Theodore Shellington Price Today & AI Analysis

01SolanaAnalysis as of Jun 14, 2026

$0.0₅4422

Contract

Live

6d9PCh5ocA2v4S7E6G1Hn1dfd72XxE8HJu22r4Sspump

Chain

Solana

Holders

408

Market cap

$4,414

At a $1M market cap, $01 would be $0.001002 (227x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is 01 a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 26

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

5.6%1 sniper, 1 bundler, 13 insiders still holding

Creator holds

0.0%

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about 01

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

STREAMstreamoors$0.0₅1749+0.0%MC $7

GiselleThe Survivor$0.0₅2092+0.0%MC $2.1K

Ask Ask Jeeves$0.0₅3928+0.0%MC $3.9K

TROLUNCJAKTrollunc Wojak$0.0₅2149+0.0%MC $2.1K

PEAKSPeaks Trade$0.0₅2574+0.0%MC $2.6K

ZECZcash$1,304.04+6.2%MC $134.05M

Theodore Shellington: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-14 13:47 UTC

Holder addresses

546

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$47,720.53

How concentrated is Theodore Shellington ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 546 addresses (2026-06-14 13:47 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Theodore Shellington?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Theodore Shellington liquidity falling?: As of 2026-06-14 13:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $47,720.53. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-14 13:47 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 14, 01:47 PM UTC

FDV

$183,876

Liquidity

$47,720.53

Holders

546

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Theodore Shellington (symbol: 01) is a very recently launched Solana meme/micro-cap token on PumpSwap with a fully diluted valuation of ~$183.9K and total liquidity of only $47.72K. The token experienced a massive 340% 24h price spike driven almost entirely by a single day of activity (June 13–14, 2026), after sitting dormant at 72 holders for ~30 days. Sell pressure is overwhelming at 75.6% of 24h volume, and the top holder (the PumpSwap liquidity pool) controls 18.39% of supply. The token is unverified, the update authority is unknown, and on-chain data reveals extreme concentration, shallow liquidity, and a very high-risk profile.

Key points

Explosive single-day holder growth: from 72 to 546 holders (+474, +87%) in ~24 hours after a month of dormancy
Extreme sell pressure: 75.6% of 24h volume ($481K) is sells vs. 24.4% buys ($155K)
Very shallow liquidity at $47.72K against $183.9K FDV — high slippage risk for any meaningful position
Top 10 wallets hold 39.54% of supply; top 100 hold 89.65% — highly concentrated distribution
No sniper data available; authority status unknown — elevated rug/manipulation risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–48 hours

bearish

The token is in a sharp post-pump retracement. Sell pressure is 75.6% of 24h volume and the 1h holder count dropped by 33 (-6%). The current price of ~$0.000184 is well below the 24h high implied by candle data (~$0.000145 range highs) and the OHLC data shows the most recent candles have Low values that are actually higher than Open/Close (data anomaly noted), but the overall pattern from candles 23–24 shows a massive wick from ~$0.000007 to ~$0.000129 followed by a gradual fade. Short-term direction is bearish with risk of returning toward the $0.000040–$0.000052 consolidation zone.

Target low

$0.000023

Target high

$0.000060

Support: $0.000043 (repeated open/close cluster in candles 1–8), $0.000023 (candles 12–14 consolidation zone), $0.000013 (candle 17 intraday low)
Resistance: $0.000053 (candles 1–8 repeated high), $0.000068 (candle 11 high), $0.000110–$0.000115 (candles 22–23 highs)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

With only $47.72K in liquidity, 89.65% of supply in the top 100 wallets, and no demonstrated organic utility or development milestones, sustained price appreciation is unlikely. The token sat dormant for ~30 days before this pump, suggesting the current activity is speculative/pump-driven rather than fundamental. A return toward pre-pump levels (~$0.000007–$0.000025) is the base expectation unless new catalysts emerge.

Catalysts

Any credible project announcement or revenue demonstration from the described 'autonomous company'
Broader Solana meme-coin market rally lifting micro-caps
Whale accumulation at lower prices creating a new base
Liquidity pool deepening reducing slippage risk

Bullish factors

340% 24h price gain demonstrates speculative momentum
Rapid holder growth from 72 to 546 in 24 hours shows new interest
5m price change of +11% and 1h change of +68% suggest short-term momentum
PumpSwap listing provides accessible entry/exit

Bearish factors

75.6% sell pressure ($481K sells vs $155K buys) in 24h
Holder count dropped 33 in the last hour (-6%), indicating early exits
Only $47.72K liquidity — extremely shallow for any meaningful position
Token was dormant for ~30 days before this pump — no organic growth
Top 100 wallets hold 89.65% of supply — extreme concentration
Update authority unknown — cannot confirm renounced status
Unverified contract with possible adversarial metadata

Confidence: low. The token is extremely new with only ~24 hours of meaningful trading history. OHLC data shows anomalous candle structures (Low > High in several candles, likely a data feed issue). Liquidity is very shallow at $47.72K, making price highly manipulable. Sniper data is unavailable. These factors severely limit predictive confidence.

