CATWIF

catwifhat Price Today & AI Analysis

CATWIFSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 22, 2026

Price

$0.046738

+4.61% 24h · FDV $67,373

Contract

Live
5pYB12kEhfhSFXJjZ7JtyqDpt6uUqhsF6iu6Ee9spump

Chain

Solana

Holders

8,496

Market cap

$67,373

More tokens on Solana

HUBHUBLaunch HUB$0.055344-36.9%MC $5.1KM32M32MPP32$0.000332+1.2%MC $331.9KWOFLWOFLWOFL$0.057761-18.4%MC $7.5Ksimulatorsimulatorsimulator$0.045134+12.4%MC $51.3KTINYTINYTiny Humans AI$0.000592-4.9%MC $578.9KEVOEVOEvorum$0.056903+2.0%MC $690.3K

catwifhat: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-22 09:19 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$34,614.09
How concentrated is catwifhat ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling catwifhat?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is catwifhat liquidity falling?
As of 2026-06-22 09:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $34,614.09. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-22 09:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about CATWIF

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Jun 22, 09:19 AM UTC

FDV

$58,189

Liquidity

$34,614.09

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

CATWIF (catwifhat) is a Solana meme token on the pump.fun launchpad (mint: 5pYB12kEhfhSFXJjZ7JtyqDpt6uUqhsF6iu6Ee9spump) with a total supply of 1 billion tokens. The token is in severe distress: it has lost ~89.8% of its value in the past 24 hours, has only $34.61K in total liquidity, and exhibits deeply anomalous on-chain data including a negative holder count (-156), frozen historical holder series (773 holders with zero change for 30 consecutive days), and a dramatic price collapse from ~$0.00057 to ~$0.000058. Multiple data anomalies suggest either a data provider error or deliberate manipulation of reported metrics. The token carries extreme risk and is unsuitable for most investors.

Key points

  • Catastrophic 89.8% price drop in 24 hours from ~$0.00057 to ~$0.000058
  • Deeply anomalous holder data: negative total holders (-156) and 30 days of zero holder change at 773
  • Extremely thin liquidity of only $34.61K with 70.1% sell pressure dominating
  • No top holder data available, no sniper data, and unknown update authority — severe transparency deficit
  • Token is immutable (mutable: false) which is a minor positive, but mint/freeze authority status is unknown

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24–72 hours

bearish

The token has already collapsed ~89.8% in 24 hours. The most recent hourly candle (07:00 UTC) shows a bearish close at the low ($0.0000582), with the prior candle (06:00 UTC) being a flat doji at $0.000570 — a 10x higher price — suggesting a sudden, violent dump. With 70.1% sell pressure, 1,309 sells vs 928 buys, and only $34.61K liquidity, further downside is the path of least resistance. A brief dead-cat bounce toward $0.000067–$0.000086 is possible but unlikely to sustain.

Target low

$0.000040

Target high

$0.000086

Support

$0.0000582 (current price / recent low), $0.000040 (estimated next psychological support)

Resistance

$0.000067 (candle [1] open), $0.000086 (candle [1] high), $0.000570 (candle [2] open/high/low/close — pre-dump level)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

With frozen holder growth (773 holders, zero change for 30 days per historical data), no verified contract, no project description, and a near-total price collapse, medium-term recovery is highly unlikely without a significant catalyst. The token appears to be in terminal decline.

Catalysts

  • Unexpected viral social media attention (low probability)
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all tokens
  • Liquidity injection by a large holder or team (unverifiable)

Bullish factors

  • Token is immutable (mutable: false), reducing one vector of rug risk
  • 24h buy volume of $25.30K shows some residual buyer interest (928 buys, 804 unique buyers)
  • Pair exists on Meteora Dynamic AMM v2, a legitimate DEX

Bearish factors

  • 89.8% price collapse in 24 hours
  • 70.1% sell pressure (sell volume $59.30K vs buy volume $25.30K)
  • Only $34.61K total liquidity — extremely thin
  • Negative holder count (-156) is a severe data anomaly suggesting possible manipulation or data error
  • 30 consecutive days of zero holder change — no organic growth
  • No project description, no verified contract, unknown update authority
  • No top holder data available — zero transparency on distribution

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to severely anomalous data (negative holder count, frozen 30-day holder series, only 2 OHLC candles available, no top holder data, no sniper data). The data may be partially corrupted or manipulated, making precise price modeling unreliable. The directional bias (bearish) is high-confidence; the specific price targets are low-confidence.

