Smugs

Smugs Price Today & AI Analysis

Smugs
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 28, 2026

4BwfCsmzbfUUb7uWxTgy4oDhdCHMGZCqntmz3CHdpump

$0.054421

+1.15%

FDV $4,297

LiveContract:4BwfCsmzbfUUb7uWxTgy4oDhdCHMGZCqntmz3CHdpumpChain:SolanaHolders:486Market cap:$4,297

More tokens on Solana

YOTS

YOTS

Year Of The Singularity

$0.0553520.1%
MC $5.2K
WIREBUS

WIREBUS

Wirebus

$0.0541220.0%
MC $4.1K
Cheshire

Cheshire

The Vogue Cat

$0.0558260.0%
MC $5.6K
BULLARC

BULLARC

The Bull Arc

$0.0523720.0%
MC $2.4K
FATBULL

FATBULL

The Fat Bull

$0.0524270.0%
MC $2.4K
STONK

STONK

STONK

$0.303648.5%
MC $258.92M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Smugs

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jul 28, 02:17 PM
FDV

$166,106

Liquidity

$46,898

Holders

1,392

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Smugs (Smugs) is a PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana (mint: 4BwfCsmzbfUUb7uWxTgy4oDhdCHMGZCqntmz3CHdpump) with a total supply of 1 billion tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$166K at the time of analysis. The token has experienced an explosive 320% price surge in the past 24 hours, driven almost entirely by a single recent hour of activity. However, the data reveals severe red flags: sell pressure dominates at 75% of volume ($542K sells vs $180K buys), liquidity is extremely shallow at $46.9K, holder data shows anomalous behavior (44 holders for 29 days then a sudden +1,348 in 24h), top holder concentration data is unavailable, and no social links or verified contract exist. The token exhibits classic pump-and-dump characteristics.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive 320% 24h price surge concentrated in a single hour (candle [1] shows open $0.0000583 to close $0.000248, a ~325% intracandle move)
Extreme sell dominance: 75% sell pressure ($542K sells vs $180K buys) with 10,560 sells vs 3,435 buys in 24h
Anomalous holder history: exactly 44 holders for 29 consecutive days with zero change, then +1,348 holders in a single day
Critically shallow liquidity at $46.9K against a $166K FDV — large trades would cause severe slippage
No top holder data, no social links, no verified contract, no description — minimal transparency

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token has already pumped ~320% in 24h with the bulk of the move occurring in a single hour (candle [1]: open $0.0000583, high $0.000269, close $0.000248). Sell pressure is overwhelming at 75% of volume. With $542K in sells vs $180K in buys and only $46.9K in liquidity, the price is highly vulnerable to a sharp reversal. The 5m, 6h, and 24h price change metrics all showing 0% (while 1h shows +170%) suggests the data snapshot may be lagging, but the candle data confirms a violent spike. A retracement toward the prior range ($0.000027–$0.000058) is the most likely near-term outcome.

Target low$0.000027
Target high$0.000269
Support: $0.000058 (candle [1] open / candle [2] high), $0.000027 (candle [2] open / multi-day prior range low)
Resistance: $0.000269 (candle [1] all-time high / intraday spike high), $0.000248 (candle [1] close)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

Given the structural characteristics — no utility, no social presence, no verified contract, extreme sell pressure, and a holder base that was dormant for 29 days before a sudden surge — sustained price appreciation is unlikely. The token fits the profile of a coordinated pump with early holders distributing into retail buyers. Medium-term price action is expected to trend back toward or below pre-pump levels unless a new catalyst emerges.

