Smugs Price Today & AI Analysis

SmugsSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 28, 2026

$0.0₅3605

Contract

Live

4BwfCsmzbfUUb7uWxTgy4oDhdCHMGZCqntmz3CHdpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

450

Market cap

$3,503

At a $1M market cap, $SMUGS would be $0.001029 (285x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is Smugs a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 25

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about Smugs

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

BBALLBeachball underwater$0.0₅5023+0.0%MC $5.0K

WIREBUSWirebus$0.0₅3940+0.0%MC $3.9K

CheshireThe Vogue Cat$0.0₅4478-0.1%MC $4.3K

BULLARCThe Bull Arc$0.0₅2342+0.0%MC $2.3K

CLAUDEClaude's Body$0.0₅2627+0.0%MC $2.6K

ZECZcash$1,240.2+3.9%MC $127.62M

Smugs: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-28 14:17 UTC

Holder addresses

1,392

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$46,898.26

How concentrated is Smugs ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,392 addresses (2026-07-28 14:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Smugs?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Smugs liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-28 14:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $46,898.26. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-28 14:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 28, 02:17 PM UTC

FDV

$166,106

Liquidity

$46,898.26

Holders

1,392

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Smugs (Smugs) is a PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana (mint: 4BwfCsmzbfUUb7uWxTgy4oDhdCHMGZCqntmz3CHdpump) with a total supply of 1 billion tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$166K at the time of analysis. The token has experienced an explosive 320% price surge in the past 24 hours, driven almost entirely by a single recent hour of activity. However, the data reveals severe red flags: sell pressure dominates at 75% of volume ($542K sells vs $180K buys), liquidity is extremely shallow at $46.9K, holder data shows anomalous behavior (44 holders for 29 days then a sudden +1,348 in 24h), top holder concentration data is unavailable, and no social links or verified contract exist. The token exhibits classic pump-and-dump characteristics.

Key points

Explosive 320% 24h price surge concentrated in a single hour (candle [1] shows open $0.0000583 to close $0.000248, a ~325% intracandle move)
Extreme sell dominance: 75% sell pressure ($542K sells vs $180K buys) with 10,560 sells vs 3,435 buys in 24h
Anomalous holder history: exactly 44 holders for 29 consecutive days with zero change, then +1,348 holders in a single day
Critically shallow liquidity at $46.9K against a $166K FDV — large trades would cause severe slippage
No top holder data, no social links, no verified contract, no description — minimal transparency

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token has already pumped ~320% in 24h with the bulk of the move occurring in a single hour (candle [1]: open $0.0000583, high $0.000269, close $0.000248). Sell pressure is overwhelming at 75% of volume. With $542K in sells vs $180K in buys and only $46.9K in liquidity, the price is highly vulnerable to a sharp reversal. The 5m, 6h, and 24h price change metrics all showing 0% (while 1h shows +170%) suggests the data snapshot may be lagging, but the candle data confirms a violent spike. A retracement toward the prior range ($0.000027–$0.000058) is the most likely near-term outcome.

Target low

$0.000027

Target high

$0.000269

Support: $0.000058 (candle [1] open / candle [2] high), $0.000027 (candle [2] open / multi-day prior range low)
Resistance: $0.000269 (candle [1] all-time high / intraday spike high), $0.000248 (candle [1] close)

Medium term · 1–7 days

bearish

Given the structural characteristics — no utility, no social presence, no verified contract, extreme sell pressure, and a holder base that was dormant for 29 days before a sudden surge — sustained price appreciation is unlikely. The token fits the profile of a coordinated pump with early holders distributing into retail buyers. Medium-term price action is expected to trend back toward or below pre-pump levels unless a new catalyst emerges.

Catalysts

Any new social media campaign or influencer promotion could trigger another short-term pump
Broader Solana meme coin market rally could provide temporary lift
Absence of any new buying catalyst will accelerate the decline as early buyers take profits

Bullish factors

320% price surge demonstrates strong short-term momentum and market attention
1,348 new holders in 24h indicates rapid community growth (though authenticity is uncertain)
Hourly candle [1] closed near its high ($0.000248 vs high $0.000269), suggesting some buying conviction at elevated levels

Bearish factors

75% sell pressure ($542K sells vs $180K buys) — sellers are overwhelming buyers 3:1
10,560 sells vs 3,435 buys in 24h — transaction count confirms sell dominance
Liquidity of only $46.9K is critically thin relative to $542K in 24h sell volume
44 holders for 29 consecutive days with zero change is highly anomalous and suggests possible manipulation or dormancy
No verified contract, no social links, no description — zero fundamental backing
FDV of $166K is extremely small, making the token susceptible to whale manipulation

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: only 2 hourly OHLC candles available (insufficient for robust TA), missing top holder data, no sniper data, anomalous holder metrics that may indicate data quality issues, and the extreme volatility of micro-cap meme tokens which makes precise price targeting unreliable.

