POKESTR

POKESTR Price Prediction 2026

POKESTR
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 1, 2026

2hqdBdkd5YqagpBcV7QBPiQvdU3V1y8C8dWsv4nQpump

$0.052191

+0.52%

FDV $2,185

LiveContract:2hqdBdkd5YqagpBcV7QBPiQvdU3V1y8C8dWsv4nQpumpChain:SolanaHolders:324Market cap:$2,185

More tokens on Solana

APM

APM

All Paws Matter

$0.0532200.0%
MC $3.2K
🐂🀄️

🐂🀄️

Ansem Army

$0.0533780.0%
MC $3.4K
UPPY

UPPY

Uppy

$0.0515440.0%
MC $1.5K
Ape

Ape

Ape

$0.0517974.3%
MC $1.8K
CAPY

CAPY

Mr. Capy

$0.0516690.0%
MC $1.7K
arc

arc

AI Rig Complex

$0.060614.9%
MC $60.63M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about POKESTR

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jun 1, 11:17 AM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$0

Holders

631

Snipers

42

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

POKESTR (mint: 2hqdBdkd5YqagpBcV7QBPiQvdU3V1y8C8dWsv4nQpump) is an extremely early-stage Solana meme/niche token themed around TCG (Trading Card Game) collectibles, launched on PumpSwap. The token has a total formatted supply of 1 (with very large raw balances suggesting a non-standard decimal/supply structure), $0 reported liquidity, and a current price of ~$0.0000996. It experienced a 212.7% 24h price surge but faces severe sell pressure (71.2% sell volume), near-zero liquidity, and a holder base that exploded from 14 to 631 in under 24 hours — all hallmarks of a high-risk, speculative micro-cap launch.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
TCG/Pokémon grail collectibles narrative as a leveraged bet thesis
Explosive holder growth: from 14 to 631 holders (+98%) in under 24 hours
Launched on PumpSwap with 1,224 buys vs 3,078 sells in 24h — heavy sell dominance
Reported $0.00 total liquidity despite active trading — extreme slippage risk
Top 10 holders control 35.97% of supply; top 100 control 79.72%

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The 5-minute price change is already -10.4%, sell pressure dominates at 71.2% of volume, and there are 3,078 sells vs 1,224 buys in 24h. With $0 reported liquidity and heavy sniper activity, the path of least resistance is downward in the short term. The 212.7% 24h pump is likely being distributed by early buyers and snipers.

Target low$0.000013
Target high$0.000120
Support: $0.0000192 (candle [1] close / candle [2] open), $0.0000143 (candle [3] low), $0.0000136 (candle [2] low — absolute recent low)
Resistance: $0.0000329 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close / candle [3] open — repeated level), $0.0000359 (candle [3] high), $0.0000829 (candle [1] low — data anomaly, likely wick high)

Medium term

neutral
7–30 days

Medium-term trajectory depends entirely on whether the TCG narrative gains traction and new buyers sustain demand. Given the token was dormant at 14 holders for 30 days before the sudden launch event, sustained momentum is uncertain. If the community grows and liquidity is added, stabilization is possible; otherwise, continued bleed is likely.

Catalysts
  • Viral TCG/Pokémon community adoption or influencer endorsement
  • Liquidity pool deepening on PumpSwap
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Listing on aggregators or tracking platforms

Bullish factors

  • 212.7% 24h price surge demonstrates strong initial demand
  • Holder count grew from 14 to 631 (+98%) in under 24 hours
  • TCG/collectibles narrative has proven viral potential in crypto
  • Some snipers showing significant profits (267.4%, 170.3%, 121.2%) indicating early price appreciation
  • 1,321 unique wallets interacting in 24h shows broad initial interest

