INU Price Today & AI Analysis

INUSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 17, 2026

$0.0₄4625

+13.19% 24h

Contract

Live

6LrDt7nBiHraUuk9PZoUL8Qy9WX6pnSpDz1RkWWRR7hN

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,779

Market cap

$46,244

At a $1M market cap, $INU would be $0.001000 (21.6x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is INU a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 1

Transfer fee

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 3% fee and the owner can still raise it.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token blocks a sell

Transfer fee

3%Every buy and sell · can be raised

Launch wallets hold

0.52%2 insiders still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about INU

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

WWWildlife Wonderland$0.0₅5893+3.1%MC $5.8K

HIREHire Agents$0.0₄1363-4.5%MC $12.8K

UBERUber Driver$0.0₄3077-1.0%MC $30.7K

VIGILANTECitizen Vigilante$0.0₅2714-7.1%MC $2.7K

cartiplayboicarti$0.0₅4590+5.7%MC $4.5K

uniuni$0.009229-64.9%MC $9.23M

INU: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-17 23:18 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$53,428.00

How concentrated is INU ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling INU?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is INU liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-17 23:18 UTC, reported liquidity was $53,428.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-17 23:18 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 17, 11:18 PM UTC

FDV

$1,038,486

Liquidity

$53,428.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

INU is a Solana meme token trading on a Raydium CPMM pool that experienced an extreme +1562% price surge in the last 24 hours, moving from roughly $0.0000735 to $0.00104, accompanied by a sharp increase in trading volume (24h buy volume $502.81K vs sell volume $452.99K) and rising buyer participation (1,818 buyers vs 1,520 sellers). However, the token's liquidity base is very shallow at just $53.43K against a $1.04M fully diluted valuation, and critical risk data — holder distribution, whale concentration, mint/freeze authority status, and sniper wallet activity — is entirely unavailable, leaving major blind spots in the risk picture.

Key points

Extreme, parabolic short-term price action (+1562% 24h) rather than steady growth
Very thin liquidity ($53.43K) relative to trading volume and FDV, implying high slippage/manipulation susceptibility
Complete absence of holder, whale, sniper, and authority-status data, unusual for a thorough risk assessment and a red flag in itself
Net buy-side dominance in volume and unique participant counts, suggesting genuine (if risky) speculative demand rather than pure bot wash trading

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48 hours

neutral

Given the parabolic run-up and already-cooling 5-minute momentum (-3.22%), a short-term consolidation or pullback is likely, though the token could also see a volatile continuation given persistent buy-side dominance. High volatility should be expected in either direction.

Target low

$0.00060

Target high

$0.00148

Support: $0.000711 (last candle low), $0.000297-0.000359 (candles 21-23 lows)
Resistance: $0.00148 (candle 21 high), $0.00143 (candle 23 high)

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

neutral

Medium-term direction is highly uncertain given the absence of holder distribution data, authority confirmation, and sniper data. Sustainability of the rally will depend heavily on whether liquidity is deepened and whether large early holders (unknown at this time) choose to distribute into strength.

Catalysts

Potential liquidity additions or removals on the Raydium CPMM pair
Social media/community momentum shifts (Twitter/website engagement)
Possible confirmation (or lack thereof) of mint/freeze authority renouncement
Broader memecoin market sentiment on Solana

Bullish factors

Net buy volume dominance (52.6% vs 47.4% sell)
Buyer count exceeds seller count (1,818 vs 1,520) in 24h
Strong upward price and volume trend over the trailing 24 hours

Bearish factors

Extreme +1562% 24h gain is a textbook setup for mean reversion / sharp correction
5m price change already negative (-3.22%), suggesting momentum fading
Very thin $53.43K liquidity pool relative to $1.04M FDV and ~$955.8K daily volume
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status increases rug-pull risk
No holder or sniper data available to rule out concentrated dump risk

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because several critical datasets are missing entirely (holder distribution, whale concentration, sniper wallet behavior, and authority status), and the available price action reflects an extreme, likely unsustainable parabolic move that is inherently difficult to forecast using technical analysis alone.

