MONSTERS

The Algorithm Monsters Price Prediction 2026

MONSTERS
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 19, 2026

2JKRHE9pxjNgWDZgewmShq8UxTfsyFrHhWkJTRsDpump

$0.051652

FDV $1,651

LiveContract:2JKRHE9pxjNgWDZgewmShq8UxTfsyFrHhWkJTRsDpumpChain:SolanaHolders:56Market cap:$1,651

More tokens on Solana

PENALTY

PENALTY

degenfc.fun

$0.0522573.6%
MC $2.3K
lol420FTP!*:)

lol420FTP!*:)

︀︀lol420fuckthePOLICE!*:)

$0.0522650.0%
MC $1.9K
Pump

Pump

Make A Pump

$0.0515700.0%
MC $1.6K
PEVOLUTION

PEVOLUTION

Pevolution

$0.0531640.0%
MC $3.2K
leo

leo

patient zero

$0.0518400.0%
MC $1.8K
arc

arc

AI Rig Complex

$0.060614.9%
MC $60.63M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about MONSTERS

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of May 19, 10:19 PM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$0

Holders

661

Snipers

25

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

MONSTERS (The Algorithm Monsters) is an extremely new Solana meme/culture token launched on PumpSwap, themed around internet culture analyst Adam Aleksic's concept of 'Algorithm Monsters' — AI-generated Lovecraftian creatures emerging from internet feeds. The token has a total formatted supply of 1 (with decimals=0, indicating a single indivisible unit or a very unusual supply structure), is unverified, mutable, and has experienced a catastrophic -81.79% price decline within 24 hours. Sell pressure is overwhelming at 91.4% of volume. The token is essentially in freefall from its launch spike.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Unique internet-culture narrative tied to a real analyst (Adam Aleksic) and viral meme concepts (Shoggoths, Big Chungus, Tung Tung Tung Sahur)
Explosive holder growth from 7 to 661 in under 24 hours (+99% in 24h)
Extremely unusual supply structure: total formatted supply of 1 with decimals=0, yet balances in the quadrillions suggest a raw supply discrepancy
Launched on PumpSwap with $0 reported liquidity — extreme illiquidity risk
91.4% sell pressure with 3,844 sells vs 358 buys in 24h signals mass exit

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

Price is in near-vertical freefall. The most recent hourly candle (Candle 1) closed at $0.0000164, down from an open of $0.0000934 — an intra-candle drop of ~82%. With 91.4% sell pressure, 3,844 sells vs 358 buys, and $0 reported liquidity, there is essentially no buy-side support. Further downside toward zero is the most probable short-term outcome.

Target low$0.000001
Target high$0.000050
Support: $0.0000164 (current price / recent low), $0.000010 (psychological round number), $0.000001 (near-zero floor)
Resistance: $0.0000934 (Candle 1 open), $0.000152 (Candle 2 open/high), $0.000174 (Candle 3 all-time high)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

Without a significant narrative catalyst, renewed influencer attention, or a dramatic reversal in buy/sell dynamics, the token is likely to continue declining toward negligible value. The meme narrative is novel but highly speculative and dependent on viral momentum that appears to have already peaked.

Catalysts
  • Renewed viral attention from Adam Aleksic or major crypto influencers
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all boats
  • Coordinated community buy-back effort
  • Listing on a higher-profile aggregator or exchange

Bullish factors

  • Strong narrative hook tied to a real internet culture analyst and trending meme concepts
  • Rapid holder growth from 7 to 661 in under 24 hours suggests genuine viral interest
  • 20 snipers present at launch, with several in profit (e.g., sniper 1 at +272.9%, sniper 13 at +89.6%), indicating early smart money captured value
  • Social presence across Twitter, website, and Moralis

Bearish factors

  • Price down -81.79% in 24 hours with no sign of reversal
  • 91.4% sell pressure ($315.92K sell volume vs $29.91K buy volume)
  • 3,844 sells vs only 358 buys in 24h — overwhelming distribution
  • $0.00 reported total liquidity — extreme slippage and exit risk
  • Mutable metadata and unknown update authority — rug risk present
  • Unverified contract
  • Most snipers have already sold or are at a loss, reducing early-holder support
  • Token is only hours old with no track record
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme volatility of this newly launched meme token, $0 reported liquidity, missing sniper cost-basis data, and the inherently unpredictable nature of viral meme narratives. Only 3 hourly candles of price history are available.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle 3 (20:00 UTC): O=$0.0000246, H=$0.0001736, L=$0.0000246, C=$0.0001492 — a strong bullish candle with a long lower wick, closing near the high. Candle 2 (21:00 UTC): O=$0.0001522, H=$0.0001522, L=$0.0000234, C=$0.0000883 — a bearish candle with a long upper wick and close near the midpoint, signaling distribution. Candle 3→2 shows a lower high ($0.0001736 → $0.0001522) and lower close. Candle 1 (22:00 UTC): O=$0.0000934, H=$0.0001396, L=$0.0000164, C=$0.0000164 — a bearish engulfing/crash candle closing at the absolute low, confirming capitulation. The pattern is a classic pump-and-dump: spike up in Candle 3, distribution in Candle 2, collapse in Candle 1.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 9%Sell 91%