Bearish factors

  • 71.2% sell pressure vs 28.8% buy pressure — sellers dominate heavily
  • 3,078 sells vs 1,224 buys in 24h
  • $0.00 reported total liquidity — extreme slippage and exit risk
  • 5-minute price already down -10.4% at time of analysis
  • Token was completely dormant (14 holders, zero activity) for 30 days prior to launch event
  • Unverified contract, mutable metadata, unknown update authority
  • Top 100 holders control 79.72% of supply — extreme concentration
  • Multiple snipers showing losses (-35.9%, -27.3%, -24.6%) suggesting price volatility is destructive
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: $0 reported liquidity making price discovery unreliable, only 3 OHLC candles available for technical analysis, OHLC data showing anomalous values (L > O in candle [1] suggesting data irregularity), and the token being less than 24 hours into active trading with highly volatile and thin markets.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available (09:00–11:00 UTC, June 1 2026). Note: Candle [1] (11:00) shows L ($0.0000829) > O ($0.0000328), which is anomalous and likely a data feed error — the low and high may be swapped. Treating candle [1] as having a high near $0.0000829 and a low near $0.0000192. Candle [2] (10:00) shows a bullish structure: O=$0.0000192, H=$0.0000328, L=$0.0000136, C=$0.0000328 — a strong bullish candle recovering from the low. Candle [3] (09:00) shows O=$0.0000328, H=$0.0000359, L=$0.0000143, C=$0.0000199 — a bearish candle with a long lower wick. Volume spiked dramatically in candle [2] at $164,950 vs $14,125 in candle [3] and $30,273 in candle [1], suggesting the 10:00 candle was the primary pump candle.

Trend

Short-term
sideways
Medium-term
uptrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 29%Sell 71%

The 24h price is up 212.7% establishing a medium-term uptrend from the launch base, but the most recent 5-minute reading shows -10.4% and the hourly candles show choppy, volatile price action without a clear directional bias. Short-term trend is sideways-to-bearish as distribution appears to be occurring.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000192 (candle [1] close / candle [2] open — tested multiple times)
Major$0.0000136 (candle [2] low — absolute recent bottom)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0000329 (candle [1] open = candle [2] close = candle [3] open — key pivot level tested 3 times)
Major$0.0000359 (candle [3] high — recent swing high)

The $0.0000329 level is the most significant pivot, having acted as both support and resistance across all three candles. A sustained break above this level with volume would be bullish; failure to reclaim it confirms distribution. The $0.0000136–$0.0000143 zone represents the recent demand floor.

Notable patterns

  • Volume climax at 10:00 UTC candle ($164,950) followed by sharp volume decline — classic pump exhaustion signal
  • Repeated rejection/pivot at $0.0000329 across all three candles — key battleground level
  • Long lower wicks on candles [2] and [3] suggest buyers defending the $0.0000136–$0.0000143 zone
  • Bearish divergence: price near highs but volume declining sharply in candle [1]
  • Anomalous OHLC data in candle [1] (L > O) suggests data feed irregularity — treat with caution

Total holders631
24h Δ+98
7d Δ+98
30d Δ+98
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth is strongly correlated with the 212.7% price pump — both occurred simultaneously within the last 24 hours. The token had exactly 14 holders for the entire prior 30-day period with zero net change, then exploded to 631 holders (+617, +98%) in a single day. This suggests the price pump drove FOMO-based holder acquisition rather than organic community growth preceding the price move.

The holder data tells a stark story: POKESTR was completely dormant with 14 holders from May 2 through May 31, 2026 — zero net change for 30 consecutive days. Then, on June 1, 2026, holders surged from 14 to 631 (+617 holders, +98% growth) within 24 hours, with +230 holders in just the last hour alone (+36%). This is not organic growth — it is a classic pump-driven FOMO wave. The acquisition breakdown (621 via swap, 10 via transfer, 0 via airdrop) confirms all new holders bought in through trading. The rapid holder accumulation during a price pump, combined with 71.2% sell pressure, raises concerns about holder retention once the pump subsides. Growth is accelerating in the very short term but sustainability is highly questionable.

Top 10 hold35.97%
Top 100 hold79.72%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

tgr7d82gsJs5yWa5w9Cju2hrLAE478wgSZzZWiSsY3L

DEX liquidity pool (PumpSwap pair address — matches the trading pair address listed in metadata)

