MONSTERS

The Algorithm Monsters Price Today & AI Analysis

MONSTERSSolanaAnalysis as of May 19, 2026

Price

$0.047809

FDV $78,046

Contract

Live
2JKRHE9pxjNgWDZgewmShq8UxTfsyFrHhWkJTRsDpump

Chain

Holders

53

Market cap

$78,046

More tokens on Solana

The Algorithm Monsters: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-19 22:19 UTC

Holder addresses

661

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

Not available
How concentrated is The Algorithm Monsters ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 661 addresses (2026-05-19 22:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling The Algorithm Monsters?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is The Algorithm Monsters liquidity falling?
Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-19 22:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Ask Unhosted AI about MONSTERS

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of May 19, 10:19 PM UTC

FDV

$0

Liquidity

Not available

Holders

661

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

MONSTERS (The Algorithm Monsters) is an extremely new Solana meme/culture token launched on PumpSwap, themed around internet culture analyst Adam Aleksic's concept of 'Algorithm Monsters' — AI-generated Lovecraftian creatures emerging from internet feeds. The token has a total formatted supply of 1 (with decimals=0, indicating a single indivisible unit or a very unusual supply structure), is unverified, mutable, and has experienced a catastrophic -81.79% price decline within 24 hours. Sell pressure is overwhelming at 91.4% of volume. The token is essentially in freefall from its launch spike.

Key points

  • Unique internet-culture narrative tied to a real analyst (Adam Aleksic) and viral meme concepts (Shoggoths, Big Chungus, Tung Tung Tung Sahur)
  • Explosive holder growth from 7 to 661 in under 24 hours (+99% in 24h)
  • Extremely unusual supply structure: total formatted supply of 1 with decimals=0, yet balances in the quadrillions suggest a raw supply discrepancy
  • Launched on PumpSwap with $0 reported liquidity — extreme illiquidity risk
  • 91.4% sell pressure with 3,844 sells vs 358 buys in 24h signals mass exit

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

Price is in near-vertical freefall. The most recent hourly candle (Candle 1) closed at $0.0000164, down from an open of $0.0000934 — an intra-candle drop of ~82%. With 91.4% sell pressure, 3,844 sells vs 358 buys, and $0 reported liquidity, there is essentially no buy-side support. Further downside toward zero is the most probable short-term outcome.

Target low

$0.000001

Target high

$0.000050

Support

$0.0000164 (current price / recent low), $0.000010 (psychological round number), $0.000001 (near-zero floor)

Resistance

$0.0000934 (Candle 1 open), $0.000152 (Candle 2 open/high), $0.000174 (Candle 3 all-time high)

Medium term · 1–7 days

bearish

Without a significant narrative catalyst, renewed influencer attention, or a dramatic reversal in buy/sell dynamics, the token is likely to continue declining toward negligible value. The meme narrative is novel but highly speculative and dependent on viral momentum that appears to have already peaked.

Catalysts

  • Renewed viral attention from Adam Aleksic or major crypto influencers
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all boats
  • Coordinated community buy-back effort
  • Listing on a higher-profile aggregator or exchange

Bullish factors

  • Strong narrative hook tied to a real internet culture analyst and trending meme concepts
  • Rapid holder growth from 7 to 661 in under 24 hours suggests genuine viral interest
  • 20 snipers present at launch, with several in profit (e.g., sniper 1 at +272.9%, sniper 13 at +89.6%), indicating early smart money captured value
  • Social presence across Twitter, website, and Moralis

Bearish factors

  • Price down -81.79% in 24 hours with no sign of reversal
  • 91.4% sell pressure ($315.92K sell volume vs $29.91K buy volume)
  • 3,844 sells vs only 358 buys in 24h — overwhelming distribution
  • $0.00 reported total liquidity — extreme slippage and exit risk
  • Mutable metadata and unknown update authority — rug risk present
  • Unverified contract
  • Most snipers have already sold or are at a loss, reducing early-holder support
  • Token is only hours old with no track record