Catalysts
  • Any new social media campaign or influencer promotion could trigger another short-term pump
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally could provide temporary lift
  • Absence of any new buying catalyst will accelerate the decline as early buyers take profits

Bullish factors

  • 320% price surge demonstrates strong short-term momentum and market attention
  • 1,348 new holders in 24h indicates rapid community growth (though authenticity is uncertain)
  • Hourly candle [1] closed near its high ($0.000248 vs high $0.000269), suggesting some buying conviction at elevated levels

Bearish factors

  • 75% sell pressure ($542K sells vs $180K buys) — sellers are overwhelming buyers 3:1
  • 10,560 sells vs 3,435 buys in 24h — transaction count confirms sell dominance
  • Liquidity of only $46.9K is critically thin relative to $542K in 24h sell volume
  • 44 holders for 29 consecutive days with zero change is highly anomalous and suggests possible manipulation or dormancy
  • No verified contract, no social links, no description — zero fundamental backing
  • FDV of $166K is extremely small, making the token susceptible to whale manipulation
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: only 2 hourly OHLC candles available (insufficient for robust TA), missing top holder data, no sniper data, anomalous holder metrics that may indicate data quality issues, and the extreme volatility of micro-cap meme tokens which makes precise price targeting unreliable.

Smugs call history

Full track record →
Jul 28bearish
24h-78.7%
7d-97.2%
30d-96.9%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (12:00 UTC): O=$0.0000277, H=$0.0000673, L=$0.0000270, C=$0.0000588, V=$93,979 — a bullish candle with a significant upper wick, closing near the high but well below the intracandle peak. Candle [1] (13:00 UTC): O=$0.0000583, H=$0.000269, L=$0.0000542, C=$0.000248, V=$475,568 — an explosive bullish candle with volume 5x the prior hour. The open of candle [1] is near the close of candle [2], confirming a continuation gap-up. The long upper wick on candle [1] (high $0.000269 vs close $0.000248) suggests some profit-taking at the top. The pattern is a parabolic spike with high-volume expansion — historically a precursor to sharp reversals in micro-cap meme tokens.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trendincreasing
Buy 25%Sell 75%

Short-term trend is technically upward based on the two available candles showing higher highs and higher closes. However, the medium-term context (29 days of flat price at ~$0.000027–$0.000058 range) indicates this is a breakout from a prolonged sideways base. With only 2 candles, trend analysis is severely limited. The spike is more characteristic of a pump event than a sustainable uptrend.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000058 (candle [1] open and candle [2] close — prior resistance turned support)
Major$0.000027 (candle [2] open and multi-week prior range floor)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000248 (candle [1] close — current price level)
Major$0.000269 (candle [1] all-time high spike)

The key support cluster is at $0.000027–$0.000058, representing the pre-pump trading range. If selling pressure continues, the price is likely to retest this zone. The $0.000269 spike high represents the major resistance and likely the distribution ceiling for early holders. The thin liquidity ($46.9K) means these levels can be breached rapidly in either direction.

Notable patterns

  • Parabolic spike candle (candle [1]): 5x volume expansion with 325% intracandle move — classic pump pattern
  • Upper wick on candle [1]: high $0.000269 vs close $0.000248 (~8% wick) indicates profit-taking at the top
  • Volume climax: single-hour volume ($475K) exceeds prior 29-day dormancy period, suggesting a coordinated event
  • Gap continuation: candle [1] opens at candle [2]'s close level, confirming momentum but also vulnerability to gap-fill

Total holders1,392
24h Δ+1348
7d Δ+1348
30d Δ+1348
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The holder count explosion (+1,348, +97% in 24h) is perfectly correlated with the 320% price spike, suggesting FOMO-driven retail entry. However, the historical data shows exactly 44 holders for all 29 prior days with zero net change on any day — this is highly anomalous and may indicate the token was dormant, relaunched, or that the holder tracking data was not functioning properly prior to the pump event.

