ANTIPUMP

Anti Pump Price Prediction 2026

ANTIPUMP
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 17, 2026

3hRBXuscbbfmpuLwjvCbDZBSRSqg7JiGD2xS4Ra4pump

$0.052267

FDV $2,267

LiveContract:3hRBXuscbbfmpuLwjvCbDZBSRSqg7JiGD2xS4Ra4pumpChain:SolanaHolders:79Market cap:$2,267

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about ANTIPUMP

Report snapshotas of May 17, 08:48 PM
FDV

$5,116

Liquidity

$6,870

Holders

121

Snipers

37

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

ANTIPUMP (Anti Pump) is a micro-cap Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap with a fully diluted valuation of ~$5,116. The token has experienced a catastrophic 24-hour price decline of ~67%, with sell pressure dominating at 87.9% of volume. The top holder (the PumpSwap liquidity pool address 8SyQr99qQuMVGzHvfvCoeYdSAKnTK3LkW1Gn31XV9X1z) controls 55.58% of supply, and the top 10 wallets collectively hold 78.02%. Holder count has collapsed from 142 (peak on May 16) to 121 currently, with a 37% drop in 24 hours. This is an extremely high-risk, speculative micro-cap token with clear signs of a post-launch dump cycle.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Ironic 'Anti Pump' branding on a token that itself pumped and dumped violently within 24 hours
Extremely concentrated supply: top 10 holders control 78.02%, with the DEX pool alone at 55.58%
Overwhelming sell pressure: 87.9% of 24h volume is sells, with 249 sellers vs only 36 buyers
Token went from 2 holders for weeks to 142 in a single day (May 16), indicating a coordinated launch event
20 snipers active in first 1000 blocks, with mixed but mostly profitable PnL outcomes

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
24–72 hours

Price has collapsed ~67% in 24 hours from a peak near $0.0000131 to current $0.00000512. With 87.9% sell pressure, 249 sellers vs 36 buyers, and holders declining 37% in 24h, the path of least resistance remains sharply downward. Thin liquidity ($6.87K total) means even small sell orders cause significant slippage.

Target low$0.0000030
Target high$0.0000065
Support: $0.0000048 (recent candle low, candles 19–21), $0.0000041 (extrapolated from sell pressure trajectory)
Resistance: $0.0000065 (candle 7–8 close zone), $0.0000095 (candle 8–14 consolidation zone), $0.0000113 (candle 17 high / launch peak zone)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

Given the token's micro-cap status, lack of utility or verified contract, no description, and the historical pattern of sitting at 2 holders for weeks before a single-day pump, sustained recovery is unlikely without a new catalyst. The token may stabilize at near-zero liquidity or become effectively illiquid.

Catalysts
  • Viral social media campaign leveraging the ironic 'Anti Pump' narrative
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all micro-caps
  • New whale accumulation at depressed prices
  • Listing on a higher-profile aggregator or influencer promotion

Bullish factors

  • Ironic branding could attract contrarian meme traders
  • Price has already dropped ~67%, reducing downside from current levels somewhat
  • Some snipers remain profitable (e.g., DrnuP46q at +117.9% realized PnL), suggesting early buyers captured value
  • Token is listed on PumpSwap with an active pair

Bearish factors

  • 87.9% sell pressure in 24h with 249 sellers vs only 36 buyers
  • Holder count dropped 37% in 24 hours (from 166 implied to 121)
  • Total liquidity only $6.87K — extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position
  • Top 10 holders control 78.02% of supply, creating massive dump risk
  • No verified contract, no description, update authority unknown
  • Token sat at 2 holders for ~4 weeks before launch pump — suggests coordinated manipulation
  • FDV of only ~$5,116 with no clear use case or community
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the token's extreme micro-cap status ($5K FDV), near-zero liquidity, lack of on-chain utility or verified contract, and the highly speculative nature of meme tokens. Price action is driven entirely by sentiment and thin order flow, making reliable prediction impossible.

