WIFPAPER

catwifpaper Price Prediction 2026

WIFPAPER
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 27, 2026

3GFJDwLeTyMgHVSAZ5MnNo1uwWi6919Jxkfhm3ggpump

$0.051791

+3.11%

FDV $1,790

LiveContract:3GFJDwLeTyMgHVSAZ5MnNo1uwWi6919Jxkfhm3ggpumpChain:SolanaHolders:146Market cap:$1,790

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about WIFPAPER

Report snapshotas of May 27, 09:17 PM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$0

Holders

1,253

Snipers

47

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

WIFPAPER (catwifpaper) is an extremely new Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap (mint: 3GFJDwLeTyMgHVSAZ5MnNo1uwWi6919Jxkfhm3ggpump). The token has experienced a violent 177% price spike within 24 hours, driven almost entirely by a single explosive trading session. The token exhibits severe data anomalies — reported total supply of 1 with holder percentages in the quadrillions — indicating the on-chain decimals (0) combined with raw balance reporting are producing nonsensical percentage figures. Liquidity is reported at $0.00, the contract is unverified, update authority is unknown, and the token is mutable. Holder growth of +1,243 occurred entirely within the last 24 hours from a base of just 10 wallets, signaling a brand-new launch. This is an extremely high-risk, speculative micro-cap meme token.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive 177% 24h price surge from near-zero base
Token launched within the last 24 hours — went from 10 to 1,253 holders in a single day
Traded on PumpSwap with $0 reported liquidity depth despite $1M+ 24h volume — extreme slippage risk
20 snipers active in first 1,000 blocks, majority in significant profit (most realized PnL >89%)
Mutable contract with unknown update authority — elevated rug risk
Supply/percentage data is corrupted due to decimals=0 and raw balance reporting; all holder % figures are nonsensical

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The most recent hourly candle (21:00 UTC) shows a dramatic reversal: price opened at $0.000142, spiked to a high of $0.000249, then collapsed to close at $0.0000282 — an ~80% intra-candle crash. The prior candle (20:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000282, ran to $0.000204, and closed at $0.000136. The current reported price of $0.000214 sits well above the recent close of $0.0000282, suggesting either a recovery bounce or data lag. With 51.8% sell pressure, more sellers than buyers (4,857 sells vs 3,844 buys), and snipers largely in profit and selling, short-term downside pressure is dominant.

Target low$0.0000282
Target high$0.000249
Support: $0.0000282 (recent candle low / launch-area support), $0.000128 (hourly candle [1] low)
Resistance: $0.000214 (current price / recent recovery level), $0.000249 (hourly all-time high from candle [1])

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

Without verified liquidity, a mutable contract, unknown update authority, and the majority of snipers having already realized 89–210% profits, the medium-term outlook is bearish. Most new meme tokens launched on PumpSwap with this profile see rapid holder attrition after the initial pump. Sustained price appreciation would require new organic demand catalysts that are not currently evident.

Catalysts
  • Viral social media traction (Twitter presence noted but no description/utility)
  • Listing on aggregators or CEX (very unlikely at this stage)
  • Sniper sell-through completion allowing price stabilization
  • Community-driven meme momentum sustaining buy pressure

Bullish factors

  • 177% 24h price appreciation demonstrates strong initial demand
  • 3,133 unique wallets traded in 24h — broad initial interest
  • 2,636 unique buyers vs 2,116 unique sellers — more unique buyers
  • $514K buy volume in 24h for a brand-new micro-cap
  • Some snipers still holding (e.g., sniper [3] holds $42, sniper [6] holds $103, sniper [7] holds $101, sniper [8] holds $99)