CATWIF call history

Full track record →

Jun 22bearish
24h+515.8%
7d+850.3%
30d+54.1%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
5pYB12...pump
Total Supply
1,000,000,000 CATWIF

Key Risks

  • 89.8% price collapse in 24 hours — possible rug pull or coordinated dump
  • Negative holder count (-156) and anomalous holder data suggest data manipulation or token abandonment
  • Only $34.61K liquidity — extremely high slippage risk on any exit
  • No top holder data — zero transparency on who controls the supply

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available. Candle [2] (06:00 UTC): O=$0.000570, H=$0.000570, L=$0.000570, C=$0.000570 — a perfectly flat doji/single-price candle with volume of 141.47, suggesting either a single large trade or a data artifact at a much higher price level. Candle [1] (07:00 UTC): O=$0.000068, H=$0.000086, L=$0.0000582, C=$0.0000582 — a strong bearish candle opening ~88% below the prior close, making a new low at $0.0000582 and closing at the low. This represents a catastrophic gap-down and bearish close with no recovery. The two-candle sequence is a textbook 'cliff drop' pattern.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Both available candles confirm a violent downtrend. The price dropped from $0.000570 to $0.0000582 — a ~89.8% decline — in a single hourly period. There is no technical basis for calling any uptrend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

30%

Sell

70%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000582 (candle [1] low = current price)

Major support

$0.000040 (estimated psychological level below current price)

Immediate resistance

$0.000067 (candle [1] open)

Major resistance

$0.000086 (candle [1] high)

The only meaningful resistance levels are derived from candle [1]: the open at $0.000067 and the high at $0.000086. The pre-dump level of $0.000570 (candle [2]) represents a distant major resistance. Current price is at the candle [1] low with no established support below.

Notable patterns

  • Cliff-drop gap-down: price opened candle [1] ~88% below candle [2] close
  • Bearish close at the low of candle [1] — no intrabar recovery
  • Flat doji in candle [2] suggests a single large sell event or data anomaly
  • Volume collapse from 141.47 to 12.38 between the two candles

Liquidity

Liquidity

$34,614.09

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically thin at $34.61K on a single Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 pool (pair: EE1ogC4caCYYa2EsSKhFg8MDrfshgoxBcY2PYEpGYnPc). The FDV of $115.84K (per trading analytics) vs $34.61K liquidity implies a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~30%, which is low. Any moderately sized trade will cause significant slippage. Net flow is strongly negative: $59.30K in sell volume vs $25.30K in buy volume over 24 hours — a 2.34:1 sell-to-buy ratio. Despite sellers being fewer in number (646 vs 804 buyers), their average transaction size is ~3.9x larger ($91.7 avg sell vs $31.5 avg buy), indicating larger holders are distributing into smaller retail buyers. Market health is poor.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000 CATWIF

FDV

$58,188.73 (metadata) / $115,840 (trading analytics — discrepancy noted)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price dropped 89.8% in a single 24-hour period, from ~$0.000570 to ~$0.0000582. This is extreme volatility consistent with a rug pull, coordinated dump, or complete loss of market confidence.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $34.61K on a single DEX pool. Any sell order of meaningful size will cause severe slippage. Exit liquidity for holders is extremely limited.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • 89.8% price collapse in 24 hours — possible rug pull or coordinated dump
  • Negative holder count (-156) and anomalous holder data suggest data manipulation or token abandonment
  • Only $34.61K liquidity — extremely high slippage risk on any exit
  • No top holder data — zero transparency on who controls the supply
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential for supply inflation or account freezing
  • Unverified contract with no project description — no accountability
  • 30 days of zero holder growth — no organic community development
  • FDV discrepancy between data sources ($58K vs $116K)

Mitigating factors

  • Token metadata is immutable (mutable: false), preventing metadata rug
  • Token exists on a legitimate DEX (Meteora Dynamic AMM v2)
  • Some residual buyer interest: 804 unique buyers and $25.30K buy volume in 24h
  • Pump.fun origin provides some baseline launch transparency

Suitable for

This token is unsuitable for virtually all investors. The combination of a near-total price collapse, anomalous holder data, thin liquidity, unknown authorities, and complete lack of project transparency makes this an extremely high-risk asset. Only sophisticated traders with full risk capital they can afford to lose entirely should consider any interaction, and only with extreme caution.