The holder history is deeply suspicious. For 29 consecutive days (June 28 – July 27, 2026), the holder count was exactly 44 with zero net change every single day. Then on July 28, holders surged by +1,348 to reach 1,392 — a 97% increase in a single day. This pattern is inconsistent with organic growth and suggests either: (1) the token was dormant/inactive for nearly a month before a coordinated pump, (2) the holder tracking system had a data gap, or (3) the token was relaunched or reactivated. The acquisition breakdown (1,346 via swap, 46 via transfer, 0 via airdrop) confirms the new holders entered through trading activity on the pump day. The supply distribution data (whales=0, sharks=0, dolphins=0, fish=0, octopus=0) and top10/top100 concentration both showing 0% are also anomalous and may indicate data unavailability rather than actual zero concentration.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token — the API returned no top 20 holders, and supply concentration metrics show 0% for both top 10 and top 100, which is almost certainly a data gap rather than a genuine reflection of distribution. This is a critical blind spot in the analysis. Without knowing who holds the majority of the 1 billion token supply, it is impossible to assess whale manipulation risk, insider selling pressure, or distribution health accurately. Given the token's PumpFun origin, the 'pump' address pattern in the mint, and the trading behavior (75% sell pressure), it is reasonable to assume significant concentration among early/insider wallets. The distribution health is classified as 'very_concentrated' as a conservative risk assumption given the data gap and token profile.

Liquidity$46,900
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$180,500
Sell$542,230
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers564
Unique sellers2,557

Liquidity is critically shallow at $46.9K on PumpSwap (pair: 7VuCDkKeRdfVeLKScwQLsEPaubV13stgG97FRTuxKVb1). This means the total liquidity pool is less than 9% of the 24h sell volume ($542K), creating extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position. A single sell of even $5K–$10K would likely move the price by 10–20%+ given the pool depth. The net flow is strongly negative — $542K in sells vs $180K in buys represents a $361K net outflow. The seller-to-buyer ratio by wallet count is 4.5:1 (2,557 sellers vs 564 buyers), and by transaction count is 3:1 (10,560 sells vs 3,435 buys). This is a deeply unhealthy market structure consistent with a distribution event. The FDV of $161–166K vs $46.9K liquidity means the token is highly illiquid relative to its market cap.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1,000,000,000
FDV$166,106

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a standard 1 billion supply with 6 decimals, consistent with PumpFun-launched meme tokens. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the token is marked as 'mutable: false', which is a mild positive signal (immutable metadata reduces certain manipulation vectors). However, mint authority and freeze authority status are not provided in the available data, making it impossible to confirm whether new tokens can be minted or accounts can be frozen. The token has no verified contract, no description, and no social links. The '.pump' suffix in the mint address confirms PumpFun origin. The FDV of ~$166K is extremely small, making the token highly susceptible to price manipulation by any holder with a meaningful position. Given the data gaps on authority status, rug risk from authorities is classified as unknown — investors should assume worst-case until confirmed otherwise.

Volatility
high

320% price surge in 24h concentrated in a single hour. Only 2 OHLC candles available, both showing extreme intracandle ranges. The token moved from $0.000027 to $0.000269 — a 10x range — within 2 hours. This level of volatility is extreme even by meme coin standards.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $46.9K against $542K in 24h sell volume. The liquidity pool covers less than 9% of daily sell volume. Any position of meaningful size will face severe slippage. Exiting a position during a sell-off could be extremely difficult.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is entirely unavailable (API returned no data). Supply distribution shows 0% for top 10 and top 100, which is a data gap rather than genuine distribution. PumpFun tokens typically have high early-holder concentration. The 29-day dormancy period with only 44 holders suggests a small group controlled the supply before the pump.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data is available. However, the trading pattern — 75% sell pressure, 2,557 unique sellers vs 564 buyers, $542K in sells vs $180K in buys — is consistent with early/insider holders dumping into retail FOMO. The 29-day dormancy followed by a sudden pump is a classic setup for a coordinated dump.

Authority
medium

Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. The token is marked 'mutable: false' which is a mild positive, but without confirmed renouncement of mint/freeze authorities, there remains a risk of supply manipulation or account freezing. Update authority is listed as 'unknown'.