Smugs call history

Full track record →

Jul 28bearish@ $0.000166

24h-78.7%

7d-97.2%

30d-96.9%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 4BwfCs...pump
Total Supply: 1,000,000,000

Key Risks

Extreme sell pressure (75% of volume) with 2,557 sellers vs 564 buyers indicates active distribution
Critically shallow liquidity ($46.9K) creates severe slippage and exit risk
29-day dormancy (44 holders, zero change) followed by sudden pump is a classic pump-and-dump setup
No top holder data — concentration risk cannot be properly assessed

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (12:00 UTC): O=$0.0000277, H=$0.0000673, L=$0.0000270, C=$0.0000588, V=$93,979 — a bullish candle with a significant upper wick, closing near the high but well below the intracandle peak. Candle [1] (13:00 UTC): O=$0.0000583, H=$0.000269, L=$0.0000542, C=$0.000248, V=$475,568 — an explosive bullish candle with volume 5x the prior hour. The open of candle [1] is near the close of candle [2], confirming a continuation gap-up. The long upper wick on candle [1] (high $0.000269 vs close $0.000248) suggests some profit-taking at the top. The pattern is a parabolic spike with high-volume expansion — historically a precursor to sharp reversals in micro-cap meme tokens.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is technically upward based on the two available candles showing higher highs and higher closes. However, the medium-term context (29 days of flat price at ~$0.000027–$0.000058 range) indicates this is a breakout from a prolonged sideways base. With only 2 candles, trend analysis is severely limited. The spike is more characteristic of a pump event than a sustainable uptrend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

25%

Sell

75%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000058 (candle [1] open and candle [2] close — prior resistance turned support)

Major support

$0.000027 (candle [2] open and multi-week prior range floor)

Immediate resistance

$0.000248 (candle [1] close — current price level)

Major resistance

$0.000269 (candle [1] all-time high spike)

The key support cluster is at $0.000027–$0.000058, representing the pre-pump trading range. If selling pressure continues, the price is likely to retest this zone. The $0.000269 spike high represents the major resistance and likely the distribution ceiling for early holders. The thin liquidity ($46.9K) means these levels can be breached rapidly in either direction.

Notable patterns

Parabolic spike candle (candle [1]): 5x volume expansion with 325% intracandle move — classic pump pattern
Upper wick on candle [1]: high $0.000269 vs close $0.000248 (~8% wick) indicates profit-taking at the top
Volume climax: single-hour volume ($475K) exceeds prior 29-day dormancy period, suggesting a coordinated event
Gap continuation: candle [1] opens at candle [2]'s close level, confirming momentum but also vulnerability to gap-fill

Liquidity

$46,898.26

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $46.9K on PumpSwap (pair: 7VuCDkKeRdfVeLKScwQLsEPaubV13stgG97FRTuxKVb1). This means the total liquidity pool is less than 9% of the 24h sell volume ($542K), creating extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position. A single sell of even $5K–$10K would likely move the price by 10–20%+ given the pool depth. The net flow is strongly negative — $542K in sells vs $180K in buys represents a $361K net outflow. The seller-to-buyer ratio by wallet count is 4.5:1 (2,557 sellers vs 564 buyers), and by transaction count is 3:1 (10,560 sells vs 3,435 buys). This is a deeply unhealthy market structure consistent with a distribution event. The FDV of $161–166K vs $46.9K liquidity means the token is highly illiquid relative to its market cap.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000

FDV

$166,106

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
320% price surge in 24h concentrated in a single hour. Only 2 OHLC candles available, both showing extreme intracandle ranges. The token moved from $0.000027 to $0.000269 — a 10x range — within 2 hours. This level of volatility is extreme even by meme coin standards.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $46.9K against $542K in 24h sell volume. The liquidity pool covers less than 9% of daily sell volume. Any position of meaningful size will face severe slippage. Exiting a position during a sell-off could be extremely difficult.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme sell pressure (75% of volume) with 2,557 sellers vs 564 buyers indicates active distribution
Critically shallow liquidity ($46.9K) creates severe slippage and exit risk
29-day dormancy (44 holders, zero change) followed by sudden pump is a classic pump-and-dump setup
No top holder data — concentration risk cannot be properly assessed
No verified contract, no social links, no description — zero fundamental transparency
Mint and freeze authority status unknown — potential for supply manipulation
FDV of $166K is extremely small, making price easily manipulated
Token is unverified and has no community presence prior to the pump event

Mitigating factors

Token metadata is marked 'mutable: false', reducing metadata manipulation risk
PumpFun platform provides some baseline liquidity infrastructure
1,348 new holders in 24h shows genuine market interest (though FOMO-driven)
No spam flag from the data provider

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced traders with a very high risk tolerance who are comfortable with the possibility of total loss. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The risk profile is consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme.

