Mooncat Price Today & AI Analysis

MCATSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 17, 2026

$0.0₄1876

-3.95% 24h

Contract

Live

241aTYhVXZ4WBVSFpfY37RqoCGBQ73KiRFAKvTtnmoon

Chain

Solana

Holders

3,942

Market cap

$18,747

At a $1M market cap, $MCAT would be $0.001001 (53.3x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is MCAT a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 1

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

0.35%1 sniper, 37 bundlers still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about MCAT

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

VELKVeilink$0.0₅3412-3.3%MC $3.2K

CanaryCanary in a coal mine$0.0₄1738-25.7%MC $16.9K

SCHLONGSCHLONG$0.0₅8979-25.3%MC $9.0K

FISHFair Pond$0.0₄2474-17.1%MC $22.8K

FrankFrank Ashford$0.0₄1494-6.1%MC $14.2K

PAWCATPAWCAT$0.000126+116.1%MC $124.8K

Mooncat: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-17 21:16 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$94,977.00

How concentrated is Mooncat ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Mooncat?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Mooncat liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-17 21:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $94,977.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-17 21:16 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 17, 09:16 PM UTC

FDV

$2,070,476

Liquidity

$94,977.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

Mooncat (MCAT) is a newly launched Solana token trading on a Meteora DAMM pool priced at $0.00207, having surged +110.9% over the past hour/24h from a near-zero origin point. The token shows only ~2 hours of trading history, extremely shallow liquidity ($94.98K) against $3.6M+ in 24h combined volume, and a near-even 50.4%/49.6% buy/sell split. Critical due-diligence data — holder distribution, sniper activity, and mint/freeze authority status — is entirely unavailable, making this a high-uncertainty, speculative micro-cap position.

Key points

Extremely fresh token with only 2 hourly candles of trading history
Massive early price volatility (candle range spanning from ~$0.000006 to ~$0.00304)
Total absence of holder and sniper data, unusual even for a new token, limiting due-diligence depth
Very thin liquidity ($94.98K) relative to trading volume, implying high slippage risk
Unique buyers (6,446) meaningfully outnumber unique sellers (4,901) in the 24h window

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48 hours

neutral

Given the parabolic +110.9% move over the last hour/24h and a -5.99% pullback in the most recent 5 minutes, the token is showing early signs of exhaustion after an aggressive rally. Shallow liquidity ($94.98K) means price could swing sharply in either direction on relatively small trade sizes. A short-term consolidation or partial retracement toward the $0.00096-$0.00110 zone is plausible before any further directional move.

Target low

$0.00090

Target high

$0.00310

Support: $0.000958, $0.00110
Resistance: $0.00205, $0.00304

Medium term · 7-14 days

neutral

With only two hours of trading history and no holder or sniper data, medium-term direction is highly speculative. Sustained buy pressure (currently near 50/50) and continued growth in unique buyers (6,446 vs 4,901 sellers) would be needed to hold gains; absent that, thin liquidity and a post-launch pattern typical of many new Solana meme tokens raises risk of a sharp drawdown.

Catalysts

Whether buy pressure meaningfully overtakes sell pressure on sustained basis
Any increase in liquidity depth reducing slippage risk
Confirmation (or lack thereof) of mint/freeze authority renouncement
Broader Solana meme-coin market sentiment and Meteora DAMM pool activity

Bullish factors

24h/1h price change of +110.9% shows strong recent momentum
Buy volume ($1.82M) modestly exceeds sell volume ($1.79M), a net inflow signal
Unique buyers (6,446) outnumber unique sellers (4,901) by a wide margin
Volume increased ~48% between the two available candles, suggesting growing interest

Bearish factors

Extremely shallow liquidity ($94.98K) relative to volume creates high slippage and manipulation risk
5m price change of -5.99% suggests the rally may already be reversing
Large upper wick on the most recent candle indicates rejection/profit-taking near highs
No holder or sniper data available to confirm distribution health or absence of coordinated dumping
Mint/freeze authority status unknown — cannot rule out rug risk
Only ~2 hours of trading history; extremely limited sample size for any trend confirmation

Confidence: low. Only two hourly candles of price history are available, no holder data exists, and no sniper data exists. The token appears to be extremely newly launched (candle 1 opens near-zero, consistent with pool seeding). Any prediction is necessarily speculative given the near-total absence of historical context beyond ~2 hours of trading.