Deep Analysis

The 24-hour OHLC series reveals a classic pump-and-dump pattern. The token launched with activity around $0.0000131 (candle 24, high of day at 21:00 UTC May 16), then sold off sharply through candle 23 ($0.0000104) and candle 22 ($0.0000088). A brief consolidation occurred in candles 12–15 around $0.0000093–$0.0000095, followed by a secondary spike in candle 17 (04:00 UTC, O: $0.0000114, H: $0.0000114, V: $11,369 — the highest volume candle). Since then, price has cascaded lower through candles 8–1, settling near $0.00000512. Candle 8 (13:00 UTC) showed the largest single-hour sell-off with $859 volume and a close well below open ($0.00000945 → $0.00000631). The most recent candles (1–3) show extremely low volume ($5–141) and flat-to-declining closes, indicating exhaustion.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 12%Sell 88%

Both short-term and medium-term trends are firmly bearish. The token made a lower high on the secondary pump (candle 17: $0.0000114 vs candle 24: $0.0000131) and has since made a series of lower lows and lower highs. No reversal signals are present in the data.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000048 (lows of candles 19–21, May 17 00:00–02:00 UTC)
Major$0.0000041 (extrapolated from sell pressure; no prior candle data below $0.0000048)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0000065 (candle 6–8 close zone, May 17 13:00–15:00 UTC)
Major$0.0000095 (candle 8–14 consolidation band)

The $0.0000048 level has been tested multiple times and represents the strongest near-term support. A break below this level would open the door to price discovery in uncharted territory. Resistance at $0.0000065 aligns with the post-secondary-pump sell-off zone.

Notable patterns

  • Classic pump-and-dump: parabolic rise to $0.0000131 followed by ~61% crash within hours
  • Secondary pump failure: candle 17 attempted recovery to $0.0000114 but failed to reclaim the prior high ($0.0000131), forming a lower high
  • Volume climax at candle 17 ($11,369) followed by immediate price collapse — classic distribution top
  • Candle 8 (13:00 UTC): large bearish candle with open $0.0000095, close $0.0000063, high volume ($859) — strong sell signal
  • Candles 1–3: extremely low volume doji-like candles indicating seller exhaustion but no buyer interest
  • Candle 3 (18:00 UTC): bearish engulfing-style close, open $0.0000057, close $0.0000052 on $141 volume

Total holders121
24h Δ-37
7d Δ+98
30d Δ+98
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

Holder count and price are highly correlated in this case. The token sat at 2 holders for ~4 weeks (April 17 – May 11), then spiked to 35 on May 12, collapsed to 2 again on May 13, recovered to 17–21 on May 14–15, then exploded to 142 on May 16 coinciding with the price pump. As price dumped on May 17, holders dropped 37% in 24 hours (from ~166 implied to 121 current), confirming that retail buyers are exiting alongside the price decline.

The historical holder data reveals an extremely erratic pattern inconsistent with organic growth. The token had exactly 2 holders from April 17 through May 11 — a 25-day period of complete inactivity. A brief spike to 35 holders on May 12 was followed by a collapse back to 2 on May 13, suggesting a test run or failed launch attempt. The successful launch occurred on May 16, bringing 142 holders (+125 net, +88% in one day). However, the 24-hour holder decline of 37% (losing 45 holders) alongside the 67% price drop confirms this is a classic pump-and-dump exit pattern. Growth is not accelerating — it is sharply reversing. The 7d and 30d figures of +98% are misleading as they reflect the single-day pump event rather than sustained organic growth.

