SWIF

Sheep Wif Hat Price Prediction 2026

SWIF
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 24, 2026

21Xp1ukfzY6dWFYFRJmp59iCgKDJ61CHMJ8dmG9npump

$0.053761

-0.35%

FDV $3,759

LiveContract:21Xp1ukfzY6dWFYFRJmp59iCgKDJ61CHMJ8dmG9npumpChain:SolanaHolders:228Market cap:$3,759

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about SWIF

Report snapshotas of Jun 24, 12:17 PM
FDV

$132,563

Liquidity

$37,218

Holders

772

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Sheep Wif Hat (SWIF) is an unverified Solana meme token on PumpSwap with a total supply of 1 billion tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$132.6K. The token has shown an explosive 93.8% price surge in the past 24 hours, but this is accompanied by deeply concerning on-chain signals: overwhelming sell pressure (89.8% of volume), extremely shallow liquidity ($37.2K), a sudden spike from 7 to 772 holders within the last hour, and zero top-holder data available. The combination of these factors suggests a highly speculative, potentially manipulated micro-cap token with very high risk.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive 93.8% 24h price gain on extremely thin liquidity ($37.2K)
Holder count surged from 7 to 772 in a single hour — anomalous and suspicious
89.8% sell pressure vs only 10.2% buy pressure in 24h trading
No verified contract, no social links, no description, no top-holder data
Token was dormant for 30+ days with only 7 holders before today's spike

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token just posted a 93.8% gain but is trading with 89.8% sell pressure ($94.4K sells vs $10.7K buys). The most recent hourly candle (12:00 UTC) shows a narrow range open/close at the high ($0.0001233–$0.0001326), suggesting exhaustion after the prior candle's wide volatile swing ($0.0000524–$0.0001457). With only $37.2K in liquidity and 1,732 sell transactions vs 268 buys, a sharp retracement is the most probable short-term outcome.

Target low$0.000052
Target high$0.000146
Support: $0.000052 (11:00 UTC candle low), $0.000058 (11:00 UTC open)
Resistance: $0.000133 (current price / 12:00 UTC high), $0.000146 (11:00 UTC all-time high in data)

Medium term

bearish
1–4 weeks

The token was completely dormant for 30+ days with only 7 holders. The sudden spike appears event-driven (likely a coordinated pump). Without sustained organic demand, verified fundamentals, or community infrastructure, the medium-term outlook is bearish. Liquidity is too shallow to support price discovery at current levels.

Catalysts
  • Any further coordinated buying could temporarily push price higher
  • Listing on a larger DEX or aggregator could attract new buyers
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally could lift all boats

Bullish factors

  • Strong 93.8% 24h price appreciation demonstrates speculative momentum
  • 887 unique wallets active in 24h shows some breadth of interest
  • 5-minute price change of +6.5% suggests very recent buying activity

Bearish factors

  • 89.8% of 24h volume is sell pressure ($94.4K sells vs $10.7K buys)
  • Only $37.2K total liquidity — extremely shallow, high slippage risk
  • Token was dormant for 30+ days with only 7 holders before today
  • No verified contract, no social links, no project description
  • Holder count anomaly (7 to 772 in 1 hour) suggests data irregularity or wash activity
  • No top-holder data available — concentration risk cannot be assessed
Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, the holder data is anomalous and likely incomplete, no top-holder breakdown exists, and no sniper data is available. The extreme sell/buy imbalance and thin liquidity make directional confidence very low.

SWIF call history

Full track record →
Jun 24bearish
24h-59.9%
7d-91.8%
30d-97.1%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (11:00 UTC): O=$0.0000587, H=$0.0001457, L=$0.0000524, C=$0.0001254 — a large bullish candle with a wide range (~178% wick-to-wick), closing in the upper half but well below the high, indicating strong buying followed by partial profit-taking. Volume was $71,849. Candle [1] (12:00 UTC): O=$0.0001233, H=$0.0001326, L=$0.0001233, C=$0.0001326 — a narrow bullish candle opening at the low and closing at the high, with volume of $33,203 (less than half the prior candle). This pattern suggests momentum is slowing after the initial spike.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 10%Sell 90%

Short-term price action shows an uptrend from the 11:00 UTC low of $0.0000524 to the current $0.0001326, but the medium-term context (30+ days of dormancy at 7 holders) is effectively sideways/flat. The current spike is an outlier event, not a sustained trend.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0001233 (12:00 UTC candle open/low)
Major$0.0000524 (11:00 UTC candle absolute low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0001326 (12:00 UTC candle high / current price)
Major$0.0001457 (11:00 UTC candle high — all-time high in available data)

The immediate support at $0.0001233 is the 12:00 UTC open. A break below this level would expose the $0.0000524–$0.0000587 zone from the prior candle's base. Resistance sits at the 11:00 UTC high of $0.0001457, which was not reclaimed in the 12:00 UTC candle.

