Willow

One Wish Willow Price Today & AI Analysis

WillowSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 2, 2026

Price

$0.053008

-3.90% 24h · FDV $3,004

Contract

Live
2VkpEcZ7zUVWZ8RUPuhKjaARw2vPUnhV2dcmco7spump

Chain

Holders

183

Market cap

$3,004

More tokens on Solana

One Wish Willow: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-02 22:20 UTC

Holder addresses

692

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

Not available
How concentrated is One Wish Willow ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 692 addresses (2026-06-02 22:20 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling One Wish Willow?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is One Wish Willow liquidity falling?
Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-02 22:20 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Ask Unhosted AI about Willow

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Jun 2, 10:20 PM UTC

FDV

$0

Liquidity

Not available

Holders

692

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

One Wish Willow (Willow) is an ultra-early-stage Solana memecoin launched on PumpSwap, themed around a viral item from the 'Obsession' movie. The token is fewer than 24 hours old with 692 holders, having exploded from 17 holders to 692 in a single day (+98%). The price surged ~188.7% in 24h but faces extreme sell pressure (86.9% sell volume vs 13.1% buy volume), zero reported liquidity depth, and highly concentrated supply. This is a high-risk, speculative micro-cap with classic pump-and-dump risk profile.

Key points

  • Viral pop-culture narrative tied to the 'Obsession' movie sold-out item
  • Explosive 24h holder growth from 17 to 692 (+98%) indicating rapid viral spread
  • 188.6% 24h price surge on PumpSwap
  • Extremely low market cap / FDV — sub-cent price with micro-cap dynamics
  • Token launched on PumpSwap with social links (Twitter, website, Moralis)

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The 5-minute price change is already -5.19%, and sell pressure dominates at 86.9% of 24h volume ($122.79K sells vs $18.52K buys). With 1,550 sell transactions vs 223 buys and 639 unique sellers vs 78 buyers, the short-term outlook is bearish. The OHLC candles show a volatile, declining pattern from the recent high. Immediate support is fragile given zero reported liquidity depth.

Target low

$0.000032

Target high

$0.000200

Support

$0.000039 (recent candle low, Candle 2 low), $0.000033 (Candle 2 absolute low ~$0.000032)

Resistance

$0.000058 (Candle 1/2 open and close cluster), $0.000070 (Candle 3 high)

Medium term · 1–7 days

bearish

Without sustained buying interest, new utility, or a broader viral catalyst, the token is likely to retrace sharply. The holder base is brand new (all acquired within 24h), sniper PnL is mostly negative, and liquidity is reported at $0.00. Continued sell pressure from early holders and snipers could drive price toward launch-level lows.

Catalysts

  • Renewed viral social media attention around the 'Obsession' movie narrative
  • Listing on a higher-tier DEX aggregator or CEX
  • Whale accumulation reversing the sell trend
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally

Bullish factors

  • 188.6% 24h price surge demonstrates strong initial momentum
  • Viral pop-culture narrative with broad retail appeal
  • Rapid holder growth from 17 to 692 in under 24 hours
  • Social media presence (Twitter, website) provides marketing infrastructure
  • 1h price change of +106.4% shows recent buying spike

Bearish factors

  • 86.9% sell pressure ($122.79K sells vs $18.52K buys) is extremely dominant
  • 1,550 sell transactions vs only 223 buy transactions in 24h
  • Total liquidity reported at $0.00 — extreme slippage risk
  • Token is less than 24 hours old with no track record
  • Top 10 holders control 34.66% of supply; top 100 control 75.09%
  • 3 of 4 snipers are in negative PnL, suggesting early buyers are underwater
  • Mutable metadata and unknown update authority introduce rug risk
  • 5-minute price already declining -5.19%

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the token being less than 24 hours old, zero reported liquidity depth, highly volatile OHLC data with inconsistent H/L ordering, missing sniper cost basis data, and the inherently unpredictable nature of memecoin price action. The 6h and 24h price change both showing 0% in analytics (despite the 188.6% figure) suggests data inconsistencies.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
2VkpEc...pump
Total Supply
1 (with 0 decimals — this is likely a display artifact; actual on-chain supply is a large integer given the holder balances shown)

