How concentrated is EbolaVirus ownership?

The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 931 holder addresses (2026-05-15 09:18 UTC).

Are large holders selling EbolaVirus?

Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.

Is EbolaVirus liquidity falling?

This report saved one reading, $40,910.21 (2026-05-15 09:18 UTC), and one reading can't show a trend.

EbolaVirus Price Today & AI Analysis

EbolaSolanaAnalysis as of May 15, 2026

$0.0₄3766

-9.00% 24h

Contract

Live

5vicJEyYTDBqMsKe74vWQeDVMe5cmeA3vr1AT8RXb9t1

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,626

Market cap

$37,624

At a $1M market cap, $EBOLA would be $0.001001 (26.6x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is Ebola a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 10

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about Ebola

3 free answers a day

EbolaVirus: holders, selling & liquidity

Saved with the report, 2026-05-15 09:18 UTC

Holder addresses

931

Top 10 supply share

Not in this report

Reported liquidity

$40,910.21

How concentrated is EbolaVirus ownership?: The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 931 holder addresses (2026-05-15 09:18 UTC).
Are large holders selling EbolaVirus?: Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.
Is EbolaVirus liquidity falling?: This report saved one reading, $40,910.21 (2026-05-15 09:18 UTC), and one reading can't show a trend.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-15 09:18 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of May 15, 09:18 AM UTC

FDV

$214,266

Liquidity

$40,910.21

Holders

931

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

EbolaVirus (Ebola) is a meme/novelty token on Solana with a total supply of 1,000,000,000 tokens, trading on PumpSwap at $0.000214 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$214K–$263K. The token experienced an explosive 316.6% price surge in the past 24 hours, driven by a sudden wave of new holders (+906 in 24h, from a base of just 24–25 holders over the prior 30 days). This is a very early-stage, high-risk speculative token with a controversial name, unverified contract, and extremely thin liquidity ($40.91K). Sell pressure dominates at 79.5% of 24h volume, and the holder base was essentially dormant for a month before today's viral spike.

Key points

Explosive 316.6% 24h price surge from a near-zero base, driven by a sudden viral holder influx
Holder count surged from 24 to 931 in a single day (+906, +97%), after 30 days of complete stagnation
Extremely thin liquidity ($40.91K) relative to FDV ($263K), creating high slippage risk
Sell pressure overwhelmingly dominates at 79.5% of 24h volume ($218K sells vs $56K buys)
Most snipers are in profit (majority of those with known PnL show positive returns, some >200%), signaling elevated dump risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token has already surged 316.6% in 24h and 152.4% in the last hour alone. With 79.5% sell pressure, 3,592 sells vs 1,516 buys, and most snipers sitting in significant profit, a sharp mean-reversion pullback is the most probable short-term outcome. The OHLC data shows the price spiked dramatically in candle [1] (H: $0.0000748) and candle [2] before the current price of $0.000214 — suggesting the current price is well above recent candle highs, indicating a parabolic move that is statistically prone to reversal.

Target low

$0.000036

Target high

$0.000350

Support: $0.000074 (recent candle high / prior resistance now support), $0.000037 (candle [1] open / candle [3] open), $0.000032 (candle [3] low)
Resistance: $0.000214 (current price / 24h high zone), $0.000350 (psychological extension target if momentum continues)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

Without a sustained community, utility, or narrative catalyst, meme tokens that spike from near-zero holder bases typically retrace 80–95% of their gains. The 30-day holder stagnation prior to today's spike suggests no organic community existed. Medium-term outlook is bearish unless a new viral catalyst emerges.

Catalysts

Continued viral social media attention could sustain momentum briefly
Sniper profit-taking and early holder exits are the primary downside catalyst
Lack of verified contract and unverified metadata reduces institutional/aggregator visibility
Thin liquidity means any large sell order will crater the price

Bullish factors

316.6% 24h price surge demonstrates strong short-term momentum
Holder count grew from 24 to 931 in a single day, showing viral adoption
5m price change of +5.2% and 1h change of +152.4% indicate active buying momentum at time of analysis
Some snipers still holding (e.g., balances of $7–$45) suggest not all early buyers have exited

Bearish factors

79.5% sell pressure ($218K sells vs $56K buys) in 24h — sellers dominate overwhelmingly
Liquidity of only $40.91K vs FDV of $263K creates extreme slippage and exit risk
Token was dormant for 30+ days with only 24–25 holders before today's spike
Multiple snipers with 100–271% realized PnL are likely to dump remaining positions
Unverified contract, controversial name, and no stated utility or roadmap
Mutable metadata flag is false but update authority is not renounced to a burn address

