How concentrated is LeverHyppo ownership?

As of 2026-09-24 01:45 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 33.29% of supply, out of 915 holder addresses.

Are large holders selling LeverHyppo?

In the 24 hours to 2026-09-24 01:45 UTC, DEX buys were $859,704.00 and sells $830,977.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.

Is LeverHyppo liquidity falling?

Liquidity rose 19.05%, from $21,860.84 (2026-09-23 17:00 UTC) to $26,024.65 (2026-09-24 01:00 UTC).

LeverHyppo Price Today & AI Analysis

LEVERHYPPOSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 24, 2026

$0.0₅4273

+7.42% 24h

Contract

Live

2Ghxme9RXa2vatoRPGnQgNKCXNZy2N3X7PbH4kzxHYPE

Chain

Solana

Holders

444

Market cap

$4,273

At a $1M market cap, $LEVERHYPPO would be $0.001000 (234x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is LEVERHYPPO a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 5

Transfer fee

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 3% fee and the owner can still raise it.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token blocks a sell

Transfer fee

3%Every buy and sell · can be raised

The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about LEVERHYPPO

3 free answers a day

LeverHyppo: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-24 01:45 UTC

Holder addresses

915

Top 10 supply share

33.29%

Reported liquidity

$20,947.00

How concentrated is LeverHyppo ownership?: As of 2026-09-24 01:45 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 33.29% of supply, out of 915 holder addresses.
Are large holders selling LeverHyppo?: In the 24 hours to 2026-09-24 01:45 UTC, DEX buys were $859,704.00 and sells $830,977.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.
Is LeverHyppo liquidity falling?: Liquidity rose 19.05%, from $21,860.84 (2026-09-23 17:00 UTC) to $26,024.65 (2026-09-24 01:00 UTC).

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Unhosted token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-24 01:45 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)	Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-23 17:00 UTC	$21,860.84
2026-09-23 18:00 UTC	$40,740.33
2026-09-23 19:00 UTC	$40,232.40
2026-09-23 20:00 UTC	$34,413.54
2026-09-23 21:00 UTC	$27,707.65
2026-09-23 22:00 UTC	$29,855.90
2026-09-23 23:00 UTC	$28,900.29
2026-09-24 00:00 UTC	$29,920.81
2026-09-24 01:00 UTC	$26,024.65

A liquidity change compares the first and last samples, which may be less than 24 hours apart. USD liquidity also moves with asset prices, not only with deposits and withdrawals.

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

2026-09-24 01:45 UTCSell · $23.07q14Djxfv…ygAJBAWallet B3Pt7fe6…8MKUpU
2026-09-24 01:45 UTCSell · $0.18Jjt4yyNn…2UTueqWallet freeupq4…ZVEByC
2026-09-24 01:45 UTCBuy · $194.394Aq2PM8d…WUFuXnWallet GSLTKaAe…BvjztN
2026-09-24 01:45 UTCBuy · $49.705PFXkBxN…hdXhbCWallet 6QwevGRR…pt3JRs
2026-09-24 01:45 UTCSell · $0.215cQj9DnX…uqbw4xWallet rLsi2DPw…JJf8uy
2026-09-24 01:45 UTCBuy · $574.502NXLaM1x…rAxEYdWallet 145GxkKC…YCK6Me
2026-09-24 01:45 UTCBuy · $198.134gPWNXdU…mrmP8cWallet 8y8Wjes4…tKcnS9
2026-09-24 01:44 UTCBuy · $4.055osQihQs…zpx5rsWallet 5rHQrhQT…DLesJo
2026-09-24 01:44 UTCBuy · $8.153SyrZu9o…Zua1V8Wallet ET5LMVcX…dz2tF1
2026-09-24 01:44 UTCSell · $1.224uyk2JZk…cjRPiYWallet 7DxPVLnB…rGGnq7

Report snapshot

as of Sep 24, 01:46 AM UTC

FDV

$194,294

Liquidity

$20,947.00

Holders

915

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

LEVERHYPPO is a microcap Solana token (FDV ~$194.29K) trading on a single Raydium CPMM pool with only $20.95K total liquidity. The token experienced an extreme price spike over the last 9 hourly candles — surging over 27,000% intra-hour at one point before retracing sharply — and is now down ~44% over the last hour and ~21% over the last 5 minutes even as the 24h change remains +283%. Holder data shows 915 addresses with the top 10 controlling 33.29% of supply, but no historical holder trend, wallet classification, or sniper data is available to corroborate whether this is organic growth or coordinated activity.