Key risks

  • Extreme sell pressure (75% of volume) with 2,557 sellers vs 564 buyers indicates active distribution
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($46.9K) creates severe slippage and exit risk
  • 29-day dormancy (44 holders, zero change) followed by sudden pump is a classic pump-and-dump setup
  • No top holder data — concentration risk cannot be properly assessed
  • No verified contract, no social links, no description — zero fundamental transparency
  • Mint and freeze authority status unknown — potential for supply manipulation
  • FDV of $166K is extremely small, making price easily manipulated
  • Token is unverified and has no community presence prior to the pump event

Mitigating factors

  • Token metadata is marked 'mutable: false', reducing metadata manipulation risk
  • PumpFun platform provides some baseline liquidity infrastructure
  • 1,348 new holders in 24h shows genuine market interest (though FOMO-driven)
  • No spam flag from the data provider
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced traders with a very high risk tolerance who are comfortable with the possibility of total loss. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The risk profile is consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme.

Smugs is a PumpFun-launched meme token that has experienced a violent 320% price spike in 24 hours, driven by overwhelming sell pressure (75%) and a sudden explosion in holder count from a 29-day dormant base of 44 holders. The token has no verified contract, no social presence, no description, and critically shallow liquidity. The data pattern is consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump. Any investment thesis must be grounded in the reality that this is an extremely high-risk, speculative micro-cap with strong indicators of insider distribution.

Bull case (low)

Momentum continuation: If the price spike attracts broader social media attention and new retail capital flows in faster than insiders can distribute, the token could see a secondary pump leg. Meme tokens on Solana have historically shown multiple pump cycles before final collapse.

  • Viral social media spread driving new retail FOMO buying
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all micro-caps
  • New liquidity injection into the PumpSwap pool reducing slippage risk
  • Influencer promotion creating sustained demand above current distribution pressure

Base case

Partial retracement followed by low-volume sideways trading: The initial pump fades as early buyers complete distribution. Price settles somewhere between the pre-pump range ($0.000027–$0.000058) and current levels, with declining volume and holder count stabilizing at a higher base than pre-pump but well below the 24h peak.

  • Some retail holders maintain positions hoping for another pump cycle
  • Liquidity remains thin but does not fully drain from the pool
  • No new major catalyst emerges in the near term
  • The token does not get listed on any major exchange or aggregator

Bear case (high)

Rapid collapse: Sell pressure continues to overwhelm buyers, liquidity drains from the pool, and the price retraces to pre-pump levels ($0.000027–$0.000058) or lower. Early holders complete their distribution, leaving late retail buyers with significant losses.

  • 75% sell pressure and 4.5:1 seller-to-buyer wallet ratio continues
  • Shallow $46.9K liquidity cannot absorb continued sell pressure
  • No fundamental value, utility, or community to sustain price
  • 29-day dormancy pattern suggests coordinated insider activity now distributing
  • Absence of any new catalyst to attract fresh buying

GeneratedJul 28, 02:17 PM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of approximately 2026-07-28T13:xx UTC. OHLC data covers the two most recent hourly candles. Historical holder data covers June 28 – July 27, 2026 (30 days). Top holder and sniper data are unavailable.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, decimals, supply, authority fields)
  • PumpSwap DEX price and liquidity data (pair: 7VuCDkKeRdfVeLKScwQLsEPaubV13stgG97FRTuxKVb1)
  • OHLC hourly candles (2 candles available: 2026-07-28T12:00 and 13:00 UTC)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buys/sells, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Top holder data (unavailable — API returned no data)
  • Sniper analysis (unavailable — endpoint returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Top 20 holder data entirely unavailable — whale concentration cannot be assessed
  • Sniper data unavailable — early buyer behavior cannot be quantified
  • Mint and freeze authority status unknown — rug risk from authorities cannot be confirmed
  • Holder distribution metrics (whales/sharks/dolphins/fish/octopus all = 0) appear to be data gaps rather than genuine zero values
  • Top 10 and top 100 supply concentration both showing 0% is almost certainly a data gap
  • The 29-day flat holder history (exactly 44 holders, zero change every day) is anomalous and may indicate data quality issues or token dormancy
  • Price change metrics showing 0% for 5m, 6h, and 24h while 1h shows +170% suggests possible data lag or snapshot timing issues
  • No social links or community data available for sentiment analysis