The 3-candle history shows a clear pump-and-dump pattern: initial spike to $0.0001736 all-time high, followed by two consecutive lower highs and lower closes, with the most recent candle closing at the session low of $0.0000164. Both short and medium-term trends are firmly bearish.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000164 (current price, Candle 1 low)
Major$0.000010 (psychological level below current price)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0000934 (Candle 1 open)
Major$0.0001736 (all-time high, Candle 3 high)

The all-time high of $0.0001736 (Candle 3) represents the major resistance. The Candle 1 open of $0.0000934 is the first overhead resistance. Current price at $0.0000164 is at the absolute low of the 3-candle range with no historical support below it.

Notable patterns

  • Pump-and-dump pattern: spike in Candle 3, distribution in Candle 2, collapse in Candle 1
  • Bearish engulfing on Candle 1 (opens above prior close, closes at new low)
  • Long upper wick on Candle 2 indicating strong selling pressure at highs
  • Lower highs across all 3 candles after the initial spike
  • Volume declining with price — potential seller exhaustion but no buyer confirmation

Total holders661
24h Δ+654
7d Δ+654
30d Δ+654
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth is inversely correlated with price in this case: the token gained 654 holders (+99%) in 24 hours while the price dropped -81.79%. This is consistent with a pump-and-dump dynamic where retail buyers FOMO in at elevated prices while early holders distribute, resulting in more holders but at lower average prices.

The historical holder data shows the token had exactly 7 holders for the entire 30-day period prior to May 19, 2026, indicating the token was dormant or pre-launch. On May 19, holders exploded from 7 to 661 (+654, +99% in 24h), with +23 added in the last hour alone. This is a classic viral launch pattern. The distribution breakdown (whales=203, sharks=212, dolphins=228, fish=26, octopus=11) shows a surprisingly high concentration of larger holders relative to small fish, which may indicate bot activity or coordinated buying. Growth is technically accelerating (23 new holders in the last hour), but this must be viewed in the context of the collapsing price.

Top 10 hold24.94%
Top 100 hold59.16%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

Bwc4uVUZyFnkzHJ44bBcUTZ6Wd4C2i411FSp2p3wRfGq

DEX liquidity pool (PumpSwap pair address)

20402219614063.70%

EPqYH4juiZQyynqKdtXWfKM14EJtBqA7MwNzKsanfdWh

Individual whale / early accumulator

535182702247.30%

AsQXCFnuFzpLLrvu9MEd8dB9M6UumTPKbZxPzSJiTmFv

Individual whale / early accumulator

511930319207.00%

C2vgUmrWRnGPAfYf9NKU68q15SHVKRLWcAWYJu1UL7kK

Individual whale / early accumulator

509566589112.10%

EyzmxeEwKti25VmE39pDB9t8JR8NGDJ4HuzpPzPZNuZJ

Individual whale / early accumulator

508308117865.40%

NOTE: The percentage figures in the raw data appear to be corrupted or represent raw balance values rather than true percentage of supply — values like '20402219614063700.00%' are nonsensical as percentages. The top 10 holders control 24.94% of supply and the top 100 control 59.16% per the supply concentration metrics, which is moderately concentrated. The #1 holder (Bwc4uVUZyFnkzHJ44bBcUTZ6Wd4C2i411FSp2p3wRfGq) matches the PumpSwap pair address, indicating it is the DEX liquidity pool. Holders 2–20 appear to be individual wallets with very similar balance sizes (~4.5T–5.4T raw units), suggesting possible bot-driven or coordinated distribution. Overall whale sentiment is distributing given the 91.4% sell pressure.

