yesnoerror Price Today & AI Analysis

YNESolanaAnalysis as of May 1, 2026

$0.000193

-1.17% 24h

Contract

Live

7D1iYWfhw2cr9yBZBFE6nZaaSUvXHqG5FizFFEZwpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

11,604

Market cap

$193,487

At a $1M market cap, $YNE would be $0.001000 (5.17x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is YNE a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 25

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Creator holds

3.3%

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about YNE

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

FFLYFirefly Aerospace - Backpack Securities$18.46+2.7%MC $21.4K

AidenThe Day Trader$0.0₅6891-3.9%MC $6.7K

TC67Trollface Chicken 67$0.0₅3281-27.0%MC $3.2K

PLAYSETPlayset$0.0₅5218-19.9%MC $4.6K

CURBThe Solana Bull$0.0₄8663-5.2%MC $86.5K

FrongusFrongus$0.000237+473.8%MC $228.8K

yesnoerror: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-01 11:19 UTC

Holder addresses

11,765

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$206,817.19

How concentrated is yesnoerror ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 11,765 addresses (2026-05-01 11:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling yesnoerror?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is yesnoerror liquidity falling?: As of 2026-05-01 11:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $206,817.19. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-01 11:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of May 1, 11:19 AM UTC

FDV

$623,501

Liquidity

$206,817.19

Holders

11,765

Snipers

Not available

Risk

High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Bearish

YNE (yesnoerror) is a Solana-based meme/utility token with a stated AI-agent use case — funding an error-spotting review system for research papers powered by OpenAI's o1 model. The token trades at ~$0.000624 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$634K and $206.82K in total liquidity on Raydium. The token has 11,765 holders and has experienced a sharp 24h price decline of ~22%. Supply concentration is very high, with the top 10 wallets controlling 61.67% of supply, posing significant concentration risk. No snipers were detected in the first 1,000 blocks, which is a mild positive. The holder base has been slowly declining over the past 30 days (-70 net), suggesting waning interest.

Key points

AI-agent narrative tied to OpenAI o1 model for research paper error detection
Zero snipers detected in first 1,000 blocks — clean launch
Verified contract, non-spam, immutable metadata (mutable: false)
Established holder base of 11,765 wallets with swap-dominant acquisition (9,664 via swap)
Active Raydium liquidity pool with $206.82K total liquidity

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24–72 hours

bearish

Price has dropped ~22% in 24h from a spike high near $0.000973 (candle [16] high) back to ~$0.000623. Sell pressure dominates at 53.9% of 24h volume. The 5m and 1h changes are both -1.81%, indicating continued near-term selling. Immediate support sits around $0.000591 (candle [10] low). A bounce is possible if buyers defend this level, but momentum is bearish.

Target low

$0.000480

Target high

$0.000654

Support: $0.000591 (candle [10] low), $0.000482 (candles [17]–[19] cluster)
Resistance: $0.000654 (candle [4] open / candle [14] close area), $0.000784 (candle [15] high), $0.000973 (candle [16] all-time high in dataset)

Medium term · 7–30 days

neutral

The 30-day holder trend is slightly negative (-70 net holders), and price has retraced sharply from the spike. Without a new catalyst — such as a demonstrable AI agent deployment or broader market tailwind — price is likely to consolidate in the $0.000480–$0.000654 range. A recovery above $0.000784 would require significant new buying interest.

Catalysts

Demonstrable AI agent deployment reviewing real research papers
Broader Solana memecoin market rally
Influencer or community-driven attention spike
Reduction in top-holder concentration through distribution

Bullish factors

Zero snipers detected — no early predatory selling pressure from launch bots
Verified, immutable contract with social presence (Reddit, Telegram, Twitter, website)
AI/research narrative has broad appeal in current market environment
Liquidity of $206.82K is reasonable for a sub-$1M FDV token
24h buyer count (290 buys, 79 unique buyers) shows active participation

Bearish factors

Top 10 holders control 61.67% of supply — extreme concentration risk
30-day holder trend is declining (-70 net holders, -0.59%)
24h price down -22.44% with sell volume exceeding buy volume (53.9% sell pressure)
Update authority not renounced (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM)
FDV of only ~$634K limits upside without significant new capital inflows
Single spike-and-dump candle pattern suggests potential whale manipulation

Confidence: low. Price prediction confidence is low due to the token's small market cap (~$634K FDV), high supply concentration (top 10 = 61.67%), thin liquidity relative to whale positions, and the speculative AI-narrative nature of the project. The 24h candle data shows a single massive spike-and-dump pattern in candle [16] (O:$0.000480, H:$0.000973, C:$0.000769) that dominates recent price action, making trend extrapolation unreliable.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 7D1iYW...pump
Total Supply: 999,968,749.146743