Key Risks

  • Zero reported liquidity depth makes exit extremely difficult and slippage catastrophic
  • 86.9% sell pressure with 8.2:1 seller-to-buyer ratio indicates active distribution phase
  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug risk cannot be ruled out
  • Token supply data is inconsistent (reported as '1' but holder balances suggest quadrillions)

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Three hourly candles are available (20:00–22:00 UTC, June 2 2026). Note: the OHLC data appears to have H and L values swapped in Candle 1 (H < L numerically), suggesting a data feed anomaly. Interpreting directionally: Candle 3 (20:00) opened at $0.0000580, reached a high of $0.0000698, and closed lower at $0.0000389 — a bearish candle with a long upper wick indicating rejection at highs. Candle 2 (21:00) opened at $0.0000393, dipped to $0.0000323, and closed at $0.0000580 — a bullish recovery candle. Candle 1 (22:00) opened at $0.0000580 and closed at $0.0000393 — another bearish close. The pattern shows high volatility with alternating bull/bear candles and no clear directional trend, consistent with a newly launched memecoin experiencing erratic price discovery.

Trend

Short-term

Sideways

Medium-term

Downtrend

Short-term price action is highly volatile and sideways-to-down across the 3 available hourly candles. The medium-term trend is bearish given the dominant sell pressure (86.9%) and the 5-minute decline of -5.19% from the current price. The token has not established a stable uptrend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

13%

Sell

87%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000039 (recent candle close cluster, Candles 1 & 3)

Major support

$0.000032 (Candle 2 low — lowest observed price in dataset)

Immediate resistance

$0.000058 (repeated open/close level across multiple candles)

Major resistance

$0.000070 (Candle 3 high — highest observed price in dataset)

The $0.000039 level has acted as both support and resistance across multiple candles, making it a key pivot. A break below $0.000032 would signal capitulation. The $0.000058 level is a key resistance that has been tested and rejected. The all-time high in this dataset is $0.000070, which represents the major resistance ceiling.

Notable patterns

  • Bearish upper wick rejection at $0.000070 in Candle 3 — sellers overwhelmed buyers at the high
  • Alternating bull/bear candle sequence suggesting indecision and high volatility
  • Declining volume trend after the peak volume candle — weakening momentum
  • Price clustering around $0.000039–$0.000058 range indicating a consolidation zone
  • Current price ($0.000142) is significantly above all 3 OHLC candle ranges — suggesting the candles may be from an earlier period before the 188.6% surge, or data ordering is reversed

Liquidity

Liquidity

Not available

Depth

Not assessed

Slippage risk

Not assessed

Liquidity depth and slippage risk cannot be assessed without a liquidity observation.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1 (with 0 decimals — this is likely a display artifact; actual on-chain supply is a large integer given the holder balances shown)

FDV

$0.00 (reported — likely a data feed limitation given the sub-cent price)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    188.6% 24h price surge followed by -5.19% in 5 minutes. Three hourly candles show price swings of 50%+ within single candles. Extreme volatility typical of newly launched memecoins.

  • LiquidityNot assessed

    A liquidity observation is not available in the saved inputs.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Zero reported liquidity depth makes exit extremely difficult and slippage catastrophic
  • 86.9% sell pressure with 8.2:1 seller-to-buyer ratio indicates active distribution phase
  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug risk cannot be ruled out
  • Token supply data is inconsistent (reported as '1' but holder balances suggest quadrillions)
  • All 692 holders acquired within 24 hours — no long-term holder base for price stability
  • Unverified contract with no audit
  • Narrative-driven with no utility — entirely dependent on viral momentum
  • Top 100 holders control 75.09% of supply — extreme dump risk from concentrated holders

Mitigating factors

  • Social media presence (Twitter, website) provides some accountability
  • Not flagged as spam by data provider
  • PumpSwap liquidity pool is the #1 holder, suggesting some DEX liquidity exists
  • Viral pop-culture narrative has demonstrated ability to attract retail buyers rapidly
  • 4 snipers is relatively low, suggesting the launch was not heavily front-run by bots

Suitable for

Suitable ONLY for highly experienced crypto traders who understand memecoin mechanics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring the position. Absolutely not suitable for risk-averse investors, beginners, or anyone investing more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This is a speculative trade, not an investment.