Notable patterns

  • Large bullish candle (11:00 UTC) with upper wick — partial profit-taking at the high
  • Narrowing range in 12:00 UTC candle — momentum exhaustion signal
  • Volume declining on price rise — bearish divergence
  • Price closed below prior candle high ($0.0001457) — failed breakout
  • Two-candle pump pattern consistent with coordinated price manipulation

Total holders772
24h Δ+765
7d Δ+765
30d Δ+765
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The holder count was flat at 7 for the entire 30-day historical period (May 25 – June 23, 2026), then surged by 765 holders (+10,929%) in a single hour coinciding with the price pump. This is a highly anomalous pattern — the correlation between price spike and holder surge is direct but suspicious, potentially indicating bot activity, airdrop distribution, or data reporting artifacts rather than organic adoption.

Historical holder data shows exactly 7 holders with zero net change every single day for 30 consecutive days (May 25 – June 23). Then, within the 24h window (and specifically within the last 1 hour per the metrics), 765 new holders appeared simultaneously with the price pump. This is not organic growth — it is either a coordinated distribution event, a bot-driven holder inflation, or a data anomaly. The current reported total of 772 holders should be treated with extreme skepticism. The distribution breakdown shows 0 whales, 0 sharks, 0 dolphins, 0 fish, and 0 octopus — further suggesting the holder classification data is incomplete or unreliable.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

unknown

No top holder data available — concentration risk cannot be assessed

0.00%

No top holders data is available for SWIF. The supply concentration metrics report top10=0% and top100=0%, which is almost certainly a data error rather than a genuine reflection of distribution. With only 772 total holders (7 of whom held for 30+ days before today), the actual concentration is likely very high among the original 7 wallets. The absence of this data is itself a red flag — it prevents proper assessment of dump risk from large holders. Given the 89.8% sell pressure and the dormancy pattern, the original holders are likely concentrated and actively distributing.

Liquidity$37,220
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$10,670
Sell$94,410
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers173
Unique sellers765

Liquidity is critically shallow at $37.2K on PumpSwap (pair: 5sHvebMBVBG2sGHsEKoMeY4qk2tsZUmx9wa2tZhfx5zF). The FDV-to-liquidity ratio is approximately 3.6:1, meaning any meaningful sell order will cause severe price impact. The 24h trading data reveals a deeply unhealthy market: $94.4K in sells vs $10.7K in buys (8.8:1 sell-to-buy ratio), with 1,732 sell transactions vs 268 buy transactions and 765 unique sellers vs 173 unique buyers. Net flow is strongly negative (outflow). This market structure is consistent with a pump-and-dump scenario where early holders are selling into retail demand. The token's price has held up temporarily due to the low liquidity amplifying price impact of even small buys, but the structural imbalance is severe.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1,000,000,000 SWIF
FDV$132,562.62

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

SWIF has a standard 1 billion token supply with a current FDV of ~$132.6K. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the contract is unverified, making it impossible to confirm whether mint or freeze authorities have been renounced. The token is marked as mutable=false, which is a mild positive signal, but without on-chain authority verification this cannot be relied upon. The token has no description, no social links, and is not verified — all of which are red flags for a legitimate project. The 'possible spam' flag is false per the data, but the overall tokenomics profile is consistent with a low-effort meme token or potential rug. The pump token suffix in the mint address (ending in 'pump') suggests it was launched via pump.fun or a similar launchpad.

Volatility
high

93.8% price surge in 24h on only 2 available candles, with the prior candle showing a 178% range from low to high. Extreme volatility on thin liquidity amplifies both upside and downside moves dramatically.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $37.2K against a $132.6K FDV. Any sell order of meaningful size will cause severe slippage. The 24h sell volume of $94.4K already exceeds total liquidity by 2.5x, indicating the pool is being rapidly drained.

Concentration
high

No top-holder data is available, but the token had only 7 holders for 30+ days. These original holders almost certainly hold a large concentrated position and appear to be actively distributing based on the 89.8% sell pressure.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data is available, but the pattern of 30+ days of dormancy followed by a sudden price pump with overwhelming sell pressure is consistent with a coordinated sniper/early-holder dump into retail liquidity.

Authority
high

Update authority is 'unknown', contract is unverified, and mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. This leaves open the possibility of supply manipulation or account freezing.

Key risks

  • Overwhelming sell pressure (89.8%) suggests active distribution by early holders
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($37.2K) creates extreme slippage and exit risk
  • No verified contract, no social links, no project description — anonymous and unaccountable
  • Anomalous holder spike (7 to 772 in 1 hour) suggests potential manipulation or bot activity
  • No top-holder data — concentration risk is unquantifiable but likely very high
  • Token was dormant for 30+ days — no organic community or development activity
  • Authority status unknown — rug pull via mint or freeze cannot be ruled out
  • Mint address suffix suggests pump.fun launch — high failure rate for such tokens

Mitigating factors

  • Token is marked mutable=false, which is a mild positive for immutability
  • Not flagged as possible spam by the data provider
  • 887 unique wallets active in 24h shows some breadth of market participation
  • Price has held above the 11:00 UTC open level in the most recent candle
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the mechanics of micro-cap meme tokens and pump-and-dump dynamics. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone who cannot afford to lose 100% of their investment. Position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

SWIF is a high-risk micro-cap meme token exhibiting classic pump-and-dump characteristics: 30+ days of dormancy, a sudden price spike with overwhelming sell pressure, anomalous holder growth, and critically shallow liquidity. There is no verifiable project fundamentals, no community infrastructure, and no authority transparency. The risk/reward profile is extremely unfavorable for new entrants at current prices.

