FERRIS

Ferris Price Today & AI Analysis

FERRISSolanaAnalysis as of May 26, 2026

Price

$0.052427

FDV $2,427

Contract

Live
2nTRq9Df7CSocXM6dknx8yrmdCzQke62u7JftWrepump

Chain

Holders

72

Market cap

$2,427

More tokens on Solana

Ferris: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-26 19:20 UTC

Holder addresses

330

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

Not available
How concentrated is Ferris ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 330 addresses (2026-05-26 19:20 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Ferris?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Ferris liquidity falling?
Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-26 19:20 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Ask Unhosted AI about FERRIS

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of May 26, 07:20 PM UTC

FDV

$0

Liquidity

Not available

Holders

330

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

FERRIS (ticker: FERRIS) is an extremely new Solana meme/concept token themed around Ferris the Crab, the mascot of the Rust programming language. The token launched within the last 24 hours (all 330 holders acquired within the past hour per holder metrics), trades on PumpSwap at ~$0.00032, and shows a 49.3% 24h price gain. However, the token exhibits severe red flags: 97.5% sell pressure by volume, $0 reported liquidity, highly anomalous supply concentration data, and a fully diluted valuation of $0.00 per the API — suggesting either a very low-cap micro-token or data reporting issues. The token is unverified, mutable, and authority status is unknown.

Key points

  • Themed around Ferris the Crab (Rust programming language mascot), giving it a niche developer/tech narrative on Solana
  • Launched within the last 24 hours — all 330 holders are brand new, making this an ultra-early-stage token
  • Extreme sell pressure: 97.5% of 24h volume ($226.45K) is sells vs. only $5.70K buys
  • Supply concentration data is anomalous (percentages far exceed 100%), indicating possible decimal/formatting issues in the raw data
  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority introduces rug risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

Despite a 49.3% 24h gain and a recent 5m pump of +7.0%, the overwhelming sell pressure (97.5% of volume, 747 sells vs. 95 buys, 325 sellers vs. 48 buyers) strongly suggests the price spike is being distributed into. The most recent hourly candle (19:00 UTC) shows a lower close ($0.000305) than the prior candle's high ($0.000364), indicating fading momentum. Short-term direction is bearish with high probability of retracement.

Target low

$0.000154

Target high

$0.000364

Support

$0.000281 (candle [1] open / prior support), $0.000157 (candle [2] open), $0.000155 (candle [2] low — major near-term floor)

Resistance

$0.000335 (candle [1] high), $0.000364 (candle [2] high — key resistance / recent peak)

Medium term · 1–7 days

bearish

With $0 reported liquidity, no established holder base prior to today, mutable metadata, unknown authority, and a sell-dominated order flow, the medium-term outlook is bearish. Sustained price appreciation would require a significant narrative catalyst (e.g., viral Rust/Solana developer community adoption) and meaningful buy-side liquidity entering the market.

Catalysts

  • Viral adoption by Rust/Solana developer community
  • Listing on a higher-profile DEX aggregator or CEX
  • Influencer promotion driving retail buy pressure
  • Liquidity pool deepening reducing slippage risk

Bullish factors

  • 49.3% 24h price appreciation showing initial demand
  • Niche narrative (Rust mascot on Solana's native language) with potential developer community appeal
  • Recent 5m price gain of +7.0% suggests short-term momentum
  • 20 snipers active in first 1,000 blocks indicating early speculative interest
  • Social presence across Telegram, Twitter, and website

Bearish factors

  • 97.5% sell pressure by volume ($226.45K sells vs. $5.70K buys)
  • 747 sell transactions vs. only 95 buy transactions in 24h
  • 325 sellers vs. 48 buyers — heavily skewed distribution
  • $0.00 reported total liquidity and FDV — extreme illiquidity risk
  • All 330 holders acquired within the last hour — zero long-term holder base
  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority
  • Unverified contract
  • Sniper PnL is mixed-to-negative for most participants, suggesting early buyers are exiting

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust TA; (2) anomalous supply/FDV data ($0.00 FDV, >100% concentration percentages) suggesting data quality issues; (3) the token is less than 24 hours old with no historical price baseline; (4) $0 reported liquidity makes price discovery unreliable.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
2nTRq9...pump
Total Supply
1 (formatted) — NOTE: Raw balances in holder data suggest the actual on-chain supply is in the hundreds of trillions, with a decimal of 0. The formatted supply of '1' likely reflects a display/API normalization issue.

