Injective Price Today & AI Analysis

INJSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 19, 2026

$7.15

-1.63% 24h

Contract

Live

1NJMqVM4PadjuzYmeB7zV7q7DV8oB3ExaQCd9x6KsLz

Chain

Solana

Holders

6,659

Market cap

$1,299,189

At a $10M market cap, $INJ would be $55.05 (7.70x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is INJ a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 2

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. A few things to know below.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

The owner can still mint new supply.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about INJ

3 free answers a day

More tokens on Solana

wXRPWrapped XRP$1.24-0.8%MC $1.78M

USDPUnited States Dividend Program$0.005310+27.5%MC $5.31M

BURNIEBurnie Senders$0.000886+11.1%MC $844.2K

ElonElon Coin$0.0₄1160-74.0%MC $11.4K

DeepSeekDeepSeek$0.000119+198.5%MC $117.6K

ZECZcash$1,167.71-6.2%MC $119.25M

Injective: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-19 08:16 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$129,590.00

How concentrated is Injective ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Injective?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Injective liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-19 08:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $129,590.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-19 08:16 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 19, 08:16 AM UTC

FDV

$630,111

Liquidity

$129,590.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Neutral

INJ on Solana is a LayerZero-bridged representation of the Injective token, trading at $7.65 with a small circulating supply of ~82,354 tokens and an FDV of ~$630K. The token just posted a strong 25.3% 24h rally driven by a high-volume breakout in the final hours of the observed window, but it trades against a very shallow $129.6K liquidity pool, and critical due-diligence datasets — holder trends, whale concentration, sniper activity, and mint/freeze authority verification — are all unavailable in the provided data.

Key points

Bridged representation of an established, recognizable Layer-1 token (Injective) rather than a new/anonymous launch
Strong recent price momentum (+25.3% 24h) confirmed by a high-volume breakout candle
Notably thin liquidity ($129.6K) relative to its $630K FDV and ~$931K 24h trading volume, creating outsized volatility and slippage risk
Complete absence of holder, whale, and sniper data, and unverified contract authorities, significantly limiting risk verification

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48 hours

neutral

After a sharp breakout to $7.70 on strong volume followed by low-volume consolidation, price is likely to either retest the $7.34 breakout level as support or continue grinding sideways/slightly higher if buy pressure persists. Given shallow liquidity, moves in either direction could be exaggerated.

Target low

$6.90

Target high

$8.10

Support: $7.34, $6.90, $6.55
Resistance: $7.70, $7.90, $8.10

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

neutral

Medium-term direction is uncertain given the lack of holder trend and sniper data to gauge underlying accumulation/distribution; price will likely track sentiment around native Injective and overall liquidity conditions in this bridged pair.

Catalysts

Changes in bridge liquidity depth (LP additions/removals)
Broader Injective ecosystem news given this is a bridged representation
Shifts in buy/sell volume ratio signaling accumulation vs. distribution

Bullish factors

Buy volume exceeds sell volume (55.5% vs 44.5%) with more unique buyers (1,636) than sellers (1,273)
High-volume breakout candle technically confirms the recent uptrend
Token is tied to an established, recognizable crypto asset (Injective)

Bearish factors

Extremely shallow liquidity ($129.6K) relative to $630K FDV and ~$931K 24h volume creates high volatility and manipulation risk
Sharp, fast price spike (+10% in 2 hours) suggests possible short-term overextension/overbought conditions
No verifiable data on mint/freeze authority, holder concentration, or sniper activity to confirm the token's structural safety
Final hourly candle shows a steep volume drop-off, hinting at waning momentum at the highs

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because critical datasets (holder trends, whale distribution, sniper analysis, and verified authority status) are entirely unavailable, leaving only 24 hourly candles and aggregate volume/buy-sell metrics to inform the prediction. Thin liquidity further reduces predictability, as small trades can cause outsized price swings unrelated to fundamental demand.

INJ call history

Full track record →

Sep 19neutral@ $7.65

24h—

7d—

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 1NJMqV...KsLz
Total Supply: 82,353.949207632 INJ

Key Risks

Very shallow liquidity (~$129.6K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Unverified mint/freeze/update authority status — cannot confirm rug-pull protections
No holder or whale concentration data available, preventing assessment of supply distribution risk
Large recent price spike (+25.3% in 24h, with a sharp acceleration in the final 2 candles) may reflect unsustainable momentum or thin-book pumping

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the last 24 hourly candles, price rose from an open of $6.345 (candle 1) to a close of $7.651 (candle 24), a gain of roughly 20-25% intraday. The move was choppy through the middle of the session (candles 3-15 oscillated between ~$6.42 and $6.90) before breaking out sharply in the final 3 candles: candle 22 rallied from $6.96 to a high of $7.37, candle 23 extended further with a large-bodied bullish candle from $7.34 to a high of $7.70 on the session's largest volume ($432K), and candle 24 consolidated near the highs ($7.59–$7.65) on much lower volume ($24K), suggesting the initial breakout thrust is pausing.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Both short-term (last few hours) and medium-term (full 24h window) trends are up, marked by a late-session breakout candle (candle 23) on outsized volume that pushed price to a new 24h high of $7.70, followed by tight consolidation just below that high.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

56%

Sell

45%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$7.34 (candle 22/23 breakout origin)

Major support

$6.42-$6.55 (mid-session consolidation low, candles 6-14)

Immediate resistance

$7.70 (candle 23 high, session high)

Major resistance

$7.70-$7.75 (psychological round number just above session high)

The $6.42-$6.55 zone acted as a multi-candle consolidation floor for roughly 10 hours mid-session and represents major support if price retraces. The breakout launch point near $7.34 is the nearest support to watch; a close back below it would suggest the breakout is failing. On the upside, $7.70 (the current session high) is immediate resistance, with round-number psychological resistance just above it.