Bull case (low)

Viral meme momentum drives sustained retail FOMO buying, temporarily pushing price toward or above the $0.0001457 resistance level. A broader Solana meme-coin rally could amplify gains.

  • Continued retail FOMO buying into the 'Sheep Wif Hat' meme narrative
  • Broader Solana ecosystem meme-coin market rally
  • Organic community formation around the token post-pump
  • Listing on a meme-coin aggregator or social media viral moment

Base case

Price consolidates in the $0.000080–$0.000130 range for a short period as sell pressure gradually overwhelms the remaining buy interest, followed by a slow bleed back toward pre-pump levels over 24–72 hours.

  • Some residual retail buying interest persists for 12–24 hours
  • Early holders continue gradual distribution rather than a single large dump
  • Liquidity pool remains active but continues to thin
  • No major external catalyst (viral moment, influencer promotion) emerges

Bear case (high)

Early holders (original 7 wallets) complete their distribution, liquidity collapses, and price retraces 70–90% back toward pre-pump levels ($0.000052–$0.000058 zone or lower). Token returns to dormancy.

  • 89.8% sell pressure continues as early holders exit
  • Shallow $37.2K liquidity cannot absorb continued selling
  • No fundamental value or community to sustain price
  • Retail buyers realize the pump is over and begin selling
  • Token returns to 7-holder dormancy state

GeneratedJun 24, 12:17 PM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-06-24T12:00 UTC. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, severely limiting technical analysis depth.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, authority fields)
  • PumpSwap DEX price feed and liquidity data
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (2 candles available)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buy/sell counts, unique wallets)
  • Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
  • Holder distribution and concentration metrics
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (no data returned)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • No top-holder data available — concentration risk cannot be quantified
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed
  • Holder count anomaly (7 to 772 in 1 hour) raises data reliability concerns
  • Supply concentration shows top10=0% and top100=0% — likely a data error
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority status unverifiable
  • No social links or project description — no qualitative project assessment possible
  • Unverified contract — on-chain code cannot be audited
  • Price % change fields for 1h, 6h, 24h all show 0% despite 93.8% 24h change — data inconsistency noted

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data used is sourced from on-chain metrics and third-party providers and may contain errors or inconsistencies. Always conduct your own research before making any investment decision.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1,000,000,000 SWIF

Key Risks

Overwhelming sell pressure (89.8%) suggests active distribution by early holders
Critically shallow liquidity ($37.2K) creates extreme slippage and exit risk
No verified contract, no social links, no project description — anonymous and unaccountable
Anomalous holder spike (7 to 772 in 1 hour) suggests potential manipulation or bot activity

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for SWIF. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. However, the broader trading data reveals a highly asymmetric pattern: 1,732 sell transactions vs 268 buy transactions in 24h, with 765 unique sellers vs 173 unique buyers. This suggests that whoever accumulated early (the original 7 holders) may be distributing into the pump, while retail buyers are absorbing the sell pressure.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available for this token.

The token had only 7 holders for 30+ days before today's spike. These early holders are the most likely source of the overwhelming sell pressure (89.8% of volume). Their sentiment appears to be distributing/exiting into the price pump.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Sheep Wif Hat (SWIF)?

The token just posted a 93.8% gain but is trading with 89.8% sell pressure ($94.4K sells vs $10.7K buys). The most recent hourly candle (12:00 UTC) shows a narrow range open/close at the high ($0.0001233–$0.0001326), suggesting exhaustion after the prior candle's wide volatile swing ($0.0000524–$0.0001457). With only $37.2K in liquidity and 1,732 sell transactions vs 268 buys, a sharp retracement is the most probable short-term outcome. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000052 to $0.000146.

Is SWIF a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the mechanics of micro-cap meme tokens and pump-and-dump dynamics. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone who cannot afford to lose 100% of their investment. Position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

How are SWIF holders trending?

Sheep Wif Hat currently has 772 holders and is growing (24h: 765, 7d: 765, 30d: 765). Historical holder data shows exactly 7 holders with zero net change every single day for 30 consecutive days (May 25 – June 23). Then, within the 24h window (and specifically within the last 1 hour per the metrics), 765 new holders appeared simultaneously with the price pump. This is not organic growth — it is either a coordinated distribution event, a bot-driven holder inflation, or a data anomaly. The current reported total of 772 holders should be treated with extreme skepticism. The distribution breakdown shows 0 whales, 0 sharks, 0 dolphins, 0 fish, and 0 octopus — further suggesting the holder classification data is incomplete or unreliable.

What does sniper activity look like for SWIF?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding SWIF?

Overwhelming sell pressure (89.8%) suggests active distribution by early holders • Critically shallow liquidity ($37.2K) creates extreme slippage and exit risk • No verified contract, no social links, no project description — anonymous and unaccountable

Track SWIF