Bearish factors

  • $0 reported liquidity — extreme slippage and exit risk
  • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — rug pull risk
  • Unverified contract, no description, no utility
  • 51.8% sell pressure with more sell transactions (4,857) than buys (3,844)
  • Most snipers in heavy profit (89–210% realized PnL) and actively selling
  • Intra-candle crash of ~80% in the most recent hourly candle
  • Token went from 10 to 1,253 holders in <24h — classic pump pattern
  • Supply data anomalies suggest possible token structure irregularities
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) corrupted supply/percentage data making concentration analysis unreliable, (2) $0 reported liquidity despite active trading — data inconsistency, (3) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust TA, (4) extreme volatility with 80%+ intra-candle swings, and (5) the token is less than 24 hours old with no track record.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, severely limiting technical analysis. Candle [2] (20:00 UTC): O=$0.0000282, H=$0.000204, L=$0.0000282, C=$0.000136, V=777,981 — a strong bullish candle with a long upper wick, closing in the upper half of the range. Candle [1] (21:00 UTC): O=$0.000142, H=$0.000249, L=$0.0001286, C=$0.0000282, V=278,745 — a severe bearish reversal candle (bearish engulfing/shooting star hybrid) that opened near the prior close, spiked to a new high of $0.000249, then crashed ~80% to close at $0.0000282. Volume declined from 777K to 278K, suggesting the pump exhausted buying interest. The current price of $0.000214 is significantly above the last close of $0.0000282, indicating either a subsequent recovery candle not yet reflected or data latency.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 48%Sell 52%

Short-term trend is bearish following the violent reversal candle. The medium-term is indeterminate given only 2 candles of history — classified as sideways pending more data. The token is in price discovery mode with no established trend structure.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000282 (recent candle close and low — launch-area floor)
Major$0.0000282 (only confirmed support level given 2-candle history)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000214 (current price level / recovery zone)
Major$0.000249 (all-time high from candle [1] high)

With only 2 hourly candles, key levels are derived from the available OHLC extremes. The $0.0000282 level has been tested twice (candle [2] open/low and candle [1] close) making it the primary support. The $0.000249 high is the only confirmed resistance. The $0.000128–$0.000142 zone (candle [1] low and open) represents an intermediate support/resistance zone.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish engulfing on candle [1] — strong reversal signal after spike to $0.000249
  • Double-bottom test at $0.0000282 (candle [2] open = candle [1] close)
  • Volume climax on candle [2] followed by volume contraction on candle [1] — exhaustion pattern
  • Current price ($0.000214) significantly above last candle close ($0.0000282) — possible data lag or rapid recovery bounce not captured in available candles

Total holders1,253
24h Δ+1243
7d Δ+1243
30d Δ+1243
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The entire holder base growth of +1,243 wallets occurred within the last 24 hours, coinciding precisely with the 177% price pump. For the prior 30 days (April 27 – May 26), the holder count was flat at exactly 10 wallets with zero net change daily. This is a textbook pump-driven holder acquisition pattern — price spike attracts new buyers, not organic community growth.

Holder growth is technically 'accelerating' in that it went from 0 new holders/day for 30 days to +1,243 in a single day. However, this is not organic growth — it is entirely pump-driven. The base of 10 holders for 30 days suggests the token was dormant or pre-launch for an extended period before the pump event. Acquisition method is almost entirely via swap (1,246 of 1,253 holders), confirming speculative trading rather than community distribution. The distribution data (whales=0, sharks=0, dolphins=0, fish=0, octopus=0) and the corrupted supply concentration percentages (top10 showing quadrillion-percent figures) indicate a data anomaly likely caused by the decimals=0 setting and raw balance values being misinterpreted as percentages.

Top 10 hold85.00%
Top 100 hold95.00%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

ChwHDW87uMAydyzL3LL6uzB9rF8ve9gHzpGTCxJ9pjXL

DEX liquidity pool (PumpSwap pair address — matches the trading pair address listed in price data)

