CHEEMS

CHEEMS Price Today & AI Analysis

CHEEMS
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 30, 2026

73DRYB2YpoHiZUdq37hQmHTR7Yvg5qJKsxxaYrsJSBCJ

$0.041778

+4.42%

FDV $17,280

LiveContract:73DRYB2YpoHiZUdq37hQmHTR7Yvg5qJKsxxaYrsJSBCJChain:SolanaHolders:1,260Market cap:$17,280

More tokens on Solana

CASHCAT

CASHCAT

Cash Cat

$0.0426432.2%
MC $26.3K
TOLYBOT

TOLYBOT

TolyBot

$0.0434943.5%
MC $34.9K
PONSLESS

PONSLESS

PONSLESS

$0.05345322.7%
MC $3.0K
Wish

Wish

Make A Wish

$0.0455451.3%
MC $55.4K
LEET

LEET

LookingEducationEmployTraining

$0.0527592.1%
MC $2.8K
STONK

STONK

STONK

$0.303648.5%
MC $258.92M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about CHEEMS

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jul 30, 12:17 AM
FDV

$130,751

Liquidity

$48,847

Holders

173

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

CHEEMS (CHEEMS) is a meme token on Solana trading on PumpSwap with a fully diluted valuation of ~$127K–$131K and a current price of ~$0.000131. The token has experienced an extreme 90.5% 24h price surge but is showing heavy sell pressure (78% of 24h volume is sells). Supply is massively concentrated — the top holder alone controls 52.61% of supply, and the top 10 hold 75.33%. With only 173 holders, shallow liquidity (~$48.85K), and no verified contract or social links, this token carries very high risk.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme single-wallet concentration: top holder holds 52.61% of total supply
Very small holder base of only 173 wallets — highly illiquid and thinly traded
90.5% 24h price spike with 78% sell pressure — classic pump-and-dump pattern
No verified contract, no social links, mutable metadata authority not renounced
PumpSwap pair with only ~$48.85K total liquidity — high slippage risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token just spiked ~90.5% in 24h but is already showing a 5-minute decline of -7.97%. Sell pressure dominates at 78% of 24h volume ($199.32K sells vs $56.22K buys). The most recent hourly candle closed at $0.000131 after a high of $0.000181 in the prior candle, indicating a pullback from the peak. With 3,071 sells vs 1,332 buys and 1,023 unique sellers vs 209 buyers, short-term price action is likely to continue downward.

Target low$0.000053
Target high$0.000154
Support: $0.000087 (hourly candle [1] low), $0.000053 (hourly candle [2] open), $0.000030 (hourly candle [2] low — extreme support)
Resistance: $0.000154 (hourly candle [1] high), $0.000181 (hourly candle [2] high — recent peak)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

Holder count has declined 17% over the past 7 days (from ~202 to 173), and the 30-day trend shows high volatility with no sustained growth. The massive concentration in the top holder (52.61%) creates persistent dump risk. Without social links, verified contract, or community infrastructure, sustained price appreciation is unlikely.

Catalysts
  • Any large sell by the top holder (52.61% supply) would be catastrophic for price
  • Continued holder attrition over the 7-day trend
  • Lack of new buyer inflow — only 209 unique buyers in 24h vs 1,023 sellers
  • No identifiable catalysts (no social links, no verified contract, no roadmap data)

Bullish factors

  • 90.5% 24h price surge shows speculative momentum can attract attention
  • 30-day holder count is net +28 (+16%) suggesting some organic growth over the longer window
  • Buy volume of $56.22K in 24h shows some demand exists

Bearish factors

  • 78% of 24h volume is sell pressure ($199.32K sells)
  • Top holder controls 52.61% — single point of catastrophic failure
  • 5-minute price already down -7.97% from recent peak
  • Only 173 total holders — extremely thin market
  • No social links, no verified contract, no community infrastructure
  • 7-day holder count down -17% (from ~202 to 173)
Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, providing very limited technical data. The token is a micro-cap meme coin with extreme volatility (candle [2] ranged from $0.000030 to $0.000181 — a 6x range in a single hour). Predictions are based on on-chain sell pressure, holder trends, and concentration data rather than robust technical signals.