MCAT call history

Full track record →

Sep 17neutral@ $0.00207

24h—

7d—

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 241aTY...moon
Total Supply: 999,998,504.62 MCAT

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($94.98K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Unknown mint/freeze authority status — inability to confirm rug-pull protections
No holder or whale distribution data — concentration risk cannot be assessed and must be assumed elevated
No sniper data — early bot/sniper dumping risk cannot be ruled out

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (20:00 UTC) opened at $0.00000604, spiked intraday to a high of $0.001105, dropped back to a low of $0.00000604 (round-tripping the entire range), and closed at $0.000961 — a massive-range candle typical of a fresh pool launch with extreme initial volatility. Candle 2 (21:00 UTC) opened at $0.000961, rallied to a high of $0.003045, pulled back to a low of $0.000958, and closed at $0.002057 — again a huge-range candle, but closing well above the prior close, confirming continued upward momentum. Volume rose from $2.23M to $3.29M between the two candles, indicating expanding participation alongside the price surge.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

The two available candles show two consecutive strong bullish closes (close-over-close: $0.000961 to $0.002057, +110.9% per the 24h/1h change metric), indicating short-term uptrend momentum. However, with only two hourly candles of history, no reliable medium-term trend can be established — it is effectively unknown/sideways by default given the extremely limited dataset.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000958 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.00000604 (candle 1 low / open)

Immediate resistance

$0.003045 (candle 2 high)

Major resistance

$0.00110501963229 (candle 1 high, now acting as a mid-range pivot)

With only two candles, support/resistance levels are provisional. Immediate support sits at the candle 2 low of $0.000958, which roughly aligns with the candle 1 close ($0.000961) — a potential value area. Immediate resistance is the candle 2 high of $0.003045, the highest price printed so far. The candle 1 high ($0.001105) is now a minor pivot inside the current range. The candle 1 low ($0.00000604) represents an extreme tail/outlier likely tied to initial pool seeding or a bot-driven wick rather than a meaningful support level.

Notable patterns

Extreme-range candle on candle 1 consistent with a fresh liquidity pool launch / bottom wick sweep
Bullish close-over-close progression across both candles (higher closes)
Large upper wick on candle 2 (high $0.003045 vs close $0.002057) suggesting rejection from highs and profit-taking
5m pullback of -5.99% following a +110.9% 1h/24h move, indicating early signs of consolidation or reversal after a parabolic spike

Liquidity

$94,977.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $94.98K is extremely shallow relative to a 24h trading volume north of $3.6M combined (buy+sell), implying a volume-to-liquidity ratio of roughly 38x. This is a major red flag for slippage — even modest-sized trades could move the price dramatically, as evidenced by the observed candle wicks. Buy volume ($1.82M) slightly exceeds sell volume ($1.79M), producing a marginal net inflow (50.4% vs 49.6% pressure), but the split is nearly balanced. Buyer count (6,446) exceeds seller count (4,901), suggesting broader buy-side participation, though this could also reflect many small buyers being distributed tokens by fewer large sellers. Given the shallow liquidity pool sitting on Meteora DAMM, this market is highly susceptible to sharp price swings from relatively small capital flows in either direction.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,998,504.62 MCAT

FDV

$2.07M

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
The token moved from a candle low of $0.00000604 to a high of $0.003045 within two hourly candles (a >500x range within the observed window), and 1h/24h price change is +110.9% while 5m change is -5.99%. This is extreme volatility typical of a freshly launched, thinly-traded token.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $94.98K against a 24h combined trading volume exceeding $3.6M — a volume/liquidity ratio near 38x. This makes the pool highly vulnerable to large slippage and price impact from moderately sized trades, and to rapid liquidity withdrawal.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($94.98K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Unknown mint/freeze authority status — inability to confirm rug-pull protections
No holder or whale distribution data — concentration risk cannot be assessed and must be assumed elevated
No sniper data — early bot/sniper dumping risk cannot be ruled out
Extreme price volatility (candle ranges spanning multiple orders of magnitude) typical of a very new, unproven token
Very short trading history (~2 hours of candle data) provides minimal basis for trend confidence
Description field is 'none' and verification/spam status are all 'unknown', indicating minimal due-diligence signals from the data provider