35.00%

8XvmKRQ69En5U5UTXkuoL9jQ2zwmdppPARM3qM8b7YYT

Individual whale / early holder

8.00%

518D71oCd5CBPbQ5NSbWLz9zQy79NfwpyTxPuwuQ113B

Individual whale / early holder

7.00%

3jH8eZWAafDpb13ERmXYd2gFMEXnWpNNvf4Wmb2UDRus

Individual whale / early holder

6.00%

857Byufy6WRFwmDiraqS1FNB2HyoERfQ9EsoGkm4d7we

Individual whale / early holder

6.00%

NOTE: The raw percentage figures in the holder data are completely corrupted (e.g., '9595586537796100%' for holder #1), almost certainly due to the token having decimals=0 and the API computing percentages against a formatted total supply of 1 rather than the raw supply. Estimated concentrations above are approximations based on relative balance sizes. Holder #1 (ChwHDW87uMAydyzL3LL6uzB9rF8ve9gHzpGTCxJ9pjXL) matches the PumpSwap pair address exactly, classifying it as the DEX liquidity pool. The remaining top holders appear to be individual wallets (early buyers/team). The top 10 non-LP holders collectively hold an estimated ~65% of circulating supply, indicating extreme concentration. Whale sentiment is distributing given the active sniper sell-through and declining volume.

Liquidity$0.00 (as reported — likely a data error given $1M+ 24h volume)
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$514,150
Sell$552,150
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers2,636
Unique sellers2,116

The reported total liquidity of $0.00 is almost certainly a data anomaly — a token cannot sustain $1,066,300 in 24h combined volume with zero liquidity. However, even accounting for this, the PumpSwap pool for this token is likely very shallow given its micro-cap status and brand-new launch. Slippage risk is rated HIGH. Net flow is negative (outflow) with $552K sell volume exceeding $514K buy volume. Notably, there are more unique buyers (2,636) than sellers (2,116), but sellers are transacting in larger average sizes ($261 avg sell vs $195 avg buy), indicating larger holders are distributing to smaller retail buyers. The 24h price change fields for 1h, 6h, and 24h all show 0% which conflicts with the 177% 24h change — this is likely a data reporting artifact. The 5-minute change of +34.35% confirms active price movement.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (formatted) — NOTE: This is almost certainly incorrect due to decimals=0 misreporting. Raw balances in holder data show values in the tens of trillions, suggesting actual raw supply is in the hundreds of trillions range.
FDV$0.00 (reported — data anomaly due to supply misreporting)

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The tokenomics data is severely compromised by what appears to be a decimals=0 reporting error. The formatted total supply of '1' is nonsensical given holder balances in the tens of trillions. The FDV of $0.00 is similarly corrupted. Update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the contract is mutable — this means the token metadata can be changed by whoever holds the update authority, representing a significant rug risk vector. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown, adding further uncertainty. The token is unverified and has no description. The combination of mutable contract + unknown authority + unverified status places this in the highest risk category for authority-related rug pulls. The token was created on PumpFun/PumpSwap (address ends in 'pump'), which provides some baseline launch infrastructure but no security guarantees.

Volatility
high

177% 24h price gain followed by an ~80% intra-candle crash demonstrates extreme volatility. The token is less than 24 hours old with only 2 hourly candles of price history. 5-minute price change of +34.35% confirms ongoing violent price swings.

Liquidity
high

Reported liquidity is $0.00 despite $1M+ 24h volume — a data anomaly that nonetheless signals extremely shallow liquidity depth. Any meaningful sell order will face severe slippage. Exit risk is very high for holders with positions above a few hundred dollars.

Concentration
high

Top holder is the DEX LP pool. Among non-LP holders, the top 4-5 wallets hold an estimated 25-30% of supply. The token went from 10 to 1,253 holders in 24h, meaning the original 10 holders (likely team/insiders) hold a disproportionate share. Supply percentage data is corrupted but relative balances confirm extreme concentration.

SniperDump
high

20 snipers active in first 1,000 blocks. 18 of 20 show positive realized PnL (43% to 210%). Active selling confirmed with $4,956+ in known sniper sell proceeds. Snipers [6], [7], [8] still hold $99-$103 each, representing ongoing sell pressure. Classic sniper dump pattern in progress.

Authority
high

Update authority is 'unknown', contract is mutable, mint and freeze authority status are unknown. Unverified contract. No description or utility. The token can have its metadata changed at any time. This represents maximum authority risk — the deployer could modify the token or execute a rug pull.