Smugs is a PumpFun-launched meme token that has experienced a violent 320% price spike in 24 hours, driven by overwhelming sell pressure (75%) and a sudden explosion in holder count from a 29-day dormant base of 44 holders. The token has no verified contract, no social presence, no description, and critically shallow liquidity. The data pattern is consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump. Any investment thesis must be grounded in the reality that this is an extremely high-risk, speculative micro-cap with strong indicators of insider distribution.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Momentum continuation: If the price spike attracts broader social media attention and new retail capital flows in faster than insiders can distribute, the token could see a secondary pump leg. Meme tokens on Solana have historically shown multiple pump cycles before final collapse.

Viral social media spread driving new retail FOMO buying
Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all micro-caps
New liquidity injection into the PumpSwap pool reducing slippage risk
Influencer promotion creating sustained demand above current distribution pressure

Base Case

Partial retracement followed by low-volume sideways trading: The initial pump fades as early buyers complete distribution. Price settles somewhere between the pre-pump range ($0.000027–$0.000058) and current levels, with declining volume and holder count stabilizing at a higher base than pre-pump but well below the 24h peak.

Some retail holders maintain positions hoping for another pump cycle
Liquidity remains thin but does not fully drain from the pool
No new major catalyst emerges in the near term
The token does not get listed on any major exchange or aggregator

Bear Case

High probability

Rapid collapse: Sell pressure continues to overwhelm buyers, liquidity drains from the pool, and the price retraces to pre-pump levels ($0.000027–$0.000058) or lower. Early holders complete their distribution, leaving late retail buyers with significant losses.

75% sell pressure and 4.5:1 seller-to-buyer wallet ratio continues
Shallow $46.9K liquidity cannot absorb continued sell pressure
No fundamental value, utility, or community to sustain price
29-day dormancy pattern suggests coordinated insider activity now distributing
Absence of any new catalyst to attract fresh buying

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 28, 02:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-28 14:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (mint, decimals, supply, authority fields)
PumpSwap DEX price and liquidity data (pair: 7VuCDkKeRdfVeLKScwQLsEPaubV13stgG97FRTuxKVb1)
OHLC hourly candles (2 candles available: 2026-07-28T12:00 and 13:00 UTC)
24h trading analytics (volume, buys/sells, unique wallets)
Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
Top holder data (unavailable — API returned no data)
Sniper analysis (unavailable — endpoint returned no data)

Limitations

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
Top 20 holder data entirely unavailable — whale concentration cannot be assessed
Sniper data unavailable — early buyer behavior cannot be quantified
Mint and freeze authority status unknown — rug risk from authorities cannot be confirmed
Holder distribution metrics (whales/sharks/dolphins/fish/octopus all = 0) appear to be data gaps rather than genuine zero values
Top 10 and top 100 supply concentration both showing 0% is almost certainly a data gap
The 29-day flat holder history (exactly 44 holders, zero change every day) is anomalous and may indicate data quality issues or token dormancy
Price change metrics showing 0% for 5m, 6h, and 24h while 1h shows +170% suggests possible data lag or snapshot timing issues
No social links or community data available for sentiment analysis

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed shows multiple high-risk indicators consistent with pump-and-dump activity. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Smugs a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 25, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Smugs?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 25, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Smugs ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,392 addresses (2026-07-28 14:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Smugs?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Smugs liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-28 14:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $46,898.26. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Smugs (Smugs)?

Is Smugs a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced traders with a very high risk tolerance who are comfortable with the possibility of total loss. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The risk profile is consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme.

What are the key risks of holding Smugs?

Extreme sell pressure (75% of volume) with 2,557 sellers vs 564 buyers indicates active distribution • Critically shallow liquidity ($46.9K) creates severe slippage and exit risk • 29-day dormancy (44 holders, zero change) followed by sudden pump is a classic pump-and-dump setup