Magic Internet Money Price Today & AI Analysis

MIMSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 14, 2026

$0.0₅9927

-1.18% 24h

Contract

Live

4p37V4YA54Jou7k3TWnwxeDXqtB9BQRik6NL3noJpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

4,159

Market cap

$9,900

At a $1M market cap, $MIM would be $0.001003 (101x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Ask Unhosted AI about MIM

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

AQCaqc$0.000190-4.4%MC $187.1K

MySpaceMySpace$0.0₄1347+1.6%MC $12.9K

BOOBoo Inu$0.0₅3152-6.6%MC $3.0K

🔺red dorito$0.0₅6906-7.3%MC $6.9K

PQLNPost-Quantum Lightning Network$0.0₅4091-2.6%MC $3.9K

PUMPPump$0.004541-4.6%MC $1.61B

Magic Internet Money: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-14 19:19 UTC

Holder addresses

5,267

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$42,193.24

How concentrated is Magic Internet Money ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 5,267 addresses (2026-07-14 19:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Magic Internet Money?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Magic Internet Money liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-14 19:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $42,193.24. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-14 19:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 14, 07:19 PM UTC

FDV

$119,693

Liquidity

$42,193.24

Holders

5,267

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Magic Internet Money (MIM) is a PumpFun-launched Solana meme token with mint address 4p37V4YA54Jou7k3TWnwxeDXqtB9BQRik6NL3noJpump. The token presents extreme red flags: a single wallet (nAQqEBJUsyLAFSqrsA6rmLqBY8hnegz199h8ug4h66K) holds 100% of the ~1B token supply, the holder base was essentially zero for 30 days and then surged by +5,245 holders in a single 24h window (likely a coordinated launch/airdrop event), sell pressure dominates at 82.6% of 24h volume, and total liquidity is only $42.19K against an FDV of $119.69K. The update authority is not renounced and is held by an external wallet. These signals collectively indicate a very high-risk, potentially manipulated token.

Key points

Single wallet controls 100% of circulating supply — extreme concentration risk
Holder base was flat at 22 for 30 days, then exploded +5,245 in 24h — highly anomalous launch pattern
82.6% sell pressure in 24h ($170.30K sells vs $35.85K buys) despite a 25% price pump
Total liquidity of only $42.19K creates severe slippage risk for any meaningful position
Update authority not renounced — token metadata remains mutable in practice

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–48 hours

bearish

The token has pumped ~25% in 24h and ~80% in the last hour, but this is occurring against a backdrop of 82.6% sell pressure and a single whale holding 100% of supply. The price spike is likely driven by thin liquidity ($42.19K) amplifying small buy orders. A sharp reversal is the most probable near-term outcome. OHLC data shows the most recent candle (19:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000426 and closed lower at $0.0000406, suggesting the pump may already be fading.

Target low

$0.000040

Target high

$0.000145

Support: $0.0000406 (recent candle close / local low), $0.0000414 (candle 3 close)
Resistance: $0.0000577 (candle 1 high — anomalous wick), $0.000120 (current price, likely thin-liquidity spike)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

With 100% supply concentration in one wallet, no meaningful liquidity depth, and a history of zero activity for 30 days prior to this event, sustained price appreciation is extremely unlikely. The medium-term outlook is bearish unless the controlling wallet locks liquidity and distributes supply credibly.

Catalysts

Whale wallet selling any portion of its 100% holding would collapse price
Liquidity removal from the PumpSwap pool would strand holders
Continued sell pressure from the 1,376 sellers vs 276 buyers in 24h

Bullish factors

Price up 25% in 24h and ~80% in 1h — short-term momentum exists
5m change of +55.9% suggests active buying interest at time of snapshot
Social links present (telegram, twitter, website) indicating some community infrastructure

Bearish factors

Single wallet holds 100% of supply — any sell is catastrophic
82.6% sell pressure ($170.30K sells vs $35.85K buys) in 24h
Total liquidity only $42.19K — extremely shallow
Holder base was 22 for 30 consecutive days before sudden +5,245 surge — artificial/coordinated
Update authority not renounced
FDV ($119.69K) is nearly 3x total liquidity — highly illiquid relative to market cap
Most recent hourly candle closed lower than it opened — momentum fading

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to extreme supply concentration (1 wallet = 100%), very shallow liquidity ($42.19K), anomalous holder surge, and only 3 OHLC candles available for technical analysis. Price action is highly manipulable in this environment.