Liquidity$0.00
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$29,910
Sell$315,920
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers91
Unique sellers1,012

Liquidity is reported as $0.00, which is an extreme red flag. This means any trade — buy or sell — will face catastrophic slippage. The 24h trading data shows $315.92K in sell volume vs only $29.91K in buy volume (91.4% sell pressure), with 1,012 unique sellers vs 91 unique buyers. The net flow is heavily outbound. The ratio of sellers to buyers (11:1) is one of the most extreme distribution signals possible. Despite $0 reported liquidity, $345K+ in volume was processed, suggesting liquidity existed at launch but has been largely drained. The token is effectively in a liquidity crisis.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (formatted, decimals=0) — NOTE: Raw balances in holder data suggest the actual on-chain supply is in the quadrillions, indicating a likely data formatting issue or non-standard decimal configuration
FDV$0.00 (as reported; effectively negligible)

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token metadata shows decimals=0 and a formatted total supply of 1, yet holder balances are in the hundreds of trillions (e.g., top holder balance: 204,022,196,140,637). This is a significant data anomaly — either the supply formatting is incorrect, or the token uses a non-standard configuration. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the token is mutable (mutable=true), meaning metadata can be changed by the authority holder — a meaningful rug risk vector. The contract is unverified. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the provided data. The FDV of $0.00 reflects the near-zero price. Given the mutable metadata and unknown authorities, rug risk from authorities cannot be ruled out and should be treated as elevated.

Volatility
high

Price dropped -81.79% in 24 hours and -86.63% in 1 hour. The token spiked to $0.0001736 and collapsed to $0.0000164 within 3 hours of trading — extreme volatility consistent with a pump-and-dump.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity reported as $0.00. Any attempt to exit a position will face extreme slippage. The liquidity pool (PumpSwap pair Bwc4uVUZyFnkzHJ44bBcUTZ6Wd4C2i411FSp2p3wRfGq) appears to have been largely drained.

Concentration
medium

Top 10 holders control 24.94% of supply; top 100 control 59.16%. Holders 2–20 show suspiciously similar balance sizes, potentially indicating coordinated wallets or bots. The PumpSwap pool is the largest single holder.

SniperDump
high

20 snipers were active at launch. Most have already sold through their positions (only 2 of 20 show remaining balances). Several snipers realized significant profits (+272.9%, +89.6%), confirming early holders dumped on retail buyers.

Authority
medium

Token is mutable with unknown update authority. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. Unverified contract. These factors create meaningful rug/manipulation risk, though no confirmed malicious action has been observed.

Key risks

  • Near-zero liquidity ($0.00 reported) makes exit extremely difficult or impossible at fair value
  • Overwhelming sell pressure (91.4%) with 11:1 seller-to-buyer ratio
  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug risk present
  • Token is only hours old with no track record or fundamentals
  • Sniper dump already occurred — early smart money has largely exited
  • Price in freefall with no technical support below current levels
  • Unverified contract on an unaudited platform
  • Viral narrative may be short-lived; meme tokens typically have very short attention spans

Mitigating factors

  • Strong viral narrative tied to a real, credible internet culture analyst (Adam Aleksic)
  • Rapid holder growth (7 → 661 in 24h) shows genuine community interest
  • Social presence across multiple platforms (Twitter, website, Moralis)
  • Some snipers remain in profit, suggesting the token has not gone to absolute zero yet
  • Meme concept (Algorithm Monsters, Shoggoths) is timely and culturally resonant
Suitable for: Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This token exhibits nearly every high-risk characteristic: extreme volatility, near-zero liquidity, sniper dumps, overwhelming sell pressure, unknown authorities, and mutable metadata. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep experience in high-risk Solana meme tokens.

MONSTERS is a high-concept meme token riding a viral internet culture narrative. It launched explosively, attracted 661 holders in under 24 hours, but has already experienced a classic pump-and-dump with -81.79% price decline. The investment case is purely speculative and narrative-driven, with no fundamentals, near-zero liquidity, and overwhelming sell pressure. The only viable bull case requires a second viral wave; the base and bear cases both point toward continued decline.

Bull case (low)

A second viral wave driven by renewed influencer attention (Adam Aleksic, major crypto Twitter accounts) or a broader Solana meme season triggers a fresh wave of buyers, pushing price back toward the $0.0001 range and establishing a more sustainable holder base.

  • Adam Aleksic or major influencer posts about the token
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Viral spread of the Algorithm Monsters concept on social media
  • Community-organized buy-back or marketing campaign
  • Listing on a prominent aggregator or meme coin tracker

Base case

The token stabilizes at a very low price ($0.000005–$0.000020) with minimal trading activity, retaining a small community of holders who believe in the narrative but unable to attract significant new capital without a major catalyst. Slow bleed toward irrelevance.

  • No major new catalyst emerges in the next 7 days
  • Liquidity remains near zero, preventing large trades
  • A small core community (50–100 holders) remains engaged
  • Price finds a temporary floor near current levels before resuming decline

Bear case (high)

Liquidity continues to drain, remaining holders capitulate, and the token trends toward near-zero value within days. The meme narrative fails to sustain a second wave, and the token joins the graveyard of failed PumpSwap launches.