Top 10 hold78.02%
Top 100 hold100.00%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

8SyQr99qQuMVGzHvfvCoeYdSAKnTK3LkW1Gn31XV9X1z

DEX Liquidity Pool (PumpSwap pair address — matches the trading pair address listed in price data)

55.58%

E1zGzPY1WdJoHSzf928NWTkZjcAhnUaN1xzF6BhCTsvS

Individual whale / early buyer

3.28%

4SPud3CqmNreouKXpR8LQjkLAm9DBqcVrpDktn4c8uEu

Individual whale / early buyer

3.08%

AuPp4YTMTyqxYXQnHc5KUc6pUuCSsHQpBJhgnD45yqrf

Individual whale / early buyer

2.75%

FmDdXvxEcqDUAPFoCcWXGD7yw4hAz8XPL8Wi1K1WGc3U

Individual whale / early buyer

2.70%

Supply concentration is extreme. The #1 holder (55.58%) is the PumpSwap liquidity pool itself (address 8SyQr99qQuMVGzHvfvCoeYdSAKnTK3LkW1Gn31XV9X1z matches the pair address in the price data), meaning over half the token supply is locked in the AMM pool. Excluding the LP, the next 9 holders collectively control ~22.44% of supply. Holders #2–#10 each hold between 1.85% and 3.28%, suggesting a cluster of early buyers or team wallets. The top 100 holders account for 100% of supply, meaning all 121 holders are within the top 100 — consistent with a brand-new micro-cap. The distribution is classified as 'very concentrated.' Whale sentiment is distributing, as evidenced by the 37% holder decline and 87.9% sell pressure in 24 hours.

Liquidity$6,870
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$3,270
Sell$23,810
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers36
Unique sellers249

Market health is critically poor. Total liquidity of $6,870 is dangerously shallow for any meaningful position — a $1,000 sell order would likely move the price by 10–15%+ given the AMM mechanics. The 24-hour net flow is heavily negative: $23,810 in sell volume vs only $3,270 in buy volume, a ratio of nearly 7.3:1. There are 249 unique sellers vs only 36 unique buyers, confirming broad-based exit behavior. The FDV of $7,300 (per analytics) vs $5,116 (per metadata) reflects the rapidly declining price. The token trades exclusively on PumpSwap (pair 8SyQr99qQuMVGzHvfvCoeYdSAKnTK3LkW1Gn31XV9X1z), with no secondary markets providing price support. Slippage risk is rated HIGH — any position above ~$500 faces severe execution risk.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,880,393.10
FDV$5,115.99

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a total supply of ~999.88 million tokens (effectively 1 billion). The FDV is only $5,116 at current prices, making this an ultra-micro-cap. The metadata indicates the contract is NOT verified, the token is mutable: false (which is a positive signal — metadata cannot be changed), and the update authority is listed as 'unknown.' Because the update authority is unknown rather than confirmed as the burn address (1111...) or explicitly renounced, mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The token was launched via pump.fun (indicated by the 'pump' suffix in the mint address), which typically uses a bonding curve mechanism. The token description is 'none,' there are no social links beyond a website and Moralis reference, and the contract is unverified. The combination of unknown authorities and unverified contract represents a meaningful rug risk that cannot be quantified without further on-chain inspection.

Volatility
high

Price dropped ~67% in 24 hours from a peak of $0.0000131 to $0.00000512. The token experienced multiple 30–50% swings within single hours (e.g., candle 17: $11,369 volume with sharp reversal). Extreme volatility is inherent to this micro-cap meme token.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only $6,870 on a single DEX (PumpSwap). Any position above ~$300–500 faces severe slippage. There are no secondary markets. If the LP is withdrawn, the token becomes completely illiquid.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 78.02% of supply. Excluding the LP pool (55.58%), the remaining top 9 non-LP holders control ~22.44%. A coordinated dump by even 2–3 of these wallets would be catastrophic for price.

SniperDump
medium

20 snipers were active in the first 1000 blocks. Most appear to have already exited (balance: $0 or unknown with recorded sales). The majority of snipers were profitable, suggesting they have already taken profits. Residual sniper dump risk is medium as some may still hold undisclosed balances.

Authority
medium

Mint and freeze authority status is unknown due to the update authority being listed as 'unknown' in metadata. The token is marked mutable: false, which is a partial positive. Without confirmed authority renouncement, there is theoretical risk of supply manipulation or account freezing.