Mitigating factors

Unique buyers (6,446) outnumber unique sellers (4,901), suggesting active organic-looking interest rather than one-sided dumping
Buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume (50.4% vs 49.6%), a mild net-inflow signal
Volume is growing between the two observed candles, suggesting rising market attention
Token trades on Meteora DAMM, a known Solana DEX infrastructure, rather than an obscure/unverified venue

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital. This token exhibits classic characteristics of an extremely early-stage, thinly-liquid Solana meme/micro-cap token: near-zero liquidity, unverified/unknown authority status, no holder transparency, and violent price swings within its first hours of trading. It is not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to actively monitor and exit rapidly.

MCAT (Mooncat) is an extremely new, low-liquidity Solana token trading on Meteora DAMM that has posted a dramatic +110.9% price move within its first observed hours, but almost every fundamental risk indicator — holder distribution, authority renouncement, sniper concentration — is unverifiable due to missing data. The setup resembles a high-risk, early-stage speculative meme-coin play rather than an investment with verifiable fundamentals.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If organic buyer interest continues to outpace sellers (currently 6,446 buyers vs 4,901 sellers) and liquidity deepens meaningfully, the token could sustain further upside as new capital chases momentum, particularly if social media traction (Twitter link present) drives retail attention typical of meme-coin cycles.

Continued net buy pressure and growing unique buyer counts
Liquidity providers adding meaningful depth to reduce slippage risk
Positive social/community momentum via the token's Twitter presence
Broader risk-on sentiment in Solana meme-coin markets

Base Case

The token likely continues to exhibit high volatility and two-sided (near 50/50) buy/sell pressure in the near term, consolidating within the recent trading range ($0.00096-$0.00304) as the market digests the initial launch spike, with direction ultimately hinging on liquidity growth and any on-chain confirmation of authority status.

No major liquidity withdrawal or authority-based supply shock occurs in the near term
Trading activity remains roughly balanced between buyers and sellers
No new holder/sniper data becomes available to materially change the risk picture within the analysis window

Bear Case

High probability

Given the extremely shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, and total absence of holder/sniper transparency, the token could suffer a rapid, severe price collapse if early holders or the deployer sell into the thin pool, especially following the parabolic +110.9% spike, which historically often precedes sharp reversals in similar low-liquidity tokens.

Thin liquidity ($94.98K) enabling large price impact from modest sell orders
Unconfirmed mint/freeze authority creating rug-pull potential
Lack of holder distribution transparency masking possible concentrated ownership
Early negative momentum already visible in the -5.99% 5-minute price change
Large upper wick on the latest candle suggesting rejection at highs

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 17, 09:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-17 21:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata
Meteora DAMM pair price feed
Hourly OHLCV candle data (2 candles available)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)
Holder distribution endpoint (not available/retired)

Limitations

No holder distribution data available — holderTrends and whaleMap sections are populated with placeholder/zero values, not real measurements
No sniper data available — smart money/sniper signals cannot be quantified
Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available, providing minimal historical context for technical analysis
Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, verification, and spam status are all listed as 'unknown' in source metadata
6h price change data was unavailable
24h unique wallet count was unavailable
All figures are drawn solely from the provided data block, which is treated as untrusted evidence per methodology; no external verification was performed

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain data that has been treated as untrusted evidence. Cryptocurrency trading, especially in low-liquidity, newly launched tokens, carries a substantial risk of total capital loss. Conduct independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Mooncat (MCAT) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Mooncat (MCAT)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Mooncat ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Mooncat?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Mooncat liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-17 21:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $94,977.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Mooncat (MCAT)?

Is MCAT a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital. This token exhibits classic characteristics of an extremely early-stage, thinly-liquid Solana meme/micro-cap token: near-zero liquidity, unverified/unknown authority status, no holder transparency, and violent price swings within its first hours of trading. It is not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to actively monitor and exit rapidly.

What are the key risks of holding MCAT?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($94.98K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — inability to confirm rug-pull protections • No holder or whale distribution data — concentration risk cannot be assessed and must be assumed elevated