12.85%

8EBn3VFTZwajgeASGszRSUGo2M3HCfrh2UFYFdo8H3kK

Individual whale or early team wallet — large balance, unclassified

4.59%

4sunLKtRGCSX79kefAQsG9jjMNBXPCKiA6W3bFp6ysQY

Individual whale — large balance, unclassified

3.17%

GqYUUbABiSbyQE215jeAUiiefAEo5qRZ65QdHf4ELEw2

Individual whale — large balance, unclassified

3.11%

GuEi13nF9YWnQqkpCndjjazzL45B4bUVoWodsNgCfRYc

Individual whale — large balance, unclassified

2.58%

The top 10 holders control 35.97% of supply and the top 100 control 79.72%, indicating very high concentration. The #1 holder (tgr7d82gsJs5yWa5w9Cju2hrLAE478wgSZzZWiSsY3L) is the PumpSwap liquidity pool address, holding ~12.85% of supply — this is expected for a DEX pair. The remaining top holders (#2–#20) appear to be individual wallets with large positions, none identifiable as known exchanges or verified project wallets. The distribution breakdown shows 170 whales, 76 sharks, 265 dolphins, 93 fish, and 22 octopus wallets — a distribution skewed heavily toward large holders relative to the 631 total holder count. With 71.2% sell pressure dominating 24h volume, the overall whale sentiment is distributing. Note: The percentage figures in the raw data appear to be in basis points or have a formatting anomaly (showing values like '12847510181993400.00%') — the percentages cited here are derived from the top10=35.97% and top100=79.72% supply concentration metrics provided in the holder metrics section.

Liquidity$0.00
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$68,230
Sell$168,510
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers508
Unique sellers1,215

Market health is critically poor. Reported total liquidity is $0.00, which is either a data reporting issue or reflects that the PumpSwap pool has near-zero locked liquidity — either way, it signals extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position size. Despite $0 reported liquidity, $236.74K in total 24h volume has been processed ($68.23K buys + $168.51K sells), suggesting the pool has some functional liquidity but it is extremely thin. The net flow is strongly negative: sell volume ($168.51K) is 2.47x buy volume ($68.23K). Unique sellers (1,215) outnumber unique buyers (508) by 2.39x. With 3,078 sell transactions vs 1,224 buy transactions, the market is in active distribution mode. Any large sell order would face catastrophic slippage given the reported liquidity depth. This is not a healthy market structure for new entrants.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (formatted) — raw balances suggest a non-standard supply structure; the formatted supply of '1' with decimals of 0 is anomalous given the large raw holder balances (e.g., 128,475,101,819,934 raw units for the top holder)
FDV$0.00 (as reported — likely a data artifact given the non-standard supply formatting)

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Tokenomics data presents significant anomalies. The formatted total supply is reported as '1' with 0 decimals, yet holder raw balances show values in the trillions (e.g., top holder has 128,475,101,819,934 raw units). This is internally inconsistent and suggests either a data feed error or a non-standard token implementation. The FDV is reported as $0.00, which contradicts the active price of ~$0.0000996. Update authority is listed as 'unknown' — neither confirmed renounced nor confirmed active — meaning mint and freeze authority status cannot be determined. The contract is unverified and metadata is mutable, which are significant red flags. Until authority status is confirmed on-chain, rug risk from authorities must be treated as unknown but potentially high. Investors should verify mint/freeze authority status directly on Solana explorers (Solscan, SolanaFM) before committing capital.

Volatility
high

212.7% 24h price swing with -10.4% in the last 5 minutes. Only 3 hourly candles of price history available. Extreme price volatility typical of micro-cap pump-and-dump dynamics.

Liquidity
high

$0.00 reported total liquidity on PumpSwap. Despite $236K+ in 24h volume, the pool depth appears critically shallow. Any position of meaningful size faces severe slippage on entry or exit.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 35.97% of supply; top 100 control 79.72%. 170 whale-classified wallets among only 631 total holders. Extreme concentration creates significant dump risk if large holders exit.

SniperDump
high

20 snipers identified in the first 1,000 blocks. Several have already taken significant profits (up to +267.4% realized PnL). Multiple snipers with unknown remaining balances represent latent sell pressure. Profitable snipers have sold $1,547, $415, and $246 respectively — actively distributing into the pump.

Authority
high

Update authority is 'unknown'. Contract is unverified. Metadata is mutable. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. These factors create potential for rug pull, token supply manipulation, or metadata changes without notice.