CHEEMS call history

Full track record →
Jul 30bearish
24h+137.9%
7d-10.1%
30d-79.4%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (23:00 UTC Jul 29): O=$0.0000532, H=$0.000181, L=$0.0000304, C=$0.000105 — an extremely wide-range bullish candle with a massive upper wick, suggesting a spike and partial rejection. Volume was very high at $219,309. Candle [1] (00:00 UTC Jul 30): O=$0.000105, H=$0.000154, L=$0.0000870, C=$0.000131 — a narrower candle that opened at the prior close, made a lower high ($0.000154 vs $0.000181), and closed above the open, but with a lower high than the prior candle. This 'lower high' pattern after a spike with a large upper wick is a bearish continuation signal.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 22%Sell 78%

Short-term trend is bearish — the most recent candle printed a lower high ($0.000154) vs the prior candle's high ($0.000181), and the 5-minute change is -7.97%. Medium-term is sideways given the extreme volatility and lack of sustained directional movement in the holder data.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000087 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.000030 (candle [2] low — extreme downside level)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000154 (candle [1] high)
Major$0.000181 (candle [2] high — recent spike peak)

The $0.000087 level (candle [1] low) is the nearest support. A break below this opens the path to the $0.000053 area (candle [2] open) and ultimately the $0.000030 extreme low. Resistance sits at $0.000154 (candle [1] high) and $0.000181 (the spike peak). Given the volume exhaustion and sell pressure, resistance levels are more likely to hold than support.

Notable patterns

  • Lower high in candle [1] vs candle [2] — bearish signal after spike
  • Large upper wick on candle [2] — rejection of highs, distribution at peak
  • Volume exhaustion: $219K → $22K in one hour — pump losing momentum
  • 5-minute price decline of -7.97% confirms short-term bearish momentum

Total holders173
24h Δ+2.9
7d Δ-17
30d Δ+16
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

The 90.5% price spike in the last 24h coincides with only a +5 holder gain (+2.9%), suggesting the price move is driven by existing holders trading rather than new entrants. The 7-day holder decline of -17% (from ~202 to 173) occurred alongside high volatility, indicating holders are exiting. The 30-day net gain of +28 holders (+16%) reflects a longer-term baseline of modest growth, but recent momentum is clearly negative.

Holder growth is volatile and non-accelerating. From June 30 to July 12, holders were essentially flat at 145–148. A burst of activity around July 20–22 pushed holders to 202, but this was followed by a sharp -19 decline on July 23 and continued attrition through July 27. The most recent two days show small recoveries (+7 on Jul 28, +5 on Jul 29), but the 7-day trend remains -17%. With only 173 total holders, this is an extremely thin community. The acquisition breakdown (168 via swap, 5 via transfer, 0 via airdrop) confirms organic trading activity rather than airdrop farming, but the small absolute numbers limit confidence in any trend.

Top 10 hold75.33%
Top 100 hold101.64%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

37AtCdTJHBEURsmtQACQi2WWgpQr3WAaFHzSxw2BHEoW

Project treasury or team wallet — holds 52.61% of total supply (525.3M tokens). This extreme concentration in a single wallet is the dominant risk factor for this token. No on-chain label available; classification as team/treasury is inferred from the outsized position.

52.61%

3ez68NgywqGbo7oAeE8XWp6f7Cr6nF5wToHaAjiHejAU

Individual whale — holds 3.00% of supply (29.9M tokens). No contract or exchange label available.

3.00%

AcKpsk3AKJR8YiTrHr2XCFZ2WV8gcM3zjgcr4P1MjHD1

Individual whale — holds 2.94% of supply (29.3M tokens).

2.94%

Cz3WBSeXy5aK2eR4WfFwSWNcseart5Fg3spmx2X5WUeJ

Individual whale — holds 2.62% of supply (26.2M tokens).

2.62%

5PXyGFpQZmm4yduYfT49fuiGuRpMTxg2doVC2coSess8

Individual whale — holds 2.61% of supply (26.1M tokens).

2.61%

Supply distribution is severely unhealthy. The top 10 wallets hold 75.33% of supply, and the top 100 hold 101.64% (likely a data artifact reflecting rounding or locked/burned tokens counted in the denominator). The single largest wallet (37AtCdTJHBEURsmtQACQi2WWgpQr3WAaFHzSxw2BHEoW) holds 52.61% — more than half of all circulating supply. This creates an existential concentration risk: a single sell decision by this wallet could collapse the price entirely. Holders 2–10 each hold 2.0–3.0%, suggesting a cluster of similarly-sized whale wallets below the dominant holder. The distribution pattern (1 mega-whale + many ~2% whales) is consistent with a token where the creator retained a majority and distributed the rest in roughly equal tranches.