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme volatility of this newly launched meme token, $0 reported liquidity, missing sniper cost-basis data, and the inherently unpredictable nature of viral meme narratives. Only 3 hourly candles of price history are available.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
2JKRHE...pump
Total Supply
1 (formatted, decimals=0) — NOTE: Raw balances in holder data suggest the actual on-chain supply is in the quadrillions, indicating a likely data formatting issue or non-standard decimal configuration

Key Risks

  • Near-zero liquidity ($0.00 reported) makes exit extremely difficult or impossible at fair value
  • Overwhelming sell pressure (91.4%) with 11:1 seller-to-buyer ratio
  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug risk present
  • Token is only hours old with no track record or fundamentals

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle 3 (20:00 UTC): O=$0.0000246, H=$0.0001736, L=$0.0000246, C=$0.0001492 — a strong bullish candle with a long lower wick, closing near the high. Candle 2 (21:00 UTC): O=$0.0001522, H=$0.0001522, L=$0.0000234, C=$0.0000883 — a bearish candle with a long upper wick and close near the midpoint, signaling distribution. Candle 3→2 shows a lower high ($0.0001736 → $0.0001522) and lower close. Candle 1 (22:00 UTC): O=$0.0000934, H=$0.0001396, L=$0.0000164, C=$0.0000164 — a bearish engulfing/crash candle closing at the absolute low, confirming capitulation. The pattern is a classic pump-and-dump: spike up in Candle 3, distribution in Candle 2, collapse in Candle 1.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

The 3-candle history shows a clear pump-and-dump pattern: initial spike to $0.0001736 all-time high, followed by two consecutive lower highs and lower closes, with the most recent candle closing at the session low of $0.0000164. Both short and medium-term trends are firmly bearish.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

9%

Sell

91%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000164 (current price, Candle 1 low)

Major support

$0.000010 (psychological level below current price)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000934 (Candle 1 open)

Major resistance

$0.0001736 (all-time high, Candle 3 high)

The all-time high of $0.0001736 (Candle 3) represents the major resistance. The Candle 1 open of $0.0000934 is the first overhead resistance. Current price at $0.0000164 is at the absolute low of the 3-candle range with no historical support below it.

Notable patterns

  • Pump-and-dump pattern: spike in Candle 3, distribution in Candle 2, collapse in Candle 1
  • Bearish engulfing on Candle 1 (opens above prior close, closes at new low)
  • Long upper wick on Candle 2 indicating strong selling pressure at highs
  • Lower highs across all 3 candles after the initial spike
  • Volume declining with price — potential seller exhaustion but no buyer confirmation

Liquidity

Liquidity

Not available

Depth

Not assessed

Slippage risk

Not assessed

Liquidity depth and slippage risk cannot be assessed without a liquidity observation.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1 (formatted, decimals=0) — NOTE: Raw balances in holder data suggest the actual on-chain supply is in the quadrillions, indicating a likely data formatting issue or non-standard decimal configuration

FDV

$0.00 (as reported; effectively negligible)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price dropped -81.79% in 24 hours and -86.63% in 1 hour. The token spiked to $0.0001736 and collapsed to $0.0000164 within 3 hours of trading — extreme volatility consistent with a pump-and-dump.

  • LiquidityNot assessed

    A liquidity observation is not available in the saved inputs.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Near-zero liquidity ($0.00 reported) makes exit extremely difficult or impossible at fair value
  • Overwhelming sell pressure (91.4%) with 11:1 seller-to-buyer ratio
  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug risk present
  • Token is only hours old with no track record or fundamentals
  • Sniper dump already occurred — early smart money has largely exited
  • Price in freefall with no technical support below current levels
  • Unverified contract on an unaudited platform
  • Viral narrative may be short-lived; meme tokens typically have very short attention spans

Mitigating factors

  • Strong viral narrative tied to a real, credible internet culture analyst (Adam Aleksic)
  • Rapid holder growth (7 → 661 in 24h) shows genuine community interest
  • Social presence across multiple platforms (Twitter, website, Moralis)
  • Some snipers remain in profit, suggesting the token has not gone to absolute zero yet
  • Meme concept (Algorithm Monsters, Shoggoths) is timely and culturally resonant

Suitable for

Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This token exhibits nearly every high-risk characteristic: extreme volatility, near-zero liquidity, sniper dumps, overwhelming sell pressure, unknown authorities, and mutable metadata. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep experience in high-risk Solana meme tokens.