INU call history

Full track record →

Sep 17neutral@ $0.00104

24h—

7d—

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 6LrDt7...R7hN
Total Supply: 999,972,622.20

Key Risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($53.43K) relative to volume and FDV creates high slippage and manipulation risk
Parabolic +1562% 24h price move is a classic pattern preceding sharp reversals/dumps
No holder distribution or whale concentration data available to assess supply concentration risk
Mint/freeze/update authority status unknown — cannot confirm rug-pull protections are in place

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the most recent 24 hourly candles, price rose from an open near $0.0000735 (candle 1) to a close of $0.00103851 (candle 24), a roughly 14x move within the window, with the bulk of the gain occurring in the final 4 hours (candles 21-24) where price rocketed from ~$0.000324 to ~$0.00139 intrahour highs before settling at $0.00104. Early candles (1-2) show tight ranges and modest volume, followed by a volume spike and large-range breakout in candle 3 (V:125,521) that lifted price 4x intrahour. A consolidation/pullback phase followed (candles 4-16) with price oscillating between ~$0.00012-$0.00033, then a renewed breakout sequence (candles 17-24) with progressively higher highs and massive volume spikes (candles 21-23 each exceeding $128K-$300K in volume), culminating in the final candle's strong bullish close near its high.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Both short-term (last 4-6 hours) and medium-term (full 24h window) trends are sharply upward, characterized by parabolic, volatile price action rather than smooth accumulation. The move is punctuated by large wicks on both sides, indicating high volatility alongside the uptrend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

53%

Sell

47%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000711 (candle 24 low)

Major support

$0.000063 (candle 1 low, session floor)

Immediate resistance

$0.00148 (candle 21 high)

Major resistance

$0.00143 (candle 23 high) / all-time intraday high near $0.00149

Immediate support sits at the most recent hourly low of $0.000711, with a much deeper major support near the session's origin low of $0.000063 (unlikely to be tested absent a full retracement). Immediate resistance is the recent spike high of ~$0.00148 set in candle 21, with candle 23's high of ~$0.00143 acting as a secondary resistance/ceiling test point just below. A break and hold above $0.00148 would be needed to confirm continuation; failure to hold $0.000711 support could open a retest of the $0.0003-0.0004 consolidation zone.

Notable patterns

Parabolic breakout with expanding volume in final 4 candles
Long upper wicks on candles 21-23 indicating rejection at highs and profit-taking
Higher highs and higher lows structure from candle 17 onward
Early tight-range consolidation (candles 4-16) followed by volatility expansion — a classic pre-breakout basing then launch pattern
Large volume spike in candle 3 (V:125,521) with no follow-through, suggesting an earlier failed pump before the sustained move

Liquidity

$53,428.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $53.43K against a fully diluted valuation of ~$1.04M and 24h trading volume near $955.8K (buy+sell) represents an extremely thin liquidity base relative to turnover — the liquidity pool is being turned over roughly 18x in a single day. This combination of shallow liquidity with heavy volume implies severe slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade in either direction. Buy volume ($502.81K, 52.6%) modestly exceeds sell volume ($452.99K, 47.4%), and buyers (1,818) outnumber sellers (1,520), suggesting mild net inflow and speculative buying pressure, but the shallow pool means price is highly sensitive to even moderate order flow, as evidenced by the extreme intra-day candle ranges.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,972,622.20

FDV

$1.04M

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price change of +1562% with intrahour swings exceeding 100% (e.g., candle 21 low $0.000297 to high $0.00149) demonstrates extreme volatility far beyond typical market conditions.
Liquidityhigh
Only $53.43K total liquidity against ~$955.8K in 24h combined volume and $1.04M FDV means large trades will incur significant slippage and the pool could be drained or manipulated relatively easily.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($53.43K) relative to volume and FDV creates high slippage and manipulation risk
Parabolic +1562% 24h price move is a classic pattern preceding sharp reversals/dumps
No holder distribution or whale concentration data available to assess supply concentration risk
Mint/freeze/update authority status unknown — cannot confirm rug-pull protections are in place
No sniper data available to assess early-buyer dump risk
5m price change already turning negative (-3.22%), suggesting momentum may be fading after the spike

Mitigating factors

24h buy volume modestly exceeds sell volume (52.6% vs 47.4%), suggesting net demand rather than pure distribution
Buyer count (1,818) exceeds seller count (1,520), indicating broad-based interest rather than a single large seller dominating
Token has social presence (Twitter, website) per metadata, though authenticity/quality of these is not verified

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who understand and accept the possibility of near-total capital loss. It is not appropriate for conservative investors, those seeking stable exposure, or anyone unable to actively monitor rapidly changing conditions given the extreme volatility, thin liquidity, and multiple unresolved data gaps (holders, authorities, snipers).

