How concentrated is STIMMY ownership?

The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 584 holder addresses (2026-06-20 22:19 UTC).

Are large holders selling STIMMY?

Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.

Is STIMMY liquidity falling?

One reading so far, $43,436.94 (2026-06-20 22:19 UTC): not enough to show a trend.

STIMMY Price Today & AI Analysis

STIMMYSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 20, 2026

$0.0₅2116

Contract

Live

4hgzvvPbBxagKwpqWTfZK95BbP8oE1LVco5DeHbZpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

Market cap

$2,113

At a $1M market cap, $STIMMY would be $0.001001 (473x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

STIMMY support and resistance today

From 1-hour candles

STIMMY trades at $0.000002116 as of Nov 8, 10:49 UTC, +0.0% in 24 hours. No trade has moved the price in 7 days, so there is no fresh support or resistance to mark.

Is STIMMY a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 6

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. A few things to know below.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about STIMMY

3 free answers a day

STIMMY: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-20 22:19 UTC

Holder addresses

584

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$43,436.94

How concentrated is STIMMY ownership?: The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 584 holder addresses (2026-06-20 22:19 UTC).
Are large holders selling STIMMY?: Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.
Is STIMMY liquidity falling?: One reading so far, $43,436.94 (2026-06-20 22:19 UTC): not enough to show a trend.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-20 22:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 20, 10:19 PM UTC

FDV

Liquidity

$43,436.94

Holders

584

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

STIMMY (STIMMY) is a newly launched Solana meme token on PumpSwap with a total formatted supply of 1 (likely a decimals=0 token with a very large raw supply, but metadata reports 1). The token experienced a massive 327.6% price spike in the last 24 hours, surging from ~$0.000029 to a high of ~$0.000147 before pulling back to ~$0.000122. Trading analytics reveal extreme sell-side dominance (73.7% sell pressure, $122.6K sell volume vs $43.8K buy volume), thin liquidity ($43.4K), and a suspicious holder data anomaly where 552 of 584 total holders appeared within the last hour — a pattern consistent with bot activity or data artifact. No top holder data, no sniper data, and unknown update authority make this a very high risk token.

Key points

Extreme 327.6% 24h price pump followed by immediate sell-side dominance (73.7% sell pressure)
Suspicious holder data: 552 of 584 holders (95%) appeared within the last 1 hour, with zero holder growth for the prior 30 days at 32 holders
Total supply reported as 1 with decimals=0 — highly anomalous tokenomics that may indicate a data reporting issue or intentional obfuscation
No top holder data available, no sniper data, and mutable metadata with unknown update authority — all significant red flags
Very thin liquidity of $43.4K against $129.2K FDV creates high slippage risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token has already pulled back from its 24h high of ~$0.000147 to ~$0.000122. With 73.7% sell pressure, 2,983 sell transactions vs 1,265 buys, and only $43.4K in liquidity, continued downward pressure is highly probable in the short term. The most recent hourly candle (candle [1]) shows a bearish close at $0.000129 from an open of $0.000140, confirming selling momentum.

Target low

$0.000017

Target high

$0.000147

Support: $0.000129 (recent hourly close / candle [1] low), $0.000017 (candle [2] absolute low — launch-level support)
Resistance: $0.000140 (candle [1] open), $0.000147 (candle [2] all-time high)

Medium term · 1–7 days

bearish

Without sustained buy-side interest, new utility, or community growth, the token is likely to retrace toward its pre-pump levels near $0.000017–$0.000030. The holder base was stagnant at 32 for 30 days before a sudden spike, suggesting the pump was not organically driven. Thin liquidity means any moderate sell order could collapse the price significantly.

Catalysts

Renewed social media attention or influencer promotion could trigger another pump
Any whale or early holder exit will likely crater the price given thin liquidity
Broader Solana meme coin market sentiment could provide temporary lift

Bullish factors

327.6% price surge demonstrates speculative demand exists
1,159 unique wallets traded in 24h showing broad awareness
PumpSwap listing provides accessible trading venue

Bearish factors

73.7% sell pressure ($122.6K sell vs $43.8K buy volume in 24h)
Price already pulling back from $0.000147 high — bearish hourly close
Only $43.4K total liquidity — extremely thin, high slippage risk
Holder count was flat at 32 for 30 days before suspicious 552-holder spike in 1 hour
No top holder data — cannot assess distribution or dump risk
Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug risk present
Unverified contract, total supply reported as 1 with decimals=0 — anomalous

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available for technical analysis, (2) missing top holder and sniper data preventing assessment of distribution risk, (3) anomalous tokenomics (supply=1, decimals=0) creating uncertainty about actual circulating supply, and (4) the token is extremely new with no established price history.