Key risks

  • Catastrophic liquidity: $6,870 total — any meaningful sell creates extreme slippage
  • 87.9% sell pressure with 249 sellers vs 36 buyers — market is in active distribution
  • Top 10 holders (excl. LP) control ~22% of supply and could dump at any time
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential rug vector
  • Unverified contract with no description or utility
  • Token sat dormant at 2 holders for 25+ days before pump — suggests coordinated launch
  • Holder count declining 37% in 24h alongside price — retail is exiting en masse
  • Single DEX listing with no price support from secondary markets

Mitigating factors

  • Token metadata is immutable (mutable: false), preventing metadata rug
  • Most snipers appear to have already exited, reducing near-term sniper dump pressure
  • Price has already declined ~67%, reducing (but not eliminating) further downside from current levels
  • The ironic 'Anti Pump' branding could attract speculative interest in a meme-driven market
  • Token is listed on PumpSwap with an active trading pair
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely inappropriate for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with micro-cap meme token dynamics on Solana. Position sizes should be considered as lottery tickets only.

ANTIPUMP is a classic pump-and-dump micro-cap meme token on Solana with no verified utility, unknown authority status, and a market cap of ~$5K. The token pumped ~2.5x on launch day (May 16) and has since collapsed ~67%. The investment case is purely speculative and sentiment-driven, with overwhelming evidence of active distribution by early holders.

Bull case (low)

Viral meme revival: The ironic 'Anti Pump' branding catches fire on social media (Crypto Twitter/X), attracting a new wave of retail buyers who push the token back toward its launch-day highs (~$0.0000131). A coordinated community effort or influencer promotion could temporarily restore momentum.

  • Viral social media campaign exploiting the ironic branding
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • New whale accumulation at current depressed prices
  • Influencer or KOL promotion on X/Twitter

Base case

Slow bleed to near-zero: The token stabilizes at a very low price ($0.000002–$0.000004) with minimal trading activity, effectively becoming a zombie token. A small number of holders remain, trading volume drops to near zero, and the token is forgotten within 1–2 weeks.

  • No new major catalyst emerges
  • Remaining holders slowly exit over days/weeks
  • Liquidity remains thin but is not fully withdrawn
  • No secondary exchange listings or influencer attention

Bear case (high)

Complete collapse: Remaining holders continue to exit, liquidity is withdrawn from the PumpSwap pool, and the token becomes effectively illiquid. Price approaches zero as the last buyers find no exit liquidity. This is the most likely outcome given current data.

  • Continued 87.9% sell pressure with no buyer support
  • LP withdrawal by the pool provider (55.58% of supply)
  • Holder count declining 37% in 24h with no reversal signal
  • No utility, no verified contract, no community infrastructure
  • Token's history of 25+ days of dormancy suggests no organic community

GeneratedMay 17, 08:48 PM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-05-17T20:00:00 UTC. Most recent candle is the 20:00 UTC hour with $5.22 volume.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint: 3hRBXuscbbfmpuLwjvCbDZBSRSqg7JiGD2xS4Ra4pump)
  • PumpSwap DEX pair data (pair: 8SyQr99qQuMVGzHvfvCoeYdSAKnTK3LkW1Gn31XV9X1z)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (24 candles, May 16–17 2026)
  • Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets, price changes)
  • Top 20 holder distribution data
  • 30-day daily historical holder series
  • Sniper analysis (first 1000 blocks, 20 snipers)
  • Moralis token API data

Limitations

  • Sniper token amounts sniped and current balances are unknown, limiting precise sniper concentration calculation
  • Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed due to 'unknown' update authority in metadata
  • No social sentiment data, Discord/Telegram activity, or developer background information available
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($5,115.99) and analytics ($7,300) suggests rapidly moving price during data collection
  • Historical holder data only goes back 30 days with daily granularity — intra-day movements not captured
  • No order book depth data available — slippage estimates are approximations based on AMM liquidity
  • Token is extremely new (effectively launched May 16, 2026) — limited historical data for pattern analysis

