How concentrated is POKESTR ownership?

The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 631 holder addresses (2026-06-01 11:17 UTC).

Are large holders selling POKESTR?

Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.

Is POKESTR liquidity falling?

Not measured: this report has no liquidity reading.

POKESTR Price Today & AI Analysis

POKESTRSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 1, 2026

$0.0₅2704

Contract

Live

2hqdBdkd5YqagpBcV7QBPiQvdU3V1y8C8dWsv4nQpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

288

Market cap

$2,697

At a $1M market cap, $POKESTR would be $0.001003 (371x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

POKESTR support and resistance today

From 1-hour candles

POKESTR trades at $0.000002704 as of Nov 8, 00:54 UTC, +0.0% in 24 hours. No trade has moved the price in 11 days, so there is no fresh support or resistance to mark.

Is POKESTR a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 5

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about POKESTR

3 free answers a day

POKESTR: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-01 11:17 UTC

Holder addresses

631

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

Not available

How concentrated is POKESTR ownership?: The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 631 holder addresses (2026-06-01 11:17 UTC).
Are large holders selling POKESTR?: Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.
Is POKESTR liquidity falling?: Not measured: this report has no liquidity reading.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-01 11:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 1, 11:17 AM UTC

FDV

Liquidity

Not available

Holders

631

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

POKESTR (mint: 2hqdBdkd5YqagpBcV7QBPiQvdU3V1y8C8dWsv4nQpump) is an extremely early-stage Solana meme/niche token themed around TCG (Trading Card Game) collectibles, launched on PumpSwap. The token has a total formatted supply of 1 (with very large raw balances suggesting a non-standard decimal/supply structure), $0 reported liquidity, and a current price of ~$0.0000996. It experienced a 212.7% 24h price surge but faces severe sell pressure (71.2% sell volume), near-zero liquidity, and a holder base that exploded from 14 to 631 in under 24 hours — all hallmarks of a high-risk, speculative micro-cap launch.

Key points

TCG/Pokémon grail collectibles narrative as a leveraged bet thesis
Explosive holder growth: from 14 to 631 holders (+98%) in under 24 hours
Launched on PumpSwap with 1,224 buys vs 3,078 sells in 24h — heavy sell dominance
Reported $0.00 total liquidity despite active trading — extreme slippage risk
Top 10 holders control 35.97% of supply; top 100 control 79.72%

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The 5-minute price change is already -10.4%, sell pressure dominates at 71.2% of volume, and there are 3,078 sells vs 1,224 buys in 24h. With $0 reported liquidity and heavy sniper activity, the path of least resistance is downward in the short term. The 212.7% 24h pump is likely being distributed by early buyers and snipers.

Target low

$0.000013

Target high

$0.000120

Support: $0.0000192 (candle [1] close / candle [2] open), $0.0000143 (candle [3] low), $0.0000136 (candle [2] low — absolute recent low)
Resistance: $0.0000329 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close / candle [3] open — repeated level), $0.0000359 (candle [3] high), $0.0000829 (candle [1] low — data anomaly, likely wick high)

Medium term · 7–30 days

neutral

Medium-term trajectory depends entirely on whether the TCG narrative gains traction and new buyers sustain demand. Given the token was dormant at 14 holders for 30 days before the sudden launch event, sustained momentum is uncertain. If the community grows and liquidity is added, stabilization is possible; otherwise, continued bleed is likely.

Catalysts

Viral TCG/Pokémon community adoption or influencer endorsement
Liquidity pool deepening on PumpSwap
Broader Solana meme coin market rally
Listing on aggregators or tracking platforms

Bullish factors

212.7% 24h price surge demonstrates strong initial demand
Holder count grew from 14 to 631 (+98%) in under 24 hours
TCG/collectibles narrative has proven viral potential in crypto
Some snipers showing significant profits (267.4%, 170.3%, 121.2%) indicating early price appreciation
1,321 unique wallets interacting in 24h shows broad initial interest

Bearish factors

71.2% sell pressure vs 28.8% buy pressure — sellers dominate heavily
3,078 sells vs 1,224 buys in 24h
$0.00 reported total liquidity — extreme slippage and exit risk
5-minute price already down -10.4% at time of analysis
Token was completely dormant (14 holders, zero activity) for 30 days prior to launch event
Unverified contract, mutable metadata, unknown update authority
Top 100 holders control 79.72% of supply — extreme concentration
Multiple snipers showing losses (-35.9%, -27.3%, -24.6%) suggesting price volatility is destructive