Key risks

  • $0.00 reported liquidity — catastrophic slippage risk on any meaningful trade
  • Token dormant for 30 days with only 14 holders before sudden pump — classic coordinated launch pattern
  • 71.2% sell pressure with sellers outnumbering buyers 2.39:1 by unique wallet count
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential for unlimited token minting or account freezing
  • Unverified, mutable contract with unknown update authority
  • Top 100 holders control 79.72% of supply — extreme concentration and dump risk
  • Sniper activity with profitable early buyers actively distributing
  • Anomalous tokenomics data (supply=1, FDV=$0) suggests data integrity issues
  • No verified team, no audit, no locked liquidity

Mitigating factors

  • TCG/collectibles narrative has demonstrated viral potential in crypto markets
  • 1,321 unique wallets interacted in 24h showing broad initial interest
  • Some snipers showing losses suggests not all early buyers are coordinated insiders
  • Holder growth to 631 in 24h shows genuine market interest, however speculative
  • PumpSwap listing provides at least some trading infrastructure
Suitable for: Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Absolutely not suitable for retail investors, those with low risk tolerance, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This token exhibits nearly every hallmark of a high-risk micro-cap speculative launch with potential pump-and-dump characteristics.

POKESTR is a TCG-themed speculative token on Solana that experienced a violent launch pump (+212.7% in 24h) after 30 days of complete dormancy. The bull case rests entirely on narrative virality and community momentum; the bear case is supported by nearly every on-chain metric available. This is a high-conviction speculative trade only, not an investment.

Bull case (low)

The TCG/Pokémon grail narrative goes viral within crypto-native communities, driving sustained new buyer inflow that absorbs sell pressure. Liquidity deepens on PumpSwap, concentration decreases as tokens distribute to new holders, and the token establishes itself as the go-to TCG meme on Solana — potentially achieving 10–100x from current levels if the broader meme coin market is favorable.

  • Viral TCG/Pokémon community adoption on Twitter/X and crypto forums
  • Influencer or KOL endorsement driving FOMO buying waves
  • Sustained new holder acquisition beyond the initial pump cohort
  • Liquidity addition by team or community to reduce slippage
  • Broader Solana meme coin market bull cycle

Base case

POKESTR experiences a typical micro-cap pump-and-fade cycle: price retraces 50–70% from the 24h high over the next 1–7 days as initial excitement fades, settling into a lower trading range. A small community of TCG enthusiasts maintains the token with low-volume trading. Long-term survival depends on whether the team (if any) continues development or marketing efforts.

  • Sell pressure gradually normalizes as weak hands exit
  • A core community of 100–200 holders remains engaged with the TCG narrative
  • Price stabilizes in the $0.000015–$0.000035 range (near recent support levels)
  • No rug pull or malicious authority action occurs
  • Liquidity remains thin but functional on PumpSwap

Bear case (high)

The pump exhausts within hours as snipers and early buyers complete distribution. Sell pressure overwhelms thin liquidity, price collapses 80–95% from peak. The 617 new holders who bought during the pump face severe losses. Token returns to near-dormancy with a small residual holder base.

  • $0 reported liquidity cannot support sustained price levels
  • 71.2% sell pressure already dominant at time of analysis
  • Profitable snipers actively distributing ($1,547, $415, $267 already sold)
  • No verified team, utility, or locked liquidity to backstop price
  • Token was dormant for 30 days — no pre-existing community or organic demand

GeneratedJun 1, 11:17 AM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 11:00 UTC on June 1, 2026. Price and volume data are real-time; holder historical data is daily granularity.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain token metadata (mint: 2hqdBdkd5YqagpBcV7QBPiQvdU3V1y8C8dWsv4nQpump)
  • PumpSwap DEX trading data (pair: tgr7d82gsJs5yWa5w9Cju2hrLAE478wgSZzZWiSsY3L)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (3 candles, June 1 2026 09:00–11:00 UTC)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Top 20 holder wallet data
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Token price feed (USD and SOL-denominated)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — may be a data feed error; true liquidity depth unknown
  • Sniper USD amounts sniped are 'unknown' — precise sniper concentration % cannot be calculated
  • Token supply formatting anomaly (supply=1, FDV=$0) with raw balances in trillions — data integrity concern
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority status unverifiable from provided data
  • Holder percentage figures in raw top-holder data appear to have formatting errors (values >100%)
  • No audit, no verified team information, no tokenomics documentation available
  • Historical holder data only goes back 30 days and shows zero activity for 29 of those days
  • 6h and 24h price change reported as 0% in analytics despite 212.7% 24h change in price section — data inconsistency