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme volatility, meme-driven price action, very limited OHLC history (only 3 hourly candles available), and the unpredictable nature of viral meme token momentum. The data is consistent with a pump-and-dump pattern, but meme tokens can sustain irrational momentum for unpredictable durations.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 5vicJE...b9t1
Total Supply: 1,000,000,000 (1 billion)

Key Risks

Extreme sell pressure (79.5%) suggests active distribution by early holders and snipers into retail buyers
Liquidity ($40.91K) is dangerously thin — large exits will crater the price
Token was dormant for 30+ days with 24 holders; current spike is purely speculative/viral with no fundamental basis
Unverified contract and unknown mint/freeze authority status

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available (07:00–09:00 UTC on 2026-05-15). Candle [3] (07:00): O=$0.0000370, H=$0.0000838, L=$0.0000321, C=$0.0000764 — a bullish candle with a long lower wick, suggesting buyers stepped in at lows. Candle [2] (08:00): O=$0.0000748, H=$0.0000748, L=$0.0000399, C=$0.0000370 — a bearish engulfing/red candle where price opened at the prior close high and sold off sharply, closing near the low. Candle [1] (09:00): O=$0.0000370, H=$0.0000748, L=$0.000165 (note: L > H in raw data, likely a data anomaly — the low field appears to contain an erroneous value higher than the high; treating H=$0.0000748 as the effective range top), C=$0.0000748, V=$33,810 — a recovery candle. The current price of $0.000214 is dramatically above all three candle highs, indicating the parabolic move occurred after the 09:00 candle, likely in the most recent incomplete hour. Volume was highest in candle [2] ($201K), coinciding with the sell-off.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is technically upward given the 316.6% 24h gain and current price above all recent candle levels. However, the medium-term (30-day) trend was completely flat at 24–25 holders and negligible price activity, making the medium-term trend effectively sideways/dormant. The current spike is a vertical parabolic move, not a sustained uptrend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

21%

Sell

80%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000074 (candle [1] and [2] high / recent consolidation zone)

Major support

$0.000032 (candle [3] low — the lowest recent price point)

Immediate resistance

$0.000214 (current price / intraday high zone)

Major resistance

$0.000350 (psychological extension level, no prior data to anchor)

Support levels are derived from the 3 available hourly candles. The $0.000074 level acted as both resistance (candle [3] high) and support/open (candle [2]). The $0.000032 level represents the lowest wick in the dataset (candle [3] low). Current price at $0.000214 has no prior resistance reference from the candle data, as it is a new all-time high within the available dataset — making it a purely momentum-driven level with no technical anchor.

Notable patterns

Parabolic vertical spike: price moved from ~$0.000037 to $0.000214 in a single session, a classic pump pattern
High-volume bearish candle [2]: highest volume ($201K) on a red/down candle — distribution signal
Candle [3] lower wick: long lower wick on candle [3] suggests buyers defended lows briefly before the spike
Data anomaly in candle [1]: Low value ($0.000165) is higher than High ($0.000074), suggesting a possible data feed error for that candle
No prior price history available for the 30-day dormant period — the token had essentially no trading activity before today

Liquidity

$40,910.21

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Market health is poor. Total liquidity of $40.91K is extremely thin relative to the FDV of $263K (liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~15.5%), meaning any moderately sized sell order will cause significant price impact. The 24h trading profile is deeply skewed toward selling: 3,592 sells vs 1,516 buys, 1,254 unique sellers vs 517 unique buyers, and $218.18K in sell volume vs $56.31K in buy volume (79.5% sell pressure). Net flow is clearly outflow. Despite 1,446 unique wallets active in 24h, the buyer-to-seller ratio of ~0.41 indicates the market is in active distribution. The PumpSwap pair (Dt1carJXP7PZwHmABAYPvpgw1NkM76vZwHjBBjdPkPQC) holds 9.73% of supply as LP, providing some baseline liquidity, but this is insufficient to absorb large exits without severe slippage.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000 (1 billion)

FDV

$214,266–$263,140 (range from price data vs analytics data)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
316.6% price surge in 24h with 152.4% gain in the last hour alone. Parabolic moves of this magnitude on meme tokens with thin liquidity are almost always followed by severe corrections. The token was dormant for 30+ days before this spike.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $40.91K against a $263K FDV. Any sell order exceeding a few thousand dollars will cause significant price impact. Exiting a meaningful position at current prices would be extremely difficult without moving the market against oneself.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme sell pressure (79.5%) suggests active distribution by early holders and snipers into retail buyers
Liquidity ($40.91K) is dangerously thin — large exits will crater the price
Token was dormant for 30+ days with 24 holders; current spike is purely speculative/viral with no fundamental basis
Unverified contract and unknown mint/freeze authority status
Controversial name (EbolaVirus) limits mainstream adoption and exchange listing potential
Most snipers are deeply in profit and represent an overhang of potential sell pressure
No utility, roadmap, team disclosure, or tokenomics documentation
Holder surge of +906 in 24h means most holders bought at or near the top of a parabolic move