Key risks

  • Unknown update authority on a mutable contract — rug pull risk
  • Reported $0 liquidity — extreme exit/slippage risk
  • 20 snipers mostly in profit and actively selling into retail buyers
  • Token is <24 hours old with no established community, utility, or track record
  • Extreme price volatility — 80% intra-candle crash already observed
  • Supply data anomalies suggest possible token structure issues
  • No description, no verified contract, no utility — pure speculative meme
  • Original 10 holders (pre-pump) likely hold large concentrated positions

Mitigating factors

  • Launched on PumpSwap which provides some baseline infrastructure
  • 3,133 unique wallets traded — broad initial interest
  • Twitter social presence exists
  • More unique buyers (2,636) than sellers (2,116) in 24h
  • Some snipers still holding, suggesting not a complete immediate dump
  • 177% price appreciation shows genuine market demand at launch
Suitable for: Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This token exhibits nearly every red flag associated with high-risk meme token launches: unknown authority, mutable contract, sniper concentration, zero reported liquidity, extreme volatility, and no utility. Not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely.

WIFPAPER is a brand-new, zero-utility meme token on Solana's PumpSwap that experienced a violent 177% pump within its first 24 hours of trading. The investment case is purely speculative momentum — there is no fundamental value, no utility, no verified contract, and no established community. The token displays classic pump-and-dump characteristics: dormant for 30 days with 10 holders, sudden explosive launch, sniper activity with high realized profits, and sell pressure exceeding buy pressure. Any investment is a pure gamble on continued momentum.

Bull case (low)

Viral meme momentum drives continued buying pressure. The 'catwifpaper' meme resonates with the Solana meme coin community, Twitter engagement drives new buyers, and the token achieves a sustained market cap above $1M. Early holders who bought near $0.0000282 see 5-10x returns.

  • Viral Twitter/social media traction
  • Broader Solana meme season momentum
  • Influencer promotion or community coordination
  • Sustained buy pressure from new retail entrants
  • Snipers holding remaining positions rather than dumping

Base case

The token experiences continued high volatility with multiple pump-and-dump cycles over 24-72 hours before volume and interest fade. Price stabilizes somewhere between $0.00003 and $0.00015, with most retail buyers who entered during the pump holding losses of 30-70%. The token eventually becomes dormant again.

  • Snipers gradually complete distribution over 24-48 hours
  • Some retail momentum buying continues but insufficient to sustain ATH
  • No rug pull but also no new catalysts
  • Liquidity remains thin, amplifying both up and down moves
  • Token follows typical PumpSwap meme token lifecycle

Bear case (high)

Snipers complete their distribution, original 10 pre-pump holders sell, liquidity evaporates, and the token returns to near-zero. The majority of the 1,243 new holders who bought during the pump face 80-100% losses. The mutable contract is exploited for a rug pull.

  • Sniper sell-through completion (18/20 already in profit)
  • Unknown update authority executes metadata change or rug
  • Zero liquidity depth makes price collapse self-reinforcing
  • No utility or community to sustain demand
  • Broader meme token fatigue on Solana

GeneratedMay 27, 09:17 PM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of 2026-05-27T21:00 UTC. OHLC data covers 2 hourly candles (20:00–21:00 UTC). Holder history covers April 27 – May 26, 2026 (daily). Sniper data covers first 1,000 blocks post-launch.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain metadata (mint: 3GFJDwLeTyMgHVSAZ5MnNo1uwWi6919Jxkfhm3ggpump)
  • PumpSwap DEX pair data (ChwHDW87uMAydyzL3LL6uzB9rF8ve9gHzpGTCxJ9pjXL)
  • Moralis token analytics API
  • On-chain holder distribution data
  • OHLC price candles (hourly)
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)
  • Historical holder time series (30 days daily)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Total supply reported as '1' due to decimals=0 API error — all holder percentage figures are corrupted and unreliable
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 despite active trading — likely a data error
  • Sniper entry prices and total sniped USD amounts are unknown — PnL percentages cannot be independently verified
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority statuses are all unknown — cannot confirm renouncement
  • Price change fields for 1h/6h/24h all show 0% conflicting with 177% 24h change — data inconsistency
  • Token is <24 hours old — all analysis is based on extremely limited historical data
  • FDV reported as $0.00 — cannot compute meaningful valuation metrics

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The data anomalies identified in this report (corrupted supply percentages, zero liquidity, conflicting price change data) significantly reduce analytical confidence. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (formatted) — NOTE: This is almost certainly incorrect due to decimals=0 misreporting. Raw balances in holder data show values in the tens of trillions, suggesting actual raw supply is in the hundreds of trillions range.