MONSTERS is a high-concept meme token riding a viral internet culture narrative. It launched explosively, attracted 661 holders in under 24 hours, but has already experienced a classic pump-and-dump with -81.79% price decline. The investment case is purely speculative and narrative-driven, with no fundamentals, near-zero liquidity, and overwhelming sell pressure. The only viable bull case requires a second viral wave; the base and bear cases both point toward continued decline.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

A second viral wave driven by renewed influencer attention (Adam Aleksic, major crypto Twitter accounts) or a broader Solana meme season triggers a fresh wave of buyers, pushing price back toward the $0.0001 range and establishing a more sustainable holder base.

  • Adam Aleksic or major influencer posts about the token
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Viral spread of the Algorithm Monsters concept on social media
  • Community-organized buy-back or marketing campaign
  • Listing on a prominent aggregator or meme coin tracker

Base Case

The token stabilizes at a very low price ($0.000005–$0.000020) with minimal trading activity, retaining a small community of holders who believe in the narrative but unable to attract significant new capital without a major catalyst. Slow bleed toward irrelevance.

  • No major new catalyst emerges in the next 7 days
  • Liquidity remains near zero, preventing large trades
  • A small core community (50–100 holders) remains engaged
  • Price finds a temporary floor near current levels before resuming decline

Bear Case

High probability

Liquidity continues to drain, remaining holders capitulate, and the token trends toward near-zero value within days. The meme narrative fails to sustain a second wave, and the token joins the graveyard of failed PumpSwap launches.

  • $0.00 reported liquidity with no signs of replenishment
  • 91.4% sell pressure with 11:1 seller-to-buyer ratio
  • Snipers have already dumped — no early-holder support
  • Mutable metadata creates ongoing uncertainty
  • Meme attention cycles are extremely short; narrative may already be exhausted

Analysis details

Generated

May 19, 10:19 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-19 22:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, mutability)
  • PumpSwap pair data (Bwc4uVUZyFnkzHJ44bBcUTZ6Wd4C2i411FSp2p3wRfGq)
  • OHLC hourly candle data (3 candles, May 19 2026 20:00–22:00 UTC)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30 days daily)
  • Top 20 holder addresses and balances
  • Sniper analysis (20 snipers, first 1,000 blocks)
  • Token metadata (name, symbol, description, social links, update authority)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Sniper cost-basis ('sniped' amounts) are all listed as unknown, preventing precise concentration and PnL calculations
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — may be a data lag or reporting issue rather than literal zero
  • Holder percentage figures in raw data appear corrupted (values >100%)
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority statuses are unknown
  • Token is only hours old — no historical price data, no established patterns
  • Formatted supply of '1' with decimals=0 conflicts with quadrillion-scale raw balances — supply data is unreliable
  • No audit, no verified contract, no on-chain program verification

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially newly launched meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is The Algorithm Monsters ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 661 addresses (2026-05-19 22:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling The Algorithm Monsters?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is The Algorithm Monsters liquidity falling?

Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for The Algorithm Monsters (MONSTERS)?

Price is in near-vertical freefall. The most recent hourly candle (Candle 1) closed at $0.0000164, down from an open of $0.0000934 — an intra-candle drop of ~82%. With 91.4% sell pressure, 3,844 sells vs 358 buys, and $0 reported liquidity, there is essentially no buy-side support. Further downside toward zero is the most probable short-term outcome. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000001 to $0.000050.

Is MONSTERS a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This token exhibits nearly every high-risk characteristic: extreme volatility, near-zero liquidity, sniper dumps, overwhelming sell pressure, unknown authorities, and mutable metadata. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep experience in high-risk Solana meme tokens.

What are the key risks of holding MONSTERS?

Near-zero liquidity ($0.00 reported) makes exit extremely difficult or impossible at fair value • Overwhelming sell pressure (91.4%) with 11:1 seller-to-buyer ratio • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug risk present

← Back to all predictions

Track MONSTERS