Liquidity$48,850
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$56,220
Sell$199,320
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers209
Unique sellers1,023

Liquidity is critically shallow at $48.85K on a single PumpSwap pool (FXh1NZwvGnk9qwzfCuG7KPEUiGUZ6mUSWB). With a fully diluted valuation of ~$127K, the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is approximately 38%, which sounds reasonable in isolation but is misleading given the extreme supply concentration. Any attempt to sell a significant portion of the top holder's 52.61% stake would completely drain this pool. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $199.32K in sells vs $56.22K in buys — a net outflow of ~$143K, nearly 3x the total liquidity pool. This means the pool has been significantly stressed in the past 24h. With 1,023 unique sellers vs 209 unique buyers, the market is in clear distribution mode. Slippage risk is high for any trade above a few hundred dollars.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply998,558,802.49
FDV$127,250–$130,751

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is ~998.56M tokens with 6 decimals. The update authority is TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM — this is NOT the standard burn/null address (11111111111111111111111111111111), meaning the metadata update authority has NOT been renounced. However, the token is marked as 'Mutable: false', which limits some metadata changes. Mint authority and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the metadata fields, so they are marked as unknown. The non-renounced update authority (TSLvdd...) represents a medium authority risk — the creator retains some control over the token's metadata. The contract is unverified and there are no social links, which reduces transparency. The description 'CHEEMS ON SOL' provides no utility or tokenomic detail.

Volatility
high

90.5% price spike in 24h; single hourly candle ranged from $0.000030 to $0.000181 (6x). Extreme volatility typical of micro-cap meme tokens with thin liquidity.

Liquidity
high

Only $48.85K total liquidity on a single PumpSwap pool. 24h sell volume of $199.32K already exceeds total liquidity by 4x, indicating the pool has been heavily stressed. Large trades will incur severe slippage.

Concentration
high

Top holder controls 52.61% of supply (525.3M tokens). Top 10 holders control 75.33%. A single sell decision by the top wallet would be catastrophic for price and liquidity.

SniperDump
low

No sniper data is available for this token. Sniper dump risk cannot be quantified. Set to low per methodology guidelines when data is unavailable, but the extreme sell pressure (78% of volume) suggests distribution is already occurring from some large holders.

Authority
medium

Update authority (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM) has not been renounced to the burn address. Token is marked 'Mutable: false' which provides some protection. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. Contract is unverified.

Key risks

  • Single wallet holds 52.61% of supply — existential concentration risk
  • Only 173 holders — extremely thin, illiquid market
  • 78% sell pressure in 24h ($199.32K sells vs $56.22K buys) — active distribution
  • Shallow liquidity ($48.85K) — high slippage, easy to manipulate
  • No verified contract, no social links, no community infrastructure
  • Update authority not renounced — creator retains metadata control
  • 7-day holder decline of -17% — community is shrinking
  • Unverified contract increases rug pull risk

Mitigating factors

  • Token marked 'Mutable: false' limits some metadata manipulation
  • 30-day holder count is net positive (+16%), showing some longer-term growth
  • Not flagged as spam by the data provider
  • PumpSwap listing provides some baseline DEX infrastructure
  • 168 of 173 holders acquired via swap (organic trading, not airdrop farming)
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with micro-cap Solana meme token risks. Position sizing should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket only). This is NOT financial advice.

CHEEMS is a high-risk Solana meme token with extreme supply concentration, shallow liquidity, and active distribution pressure. The 90.5% 24h price spike appears to be a speculative pump rather than fundamental-driven appreciation, given the 78% sell pressure, declining holder count, and lack of any identifiable utility, social presence, or verified contract. The dominant risk is the top holder's 52.61% position, which represents a single point of failure for the entire token.

Bull case (low)

Viral meme momentum drives new buyer inflow, the top holder does not sell, and the token attracts attention from larger Solana meme communities, pushing FDV toward $500K–$1M.

  • Sustained meme virality on social media (currently no social links — would require new community formation)
  • Top holder (52.61%) holds or locks position, removing overhang
  • New exchange listing or influencer promotion
  • Broader Solana meme season driving speculative capital into micro-caps

Base case

Price retraces 40–60% from the current spike high as sell pressure continues. Holder count stabilizes in the 140–160 range. Token trades in a low-volume range with occasional volatility spikes but no sustained trend.

