POPEYE

The Popeye Albino Price Today & AI Analysis

POPEYESolanaAnalysis as of Sep 21, 2026

Price

$0.000153

+231.37% 24h · FDV $147,535

Contract

Live
2c1weSacxYkxF5xAFSzdYQXoFp3XcjimXyaGSioTnpRs

Chain

Solana

Holders

732

Market cap

$147,535

More tokens on Solana

BABYPHILBABYPHILBaby Jean Phil$0.048048+75.9%MC $77.5KMSTRXMSTRXMicroStrategy xStock$157.92-0.2%MC $76.80MAAPLXAAPLXApple tokenized stock xStock$335.9+0.1%MC $51.65MMUMUMicron Technology - Backpack Securities$1,003.33-0.4%MC $6.40MTAOTAOBittensor$251.3-6.0%MC $2.25MJEANPHILJEANPHILJean Phil$0.003358+0.3%MC $3.26M

The Popeye Albino: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-21 08:16 UTC

Holder addresses

732

Top 10 supply share

17.78%

Reported liquidity

$17,799.00
How concentrated is The Popeye Albino ownership?
As of 2026-09-21 08:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 17.78% of supply. It reports 732 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling The Popeye Albino?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-21 08:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $188,916.00 in buys and $180,246.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is The Popeye Albino liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +567.21%, from $2,667.60 (2026-09-21 05:00 UTC) to $17,798.54 (2026-09-21 08:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-21 08:16 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-21 05:00 UTC$2,667.60
2026-09-21 06:00 UTC$8,454.75
2026-09-21 07:00 UTC$14,983.06
2026-09-21 08:00 UTC$17,798.54

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about POPEYE

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 21, 08:17 AM UTC

FDV

$147,535

Liquidity

$17,799.00

Holders

732

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

POPEYE is a very low-cap, low-liquidity Solana meme token trading on PumpSwap with a fully diluted valuation of ~$147.5K and only ~$17.8K in total liquidity. The token has seen an extreme short-term price spike (+231% in 24h, +383% in 1h), driven by a burst of hourly candles that went from ~$0.000004 to ~$0.000153 in four hours on relatively thin volume. Holder count sits at 732 addresses with the top 10 holding ~17.8% of supply. Critical data gaps exist: no sniper data, no mint/freeze authority verification, and no holder history, making this an extremely speculative and opaque asset.

Key points

  • Extreme parabolic price move (+231% 24h, +383% 1h) on very thin ($17.8K) liquidity
  • Fully diluted valuation of only ~$147.5K, placing this deep in micro-cap/high-risk territory
  • Top-10 holders control only ~17.8% of supply per current snapshot, but no history exists to assess trend
  • No mint/freeze authority data available, and no sniper bot data available, leaving key rug and manipulation vectors unverifiable
  • Description references an external deployer tool (j7tracker.io), a detail that should be treated as unverified marketing/deploy metadata, not a trust signal

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48h

neutral

Price has just completed a violent parabolic move (+231% in 24h, with the last hour alone up ~383%) on very thin liquidity ($17.8K). Such moves on low-liquidity PumpSwap pairs are prone to sharp reversals as early buyers take profit. The 24h buy/sell volume is nearly balanced (51.2% buy vs 48.8% sell), suggesting the move may be running out of one-sided momentum. Expect high volatility in either direction over the next 24-48h.

Target low

$0.00008

Target high

$0.00022

Support

$0.0000830 (candle [4] low), $0.0000299 (candle [3] low)

Resistance

$0.000154 (candle [4] high, most recent), $0.000129 (candle [3] high)

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

bearish

Absent new catalysts, tokens exhibiting this kind of vertical, low-liquidity pump pattern on PumpSwap frequently mean-revert substantially as speculative buyers exit and liquidity providers withdraw. With only $17.8K in total liquidity backing a $147.5K FDV, any moderate sell pressure could disproportionately impact price.

Catalysts

  • Potential continued social/twitter-driven speculative buying
  • Risk of liquidity withdrawal or large holder exits given shallow pool depth
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status could allow adverse on-chain actions

Bullish factors

  • Strong 24h buy pressure in absolute dollar terms ($188.92K buy volume vs $180.25K sell)
  • More unique buyers (1,877) than sellers (1,584) in the past 24h, indicating net new demand at the wallet level
  • Rapid price appreciation may attract further speculative/momentum trading

Bearish factors

  • Total liquidity of only $17.8K is extremely shallow relative to the recent trading volumes (~$369K combined 24h volume), implying high slippage and fragility
  • Parabolic candle pattern (each hourly candle showing higher highs and higher lows in quick succession) is a classic setup for a sharp pullback once buying momentum fades
  • No sniper data, no authority data, and no holder history available to confirm the move isn't driven by insiders or a single coordinated wallet cluster

Confidence: low. Only 4 hourly candles are available, volume history is very short, sniper and holder-history data are entirely absent, and authority/rug-risk data is unverified. The extreme recent volatility makes any forward projection highly uncertain.