MIM call history

Full track record →

Jul 14bearish@ $0.000120

24h+181.6%

7d-72.2%

30d-85.4%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 4p37V4...pump
Total Supply: 999,908,785.56 (formatted) / ~1,000,000,000

Key Risks

Single wallet controls 100% of token supply — existential concentration risk
Update authority not renounced — active external wallet retains control
Total liquidity of only $42.19K — any meaningful sell causes severe slippage
82.6% sell pressure in 24h — active distribution underway

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly OHLC candles are available (17:00–19:00 UTC on 2026-07-14). Candle 3 (17:00): O=$0.0000426, H=$0.0000426, L=$0.0000414, C=$0.0000414 — a bearish candle closing at the low. Candle 2 (18:00): O=$0.0000406, H=$0.0000426, L=$0.0000406, C=$0.0000426 — a bullish recovery candle. Candle 1 (19:00): O=$0.0000426, H=$0.0000426, L=$0.0000577, C=$0.0000406 — NOTE: the High ($0.0000577) is anomalously above the Open/Close, and the Close ($0.0000406) is below the Open, suggesting a bearish candle with an unusual upper wick (possible data artifact or thin-liquidity spike). Volume is declining: 110,776 → 65,655 → 26,049, indicating waning interest. The current price ($0.000120) is far above all three candle closes, suggesting the price spike occurred after the last recorded candle.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend appears upward based on the 24h +25% price change and recent 1h +79.6% move, but the 3-candle OHLC window shows declining volume and a bearish close on the most recent candle. Medium-term is effectively sideways/flat given 30 days of zero activity prior to this event.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

17%

Sell

83%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000406 (most recent candle close)

Major support

$0.0000414 (candle 3 close / recent range low)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000426 (repeated open/high across candles 2 & 3)

Major resistance

$0.0000577 (candle 1 anomalous high wick)

Support is clustered in the $0.0000406–$0.0000414 range based on recent candle closes. Resistance at $0.0000426 has been tested multiple times. The current price ($0.000120) is well above all charted levels, suggesting the pump occurred outside the available OHLC window and is unsupported by visible technical structure.

Notable patterns

Declining volume during price pump — bearish divergence
Bearish close on most recent candle (candle 1: closed below open)
Anomalous upper wick on candle 1 suggesting thin-liquidity spike or data artifact
30-day flat price/holder history followed by sudden vertical move — classic pump pattern
Price currently trading ~3x above the most recent OHLC candle range — extreme extension

Liquidity

$42,193.24

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $42.19K on a single PumpSwap pool (BTafPrEjNu8KMwYSpdvYYHMwJKPWopVg5ByUyYDcNDn). The FDV of $119.69K is nearly 3x the total liquidity, meaning the market cap is largely theoretical and unsupported by actual liquidity depth. Any sell order of meaningful size will cause severe slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $170.30K in sells vs $35.85K in buys — a ratio of nearly 5:1. There are 5x more unique sellers (1,376) than buyers (276). The 24h volume of ~$206K is nearly 5x the total liquidity pool, indicating extreme turnover and instability. Market health is poor.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,908,785.56 (formatted) / ~1,000,000,000

FDV

$119,692.74

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price has moved +25% in 24h and +79.6% in 1h on extremely thin liquidity ($42.19K). The 5m change of +55.9% indicates extreme short-term volatility. With a single whale holding 100% of supply, any large sell will cause catastrophic price impact.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $42.19K on a single PumpSwap pool. The FDV ($119.69K) is ~2.8x the liquidity. 24h volume ($206K) is nearly 5x the liquidity pool, indicating the pool is being rapidly drained. High slippage is guaranteed for any trade above a few hundred dollars.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Single wallet controls 100% of token supply — existential concentration risk
Update authority not renounced — active external wallet retains control
Total liquidity of only $42.19K — any meaningful sell causes severe slippage
82.6% sell pressure in 24h — active distribution underway
Holder base was flat at 22 for 30 days then surged via airdrop — artificial/coordinated launch
Unverified contract with unknown mint/freeze authority status
FDV ($119.69K) is ~2.8x total liquidity — valuation largely theoretical
Declining volume during price pump — bearish divergence signal