01 call history

Full track record →

Jun 14bearish@ $0.000184

24h-7.1%

7d-91.2%

30d-97.4%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 6d9PCh...pump
Total Supply: 999,812,727.14

Key Risks

Extreme sell pressure: 75.6% of 24h volume is sells, with 2,913 sellers vs. 829 buyers
Critically shallow liquidity ($47.72K) — high slippage and exit risk
Top 100 wallets hold 89.65% of supply — extreme concentration risk
Token was dormant for 30 days before pump — suggests coordinated/artificial price action

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 24-hour OHLC series (candles 1–24, hourly) reveals a classic pump-and-dump pattern. Candle 24 (earliest, 14:00 June 13) shows a massive range from a low of ~$0.000008 to a high of ~$0.000129 — a 16x intraday wick — with strong close at ~$0.000109, indicating the initial pump. Candle 23 (15:00) hit a high of ~$0.000115 before closing at ~$0.000064, showing distribution beginning. Candles 22–21 continued the fade from highs of ~$0.000110 and ~$0.000108 respectively. By candles 12–14 (00:00–02:00 June 14), price had compressed into a tight range around $0.000023, forming a consolidation base. Candles 7–11 show a recovery attempt with candle 11 spiking to $0.000068 before fading. Candles 1–8 show a repetitive open/close pattern around $0.000043–$0.000053, suggesting algorithmic or bot-driven trading. NOTE: Several candles show Low > High values (e.g., candle 1: L=$0.000104 > H=$0.000053), which is a data feed anomaly — these candles should be interpreted with caution.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

The token is in a clear short-to-medium term downtrend from the June 13 pump peak (~$0.000129 high) toward the current ~$0.000184 reported price (which may reflect a very recent spike not fully captured in the hourly candles). The overall trajectory from candle 24 peak to candles 1–8 consolidation is lower highs and lower lows, consistent with post-pump distribution.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

24%

Sell

76%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000043 (repeated open/close cluster, candles 1–8)

Major support

$0.000023 (candles 12–14 consolidation base)

Immediate resistance

$0.000053 (candles 1–8 repeated high ceiling)

Major resistance

$0.000110–$0.000115 (candles 22–23 pump highs)

The $0.000043–$0.000053 band has acted as a consolidation zone across 8 consecutive candles, making it the most significant near-term support/resistance pivot. A break below $0.000043 opens the path to the $0.000023 base. The $0.000110–$0.000115 zone represents the pump-era resistance that would require substantial new buying to reclaim.

Notable patterns

Pump-and-dump wick: Candle 24 shows a ~16x range from low to high in a single hour
Post-pump distribution: Candles 23–18 show progressively lower highs (lower high pattern)
Consolidation compression: Candles 12–14 form a tight doji-like cluster around $0.000023
Algorithmic/bot pattern: Candles 1–8 show near-identical open/close values ($0.000043/$0.000053) suggesting automated trading
Data anomaly: Multiple candles show Low > High values, indicating possible data feed errors that limit technical reliability

Liquidity

$47,720.53

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $47.72K against a $183.9K FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of only ~26%. This means any position of meaningful size will face severe slippage. The 24h trading volume of ~$636K is over 13x the available liquidity, indicating extremely high turnover relative to depth. The sell-to-buy ratio is alarming: 9,261 sell transactions vs. 3,103 buy transactions, and 2,913 unique sellers vs. 829 unique buyers — a 3.5:1 seller-to-buyer ratio. Net flow is strongly negative (outflow). The market health is poor: shallow liquidity, dominant sell pressure, and a seller count more than 3x the buyer count all point to a token in active distribution/dumping phase.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,812,727.14

FDV

$183,876.38

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
340% 24h price gain followed by active distribution. OHLC candles show a 16x intraday range on the launch candle. Extreme volatility makes position sizing and exit timing extremely difficult.
Liquidityhigh
Only $47.72K in total liquidity against $636K in 24h volume. Any position above a few hundred dollars will face significant slippage. The liquidity pool (top holder at 18.39%) could be withdrawn at any time.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme sell pressure: 75.6% of 24h volume is sells, with 2,913 sellers vs. 829 buyers
Critically shallow liquidity ($47.72K) — high slippage and exit risk
Top 100 wallets hold 89.65% of supply — extreme concentration risk
Token was dormant for 30 days before pump — suggests coordinated/artificial price action
Unknown authority status — cannot rule out mint or freeze authority exploits
Unverified contract with no on-chain validation
1h holder count already declining (-33, -6%) — early buyers exiting
Micro-cap FDV ($183.9K) makes token highly susceptible to manipulation