Key points

Very shallow liquidity ($20.95K) relative to FDV, making price extremely sensitive to individual trades
Violent single-hour pump (low $0.0000036 to high $0.00101) followed by an ongoing steep reversal, a classic pump-and-dump volatility signature
Complete absence of sniper data and authority (mint/freeze) confirmation, leaving major risk vectors unverifiable rather than confirmed safe
Top-10 concentration of 33.29% across a small 915-address holder base

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-6 hours

bearish

Momentum has turned sharply negative in the most recent candles: price fell from a local high near $0.000382 (candle [8] high) to $0.000194 (candle [9] close), with 1h change at -44.4% and 5m change at -21.1%. Absent a fresh liquidity injection or buy-side catalyst, the path of least resistance appears downward as the earlier spike unwinds.

Target low

$0.00012

Target high

$0.00025

Support: $0.000149 (candle [9] low), $0.000150 (candle [5] low)
Resistance: $0.000292 (candle [9] open / candle [8] close), $0.000382 (candle [8] high)

Medium term · 1-3 days

neutral

With only 9 hours of candle history available and no fundamental catalyst evident beyond the initial spike, medium-term direction is highly uncertain. Sustained recovery would require renewed buy volume and liquidity growth beyond the current $20.95K pool; continued sell pressure or liquidity withdrawal could see the token retrace toward pre-spike levels near $0.0000036.

Catalysts

Potential renewed social/marketing push given active Twitter and website links
Liquidity pool growth or lack thereof will dictate ability to absorb sell pressure
Any clarity on mint/freeze authority status could materially shift risk perception

Bullish factors

24h buy volume ($859.70K) slightly exceeds 24h sell volume ($830.98K), a marginally positive net flow signal
Unique buyer count (3,011) exceeds unique seller count (2,490) over 24h
24h price change remains deeply positive (+283%) despite recent pullback, indicating some residual bullish base

Bearish factors

Sharp -44.4% 1h and -21.1% 5m price declines show strong recent bearish momentum
Extremely thin $20.95K liquidity increases downside slippage risk on any sell pressure
Single-hour pump-then-dump candle pattern is a hallmark of unsustainable speculative moves
No confirmation of mint/freeze authority renouncement, leaving structural downside risk unaddressed

Confidence: low. Only 9 hourly candles are available, volume and price have been extremely erratic, liquidity is very thin, and multiple key inputs (authorities, sniper data, holder history) are missing — all of which severely limit the reliability of any forward-looking price view.

LEVERHYPPO call history

Full track record →

Sep 24bearish@ $0.000194

24h-52.5%

7d-80.4%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 2Ghxme...HYPE
Total Supply: 999,999,969.32 LEVERHYPPO

Key Risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($20.95K) relative to FDV (~$194.29K), creating high slippage and manipulation risk for any meaningfully sized trade
Massive intraday volatility with a rapid pump (candle low $0.0000036 to high $0.00101 in a single hour) followed by a sharp -44% 1h pullback and -21% 5m move, suggesting a pump-and-dump pattern
Mint/freeze authority status unknown — cannot rule out further dilution or account freezes
No sniper coverage available, so early-bot/insider dumping risk cannot be assessed or excluded

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Across the 9 available hourly candles, price opened at $0.00000364 and spiked violently to an intra-candle high of $0.00101 (candle [2]) — a massive wick suggesting a rapid pump likely driven by low initial liquidity — before entering a steady downtrend through candles [3]-[7], briefly bouncing in candle [8] to a high of $0.000382, then falling again to close at $0.000194 in the latest candle [9] with a low of $0.0001494.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

After the initial explosive spike in candle [2], nearly every subsequent candle has printed lower highs and lower closes, consistent with a fading pump. The brief bounce in candle [8] failed to reclaim prior highs and was quickly sold back down in candle [9].