INU is a microcap Solana token that just experienced an explosive +1562% 24h price rally on the back of a Raydium CPMM pair with only ~$53.43K in liquidity. The move is backed by genuine (if narrow) buy-side volume dominance and rising buyer counts, but is undermined by critical missing data — no holder/whale distribution, no confirmed mint/freeze authority status, and no sniper analysis — plus classic parabolic-blow-off chart characteristics that often precede sharp corrections.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buying momentum continues and the token gains further social/community traction (leveraging its existing Twitter/website presence), price could extend gains toward and beyond the recent high of ~$0.00148, especially if liquidity is added to support larger trade sizes without excessive slippage.

Continued net buy-side volume dominance (currently 52.6% buys)
Growing unique buyer count (1,818 in 24h) suggesting expanding interest
Possible narrative/meme momentum given INU/UNI branding and social presence

Base Case

Price likely remains highly volatile with large swings in both directions, oscillating within a wide range roughly between the recent consolidation zone ($0.0003-0.0006) and the new highs (~$0.0014-0.0015) as the market digests the rapid rally, without a clear sustained directional resolution in the immediate term.

No major new liquidity is added or removed abruptly
Trading volume remains elevated but gradually normalizes from peak levels
No confirmed rug-pull event (mint/freeze authority abuse) occurs during the observation window

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic +1562% rally exhausts itself as early buyers and any concentrated holders take profits into the thin $53.43K liquidity pool, causing a sharp price collapse back toward the $0.0003-0.0006 consolidation zone or lower, especially given the already-negative 5m price change signaling fading momentum.

Extremely thin liquidity relative to volume enabling outsized price impact from moderate sell orders
Classic blow-off-top candle structure with long upper wicks and decelerating short-term momentum (-3.22% at 5m)
Unknown holder concentration and unknown authority status remove any assurance against a coordinated dump or supply manipulation
No sniper data to rule out early-wallet dumping

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 17, 11:18 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-17 23:18 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata
Hourly OHLC price candles (24h)
Aggregated trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
Raydium CPMM liquidity pair data

Limitations

No holder distribution or holder growth data available (upstream endpoints retired)
No whale/top-holder concentration data available
No sniper wallet data available ('No sniper data available')
Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, verification, and mutability status all listed as unknown
6h price change unavailable
24h $ change and native price unavailable
Analysis based on a single 24-hour candle window, limiting longer-term trend validation

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (holder data, authority status, sniper data). The token exhibits extremely high volatility and thin liquidity; any investment decision should involve independent due diligence and should not be based on this report alone. Data and claims originating from the token's own metadata/description are treated as unverified and potentially adversarial per standard analytical protocol.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is INU a scam?

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 3% fee and the owner can still raise it. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell INU?

Yes. Every buy and sell pays a 3% transfer fee, and the owner can still raise it. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is INU ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling INU?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is INU liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-17 23:18 UTC, reported liquidity was $53,428.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for INU (INU)?

Is INU a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who understand and accept the possibility of near-total capital loss. It is not appropriate for conservative investors, those seeking stable exposure, or anyone unable to actively monitor rapidly changing conditions given the extreme volatility, thin liquidity, and multiple unresolved data gaps (holders, authorities, snipers).

What are the key risks of holding INU?

Extremely thin liquidity ($53.43K) relative to volume and FDV creates high slippage and manipulation risk • Parabolic +1562% 24h price move is a classic pattern preceding sharp reversals/dumps • No holder distribution or whale concentration data available to assess supply concentration risk