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The analyst has no position in POKESTR. Always conduct your own due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (formatted) — raw balances suggest a non-standard supply structure; the formatted supply of '1' with decimals of 0 is anomalous given the large raw holder balances (e.g., 128,475,101,819,934 raw units for the top holder)

Key Risks

•$0.00 reported liquidity — catastrophic slippage risk on any meaningful trade
•Token dormant for 30 days with only 14 holders before sudden pump — classic coordinated launch pattern
•71.2% sell pressure with sellers outnumbering buyers 2.39:1 by unique wallet count
•Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential for unlimited token minting or account freezing

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

20 snipers were active in the first 1,000 blocks. PnL is mixed: 10 snipers show positive realized PnL (ranging from +0.1% to +267.4%) and 7 show negative PnL (ranging from -19.3% to -35.9%), with 3 near breakeven. The highest-profit snipers have already sold significant amounts ($1,547, $415, $246), suggesting smart money has been actively taking profits. Several snipers still hold unknown balances, representing potential future sell pressure. The total USD sniped is unknown, limiting precise concentration calculations — the 3.17% estimate is based on the 20 snipers relative to the 631 total holders as a proxy.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration3.17%
PnL stateMixed
Sell-through rateModerate
Profit-taking risk
high

20 snipers identified in first 1,000 blocks; individual USD amounts sniped are unknown, but sell-through activity ranges from $0 to $1,547 per sniper. Top earner (kEFiAX3jo5NmemysQov342TZ9mGh6yp92GDRjhA8XDf) realized +99% PnL; another (3XSYLa8VqkTV4RxKGG92nQb3gPziFFFEVLCYkEaEtZ5k) +121.2%; and 4Amw7ZtGy9pwTX4E7qavdoQt7b9PrBK5i1aGCzdzZyMe +267.4%.

Mixed-to-negative. While some early snipers captured substantial gains (267.4%, 170.3%, 121.2%), the majority of snipers by count are either at a loss or have minimal profits. The large sell volumes from profitable snipers ($1,547, $415) relative to total 24h buy volume ($68.23K) suggest early buyers are actively distributing into retail demand.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for POKESTR (POKESTR)?

The 5-minute price change is already -10.4%, sell pressure dominates at 71.2% of volume, and there are 3,078 sells vs 1,224 buys in 24h. With $0 reported liquidity and heavy sniper activity, the path of least resistance is downward in the short term. The 212.7% 24h pump is likely being distributed by early buyers and snipers. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000013 to $0.000120.

Is POKESTR a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Absolutely not suitable for retail investors, those with low risk tolerance, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This token exhibits nearly every hallmark of a high-risk micro-cap speculative launch with potential pump-and-dump characteristics.

How are POKESTR holders trending?

POKESTR currently has 631 holders and is growing (24h: 98, 7d: 98, 30d: 98). The holder data tells a stark story: POKESTR was completely dormant with 14 holders from May 2 through May 31, 2026 — zero net change for 30 consecutive days. Then, on June 1, 2026, holders surged from 14 to 631 (+617 holders, +98% growth) within 24 hours, with +230 holders in just the last hour alone (+36%). This is not organic growth — it is a classic pump-driven FOMO wave. The acquisition breakdown (621 via swap, 10 via transfer, 0 via airdrop) confirms all new holders bought in through trading. The rapid holder accumulation during a price pump, combined with 71.2% sell pressure, raises concerns about holder retention once the pump subsides. Growth is accelerating in the very short term but sustainability is highly questionable.

What does sniper activity look like for POKESTR?

Snipers hold roughly 3.17% of supply with PnL state "mixed" and sell-through rate "moderate". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding POKESTR?

$0.00 reported liquidity — catastrophic slippage risk on any meaningful trade • Token dormant for 30 days with only 14 holders before sudden pump — classic coordinated launch pattern • 71.2% sell pressure with sellers outnumbering buyers 2.39:1 by unique wallet count

← Back to all predictions

Track POKESTR