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: $0 reported liquidity making price discovery unreliable, only 3 OHLC candles available for technical analysis, OHLC data showing anomalous values (L > O in candle [1] suggesting data irregularity), and the token being less than 24 hours into active trading with highly volatile and thin markets.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 2hqdBd...pump
Total Supply: 1 (formatted) — raw balances suggest a non-standard supply structure; the formatted supply of '1' with decimals of 0 is anomalous given the large raw holder balances (e.g., 128,475,101,819,934 raw units for the top holder)

Key Risks

$0.00 reported liquidity — catastrophic slippage risk on any meaningful trade
Token dormant for 30 days with only 14 holders before sudden pump — classic coordinated launch pattern
71.2% sell pressure with sellers outnumbering buyers 2.39:1 by unique wallet count
Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential for unlimited token minting or account freezing

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available (09:00–11:00 UTC, June 1 2026). Note: Candle [1] (11:00) shows L ($0.0000829) > O ($0.0000328), which is anomalous and likely a data feed error — the low and high may be swapped. Treating candle [1] as having a high near $0.0000829 and a low near $0.0000192. Candle [2] (10:00) shows a bullish structure: O=$0.0000192, H=$0.0000328, L=$0.0000136, C=$0.0000328 — a strong bullish candle recovering from the low. Candle [3] (09:00) shows O=$0.0000328, H=$0.0000359, L=$0.0000143, C=$0.0000199 — a bearish candle with a long lower wick. Volume spiked dramatically in candle [2] at $164,950 vs $14,125 in candle [3] and $30,273 in candle [1], suggesting the 10:00 candle was the primary pump candle.

Trend

Short-term

Sideways

Medium-term

Uptrend

The 24h price is up 212.7% establishing a medium-term uptrend from the launch base, but the most recent 5-minute reading shows -10.4% and the hourly candles show choppy, volatile price action without a clear directional bias. Short-term trend is sideways-to-bearish as distribution appears to be occurring.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

29%

Sell

71%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000192 (candle [1] close / candle [2] open — tested multiple times)

Major support

$0.0000136 (candle [2] low — absolute recent bottom)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000329 (candle [1] open = candle [2] close = candle [3] open — key pivot level tested 3 times)

Major resistance

$0.0000359 (candle [3] high — recent swing high)

The $0.0000329 level is the most significant pivot, having acted as both support and resistance across all three candles. A sustained break above this level with volume would be bullish; failure to reclaim it confirms distribution. The $0.0000136–$0.0000143 zone represents the recent demand floor.

Notable patterns

Volume climax at 10:00 UTC candle ($164,950) followed by sharp volume decline — classic pump exhaustion signal
Repeated rejection/pivot at $0.0000329 across all three candles — key battleground level
Long lower wicks on candles [2] and [3] suggest buyers defending the $0.0000136–$0.0000143 zone
Bearish divergence: price near highs but volume declining sharply in candle [1]
Anomalous OHLC data in candle [1] (L > O) suggests data feed irregularity — treat with caution

Liquidity

Not available

Depth

Not assessed

Slippage risk

Not assessed

Liquidity depth and slippage risk cannot be assessed without a liquidity observation.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1 (formatted) — raw balances suggest a non-standard supply structure; the formatted supply of '1' with decimals of 0 is anomalous given the large raw holder balances (e.g., 128,475,101,819,934 raw units for the top holder)

FDV

$0.00 (as reported — likely a data artifact given the non-standard supply formatting)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
212.7% 24h price swing with -10.4% in the last 5 minutes. Only 3 hourly candles of price history available. Extreme price volatility typical of micro-cap pump-and-dump dynamics.
LiquidityNot assessed
A liquidity observation is not available in the saved inputs.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

$0.00 reported liquidity — catastrophic slippage risk on any meaningful trade
Token dormant for 30 days with only 14 holders before sudden pump — classic coordinated launch pattern
71.2% sell pressure with sellers outnumbering buyers 2.39:1 by unique wallet count
Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential for unlimited token minting or account freezing
Unverified, mutable contract with unknown update authority
Top 100 holders control 79.72% of supply — extreme concentration and dump risk
Sniper activity with profitable early buyers actively distributing
Anomalous tokenomics data (supply=1, FDV=$0) suggests data integrity issues
No verified team, no audit, no locked liquidity

Mitigating factors

TCG/collectibles narrative has demonstrated viral potential in crypto markets
1,321 unique wallets interacted in 24h showing broad initial interest
Some snipers showing losses suggests not all early buyers are coordinated insiders
Holder growth to 631 in 24h shows genuine market interest, however speculative
PumpSwap listing provides at least some trading infrastructure

Suitable for

Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Absolutely not suitable for retail investors, those with low risk tolerance, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This token exhibits nearly every hallmark of a high-risk micro-cap speculative launch with potential pump-and-dump characteristics.