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Investing in micro-cap meme tokens carries extreme risk of total loss. The analyst has no position in ANTIPUMP. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,880,393.10

Key Risks

Catastrophic liquidity: $6,870 total — any meaningful sell creates extreme slippage
87.9% sell pressure with 249 sellers vs 36 buyers — market is in active distribution
Top 10 holders (excl. LP) control ~22% of supply and could dump at any time
Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential rug vector

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

20 snipers were active in the first 1000 blocks. Of the 20 with known realized PnL data, the outcomes are mixed: 4 snipers show negative realized PnL (EhWgjXd: -44.4%, HpBQZop: -50.3%, B9ghHCM: -5.9%, 6RPA4wrs: -4.2%) while the majority are in profit (DrnuP46q: +117.9%, DQmMnaki: +103.0%, F7RV6aB: +54.0%, 2QALaBb: +50.5%, ER6KS5K: +48.7%, 3jKWQkD: +46.9%, A9ot6iH: +40.5%, FTHPU9H: +39.4%, 3SkBCx4: +33.4%, 912iwi9: +32.5%, DCvkbVt: +26.5%, HYd4z1Z: +18.7%, 3XsB5ha: +16.8%, CodMUWb: +15.9%, Eh2odq3: +6.5%). Most snipers appear to have fully exited (balance: $0 or unknown with sold amounts recorded), suggesting the smart money has largely left the token.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration2.50%
PnL stateMixed
Sell-through rateHigh
Profit-taking risk
high

20 snipers identified in first 1000 blocks; exact token balances unknown, but most show $0 or unknown current balance, indicating high sell-through. Estimated <3% of supply remains with snipers.

Early buyers (snipers) who remain profitable have mostly exited, as evidenced by $0 or unknown balances. The two largest loss-makers (EhWgjXd: -44.4% on $565 sold; HpBQZop: -50.3% on $468 sold) represent the largest dollar-value sniper losses, suggesting some early buyers were caught in the dump. Overall sniper sentiment is cautious-to-negative.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Anti Pump (ANTIPUMP)?

Price has collapsed ~67% in 24 hours from a peak near $0.0000131 to current $0.00000512. With 87.9% sell pressure, 249 sellers vs 36 buyers, and holders declining 37% in 24h, the path of least resistance remains sharply downward. Thin liquidity ($6.87K total) means even small sell orders cause significant slippage. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.0000030 to $0.0000065.

Is ANTIPUMP a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely inappropriate for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with micro-cap meme token dynamics on Solana. Position sizes should be considered as lottery tickets only.

How are ANTIPUMP holders trending?

Anti Pump currently has 121 holders and is declining (24h: -37, 7d: 98, 30d: 98). The historical holder data reveals an extremely erratic pattern inconsistent with organic growth. The token had exactly 2 holders from April 17 through May 11 — a 25-day period of complete inactivity. A brief spike to 35 holders on May 12 was followed by a collapse back to 2 on May 13, suggesting a test run or failed launch attempt. The successful launch occurred on May 16, bringing 142 holders (+125 net, +88% in one day). However, the 24-hour holder decline of 37% (losing 45 holders) alongside the 67% price drop confirms this is a classic pump-and-dump exit pattern. Growth is not accelerating — it is sharply reversing. The 7d and 30d figures of +98% are misleading as they reflect the single-day pump event rather than sustained organic growth.

What does sniper activity look like for ANTIPUMP?

Snipers hold roughly 2.50% of supply with PnL state "mixed" and sell-through rate "high". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding ANTIPUMP?

Catastrophic liquidity: $6,870 total — any meaningful sell creates extreme slippage • 87.9% sell pressure with 249 sellers vs 36 buyers — market is in active distribution • Top 10 holders (excl. LP) control ~22% of supply and could dump at any time

Track ANTIPUMP