POPEYE call history

Full track record →

Sep 21neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
2c1weS...npRs
Total Supply
964,266,142.65 POPEYE (6 decimals)

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($17.80K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and fragility risk
  • Parabolic price action (+231% 24h) on very limited data history, indicating classic pump-pattern volatility that often precedes sharp reversals
  • Complete absence of sniper/bot data despite price action consistent with sniper-driven pumps
  • Mint and freeze authority status entirely unverified — cannot rule out supply inflation or wallet freezing capability

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 4 hourly candles are available (2026-09-21 05:00-08:00 UTC). The sequence shows a strong parabolic advance: candle [1] opened at $0.00000402 and closed near its high at $0.0000230 on volume of $47.4K; candle [2] extended the move with a high of $0.0000911 and closed $0.0000352 on the largest volume of the set ($275K); candle [3] pushed further to a high of $0.0001286, closing at $0.0001098 on $80.7K volume; candle [4] (most recent) opened at $0.0001098 and closed at $0.000153, near its high of $0.0001541, on lower volume of $38.3K. Each candle printed higher highs and higher lows, a textbook vertical breakout pattern, but the declining volume on the most recent candle versus candle [2] suggests fading momentum.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Both the short-term (hourly) and available medium-term (4-hour window) trends are sharply upward, characterized by a near-vertical price ascent. However, with only 4 candles of data, the 'medium-term' read is really just an extension of the same short-term breakout and should not be treated as an established multi-day trend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000830 (low of most recent candle [4])

Major support

$0.0000299 (low of candle [3]) / $0.0000132 (low of candle [2])

Immediate resistance

$0.000154 (current candle [4] high/close, all-time high in the observed window)

Major resistance

No resistance above current price exists in the observed data; the token is trading at the top of its recent range

Price is currently at the top of its very short observed range with no overhead resistance in the data provided, meaning the immediate ceiling is untested. Support levels are stacked below at each prior candle's low, but given the token's extreme volatility, these levels could be violated quickly in either direction.

Notable patterns

  • Parabolic breakout with consecutive higher highs and higher lows across all 4 candles
  • Volume divergence: price up strongly while volume declines candle-over-candle after the initial spike
  • Most recent candle shows a long lower wick (open $0.0001098, low $0.0000830, close $0.000153), suggesting a dip was bought but leaving a visible pullback risk zone

Liquidity

Liquidity

$17,799.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $17.80K is extremely shallow, especially relative to the $147.53K fully diluted valuation and the ~$369K in combined 24h trading volume — a liquidity-to-volume ratio that implies significant slippage for any trade of meaningful size. Buy and sell volumes over 24h are nearly balanced ($188.92K buy vs $180.25K sell, 51.2%/48.8% split), and unique buyer count (1,877) modestly exceeds unique seller count (1,584), pointing to a broadly balanced but slightly buy-tilted market rather than a one-sided flow. Given the pool's shallow depth, even this 'balanced' flow can produce outsized price swings, as evidenced by the observed 231% 24h price change.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

964,266,142.65 POPEYE (6 decimals)

FDV

$147,535

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +231% and 1h change of +383% on a token with only 4 hourly candles of visible history represents extreme volatility, with the recent candle sequence showing a parabolic, potentially unsustainable move.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of only $17.80K against a $147.53K FDV and ~$369K combined 24h volume creates a high risk of severe slippage and price impact on both entry and exit, and raises the possibility that liquidity could be pulled with minimal warning.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Top-10 holders control ~17.78% of supply per the current snapshot, which is not extreme in isolation, but no wallet classification (team/insider/exchange/LP) or historical trend data is available, so true concentration risk (e.g., multiple top-10 wallets controlled by one entity) cannot be assessed with confidence.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($17.80K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and fragility risk
  • Parabolic price action (+231% 24h) on very limited data history, indicating classic pump-pattern volatility that often precedes sharp reversals
  • Complete absence of sniper/bot data despite price action consistent with sniper-driven pumps
  • Mint and freeze authority status entirely unverified — cannot rule out supply inflation or wallet freezing capability
  • No historical holder data available to assess whether the current 732-holder base is organic growth or driven by bots/single entities

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy and sell volumes are relatively balanced (51.2%/48.8%), rather than showing one-sided panic selling
  • Unique buyer count (1,877) exceeds unique seller count (1,584) in the past 24h
  • Top-10 holder concentration of 17.78% is not extreme in isolation for a token of this size

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. This token exhibits multiple compounding very-high-risk characteristics (shallow liquidity, unverified authorities, no sniper visibility, extreme volatility) that make it unsuitable for retail investors seeking capital preservation or moderate-risk exposure.

