GILF

Grandma I'd Like to Fuck Price Today & AI Analysis

GILFSolanaAnalysis as of Aug 7, 2026

Price

$0.052610

+5.66% 24h · FDV $2,477

Contract

Live
2YxBvZ4BwYtoLdzf7pDAAQ6kExX94q5nz8RrLaPHpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

128

Market cap

$2,477

More tokens on Solana

HedgeHedgeHedge$0.054054-0.0%MC $4.1KIsabellaIsabellaJustice for Isabella Stroupe$0.052300+3.4%MC $2.3KMORTMORTMORT$0.053135+0.0%MC $3.1KTEALTEALPeter Teal$0.054535+0.0%MC $4.5Kpendupendupendu$0.054096-1.0%MC $4.1KSAISAISairium$0.053014-87.1%MC $301.4K

Grandma I'd Like to Fuck: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-08-07 18:16 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$34,386.47
How concentrated is Grandma I'd Like to Fuck ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Grandma I'd Like to Fuck?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Grandma I'd Like to Fuck liquidity falling?
As of 2026-08-07 18:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $34,386.47. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-08-07 18:16 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about GILF

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Aug 7, 06:16 PM UTC

FDV

$64,948

Liquidity

$34,386.47

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

GILF (Grandma I'd Like to Fuck) is a meme token on Solana launched on PumpSwap (pair Cs3C1y9gFi8AGxaVov7rYVnXSWq3aAUxVJn5CPuVUH2L). The token has experienced an extreme 219% 24h price surge, but is showing heavy sell pressure (69.6% sell volume vs 30.4% buy volume) with very shallow liquidity of only $34.39K against a $66.38K FDV. The token is unverified, has no description, and its update authority is unknown. This is a high-risk speculative meme token.

Key points

  • Extreme 219% 24h price spike driven by speculative meme momentum
  • Severely imbalanced sell pressure: 69.6% sell vs 30.4% buy volume in 24h
  • Very shallow liquidity ($34.39K) relative to FDV ($66.38K) — near 1:2 ratio indicating fragility
  • Unverified contract with unknown update authority — elevated rug risk
  • High seller-to-buyer ratio: 1,526 sellers vs 458 buyers in 24h

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token surged ~219% in 24h but is now showing clear distribution: sell volume ($203.98K) dwarfs buy volume ($89.21K), and the most recent candle closed lower than it opened ($0.0000787 open vs $0.0000699 close). The 5-minute change is already -4.26%, suggesting momentum is fading. Price is likely to retrace toward the $0.000040–$0.000060 range unless fresh buying catalysts emerge.

Target low

$0.000030

Target high

$0.000100

Support

$0.000066 (candle [1] low), $0.000010 (candle [3] low — extreme downside)

Resistance

$0.000103 (candle [1] high — recent peak), $0.000118 (candle [2] high — session high)

Medium term · 1–7 days

bearish

Without sustained buying interest, new utility, or viral social momentum, meme tokens of this profile typically retrace 70–90% from their spike highs. The shallow liquidity pool means even moderate sell orders will cause significant price impact. Medium-term outlook is bearish unless a new catalyst emerges.

Catalysts

  • Viral social media traction on Twitter (only listed social)
  • New liquidity additions to the PumpSwap pool
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Whale accumulation reversing current distribution trend

Bullish factors

  • 219% 24h price surge demonstrates strong initial speculative demand
  • 1h price change of +83.58% shows recent momentum burst
  • 2,225 buy transactions in 24h indicates active participation
  • 458 unique buyers in 24h shows some breadth of interest

Bearish factors

  • Sell volume ($203.98K) is 2.3x buy volume ($89.21K)
  • 4,259 sells vs 2,225 buys — sellers outnumber buyers 2:1 by transaction count
  • 1,526 sellers vs 458 buyers — heavy distribution by unique wallets
  • Most recent candle [1] is a bearish candle (O:$0.0000787 > C:$0.0000699)
  • 5-minute price change already -4.26%
  • Liquidity of only $34.39K — extremely shallow, high slippage risk
  • Unverified contract, unknown update authority
  • 6h and 24h % changes listed as 0% suggesting data anomaly or manipulation

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly OHLC candles are available, no holder data exists, sniper data is unavailable, and the token is extremely new and volatile. Price predictions for ultra-low-cap meme tokens with <$35K liquidity carry very low statistical reliability.

