
Creator adds liquidity or utility despite stated intentions
Second coordinated pump event by existing holders
Listing on meme coin aggregators or influencer promotion

Base Case

Price gradually bleeds back toward the $0.0000154–$0.0000187 range (candles [7]–[10] zone) over the next 24–72 hours as post-pump sellers outpace new buyers, representing a ~80–84% decline from current price. Token remains tradeable but illiquid.

No additional pump events or major new catalysts emerge
Liquidity pool remains intact (creator does not remove liquidity)
Mint authority is not exercised to dilute supply
Current buyer/seller balance (51.4%/48.6%) gradually shifts toward net selling
Pre-pump base of ~$0.0000130 acts as longer-term floor if community persists

Bear Case

High probability

Post-pump bleed continues: the pump was a one-time event, sellers dominate, liquidity is drained, and price reverts to pre-pump levels of $0.0000130–$0.0000154, representing an ~85–87% loss from current price. In a worst case, unknown mint authority is exercised or liquidity is removed entirely.

No utility or development roadmap — creator admits token is purposeless
Unknown mint/freeze authority creates existential rug risk
Critically thin $14.22K liquidity cannot support sustained price levels
Post-pump selling pressure already evident (-11.28% in 5 minutes)
Pump-and-dump wick pattern historically precedes sharp sustained declines
Single Raydium pool — liquidity removal would effectively end trading

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 2, 11:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-02 23:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Token metadata (mint, name, symbol, decimals, supply, description, social links)
Price data (USD spot price, 24h % change)
OHLC hourly candles (24 candles, USD-denominated)
Trading analytics (liquidity, volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Holder data is entirely unavailable — holder count, growth, and distribution cannot be assessed
Sniper/early buyer data is unavailable — smart money signals are severely limited
Update authority, mint authority, freeze authority, and contract mutability are all 'unknown' — rug risk cannot be fully quantified
Only 24 hourly candles provided — insufficient for medium/long-term technical analysis
Several candle hours are missing (gaps in the series), suggesting illiquid periods with no trades
24h dollar change and native price are listed as 'unknown' in the data
6h price change is listed as 'unknown'
Single liquidity pool on Raydium — no cross-venue price discovery
Token description is adversarial/self-deprecating and may be intentionally misleading in either direction
FDV of $96K and $14.22K liquidity make all price targets highly unreliable

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The token analyzed here has been explicitly described by its own creator as 'useless' and 'a mistake.' Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Satori AI Agent ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Satori AI Agent?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Satori AI Agent liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-02 23:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $14,223.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Satori AI Agent (SAAR)?

Is SAAR a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for conservative investors, income-seeking investors, or anyone without deep familiarity with micro-cap meme token risks. Position sizes should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket). The creator's own description of the token as 'useless' and 'a mistake' should be taken at face value.

What are the key risks of holding SAAR?

Unknown mint and freeze authority — potential for unlimited token minting or wallet freezing • Critically thin liquidity ($14.22K) — severe slippage on any meaningful trade • Creator explicitly states token is 'useless' with no utility or development intent