Key Risks

  • $0.00 reported liquidity — extreme illiquidity and slippage risk
  • 97.5% sell pressure — token is being heavily distributed, not accumulated
  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug risk vector
  • All holders acquired within last hour — zero established community or long-term holders

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available (18:00 and 19:00 UTC on 2026-05-26). Candle [2] (18:00): O=$0.000157, H=$0.000364, L=$0.000155, C=$0.000287 — a large bullish candle with a very wide range (~135% from low to high), closing in the upper half. This is a strong launch/pump candle with high volume ($138,836). Candle [1] (19:00): O=$0.000281, H=$0.000336, L=$0.000281, C=$0.000305 — a smaller bullish candle opening near the prior close, with a narrower range and lower volume ($91,200). The open of candle [1] equals its low, suggesting buying on open but fading into close. Volume is declining from candle [2] to candle [1], indicating weakening momentum.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

The 2-candle history shows an initial strong upward move followed by a lower-high and lower-volume continuation. The short-term trend is technically up from the launch low of $0.000155, but the medium-term is effectively sideways/unknown given the token's age of less than 2 hours of price history.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

3%

Sell

98%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000281 (candle [1] open = candle [1] low)

Major support

$0.000155 (candle [2] absolute low — launch floor)

Immediate resistance

$0.000335 (candle [1] high)

Major resistance

$0.000364 (candle [2] high — all-time high)

The all-time high of $0.000364 (candle [2] high) is the key resistance. Immediate support sits at $0.000281 where candle [1] opened. A break below $0.000281 opens the path to the launch low of $0.000155. Given the sell-heavy order flow, the probability of testing lower supports is elevated.

Notable patterns

  • Declining volume on price rise (bearish divergence)
  • Candle [1] open equals candle [1] low — buyers stepped in at open but failed to sustain momentum
  • Wide-range launch candle (candle [2]) followed by narrowing range (candle [1]) — classic pump-and-distribution pattern
  • Lower high in candle [1] ($0.000336) vs candle [2] ($0.000364) — early sign of topping

Liquidity

Liquidity

Not available

Depth

Not assessed

Slippage risk

Not assessed

Liquidity depth and slippage risk cannot be assessed without a liquidity observation.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1 (formatted) — NOTE: Raw balances in holder data suggest the actual on-chain supply is in the hundreds of trillions, with a decimal of 0. The formatted supply of '1' likely reflects a display/API normalization issue.

FDV

$0.00 (as reported — likely reflects the micro-cap nature or a data issue given the price of $0.00032)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    The token surged ~107% from its launch low to high within 2 hours, then showed declining momentum. With only 2 candles of price history and a 49.3% 24h gain, volatility is extreme. The wide candle ranges (candle [2]: $0.000155–$0.000364) confirm high intraday volatility.

  • LiquidityNot assessed

    A liquidity observation is not available in the saved inputs.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • $0.00 reported liquidity — extreme illiquidity and slippage risk
  • 97.5% sell pressure — token is being heavily distributed, not accumulated
  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug risk vector
  • All holders acquired within last hour — zero established community or long-term holders
  • Unverified contract on PumpFun — no independent audit
  • Anomalous supply/FDV data suggesting possible data quality issues that obscure true tokenomics
  • Very concentrated holder distribution — top LP + 9 whales control near 100% of supply
  • No historical price data — impossible to assess longer-term support levels

Mitigating factors

  • PumpFun launch typically burns mint authority at bonding curve completion — if confirmed, reduces inflation risk
  • Social presence (Telegram, Twitter, website) suggests some level of project organization
  • Niche narrative (Rust mascot) could attract genuine developer community interest
  • 20 snipers already largely exited — reduces future sniper dump overhang
  • The 49.3% 24h gain shows there is some genuine demand, however thin

Suitable for

Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand they may lose 100% of their investment. This token is appropriate only as a very small position within a diversified high-risk portfolio. Not suitable for retail investors, long-term investors, or anyone who cannot afford to lose their entire investment. This is NOT financial advice.