POKESTR is a TCG-themed speculative token on Solana that experienced a violent launch pump (+212.7% in 24h) after 30 days of complete dormancy. The bull case rests entirely on narrative virality and community momentum; the bear case is supported by nearly every on-chain metric available. This is a high-conviction speculative trade only, not an investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The TCG/Pokémon grail narrative goes viral within crypto-native communities, driving sustained new buyer inflow that absorbs sell pressure. Liquidity deepens on PumpSwap, concentration decreases as tokens distribute to new holders, and the token establishes itself as the go-to TCG meme on Solana — potentially achieving 10–100x from current levels if the broader meme coin market is favorable.

Viral TCG/Pokémon community adoption on Twitter/X and crypto forums
Influencer or KOL endorsement driving FOMO buying waves
Sustained new holder acquisition beyond the initial pump cohort
Liquidity addition by team or community to reduce slippage
Broader Solana meme coin market bull cycle

Base Case

POKESTR experiences a typical micro-cap pump-and-fade cycle: price retraces 50–70% from the 24h high over the next 1–7 days as initial excitement fades, settling into a lower trading range. A small community of TCG enthusiasts maintains the token with low-volume trading. Long-term survival depends on whether the team (if any) continues development or marketing efforts.

Sell pressure gradually normalizes as weak hands exit
A core community of 100–200 holders remains engaged with the TCG narrative
Price stabilizes in the $0.000015–$0.000035 range (near recent support levels)
No rug pull or malicious authority action occurs
Liquidity remains thin but functional on PumpSwap

Bear Case

High probability

The pump exhausts within hours as snipers and early buyers complete distribution. Sell pressure overwhelms thin liquidity, price collapses 80–95% from peak. The 617 new holders who bought during the pump face severe losses. Token returns to near-dormancy with a small residual holder base.

$0 reported liquidity cannot support sustained price levels
71.2% sell pressure already dominant at time of analysis
Profitable snipers actively distributing ($1,547, $415, $267 already sold)
No verified team, utility, or locked liquidity to backstop price
Token was dormant for 30 days — no pre-existing community or organic demand

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 1, 11:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-01 11:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Solana on-chain token metadata (mint: 2hqdBdkd5YqagpBcV7QBPiQvdU3V1y8C8dWsv4nQpump)
PumpSwap DEX trading data (pair: tgr7d82gsJs5yWa5w9Cju2hrLAE478wgSZzZWiSsY3L)
Hourly OHLC candle data (3 candles, June 1 2026 09:00–11:00 UTC)
Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
Top 20 holder wallet data
Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers)
Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
Token price feed (USD and SOL-denominated)

Limitations

Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — may be a data feed error; true liquidity depth unknown
Sniper USD amounts sniped are 'unknown' — precise sniper concentration % cannot be calculated
Token supply formatting anomaly (supply=1, FDV=$0) with raw balances in trillions — data integrity concern
Update authority listed as 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority status unverifiable from provided data
Holder percentage figures in raw top-holder data appear to have formatting errors (values >100%)
No audit, no verified team information, no tokenomics documentation available
Historical holder data only goes back 30 days and shows zero activity for 29 of those days
6h and 24h price change reported as 0% in analytics despite 212.7% 24h change in price section — data inconsistency

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The analyst has no position in POKESTR. Always conduct your own due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is POKESTR a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Nov 5, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell POKESTR?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 5, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for POKESTR (POKESTR)?

Is POKESTR a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Absolutely not suitable for retail investors, those with low risk tolerance, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This token exhibits nearly every hallmark of a high-risk micro-cap speculative launch with potential pump-and-dump characteristics.

What are the key risks of holding POKESTR?

$0.00 reported liquidity — catastrophic slippage risk on any meaningful trade • Token dormant for 30 days with only 14 holders before sudden pump — classic coordinated launch pattern • 71.2% sell pressure with sellers outnumbering buyers 2.39:1 by unique wallet count