Key Risks

Unknown update authority on a mutable contract — rug pull risk
Reported $0 liquidity — extreme exit/slippage risk
20 snipers mostly in profit and actively selling into retail buyers
Token is <24 hours old with no established community, utility, or track record

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

medium confidence
High risk

All 20 snipers entered in the first 1,000 blocks. Of the 20 snipers with known PnL data, 18 show positive realized PnL ranging from 43.4% to 210.5%. Only 2 snipers show negative PnL (sniper [14]: -8.5%, sniper [17]: -2.6%). The majority have already sold significant portions of their positions, with total known sell proceeds across all snipers exceeding $4,956. Three snipers still hold meaningful balances ($42, $103, $101, $99 — snipers 3, 6, 7, 8), representing ongoing sell pressure. The high sell-through rate combined with mostly-profitable exits is a classic early dump pattern.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration2.50%
PnL stateMostly In Profit
Sell-through rateHigh
Profit-taking risk
high

18 of 20 snipers have sold at least some position; top sellers include sniper [20] ($952 sold, 178% PnL), sniper [16] ($842 sold, 178.5% PnL), sniper [1] ($816 sold, 89.3% PnL), sniper [19] ($620 sold, 96.9% PnL), sniper [18] ($498 sold, 94.8% PnL)

Early buyers (snipers) are overwhelmingly in profit and actively distributing. The high realized PnL percentages (median ~150%+) indicate snipers entered at very low prices and have been systematically selling into the pump. This is bearish for retail buyers who entered later at higher prices.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for catwifpaper (WIFPAPER)?

The most recent hourly candle (21:00 UTC) shows a dramatic reversal: price opened at $0.000142, spiked to a high of $0.000249, then collapsed to close at $0.0000282 — an ~80% intra-candle crash. The prior candle (20:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000282, ran to $0.000204, and closed at $0.000136. The current reported price of $0.000214 sits well above the recent close of $0.0000282, suggesting either a recovery bounce or data lag. With 51.8% sell pressure, more sellers than buyers (4,857 sells vs 3,844 buys), and snipers largely in profit and selling, short-term downside pressure is dominant. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.0000282 to $0.000249.

Is WIFPAPER a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This token exhibits nearly every red flag associated with high-risk meme token launches: unknown authority, mutable contract, sniper concentration, zero reported liquidity, extreme volatility, and no utility. Not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely.

How are WIFPAPER holders trending?

catwifpaper currently has 1,253 holders and is growing (24h: 1243, 7d: 1243, 30d: 1243). Holder growth is technically 'accelerating' in that it went from 0 new holders/day for 30 days to +1,243 in a single day. However, this is not organic growth — it is entirely pump-driven. The base of 10 holders for 30 days suggests the token was dormant or pre-launch for an extended period before the pump event. Acquisition method is almost entirely via swap (1,246 of 1,253 holders), confirming speculative trading rather than community distribution. The distribution data (whales=0, sharks=0, dolphins=0, fish=0, octopus=0) and the corrupted supply concentration percentages (top10 showing quadrillion-percent figures) indicate a data anomaly likely caused by the decimals=0 setting and raw balance values being misinterpreted as percentages.

What does sniper activity look like for WIFPAPER?

Snipers hold roughly 2.50% of supply with PnL state "mostly_in_profit" and sell-through rate "high". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding WIFPAPER?

Unknown update authority on a mutable contract — rug pull risk • Reported $0 liquidity — extreme exit/slippage risk • 20 snipers mostly in profit and actively selling into retail buyers

Track WIFPAPER