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000149 (candle [9] low)

Major support

$0.0000036 (candle [1] open/low, pre-spike base)

Immediate resistance

$0.000292-$0.000311 (candle [9] range / prior candle [8] close)

Major resistance

$0.000382-$0.001012 (candles [8] and [2] highs)

Price is currently trading well below the mid-range of its 9-hour history, closer to immediate support than resistance. A break below $0.000149 could expose the token to a retest of much lower pre-spike levels, while reclaiming $0.000292-$0.000311 would be the first sign of stabilization.

Notable patterns

Large upper-wick spike candle (candle [2]) indicative of a rapid pump followed by rejection
Series of lower highs and lower closes across candles [3] through [7], a classic downtrend structure
Failed bounce/rejection pattern in candles [8]-[9] where a modest recovery high was quickly reversed
Sharply declining volume profile suggesting fading speculative momentum

Liquidity

$20,947.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $20.95K is extremely shallow relative to both the 24h trading volume (~$1.69M combined) and the $194.29K FDV, implying that trade activity is churning heavily through a small pool and that slippage on moderately sized trades would be significant. 24h buy volume ($859.70K) marginally exceeds sell volume ($830.98K), a slight net inflow, and unique buyers (3,011) outnumber unique sellers (2,490), which is a mildly positive signal on participation breadth. However, this volume-to-liquidity ratio (over 80x) is itself a red flag, consistent with the extreme intra-hour volatility seen in the OHLC data, where prices swing by orders of magnitude within single candles.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,969.32 LEVERHYPPO

FDV

$194.29K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Hourly candles show extreme swings: price spiked from ~$0.0000036 to ~$0.00101 within one hour (candle [2]) then collapsed to $0.000194 by the latest candle. 24h change is +283% but 1h change is -44.4% and 5m change is -21.1%, indicating a violent pump followed by an ongoing sharp reversal.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $20.95K against a $194.29K FDV, meaning even modest trade sizes can move price significantly. This is consistent with the observed intraday volatility and wide candle ranges.
Concentrationhigh
Top-10 holders control 33.29% of supply across only 915 holder addresses. No holder history or wallet classification data is available, so it is impossible to confirm whether these are organic holders, insiders, or bots; this concentration combined with unknown identity is a material risk.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($20.95K) relative to FDV (~$194.29K), creating high slippage and manipulation risk for any meaningfully sized trade
Massive intraday volatility with a rapid pump (candle low $0.0000036 to high $0.00101 in a single hour) followed by a sharp -44% 1h pullback and -21% 5m move, suggesting a pump-and-dump pattern
Mint/freeze authority status unknown — cannot rule out further dilution or account freezes
No sniper coverage available, so early-bot/insider dumping risk cannot be assessed or excluded
Top-10 holders control ~33.3% of supply with no way to verify who these wallets are or their trading intent
Token metadata fields (verified contract, mutability, spam flag) are all unknown, reducing overall trust in the asset's provenance

Mitigating factors

24h buy/sell volumes are fairly balanced (50.8% buy vs 49.2% sell), suggesting no single-sided panic dumping in aggregate volume terms as of the snapshot
Reasonable number of unique 24h participants (3,011 buyers vs 2,490 sellers) implies some organic two-sided activity rather than a single wallet driving all volume

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital. Not appropriate for investors seeking capital preservation or those unable to actively monitor extremely volatile, thinly-liquid microcap positions. Position sizing should be minimal given the liquidity depth and unknown authority/sniper risk.