STIMMY call history

Full track record →

Jun 20bearish@ $0.000122

24h-96.7%

7d-98.4%

30d-98.5%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 4hgzvv...pump
Total Supply: 1 (formatted, decimals=0) — anomalous; likely a data reporting artifact

Key Risks

Unknown update authority with mutable metadata — rug pull risk cannot be ruled out
Anomalous tokenomics (supply=1, decimals=0) — possible data obfuscation or non-standard token structure
No top holder data — cannot assess whale dump risk
Extreme sell pressure: 73.7% of 24h volume is sells ($122.6K vs $43.8K buys)

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (21:00 UTC) was the launch/pump candle: Open $0.000030, High $0.000147, Low $0.000017, Close $0.000137 — an extremely wide-range bullish candle with a long lower wick indicating initial volatility and strong buying that pushed price up ~4.9x from open. Volume was $90,736. Candle [1] (22:00 UTC) opened at $0.000140 (near candle [2] close), reached a high of only $0.000140 (no new high — failed to break resistance), and closed at $0.000129 on $34,793 volume — a bearish candle showing distribution after the pump. The pattern is a classic 'pump and dump' setup: explosive launch candle followed by a lower-high, lower-close bearish candle with declining volume.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is bearish: candle [1] made a lower high ($0.000140 vs $0.000147) and lower close ($0.000129 vs $0.000137) compared to candle [2]. Medium-term trend is effectively unknown given only 2 candles of history, classified as sideways pending more data.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

26%

Sell

74%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000129 (candle [1] low / recent close)

Major support

$0.000017 (candle [2] absolute low — pre-pump floor)

Immediate resistance

$0.000140 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close area)

Major resistance

$0.000147 (candle [2] all-time high)

The $0.000129 level is the most recent close and acts as immediate support. A break below this opens the path to the $0.000017 launch low. On the upside, $0.000140–$0.000147 is a resistance zone formed by the pump candle's close and absolute high. Given the thin liquidity, these levels can be breached rapidly.

Notable patterns

Pump-and-dump candle pattern: explosive wide-range launch candle followed by bearish distribution candle
Lower high on candle [1] vs candle [2] — failed to make new highs, bearish signal
Declining volume on price pullback — consistent with distribution, not accumulation
Long lower wick on candle [2] ($0.000017 low vs $0.000030 open) suggests initial sell pressure was absorbed before the pump

Liquidity

$43,436.94

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is extremely thin at $43.4K on PumpSwap (pair 4hi1yBTFhQoPYZn1PStGKmMQJPg22HWhMM8mbzNetH3U). The FDV of $129.2K is nearly 3x the total liquidity, meaning any significant sell order will cause severe slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $122.6K in sell volume vs $43.8K in buy volume represents a net outflow of ~$78.8K. Unique sellers (1,019) outnumber unique buyers (580) by 1.76:1. With 2,983 sell transactions vs 1,265 buy transactions, the market is in active distribution mode. The price % change showing 0% across all timeframes (5m, 1h, 6h, 24h) in the analytics section is inconsistent with the OHLC data showing a 327.6% move — this may indicate a data lag or reporting anomaly. Overall market health is poor: thin liquidity, heavy sell pressure, and anomalous data reporting.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1 (formatted, decimals=0) — anomalous; likely a data reporting artifact

FDV

$129,210

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
327.6% price pump in 24 hours followed by immediate bearish reversal. Only 2 hourly candles of price history. Extreme price swings possible in either direction given thin liquidity.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $43.4K. Any moderate sell order will cause severe slippage. Sell volume ($122.6K) already exceeds total liquidity in 24 hours, indicating rapid capital rotation.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Unknown update authority with mutable metadata — rug pull risk cannot be ruled out
Anomalous tokenomics (supply=1, decimals=0) — possible data obfuscation or non-standard token structure
No top holder data — cannot assess whale dump risk
Extreme sell pressure: 73.7% of 24h volume is sells ($122.6K vs $43.8K buys)
Suspicious holder spike: 552 holders appeared in 1 hour after 30 days of zero growth at 32 holders
Thin liquidity ($43.4K) creates high slippage and price manipulation risk
Price % change showing 0% across all timeframes in analytics despite 327.6% 24h move — data inconsistency raises reliability concerns
Unverified contract on PumpSwap — no audit or verification