Mitigating factors

Token metadata is marked 'Mutable: false' providing some protection against metadata manipulation
Social links present (telegram, twitter, website, moralis) suggesting some community infrastructure
PumpFun launch mechanism typically includes LP burn (unconfirmed)
Price has shown short-term upward momentum (+25% 24h, +79.6% 1h)

Suitable for

This token is NOT suitable for any risk-averse investor. Given the extreme concentration (100% single wallet), artificial holder growth via airdrop, dominant sell pressure, and shallow liquidity, this token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a coordinated pump-and-dump scheme. Only highly experienced traders with strict stop-losses, very small position sizes relative to their portfolio, and full acceptance of total loss should consider any exposure. This is not a recommendation to invest.

MIM presents as a high-risk PumpFun meme token with a name borrowed from Bitcoin culture ('Magic Internet Money'). The on-chain data reveals a deeply concerning profile: 100% supply concentration in one wallet, 30 days of dormancy followed by an artificial airdrop-driven holder surge, overwhelming sell pressure, and minimal liquidity. The investment case is almost entirely speculative and momentum-driven, with fundamental risks that are extreme.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Short-term momentum trade: If the price pump continues due to social media attention and thin-liquidity amplification, early buyers could see significant short-term gains before the inevitable reversal.

Continued social media/community momentum driving new buyers into thin liquidity
Whale wallet refraining from selling and potentially locking liquidity
Bitcoin meme narrative gaining traction in current market cycle

Base Case

Price retraces sharply from the current pump levels as sell pressure continues to dominate. The token stabilizes at a much lower price with minimal trading activity, similar to the 30-day dormant period prior to this event.

Sell pressure (82.6%) continues to dominate
No major new catalyst or liquidity injection occurs
Whale wallet does not immediately dump entire supply but gradually distributes
Holder count stabilizes or declines as airdrop recipients exit

Bear Case

High probability

Rug pull or coordinated dump: The controlling whale sells any portion of its 100% holding, collapsing the price. Airdrop recipients continue dumping, liquidity is removed, and the token returns to near-zero.

Single wallet holding 100% of supply sells into the pump
Liquidity removal from the PumpSwap pool
Continued 82.6% sell pressure exhausting buy-side liquidity
Airdrop recipients (4,824 wallets) dumping zero-cost tokens

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 14, 07:19 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-14 19:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, authority)
PumpSwap DEX trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
Hourly OHLC candle data (3 candles, 17:00–19:00 UTC 2026-07-14)
Holder metrics and distribution data (top holders, concentration)
Historical daily holder counts (30-day series)
Acquisition method breakdown (swap/transfer/airdrop)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
No sniper data available — smart money signals are limited to on-chain holder/volume data
Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly confirmed in metadata
Holder surge of +5,245 in 24h may include bot/sybil wallets inflating apparent holder count
PumpFun LP burn status unconfirmed
Update authority wallet (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM) not analyzed for historical behavior
Price data shows significant discrepancy between OHLC candle range (~$0.000040–$0.000058) and current price ($0.000120) — the pump may have occurred after the last candle

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed shows multiple high-risk indicators consistent with coordinated pump-and-dump activity. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. Always conduct your own research.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Magic Internet Money ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 5,267 addresses (2026-07-14 19:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Magic Internet Money?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Magic Internet Money liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-14 19:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $42,193.24. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Magic Internet Money (MIM)?

Is MIM a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.5/100. This token is NOT suitable for any risk-averse investor. Given the extreme concentration (100% single wallet), artificial holder growth via airdrop, dominant sell pressure, and shallow liquidity, this token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a coordinated pump-and-dump scheme. Only highly experienced traders with strict stop-losses, very small position sizes relative to their portfolio, and full acceptance of total loss should consider any exposure. This is not a recommendation to invest.

What are the key risks of holding MIM?

Single wallet controls 100% of token supply — existential concentration risk • Update authority not renounced — active external wallet retains control • Total liquidity of only $42.19K — any meaningful sell causes severe slippage