LEVERHYPPO is a highly speculative, newly-volatile microcap token that just underwent (and appears to be unwinding from) a dramatic short-term price spike, trading with very thin liquidity and multiple unresolved risk factors including unknown mint/freeze authority status and no sniper wallet visibility. Any position here should be treated as a high-risk speculative trade, not an investment, sized accordingly.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy-side momentum reasserts itself — supported by the currently balanced-to-slightly-positive net flow (50.8% buy vs 49.2% sell, 3,011 vs 2,490 unique participants) — and liquidity providers add depth to the pool, price could stabilize and attempt to reclaim the $0.000292-$0.000382 resistance zone seen in recent candles.

Sustained or renewed buy volume outpacing sell volume
Growth in liquidity pool depth reducing slippage and volatility
Positive social momentum via the token's Twitter/website presence attracting new buyers

Base Case

Price continues to exhibit high volatility within a wide range roughly bounded by the $0.000149 recent low and the $0.000382 recent bounce high, as the market digests the initial spike without a clear directional catalyst, while liquidity remains thin and holder/authority uncertainty persists.

No major new liquidity injection or authority disclosure occurs in the near term
Trading volume gradually normalizes from currently elevated levels
Top-10 holder concentration (33.29%) remains stable without large observable sell-offs, though this cannot be independently verified with current data

Bear Case

High probability

The observed pattern — a massive single-hour spike (up to $0.00101) followed by consistent lower highs/lower closes and an accelerating -44% hourly decline — continues, with price retracing toward pre-spike levels as speculative buyers who caused the initial pump take profits and thin liquidity amplifies the downside.

Sharp negative short-term momentum (-44.4% 1h, -21.1% 5m)
Extremely shallow $20.95K liquidity relative to trading volume, amplifying sell-driven price drops
Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaving room for further dilution or negative surprises
Lack of sniper/holder history data preventing confirmation that early holders aren't preparing to exit

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 24, 01:46 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-24 01:45 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
USD price feed and 24h/1h/5m percentage changes
9 most recent hourly OHLCV candles from Raydium CPMM pair
Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
Unhosted holder aggregate snapshot (holder count, top-10 concentration)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 9 hourly candles were available, insufficient for robust technical/trend analysis
No sniper data was returned by the source, preventing any assessment of early-buyer/sniper concentration or PnL
No historical holder count data (24h/7d/30d) exists, so holder growth/trend claims could not be substantiated and were explicitly flagged as unavailable
Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and mutability status are all unknown, leaving a major rug-risk vector unassessed
Top-100 holder concentration was not provided, limiting the whale distribution picture to only the top-10 figure
Token metadata fields (description, social validity) are creator-supplied and untrusted; no independent verification of legitimacy was possible

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (authority status, sniper coverage, holder history). Cryptocurrency trading, especially in low-liquidity microcap tokens, carries a high risk of substantial or total loss. Conduct independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is LeverHyppo (LEVERHYPPO) a scam?

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 3% fee and the owner can still raise it. The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply. Checked Nov 5, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell LeverHyppo (LEVERHYPPO)?

Yes. Every buy and sell pays a 3% transfer fee, and the owner can still raise it. Checked Nov 5, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for LeverHyppo (LEVERHYPPO)?

Is LEVERHYPPO a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital. Not appropriate for investors seeking capital preservation or those unable to actively monitor extremely volatile, thinly-liquid microcap positions. Position sizing should be minimal given the liquidity depth and unknown authority/sniper risk.

What are the key risks of holding LEVERHYPPO?

Extremely thin liquidity ($20.95K) relative to FDV (~$194.29K), creating high slippage and manipulation risk for any meaningfully sized trade • Massive intraday volatility with a rapid pump (candle low $0.0000036 to high $0.00101 in a single hour) followed by a sharp -44% 1h pullback and -21% 5m move, suggesting a pump-and-dump pattern • Mint/freeze authority status unknown — cannot rule out further dilution or account freezes