Mitigating factors

Mutable: false — token metadata cannot be altered
'pump' suffix suggests Pump.fun origin, which typically burns mint authority on bonding curve completion
PumpSwap listing provides some baseline liquidity and price discovery
Social links (Twitter, website) exist — some minimal project presence
Rapid holder growth (72 → 546) shows genuine new interest, even if speculative

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap meme tokens, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and have the technical capability to manage slippage on extremely shallow liquidity. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana DeFi mechanics and pump-and-dump dynamics.

Theodore Shellington (01) is a micro-cap Solana token that experienced a single-day speculative pump after 30 days of dormancy. The on-chain data presents an overwhelmingly bearish picture: extreme sell pressure (75.6%), shallow liquidity ($47.72K), very high supply concentration (top 100 = 89.65%), unknown authority status, and a declining holder count in the most recent hour. The bull case relies entirely on continued speculative momentum, which is contradicted by the current sell/buy ratio of 3:1. This is a very high risk, speculative instrument with characteristics consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Speculative momentum continuation: If the token attracts viral attention (e.g., Twitter/social media amplification of the 'autonomous company' narrative), new retail buyers could sustain or extend the pump, pushing price toward the $0.000110–$0.000115 resistance zone.

Viral social media traction for the 'autonomous revenue company' narrative
Broader Solana meme-coin market rally
Whale accumulation at current levels rather than distribution
Liquidity deepening reducing slippage barriers to entry

Base Case

Gradual fade with high volatility: Price consolidates in the $0.000023–$0.000053 range as the initial pump excitement fades, with sporadic volatility spikes. The token retains a small speculative community but fails to develop organic utility or sustained holder growth.

Sell pressure moderates but remains dominant
Liquidity stays shallow, limiting both upside and downside velocity
No major new catalysts (positive or negative) emerge in the near term
Early holders continue gradual distribution rather than a single catastrophic dump

Bear Case

High probability

Post-pump collapse: The dominant sell pressure (75.6%), declining holder count (-33 in 1h), and extreme concentration (89.65% in top 100) lead to a rapid price collapse back toward pre-pump levels of $0.000007–$0.000023 as early holders fully distribute.

Continued 3:1 seller-to-buyer ratio exhausting buy-side support
Whale/early holder distribution into shallow $47.72K liquidity
No fundamental utility or revenue demonstrated on-chain
Liquidity pool withdrawal risk from top holder (18.39%)
Broader risk-off sentiment in micro-cap Solana tokens

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 14, 01:47 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-14 13:47 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, authority fields)
PumpSwap DEX price feed and OHLC candle data (24 hourly candles)
Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets, transaction counts)
Holder metrics and distribution data (top 20 holders, concentration percentages)
Historical holder time series (30-day daily)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

No sniper data available — smart money signals are inferred rather than computed
Update authority status is 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority renouncement cannot be confirmed
Multiple OHLC candles show Low > High values (data feed anomaly), limiting technical analysis reliability
Token has only ~24 hours of meaningful trading history — insufficient for robust trend analysis
The 24h price change shown as '0%' in trading analytics contradicts the '340%' figure in the price section — data inconsistency noted
FDV figures differ slightly between metadata ($183,876) and trading analytics ($180,730) — minor data discrepancy
Holder classifications (whale/shark/dolphin/fish) are based on balance thresholds, not behavioral analysis
No audit, verified contract, or on-chain revenue data available to validate the project description

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Theodore Shellington (01) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 26, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Theodore Shellington (01)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 26, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Theodore Shellington ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 546 addresses (2026-06-14 13:47 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Theodore Shellington?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Theodore Shellington liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-14 13:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $47,720.53. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Theodore Shellington (01)?

Is 01 a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap meme tokens, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and have the technical capability to manage slippage on extremely shallow liquidity. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana DeFi mechanics and pump-and-dump dynamics.

What are the key risks of holding 01?

Extreme sell pressure: 75.6% of 24h volume is sells, with 2,913 sellers vs. 829 buyers • Critically shallow liquidity ($47.72K) — high slippage and exit risk • Top 100 wallets hold 89.65% of supply — extreme concentration risk