GILF call history

Full track record →

Aug 7bearish
24h-94.7%
7d-97.1%
30d-96.4%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
2YxBvZ...pump
Total Supply
949,971,424.61

Key Risks

  • Unknown mint and freeze authority — potential for supply manipulation or account freezing
  • Unverified contract with unknown update authority
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($34.39K) — high exit slippage and rug-pull risk
  • Overwhelming sell pressure: 69.6% sell volume, 1,526 sellers vs 458 buyers

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Three hourly candles are available. Candle [3] (16:00 UTC): bearish, opened $0.0000294, closed $0.0000118, with a low of $0.0000090 — a sharp sell-off. Candle [2] (17:00 UTC): explosive bullish candle, opened $0.0000119, surged to a high of $0.0001186, closed at $0.0000804 — a massive wick-heavy candle indicating a pump with partial rejection. Candle [1] (18:00 UTC): bearish candle, opened $0.0000787, high $0.0001032, closed $0.0000699 — a lower close with upper wick, suggesting distribution at the top. Pattern: pump-and-partial-dump with declining closes after the spike high.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

After a violent pump in candle [2], the price has been making lower closes (candle [2] close $0.0000804 → candle [1] close $0.0000699). The short-term trend is turning down from the spike high. Medium-term is indeterminate given only 3 candles of history, but the structure resembles a classic pump-and-distribution pattern.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

30%

Sell

70%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000066 (candle [1] low)

Major support

$0.000009–$0.000011 (candle [3] low — pre-pump base)

Immediate resistance

$0.000080 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close area)

Major resistance

$0.000103–$0.000118 (candle [1] and [2] highs — spike peak zone)

The key support is the candle [1] low at $0.000066. A break below this opens a path toward the pre-pump base around $0.000009–$0.000011. Resistance is clustered at the spike highs of $0.000103 (candle [1] high) and $0.000118 (candle [2] high). These levels represent the distribution zone where sellers overwhelmed buyers.

Notable patterns

  • Pump-and-distribution: explosive candle [2] followed by bearish candle [1] with lower close
  • Upper wick rejection on candle [1] at $0.000103 — sellers defending the high
  • Volume climax on candle [2] ($199K) followed by sharp volume decline on candle [1] ($26K) — classic exhaustion signal
  • Candle [3] shows a long lower wick (low $0.000009, close $0.000011) — capitulation before the pump
  • Bearish engulfing structure: candle [1] opens above candle [2] close and closes below it

Liquidity

Liquidity

$34,386.47

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is extremely shallow at $34.39K against a $66.38K FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~52%, which sounds reasonable but in absolute terms means any sell order above a few hundred dollars will cause significant slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: sell volume ($203.98K) is 2.28x buy volume ($89.21K). Unique sellers (1,526) outnumber unique buyers (458) by 3.3:1, indicating broad distribution. With 4,259 sell transactions vs 2,225 buy transactions, the market is in clear outflow. Slippage risk is high for any position above ~$500. The PumpSwap pair (Cs3C1y9gFi8AGxaVov7rYVnXSWq3aAUxVJn5CPuVUH2L) is the sole liquidity venue identified.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

949,971,424.61

FDV

$66,380

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    219% 24h price swing with candles showing moves from $0.000009 to $0.000118 within hours. Extreme volatility typical of low-cap meme tokens post-pump.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Only $34.39K total liquidity on a single PumpSwap pool. Any meaningful position exit will cause severe slippage. Liquidity could be withdrawn at any time.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Unknown mint and freeze authority — potential for supply manipulation or account freezing
  • Unverified contract with unknown update authority
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($34.39K) — high exit slippage and rug-pull risk
  • Overwhelming sell pressure: 69.6% sell volume, 1,526 sellers vs 458 buyers
  • Classic pump-and-dump price pattern visible in 3-candle OHLC history
  • Single liquidity venue (PumpSwap) — no diversified market depth
  • No project description, no verified socials beyond Twitter — minimal transparency
  • 6h and 24h % changes showing 0% may indicate data anomaly or price manipulation

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable metadata is set to false — token metadata cannot be altered post-launch
  • Token launched via PumpFun infrastructure which has standardized launch mechanics
  • Active trading with 1,604 unique wallets in 24h shows genuine market participation
  • Twitter social link exists — some minimal social presence

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token mechanics and pump-and-dump dynamics. Position sizing should be minimal (well under 1% of any portfolio) if engaged at all.