Key Risks

Extreme supply concentration: top 2 holders control 36.76% — single-wallet exit risk
Shallow liquidity ($206.82K) relative to whale positions creates severe slippage risk
30-day holder decline (-70, -0.59%) signals waning community interest
Update authority not renounced — deployer retains administrative control

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 19-hour OHLC dataset reveals a dramatic spike-and-dump pattern. Candles [19]–[17] (Apr 30 14:00–16:00 UTC) show flat, low-volume price action around $0.000480–$0.000483. Candle [16] (Apr 30 17:00) is the defining candle: O:$0.000479, H:$0.000973, C:$0.000769 with massive volume of 25,883 USD — a long upper wick bullish engulf that nearly doubled the price intraday before partial retracement. Candle [15] (Apr 30 18:00) continued elevated at O:$0.000772, H:$0.000784, then sold off to C:$0.000654 on 11,715 USD volume — a bearish engulfing/shooting star. Candles [14]–[10] show a steady grind lower from $0.000651 to $0.000591. Candles [9]–[6] show a mild recovery attempt from $0.000595 to $0.000628. Candles [5]–[1] (May 1 06:00–11:00) show low-volume consolidation around $0.000623–$0.000654, with very thin volume (1–55 USD), suggesting price discovery has stalled.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is clearly bearish following the spike-and-dump from $0.000973 high. Medium-term (pre-spike baseline) was sideways around $0.000480–$0.000483, and price has now settled into a new sideways range of $0.000591–$0.000654 — elevated above pre-spike levels but well below the spike high.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

46%

Sell

54%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000591 (candle [10] low, Apr 30 23:00)

Major support

$0.000480 (pre-spike base, candles [17]–[19])

Immediate resistance

$0.000654 (candle [4] open / candle [14] close)

Major resistance

$0.000784 (candle [15] high) and $0.000973 (candle [16] all-time high in dataset)

The pre-spike consolidation zone ($0.000480–$0.000483) represents major support — a full retracement to this level would represent ~23% further downside from current price. The $0.000591 level (candle [10] low) is the nearest support. Resistance is layered at $0.000654, $0.000784, and $0.000973. Price is currently sandwiched between immediate support and resistance in a narrow band.

Notable patterns

Spike-and-dump: Candle [16] shows a near-100% intraday range (L:$0.000479 to H:$0.000973) with massive volume — classic pump pattern
Shooting star / bearish engulfing: Candle [15] opens near the spike close and sells off sharply — confirms distribution at highs
Volume exhaustion: Volume collapses from 25,883 in candle [16] to <2 USD in candle [1] — selling pressure drying up but no buying conviction
Sideways consolidation post-dump: Candles [5]–[1] show tight range with minimal volume — price discovery pause
Lower highs forming: Each recovery attempt since the spike has made a lower high ($0.000784 → $0.000638 → $0.000623)

Liquidity

$206,817.19

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of $206.82K on the Raydium pair (AAoREr9vexyGrinK6Z2GBcq5TKrNkZQXzkDpDDeXVaMk) is shallow relative to the whale positions. Holder #1 alone holds ~$128K worth of tokens at current prices (205.4M × $0.000624), meaning a single large holder could drain a significant portion of the liquidity pool in one transaction. The 24h net flow is negative (sell volume $27.91K > buy volume $23.86K), confirming outflow pressure. With 97 unique wallets active in 24h (79 buyers, 73 sellers), the market is thinly traded. Slippage risk is high for any position exceeding a few thousand dollars. The FDV/liquidity ratio of ~3.07x ($634K FDV / $206.82K liquidity) is acceptable for a micro-cap but still leaves the token vulnerable to liquidity crises if whales exit.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,968,749.146743

FDV

$634,640

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
The token experienced a near-100% intraday range on Apr 30 (L:$0.000479 to H:$0.000973) and has since declined -22.44% in 24h. Extreme volatility is characteristic of micro-cap tokens with thin liquidity.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of $206.82K is shallow. The top holder alone controls ~$128K in token value at current prices, meaning whale exits could cause catastrophic slippage. Slippage risk is high for positions above ~$5K.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme supply concentration: top 2 holders control 36.76% — single-wallet exit risk
Shallow liquidity ($206.82K) relative to whale positions creates severe slippage risk
30-day holder decline (-70, -0.59%) signals waning community interest
Update authority not renounced — deployer retains administrative control
Spike-and-dump price pattern suggests potential whale manipulation
AI narrative is unproven — no verifiable on-chain evidence of the described agent functionality
Micro-cap FDV (~$634K) makes token highly susceptible to market sentiment swings