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed shows multiple high-risk indicators consistent with pump-and-dump activity. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1,000,000,000

Key Risks

•Extreme sell pressure (75% of volume) with 2,557 sellers vs 564 buyers indicates active distribution
•Critically shallow liquidity ($46.9K) creates severe slippage and exit risk
•29-day dormancy (44 holders, zero change) followed by sudden pump is a classic pump-and-dump setup
•No top holder data — concentration risk cannot be properly assessed

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals must be inferred from trading analytics alone. The 24h data shows 564 unique buyers vs 2,557 unique sellers — a 4.5:1 seller-to-buyer ratio by wallet count. This strongly suggests early holders (potentially including insiders or coordinated wallets) are distributing to a larger pool of retail buyers. The $542K in sell volume vs $180K in buy volume confirms net outflow. Without sniper data, it is impossible to quantify early-buyer concentration or realized PnL, but the trading pattern is consistent with informed sellers offloading into a retail-driven pump.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available — sniper analysis endpoint returned no data for this token.

Likely distributing — 2,557 unique sellers vs 564 unique buyers in 24h, with $542K in sell volume vs $180K in buy volume, strongly implies early/informed holders are taking profits into the price spike. The anomalous 29-day dormancy period (44 holders, zero change) followed by a sudden pump suggests a coordinated launch or reactivation event.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Smugs (Smugs)?

The token has already pumped ~320% in 24h with the bulk of the move occurring in a single hour (candle [1]: open $0.0000583, high $0.000269, close $0.000248). Sell pressure is overwhelming at 75% of volume. With $542K in sells vs $180K in buys and only $46.9K in liquidity, the price is highly vulnerable to a sharp reversal. The 5m, 6h, and 24h price change metrics all showing 0% (while 1h shows +170%) suggests the data snapshot may be lagging, but the candle data confirms a violent spike. A retracement toward the prior range ($0.000027–$0.000058) is the most likely near-term outcome. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000027 to $0.000269.

Is Smugs a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced traders with a very high risk tolerance who are comfortable with the possibility of total loss. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The risk profile is consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme.

How are Smugs holders trending?

Smugs currently has 1,392 holders and is growing (24h: 1348, 7d: 1348, 30d: 1348). The holder history is deeply suspicious. For 29 consecutive days (June 28 – July 27, 2026), the holder count was exactly 44 with zero net change every single day. Then on July 28, holders surged by +1,348 to reach 1,392 — a 97% increase in a single day. This pattern is inconsistent with organic growth and suggests either: (1) the token was dormant/inactive for nearly a month before a coordinated pump, (2) the holder tracking system had a data gap, or (3) the token was relaunched or reactivated. The acquisition breakdown (1,346 via swap, 46 via transfer, 0 via airdrop) confirms the new holders entered through trading activity on the pump day. The supply distribution data (whales=0, sharks=0, dolphins=0, fish=0, octopus=0) and top10/top100 concentration both showing 0% are also anomalous and may indicate data unavailability rather than actual zero concentration.

What does sniper activity look like for Smugs?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding Smugs?

Extreme sell pressure (75% of volume) with 2,557 sellers vs 564 buyers indicates active distribution • Critically shallow liquidity ($46.9K) creates severe slippage and exit risk • 29-day dormancy (44 holders, zero change) followed by sudden pump is a classic pump-and-dump setup

← Back to all predictions

Track Smugs