GILF is a high-risk Solana meme token that has experienced a violent pump (+219% in 24h) but is showing all the hallmarks of a distribution phase: overwhelming sell pressure, declining volume after the spike, bearish candle structure, and a 3.3:1 seller-to-buyer ratio. The token has no verified contract, unknown authority status, and only $34.39K in liquidity. The investment thesis is almost entirely speculative momentum-based with significant downside risk.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral meme momentum drives a second wave of buying, new liquidity is added to the pool, and the token achieves broader Solana meme coin community recognition, pushing price back toward or above the $0.000118 spike high.

  • Viral Twitter/social media traction causing FOMO buying
  • New whale accumulation reversing current distribution
  • Broader Solana meme season lifting all low-cap tokens
  • Liquidity pool deepening reducing slippage and attracting larger buyers

Base Case

The token stabilizes in the $0.000040–$0.000070 range short-term as the initial pump fades, then gradually drifts lower over days/weeks as interest wanes, settling 60–80% below the spike high.

  • No new major catalysts emerge
  • Liquidity remains at current shallow levels
  • Sell pressure moderates but buyers remain insufficient to push new highs
  • Token avoids outright rug-pull in the near term

Bear Case

High probability

Sell pressure continues to dominate, early buyers complete their distribution, liquidity is thin and potentially withdrawn, and the token retraces 80–95% from its spike high back toward pre-pump levels ($0.000009–$0.000020).

  • Continued 69.6% sell pressure with no catalyst for reversal
  • Shallow liquidity amplifying downside price impact
  • Unknown authority status creating rug-pull risk
  • No fundamental value or utility to support price floor
  • Classic pump-and-dump pattern completion

Analysis details

Generated

Aug 7, 06:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-08-07 18:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Mint: 2YxBvZ4BwYtoLdzf7pDAAQ6kExX94q5nz8RrLaPHpump)
  • PumpSwap pair data (Cs3C1y9gFi8AGxaVov7rYVnXSWq3aAUxVJn5CPuVUH2L)
  • USD price feed and 24h change data
  • 3 hourly OHLC candles (2026-08-07 16:00–18:00 UTC)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buys/sells, unique wallets)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • No holder count or distribution data available (endpoints retired)
  • No sniper/early buyer data available
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are unknown
  • Contract is unverified — on-chain mechanics cannot be fully confirmed
  • 6h and 24h % price changes showing 0% is anomalous and may indicate data feed issues
  • Single liquidity pool with very shallow depth limits price discovery reliability
  • Token is extremely new with minimal price history

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Meme tokens like GILF carry extreme risk of total loss. The data used is sourced from on-chain metrics and third-party APIs which may contain errors or delays. Past price performance (including the 219% 24h spike) is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose completely.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Grandma I'd Like to Fuck ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Grandma I'd Like to Fuck?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Grandma I'd Like to Fuck liquidity falling?

As of 2026-08-07 18:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $34,386.47. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Grandma I'd Like to Fuck (GILF)?

The token surged ~219% in 24h but is now showing clear distribution: sell volume ($203.98K) dwarfs buy volume ($89.21K), and the most recent candle closed lower than it opened ($0.0000787 open vs $0.0000699 close). The 5-minute change is already -4.26%, suggesting momentum is fading. Price is likely to retrace toward the $0.000040–$0.000060 range unless fresh buying catalysts emerge. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000030 to $0.000100.

Is GILF a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token mechanics and pump-and-dump dynamics. Position sizing should be minimal (well under 1% of any portfolio) if engaged at all.

What are the key risks of holding GILF?

Unknown mint and freeze authority — potential for supply manipulation or account freezing • Unverified contract with unknown update authority • Extremely shallow liquidity ($34.39K) — high exit slippage and rug-pull risk

← Back to all predictions

Track GILF