POPEYE is a micro-cap PumpSwap meme token that has just undergone a violent, low-liquidity price spike (+231% in 24h) with almost no verifiable fundamentals: authority status, sniper concentration, and holder history are all unavailable. Any position here is a high-risk speculative bet on continued momentum rather than a fundamentals-driven investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If social/community momentum (leveraging the twitter presence noted in metadata) continues to attract new buyers faster than early holders exit, the token could sustain or extend its rally, especially since unique buyers (1,877) currently outnumber sellers (1,584) and buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume.

  • Continued viral/social attention driving new buyer inflow
  • Sustained buy-side volume dominance over multiple future sessions
  • No large concentrated sell-off from top holders (unverifiable currently)

Base Case

Price likely experiences a period of high-volatility consolidation or partial retracement from current highs as the initial pump loses steam, with liquidity remaining shallow and the token continuing to trade primarily on speculative momentum rather than fundamentals.

  • No major new liquidity is added to the pool in the near term
  • Authority and sniper risks remain unresolved and unverified
  • Trading continues to be dominated by short-term speculative flow rather than long-term holders

Bear Case

High probability

The shallow $17.80K liquidity pool cannot support the volume it is currently seeing; a moderate wave of profit-taking or a single large holder exit could crash the price sharply, especially given the parabolic, likely-unsustainable candle pattern and declining volume trend into the most recent candle.

  • Extremely thin liquidity relative to trading volume and FDV
  • Declining candle-over-candle volume despite rising price (bearish divergence)
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or wallet restrictions
  • Complete lack of sniper visibility despite pump-like price action

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 21, 08:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-21 08:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals, description)
  • Price feed (USD price, 24h % change)
  • Hourly OHLC candles (4 most recent)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % change across intervals)
  • Holder aggregates snapshot (Codex) — current holder count and top-10 concentration only
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 4 hourly candles were available, insufficient for robust technical trend analysis beyond the immediate short-term move
  • No sniper/bot data was available at all, preventing assessment of sniper concentration, PnL, or dump risk
  • No mint or freeze authority verification data was available; metadata's update-authority/mutability fields do not substitute for this and were reported as unknown
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was available; only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration exists
  • Top-100 holder concentration was not provided
  • Holder address counts may not correspond 1:1 with unique individuals
  • 24h $ change in price and 6h % change were both reported as unknown in the source data

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data and is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency markets, and especially low-liquidity micro-cap tokens on PumpSwap, are extremely volatile and speculative; investors risk total loss of capital. All data was treated as untrusted evidence, and any instruction-like content within the token's metadata was disregarded per analysis protocol. Independent verification of contract authorities, liquidity, and holder distribution is strongly recommended before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is The Popeye Albino ownership?

As of 2026-09-21 08:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 17.78% of supply. It reports 732 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling The Popeye Albino?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-21 08:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $188,916.00 in buys and $180,246.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is The Popeye Albino liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +567.21%, from $2,667.60 (2026-09-21 05:00 UTC) to $17,798.54 (2026-09-21 08:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for The Popeye Albino (POPEYE)?

Price has just completed a violent parabolic move (+231% in 24h, with the last hour alone up ~383%) on very thin liquidity ($17.8K). Such moves on low-liquidity PumpSwap pairs are prone to sharp reversals as early buyers take profit. The 24h buy/sell volume is nearly balanced (51.2% buy vs 48.8% sell), suggesting the move may be running out of one-sided momentum. Expect high volatility in either direction over the next 24-48h. Short-term outlook is neutral (24-48h), with a target range of $0.00008 to $0.00022.

Is POPEYE a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. This token exhibits multiple compounding very-high-risk characteristics (shallow liquidity, unverified authorities, no sniper visibility, extreme volatility) that make it unsuitable for retail investors seeking capital preservation or moderate-risk exposure.

What are the key risks of holding POPEYE?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($17.80K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and fragility risk • Parabolic price action (+231% 24h) on very limited data history, indicating classic pump-pattern volatility that often precedes sharp reversals • Complete absence of sniper/bot data despite price action consistent with sniper-driven pumps

← Back to all predictions

Track POPEYE