CATWIF presents no credible investment thesis at this time. The token has experienced a catastrophic 89.8% price collapse, exhibits severely anomalous on-chain data (negative holder counts, frozen 30-day holder series), has only $34.61K in liquidity, and provides zero transparency on holder distribution or project fundamentals. The data pattern is consistent with a completed or ongoing rug pull / coordinated dump scenario.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Speculative dead-cat bounce or viral meme revival

  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally creating indiscriminate buying
  • Viral social media attention driving new retail buyers to the token
  • A large holder or team member injecting liquidity and marketing the token

Base Case

Token stabilizes at current depressed levels with minimal trading activity, slowly grinding toward irrelevance

  • Remaining 773 holders (per historical data) largely hold or slowly exit
  • No new catalysts emerge to drive meaningful buying interest
  • Liquidity remains thin, price oscillates in a narrow range near current lows
  • Token is not formally abandoned but sees no meaningful development or community activity

Bear Case

High probability

Complete token abandonment and price approaching zero

  • Continuation of dominant sell pressure (70.1% of 24h volume)
  • No holder growth for 30+ days indicating dead community
  • Thin liquidity ($34.61K) unable to absorb any meaningful selling
  • Anomalous data suggesting possible token migration or abandonment event

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 22, 09:19 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-22 09:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Moralis on-chain token metadata API
  • Moralis price and OHLC API (hourly candles)
  • Moralis trading analytics API (24h volume, buy/sell pressure)
  • Moralis holder metrics and historical holder series API
  • Moralis top holders API (returned no data)
  • Moralis sniper analysis API (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Holder count is reported as negative (-156), which is impossible and indicates a data error or token migration event
  • Historical holder series shows implausible 30-day flat line at 773 with zero change
  • No top holder data available — whale map analysis is severely limited
  • No sniper data available — smart money signals cannot be properly assessed
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are all unknown
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($58,188) and trading analytics ($115,840) is unexplained
  • Token has no project description, making fundamental analysis impossible
  • Price change percentages in trading analytics show 0% for all timeframes (5m, 1h, 6h, 24h) despite clear price movement — likely a data feed issue

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. All data is sourced from third-party APIs and may contain errors, delays, or anomalies as evidenced by the negative holder count and other inconsistencies in this dataset. Cryptocurrency investments, especially meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. The anomalous data patterns observed in this token (negative holders, frozen series, 89.8% price collapse) are serious red flags that warrant extreme caution.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is catwifhat ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling catwifhat?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is catwifhat liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-22 09:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $34,614.09. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for catwifhat (CATWIF)?

The token has already collapsed ~89.8% in 24 hours. The most recent hourly candle (07:00 UTC) shows a bearish close at the low ($0.0000582), with the prior candle (06:00 UTC) being a flat doji at $0.000570 — a 10x higher price — suggesting a sudden, violent dump. With 70.1% sell pressure, 1,309 sells vs 928 buys, and only $34.61K liquidity, further downside is the path of least resistance. A brief dead-cat bounce toward $0.000067–$0.000086 is possible but unlikely to sustain. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.000040 to $0.000086.

Is CATWIF a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is unsuitable for virtually all investors. The combination of a near-total price collapse, anomalous holder data, thin liquidity, unknown authorities, and complete lack of project transparency makes this an extremely high-risk asset. Only sophisticated traders with full risk capital they can afford to lose entirely should consider any interaction, and only with extreme caution.

What are the key risks of holding CATWIF?

89.8% price collapse in 24 hours — possible rug pull or coordinated dump • Negative holder count (-156) and anomalous holder data suggest data manipulation or token abandonment • Only $34.61K liquidity — extremely high slippage risk on any exit

← Back to all predictions

Track CATWIF