Mitigating factors

Zero snipers in first 1,000 blocks — clean, fair launch
Verified contract, not flagged as spam
Immutable metadata (mutable: false) prevents rug via metadata changes
Established holder base of 11,765 with swap-dominant acquisition
Active social presence (Reddit, Telegram, Twitter, website)
Liquidity of $206.82K is reasonable for the FDV tier
Unique AI/research narrative differentiates from pure memecoins

Suitable for

Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant, speculative investors who can afford to lose their entire position. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking stable returns, or those unable to monitor positions actively. Position sizing should be minimal given the concentration and liquidity risks.

YNE presents a speculative micro-cap opportunity built on an AI-agent narrative (research paper error detection via OpenAI o1). The token has a clean launch (no snipers), verified contract, and an established holder base of ~11,765. However, extreme supply concentration (top 10 = 61.67%), a declining 30-day holder trend, shallow liquidity, and an unproven use case make this a high-risk speculative play. The recent spike-and-dump pattern raises concerns about whale-driven price manipulation.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The AI agent gains demonstrable traction — publishing verified research paper error findings, attracting media attention, and driving new holder acquisition. The broader Solana memecoin market rallies, bringing fresh capital. Whales hold their positions, and the token re-tests the $0.000784–$0.000973 resistance zone, representing 25–56% upside from current levels.

Verifiable AI agent deployment with real research paper error findings
Broader Solana/crypto market bull run
Influencer or media coverage of the AI narrative
Whale holders maintaining or adding to positions
New exchange listings or integrations

Base Case

Price consolidates in the $0.000480–$0.000654 range over the next 30 days. Holder count stabilizes around 11,700–11,800. The AI narrative maintains a small but dedicated community without major new catalysts. Token survives but does not achieve significant price appreciation without a new trigger.

No major whale exits in the near term
Liquidity pool remains stable at ~$200K+
AI agent project continues development without major setbacks
Broader market remains range-bound
Holder count stabilizes rather than accelerating its decline

Bear Case

Medium probability

Top holders (especially #1 at 20.54% and #2 at 16.22%) begin distributing into any price strength, overwhelming the $206.82K liquidity pool. Holder count continues declining, community interest fades, and price retraces to the pre-spike base of $0.000480 or below, representing ~23% further downside.

Whale distribution from top concentrated holders
Continued 30-day holder decline accelerating
Failure to deliver on AI agent use case
Broader market downturn reducing risk appetite
Liquidity pool thinning as LPs withdraw

Analysis details

Generated

May 1, 11:19 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-01 11:19 UTC

Model confidence

Medium

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (Mint: 7D1iYWfhw2cr9yBZBFE6nZaaSUvXHqG5FizFFEZwpump)
Raydium DEX pair data (AAoREr9vexyGrinK6Z2GBcq5TKrNkZQXzkDpDDeXVaMk)
19-hour OHLC candle data (hourly, USD)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
Top 20 holder snapshot with balance data
30-day daily historical holder series
Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)
Holder distribution metrics (whales/sharks/dolphins/fish/octopus tiers)

Limitations

Mint and freeze authority status could not be definitively determined from provided metadata
Top holder wallet classifications are inferred — no on-chain labeling data provided
Sniper analysis shows zero snipers but methodology/block range limitations are unknown
Only 19 hours of OHLC data provided — insufficient for multi-day technical analysis
AI agent functionality cannot be verified from on-chain data alone
Holder distribution tier definitions (whale/shark/dolphin etc.) thresholds not specified in source data
Update authority wallet (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM) not cross-referenced against known entity databases

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is yesnoerror (YNE) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 25, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell yesnoerror (YNE)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 25, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is yesnoerror ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 11,765 addresses (2026-05-01 11:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling yesnoerror?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is yesnoerror liquidity falling?

As of 2026-05-01 11:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $206,817.19. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for yesnoerror (YNE)?

Is YNE a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as high with a risk score of 7.8/100. Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant, speculative investors who can afford to lose their entire position. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking stable returns, or those unable to monitor positions actively. Position sizing should be minimal given the concentration and liquidity risks.

What are the key risks of holding YNE?

Extreme supply concentration: top 2 holders control 36.76% — single-wallet exit risk • Shallow liquidity ($206.82K) relative to whale positions creates severe slippage risk • 30-day holder decline (-70, -0.59%) signals waning community interest