Mitigating factors

Token metadata is set to 'Mutable: false', reducing risk of metadata manipulation
The largest holder (9.73%) is the DEX liquidity pool, not a whale preparing to dump
Top 9 individual holders each hold 1.84%–3.15% — no single whale dominates outside the LP
Active trading with 1,446 unique wallets in 24h shows genuine market interest, however brief
PumpSwap listing provides some baseline decentralized liquidity infrastructure

Suitable for

Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of rapid entry/exit execution. Completely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token pump-and-dump patterns. This is not an investment — it is a high-risk speculative trade at best.

EbolaVirus (Ebola) is a pure meme/novelty token with no stated utility, no verified contract, and a 30-day history of complete dormancy before a single-day viral spike. The investment thesis is entirely momentum-driven and speculative. The token exhibits classic pump-and-dump characteristics: parabolic price action, overwhelming sell pressure, sniper profits being realized, and retail FOMO-driven holder accumulation at elevated prices. Any 'thesis' for holding is purely a bet on continued viral momentum, which is inherently unpredictable and statistically unlikely to sustain.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued viral social media momentum drives sustained retail buying, pushing the token to a higher FDV ($1M+). The thin liquidity means even modest buy pressure can move the price significantly upward. A listing on a mid-tier aggregator or influencer promotion could extend the pump.

Viral social media catalyst sustains retail FOMO beyond initial spike
Influencer or KOL promotion drives new buyer waves
Thin liquidity amplifies upside price moves on any sustained buy pressure
Meme token market cycle remains favorable for speculative assets

Base Case

The token experiences a sharp 60–80% correction from current prices over the next 24–72 hours as initial excitement fades and sellers overwhelm buyers. Price stabilizes at a new, lower equilibrium with a modest community of 200–400 active holders. The token may see occasional minor pumps but fails to establish sustained momentum.

Sell pressure remains dominant as early holders distribute
No major new viral catalyst emerges in the near term
Liquidity remains thin, amplifying downside moves
A subset of new holders become long-term bag holders at elevated prices
The token avoids a complete rug/abandonment scenario

Bear Case

High probability

Snipers and early holders complete their distribution into retail buyers, liquidity is drained, and the price collapses 80–95% from current levels back toward the pre-pump range of $0.000032–$0.000074. The token returns to dormancy with a larger but inactive holder base.

79.5% sell pressure continues as early holders exit
Snipers with 100–271% unrealized/realized gains complete profit-taking
Thin liquidity ($40.91K) cannot absorb sustained selling
No fundamental catalyst to attract long-term holders
Controversial name limits organic community building

Analysis details

Generated

May 15, 09:18 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-15 09:18 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Moralis on-chain metadata API
PumpSwap DEX trading analytics
Hourly OHLC price feed (3 candles)
On-chain holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)
Top 20 holder wallet data
24h trading volume and buyer/seller analytics

Limitations

Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis; no daily or weekly chart data
Sniper initial buy amounts (USD) are all listed as 'unknown', preventing precise sniper concentration calculation
Mint authority and freeze authority status not explicitly provided in metadata
Candle [1] contains a data anomaly (Low > High), suggesting a possible data feed error
The 6h and 24h price change figures show 0% in analytics despite the 316.6% 24h change shown in price data — likely a data source discrepancy or calculation window difference
No social media metrics, team information, or on-chain program verification data available
FDV discrepancy between two data sources ($214K vs $263K) not fully reconciled
Token launch date not explicitly provided; inferred as approximately 30+ days ago based on holder history

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an endorsement of this token. EbolaVirus (Ebola) is an extremely high-risk speculative asset. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Cryptocurrency investments, especially meme tokens, can result in total loss of capital. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is EbolaVirus (Ebola) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Nov 10, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell EbolaVirus (Ebola)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 10, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for EbolaVirus (Ebola)?

Is Ebola a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of rapid entry/exit execution. Completely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token pump-and-dump patterns. This is not an investment — it is a high-risk speculative trade at best.

What are the key risks of holding Ebola?

Extreme sell pressure (79.5%) suggests active distribution by early holders and snipers into retail buyers • Liquidity ($40.91K) is dangerously thin — large exits will crater the price • Token was dormant for 30+ days with 24 holders; current spike is purely speculative/viral with no fundamental basis