  • $0.00 reported liquidity with no signs of replenishment
  • 91.4% sell pressure with 11:1 seller-to-buyer ratio
  • Snipers have already dumped — no early-holder support
  • Mutable metadata creates ongoing uncertainty
  • Meme attention cycles are extremely short; narrative may already be exhausted

GeneratedMay 19, 10:19 PM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-05-19T22:00 UTC. Price and volume data is current to the most recent hourly candle. Holder data reflects a 24h snapshot.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, mutability)
  • PumpSwap pair data (Bwc4uVUZyFnkzHJ44bBcUTZ6Wd4C2i411FSp2p3wRfGq)
  • OHLC hourly candle data (3 candles, May 19 2026 20:00–22:00 UTC)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30 days daily)
  • Top 20 holder addresses and balances
  • Sniper analysis (20 snipers, first 1,000 blocks)
  • Token metadata (name, symbol, description, social links, update authority)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Sniper cost-basis ('sniped' amounts) are all listed as unknown, preventing precise concentration and PnL calculations
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — may be a data lag or reporting issue rather than literal zero
  • Holder percentage figures in raw data appear corrupted (values >100%)
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority statuses are unknown
  • Token is only hours old — no historical price data, no established patterns
  • Formatted supply of '1' with decimals=0 conflicts with quadrillion-scale raw balances — supply data is unreliable
  • No audit, no verified contract, no on-chain program verification

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially newly launched meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (formatted, decimals=0) — NOTE: Raw balances in holder data suggest the actual on-chain supply is in the quadrillions, indicating a likely data formatting issue or non-standard decimal configuration

Key Risks

•Near-zero liquidity ($0.00 reported) makes exit extremely difficult or impossible at fair value
•Overwhelming sell pressure (91.4%) with 11:1 seller-to-buyer ratio
•Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug risk present
•Token is only hours old with no track record or fundamentals

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

20 snipers were active in the first 1,000 blocks. Sniper cost-basis data is unavailable (all 'sniped' amounts listed as unknown), making precise concentration calculations impossible. Of the 20 snipers with known PnL: 11 are in profit (ranging from +2.5% to +272.9%), 8 are at a loss (ranging from -1.4% to -23.2%), and 1 is at breakeven. The top sniper (niggerd597...) realized +272.9% profit; sniper 13 (2tgUbS9U...) realized +89.6%. Most snipers appear to have fully sold their positions given near-zero remaining balances. The high sell-through rate among snipers is consistent with the 91.4% overall sell pressure.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateMixed
Sell-through rateHigh
Profit-taking risk
high

Sniper balances are largely unknown; only 2 of 20 snipers show remaining balances (G75fQqmC1ZRAZmRM4tETPg2STcXigR6hYboXSQTWNxQz: $24, A4yunkwYg9VEoc5hfe29SEhoj7Y63zPjrMEF6x9dSFur: $2), suggesting the vast majority have fully exited their positions.

Early buyers (snipers) are predominantly exiting. The majority have sold through their positions, with only 2 of 20 showing any remaining balance. This signals that informed early participants view the current price as a distribution zone, not an accumulation opportunity.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for The Algorithm Monsters (MONSTERS)?

Price is in near-vertical freefall. The most recent hourly candle (Candle 1) closed at $0.0000164, down from an open of $0.0000934 — an intra-candle drop of ~82%. With 91.4% sell pressure, 3,844 sells vs 358 buys, and $0 reported liquidity, there is essentially no buy-side support. Further downside toward zero is the most probable short-term outcome. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000001 to $0.000050.

Is MONSTERS a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This token exhibits nearly every high-risk characteristic: extreme volatility, near-zero liquidity, sniper dumps, overwhelming sell pressure, unknown authorities, and mutable metadata. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep experience in high-risk Solana meme tokens.

How are MONSTERS holders trending?

The Algorithm Monsters currently has 661 holders and is growing (24h: 654, 7d: 654, 30d: 654). The historical holder data shows the token had exactly 7 holders for the entire 30-day period prior to May 19, 2026, indicating the token was dormant or pre-launch. On May 19, holders exploded from 7 to 661 (+654, +99% in 24h), with +23 added in the last hour alone. This is a classic viral launch pattern. The distribution breakdown (whales=203, sharks=212, dolphins=228, fish=26, octopus=11) shows a surprisingly high concentration of larger holders relative to small fish, which may indicate bot activity or coordinated buying. Growth is technically accelerating (23 new holders in the last hour), but this must be viewed in the context of the collapsing price.

What does sniper activity look like for MONSTERS?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "mixed" and sell-through rate "high". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding MONSTERS?

Near-zero liquidity ($0.00 reported) makes exit extremely difficult or impossible at fair value • Overwhelming sell pressure (91.4%) with 11:1 seller-to-buyer ratio • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug risk present

← Back to all predictions

Track MONSTERS