Mitigating factors

Token is not flagged as possible spam by the data provider
1,159 unique wallets traded in 24h showing genuine market interest
Listed on PumpSwap providing some trading infrastructure
Social links (Twitter, website) exist suggesting some project presence

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose their entire investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep experience in high-risk Solana meme token trading. The combination of unknown authorities, anomalous tokenomics, missing holder data, extreme sell pressure, and thin liquidity makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

STIMMY is a high-risk, newly launched Solana meme token that experienced a 327.6% pump in 24 hours but is already showing strong signs of distribution. The token has multiple critical data gaps (no top holders, no sniper data, unknown authorities) and anomalous metrics (supply=1, 30-day flat holder count followed by instant 552-holder spike) that make fundamental analysis unreliable. The investment case is almost entirely speculative momentum-based, with significant evidence that early holders are already exiting.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If STIMMY gains viral social media traction (Twitter/meme community), a second pump wave could push price back toward or above the $0.000147 all-time high. The 1,159 unique wallets already engaged in 24h provides a base for community growth. A successful meme narrative could attract new capital.

Viral social media momentum on Twitter/crypto communities
Broader Solana meme season driving speculative capital into low-cap tokens
New influencer or KOL promotion
Successful community building around the 'trenches' narrative

Base Case

STIMMY continues to trade in a volatile range between $0.000050–$0.000130, gradually declining as sell pressure outpaces new buyers. The token fades into low-volume obscurity within 1–2 weeks as is typical for PumpSwap meme tokens without sustained narrative momentum.

No major new catalysts emerge (no viral moment, no influencer promotion)
Sell pressure continues to dominate as early holders exit
Liquidity remains thin, preventing large new capital inflows
Token authorities do not execute a rug pull (price declines organically rather than instantly)

Bear Case

High probability

Early holders (the 32 who held for 30 days before the pump) continue distributing into any remaining buy pressure. Thin liquidity ($43.4K) means even moderate selling collapses the price back toward the $0.000017 launch low or lower. Unknown authorities could execute a rug pull. The anomalous holder data suggests bot activity that could evaporate.

Continued 73.7% sell pressure exhausts remaining buy-side liquidity
Early insider holders dumping into the pump
Rug pull by unknown update authority
No fundamental value or utility to sustain price
Thin liquidity amplifying any sell pressure

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 20, 10:19 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-20 22:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Moralis on-chain token metadata API
PumpSwap DEX trading analytics
Hourly OHLC price candles (2 candles available)
Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
Trading volume and buyer/seller analytics

Limitations

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
No top holder data available — whale and concentration analysis is impossible
No sniper data available — early buyer PnL and dump risk cannot be quantified
Total supply reported as 1 with decimals=0 is anomalous — tokenomics analysis is unreliable
Update authority is unknown — authority risk cannot be fully assessed
Holder distribution data (whales/sharks/dolphins/fish/octopus all = 0) is anomalous and unreliable
Top10/top100 concentration reported as 0% is inconsistent with any real token distribution
Price % change showing 0% across all timeframes in analytics contradicts the 327.6% 24h move — data pipeline inconsistency
The 552-holder spike in 1 hour after 30 days of zero growth is highly anomalous and may represent a data artifact rather than real holders
Token is very newly launched with minimal price history

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially newly launched meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The data used contains multiple anomalies and gaps that reduce analytical confidence. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. This analysis was generated by an automated system and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is STIMMY a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. A few things to know below. The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply. Checked Nov 6, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell STIMMY?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 6, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for STIMMY (STIMMY)?

Is STIMMY a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose their entire investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep experience in high-risk Solana meme token trading. The combination of unknown authorities, anomalous tokenomics, missing holder data, extreme sell pressure, and thin liquidity makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

What are the key risks of holding STIMMY?

Unknown update authority with mutable metadata — rug pull risk cannot be ruled out • Anomalous tokenomics (supply=1, decimals=0) — possible data obfuscation or non-standard token structure • No top holder data — cannot assess whale dump risk