One Wish Willow (Willow) is a pure narrative-driven memecoin in its first 24 hours of existence. The bull case rests entirely on viral momentum from the 'Obsession' movie theme sustaining and attracting new buyers faster than existing holders sell. The bear case — which appears more probable given current on-chain data — is that the token is in active distribution with 86.9% sell pressure, zero liquidity depth, and a holder base that is entirely new and untested. The base case is a continued volatile decline with occasional pump spikes driven by social media activity.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The 'Obsession' movie narrative goes viral on Twitter/TikTok, driving a second wave of retail FOMO. New buyer inflow overwhelms sellers, liquidity deepens on PumpSwap, and the token achieves a 5–10x from current levels before stabilizing.

  • Sustained viral social media campaign around the 'Obsession' movie theme
  • Influencer promotion driving retail FOMO
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifting all boats
  • Whale accumulation reversing the current sell trend

Base Case

The token experiences continued high volatility with periodic pump spikes driven by social media activity, but the overall trend is downward as sell pressure outpaces new buyer inflow. Price stabilizes at a fraction of the 24h high within 7 days.

  • Viral narrative provides intermittent buying interest but not sustained demand
  • Liquidity remains thin, keeping price action erratic
  • Whale holders gradually distribute into any price spikes
  • No major exchange listing or partnership announcement

Bear Case

High probability

Sell pressure continues to dominate, liquidity remains thin, and the token retraces 70–90% from its 24h high as early holders and snipers exit. The holder count stabilizes or declines as buyers realize losses.

  • 86.9% sell pressure with 8.2:1 seller-to-buyer ratio already in place
  • Zero reported liquidity depth amplifying price impact of sells
  • Mutable metadata and unknown authority creating trust deficit
  • Narrative fades without sustained social media engagement
  • Sniper and whale distribution into retail buyers

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 2, 10:20 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-02 22:20 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain metadata (mint, decimals, supply, authority)
  • PumpSwap DEX trading data (pair: 7tvfaFUWc15z3kVkJTKuazNzkHn9g1Xdr8bPCBrcgNtZ)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (3 candles, June 2 2026)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data
  • Historical holder series (30 days daily)
  • Top 20 holder addresses and balances
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 4 snipers)

Limitations

  • Total supply reported as '1' with 0 decimals is inconsistent with holder balance data — supply figures may be unreliable
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 may be a data feed error rather than true zero liquidity
  • Sniper cost basis (USD sniped) is unknown for all 4 snipers, limiting precise PnL and concentration calculations
  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • OHLC candle H/L values appear swapped in Candle 1, suggesting possible data feed anomaly
  • 6h and 24h price change both show 0% in analytics despite 188.6% 24h change reported elsewhere — data inconsistency
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are all unknown — rug risk cannot be fully assessed
  • Historical holder data shows only 17 holders for 30 days with no change, then 692 in 24h — the 30-day history may not reflect the token's true age
  • No audit, no verified contract, no on-chain utility metrics available

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially newly launched memecoins, carry extreme risk of total loss. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is One Wish Willow ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 692 addresses (2026-06-02 22:20 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling One Wish Willow?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is One Wish Willow liquidity falling?

Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for One Wish Willow (Willow)?

The 5-minute price change is already -5.19%, and sell pressure dominates at 86.9% of 24h volume ($122.79K sells vs $18.52K buys). With 1,550 sell transactions vs 223 buys and 639 unique sellers vs 78 buyers, the short-term outlook is bearish. The OHLC candles show a volatile, declining pattern from the recent high. Immediate support is fragile given zero reported liquidity depth. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000032 to $0.000200.

Is Willow a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced crypto traders who understand memecoin mechanics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring the position. Absolutely not suitable for risk-averse investors, beginners, or anyone investing more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This is a speculative trade, not an investment.

What are the key risks of holding Willow?

Zero reported liquidity depth makes exit extremely difficult and slippage catastrophic • 86.9% sell pressure with 8.2:1 seller-to-buyer ratio indicates active distribution phase • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug risk cannot be ruled out

← Back to all predictions

Track Willow