FERRIS is an ultra-early-stage PumpFun meme token themed around Ferris the Crab, the Rust programming language mascot. The investment thesis hinges entirely on whether the niche developer/tech narrative can attract a genuine community and sustained buy pressure. Currently, the data overwhelmingly shows distribution: 97.5% sell volume, 325 sellers vs. 48 buyers, and $0 reported liquidity. The token is less than 24 hours old with no established holder base. The risk/reward is extremely asymmetric to the downside based on current on-chain data.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The Rust/Solana developer narrative goes viral within the crypto-tech community. Influencers or prominent Solana ecosystem figures promote FERRIS, driving a wave of retail and developer-community buyers. Liquidity deepens, the holder base grows organically, and the token establishes itself as the 'official' Rust/Solana meme — similar to how other ecosystem mascot tokens have performed.

  • Viral adoption by Rust/Solana developer Twitter community
  • Influencer or KOL promotion driving retail FOMO
  • Deepening liquidity pool enabling larger position sizes
  • Sustained buy pressure overcoming current sell dominance
  • Listing on DEX aggregators increasing discoverability

Base Case

The token stabilizes in the $0.000155–$0.000335 range with low trading volume as initial excitement fades. A small community forms around the Rust mascot narrative, providing a floor, but without a major catalyst the token trades sideways-to-down over the next 1–2 weeks before either fading into obscurity or finding a new catalyst.

  • Sell pressure moderates as early sellers exhaust their positions
  • A small but genuine developer/meme community forms around the Rust narrative
  • Liquidity remains thin but sufficient for small trades
  • No rug pull or adverse authority action occurs
  • No major new catalyst (positive or negative) emerges in the near term

Bear Case

High probability

The initial pump was entirely sniper/bot-driven and is now being distributed. With no liquidity, no established community, and overwhelming sell pressure, the price retraces to near-launch lows ($0.000155 or below). The token becomes inactive within days as interest fades, following the typical PumpFun token lifecycle of pump-and-dump.

  • 97.5% sell pressure continues or accelerates
  • Remaining whale holders (positions 2–10) begin selling into thin liquidity
  • No new buyer catalysts emerge
  • Mutable metadata or authority actions erode confidence
  • Token fails to graduate from PumpFun bonding curve or loses DEX visibility

Analysis details

Generated

May 26, 07:20 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-26 19:20 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Moralis on-chain token metadata API
  • PumpSwap DEX trading analytics
  • Hourly OHLC price data (2 candles)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Top 20 holder distribution data
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers)
  • Trading volume and buyer/seller analytics

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Total supply formatted as '1' is inconsistent with raw holder balances in the hundreds of trillions — decimal/API normalization issue creates uncertainty in all supply-based calculations
  • FDV reported as $0.00 despite a live price — data quality issue
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — may be a data issue or reflect genuinely empty LP
  • Sniper total sniped USD and individual balances are largely 'unknown' — limits smart money analysis precision
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority statuses are unknown — cannot definitively assess rug risk
  • Token is less than 24 hours old — no historical price baseline, no established patterns, no community track record
  • Holder distribution percentages in raw data exceed 100% by many orders of magnitude — normalized estimates used instead
  • No order book depth data available — slippage estimates are qualitative

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data quality issues identified in this report (anomalous supply figures, $0 FDV/liquidity) mean conclusions should be treated with additional caution. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Ferris ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 330 addresses (2026-05-26 19:20 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Ferris?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Ferris liquidity falling?

Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Ferris (FERRIS)?

Despite a 49.3% 24h gain and a recent 5m pump of +7.0%, the overwhelming sell pressure (97.5% of volume, 747 sells vs. 95 buys, 325 sellers vs. 48 buyers) strongly suggests the price spike is being distributed into. The most recent hourly candle (19:00 UTC) shows a lower close ($0.000305) than the prior candle's high ($0.000364), indicating fading momentum. Short-term direction is bearish with high probability of retracement. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000154 to $0.000364.

Is FERRIS a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand they may lose 100% of their investment. This token is appropriate only as a very small position within a diversified high-risk portfolio. Not suitable for retail investors, long-term investors, or anyone who cannot afford to lose their entire investment. This is NOT financial advice.

What are the key risks of holding FERRIS?

$0.00 reported liquidity — extreme illiquidity and slippage risk • 97.5% sell pressure — token is being heavily distributed, not accumulated • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug risk vector

← Back to all predictions

Track FERRIS