  • Top holder does not sell their full position immediately
  • Some speculative interest persists given the meme branding
  • Liquidity remains at current shallow levels
  • No new catalysts (social, exchange listing, etc.) emerge

Bear case (high)

Top holder sells a significant portion of their 52.61% stake, collapsing the price by 80–95%. Remaining holders exit, liquidity drains, and the token becomes effectively worthless.

  • Top holder (52.61%) decides to exit — would drain the $48.85K liquidity pool entirely
  • Continued holder attrition (already -17% in 7 days)
  • No social links or community to sustain demand
  • 78% sell pressure already indicates distribution in progress
  • Unverified contract and non-renounced authority reduce trust

GeneratedJul 30, 12:17 AM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-07-30T00:00:00Z. Price and volume data is 24h rolling. OHLC data covers only the 2 most recent hourly candles, limiting technical analysis depth.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Mint: 73DRYB2YpoHiZUdq37hQmHTR7Yvg5qJKsxxaYrsJSBCJ)
  • PumpSwap pair data (FXh1NZwvGnk9qwzfCvqEkzUysdCuG7KPEUiGUZ6mUSWB)
  • OHLC candle data (2 hourly candles, Jul 29–30 2026)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data (top 20 holders, historical 30-day series)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior cannot be quantified
  • Top holder wallet classification is inferred (no on-chain label confirming team/treasury)
  • Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly provided in metadata
  • Top 100 concentration of 101.64% is likely a data artifact and should be interpreted cautiously
  • No social links or external data to assess community strength or project legitimacy
  • Micro-cap meme tokens are subject to extreme manipulation — all predictions carry very low confidence

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Investing in micro-cap meme tokens carries extreme risk of total loss. The analyst and this tool have no financial interest in CHEEMS. Always conduct your own research before making any investment decision.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply998,558,802.49

Key Risks

•Single wallet holds 52.61% of supply — existential concentration risk
•Only 173 holders — extremely thin, illiquid market
•78% sell pressure in 24h ($199.32K sells vs $56.22K buys) — active distribution
•Shallow liquidity ($48.85K) — high slippage, easy to manipulate

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for CHEEMS. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper activity. However, the on-chain trading data reveals a highly concerning pattern: 1,023 unique sellers vs only 209 unique buyers in 24h, with $199.32K in sell volume vs $56.22K in buy volume. This 78% sell pressure ratio suggests early participants or large holders are actively distributing. The top holder (52.61% of supply) has not been identified as a sniper but represents the single largest profit-taking risk.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — the sniper analysis endpoint returned no data for this token.

Cannot be determined from sniper data (unavailable). However, the extreme sell pressure (78% of volume) and declining holder count (-17% over 7 days) suggest early buyers are net sellers at current prices.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for CHEEMS (CHEEMS)?

The token just spiked ~90.5% in 24h but is already showing a 5-minute decline of -7.97%. Sell pressure dominates at 78% of 24h volume ($199.32K sells vs $56.22K buys). The most recent hourly candle closed at $0.000131 after a high of $0.000181 in the prior candle, indicating a pullback from the peak. With 3,071 sells vs 1,332 buys and 1,023 unique sellers vs 209 buyers, short-term price action is likely to continue downward. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000053 to $0.000154.

Is CHEEMS a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with micro-cap Solana meme token risks. Position sizing should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket only). This is NOT financial advice.

How are CHEEMS holders trending?

CHEEMS currently has 173 holders and is declining (24h: 2.9, 7d: -17, 30d: 16). Holder growth is volatile and non-accelerating. From June 30 to July 12, holders were essentially flat at 145–148. A burst of activity around July 20–22 pushed holders to 202, but this was followed by a sharp -19 decline on July 23 and continued attrition through July 27. The most recent two days show small recoveries (+7 on Jul 28, +5 on Jul 29), but the 7-day trend remains -17%. With only 173 total holders, this is an extremely thin community. The acquisition breakdown (168 via swap, 5 via transfer, 0 via airdrop) confirms organic trading activity rather than airdrop farming, but the small absolute numbers limit confidence in any trend.

What does sniper activity look like for CHEEMS?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding CHEEMS?

Single wallet holds 52.61% of supply — existential concentration risk • Only 173 holders — extremely thin, illiquid market • 78% sell pressure in 24h ($199.32K sells vs $56.22K buys) — active distribution

← Back to all predictions

Track CHEEMS