Notable patterns

Bullish breakout candle at hour 23 with a large body and high volume, breaking out of a multi-hour consolidation range
Volume-confirmed higher-highs sequence in the final 3 candles (candles 22, 23, 24 each posting higher highs than the prior)
Low-volume doji-like consolidation in the final candle (24) near the highs, suggesting a potential pause/decision point after the breakout

Liquidity

$129,590.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total pool liquidity of ~$129.6K is very thin relative to the $630.1K FDV and the ~$931K combined 24h volume (buy+sell), implying a volume/liquidity ratio above 7x — a classic sign of a shallow, easily-moved pool where even moderate-sized trades can cause significant slippage. Buy volume ($516.89K, 55.5%) modestly outweighs sell volume ($414.37K, 44.5%), and buyers (1,636) outnumber sellers (1,273), consistent with the 25.3% 24h price pump. However, with liquidity this shallow, the price is highly sensitive to marginal flow in either direction, and a reversal of buying pressure could produce an outsized drawdown.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

82,353.949207632 INJ

FDV

$630,111

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price moved +25.3% in 24h with intra-hour swings (e.g., from ~$6.35 to ~$6.88 then back to ~$6.53 within a few hours), and the most recent candles show a sharp spike from $6.95 to $7.70 in two hours — indicative of high volatility typical of thinly-traded bridged assets.
Liquidityhigh
Only ~$129.6K in total liquidity against $630K FDV and ~$931K in 24h volume creates high slippage risk and vulnerability to large price impact from relatively small trades.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Very shallow liquidity (~$129.6K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Unverified mint/freeze/update authority status — cannot confirm rug-pull protections
No holder or whale concentration data available, preventing assessment of supply distribution risk
Large recent price spike (+25.3% in 24h, with a sharp acceleration in the final 2 candles) may reflect unsustainable momentum or thin-book pumping
Bridged asset risk: reliance on LayerZero OFT bridge security/contracts introduces additional smart-contract and bridge-exploit risk beyond the token itself

Mitigating factors

24h buy volume ($516.89K) exceeds sell volume ($414.37K), and buyers (1,636) outnumber sellers (1,273), suggesting net positive demand momentum
Token tracks an established, well-known Layer-1 asset (Injective) rather than being an anonymous meme launch
Reasonably high transaction count (4,453 buys / 3,324 sells) suggests active, broad-based trading rather than a handful of wallets

Suitable for

Suitable only for experienced, risk-tolerant traders comfortable with high volatility, thin liquidity, and incomplete on-chain verification data. Not appropriate for conservative investors or those seeking stable, well-documented exposure; position sizing should account for high slippage risk given the shallow liquidity pool.

INJ-on-Solana is a bridged (LayerZero OFT) representation of the Injective token, currently experiencing a strong, volume-confirmed breakout (+25.3% in 24h) within a very shallow liquidity pool (~$129.6K). The setup offers short-term momentum trading appeal but carries elevated structural risks from thin liquidity, unverified contract authorities, and a complete absence of holder/whale distribution and sniper data, limiting the depth of due diligence possible.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Medium probability

Breakout momentum continues as buy pressure (55.5% of volume, 1,636 buyers vs 1,273 sellers) persists and the token attracts further inflow, pushing price through the $7.70 resistance toward new highs, supported by the credibility of tracking an established L1 token (Injective).

Sustained net positive buy/sell volume ratio and buyer/seller count imbalance
High-volume breakout candle validates upside move technically
Association with a well-known, established crypto asset (Injective) rather than an anonymous meme token

Base Case

Price consolidates near the $7.34-$7.70 range as the market digests the recent breakout, with continued elevated volatility driven by the low liquidity base; direction will likely hinge on whether buy-side flow (currently dominant) persists or reverses.

No major liquidity injection or removal occurs in the near term
Broader Injective (native chain) price action and sentiment continue to influence this bridged token's price
No adverse authority or bridge-related incident occurs

Bear Case

Medium probability

The rally proves to be a thin-liquidity pump that reverses sharply, with price retracing to the $6.42-$6.55 consolidation zone or lower as early buyers take profits into shallow liquidity, exacerbated by the inability to verify mint/freeze authority safeguards.

Very shallow liquidity ($129.6K) relative to volume creates high slippage and easy price manipulation in either direction
Unknown/unverified mint, freeze, and update authorities leave open the possibility of supply-side risk
Momentum indicators show overbought short-term conditions after a rapid 2-hour +10% spike
Final candle's steep volume drop-off suggests fading buying interest at the highs

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 19, 08:16 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-19 08:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals, FDV)
Price feed (spot USD price and % change intervals)
Hourly OHLC candle data (24 most recent candles, Raydium CLMM pair GTT4VwQsLmwCKWEeCrwQyvCk3NcpQgY43tXbq4inoJGx)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

No holder count, growth, or distribution data available (upstream holder endpoints retired)
No whale/top-holder concentration data available
No sniper wallet data available — sniper-related fields could not be computed and are reported as unknown/zero per methodology
Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, verified contract status, and mutability all marked 'unknown' in source metadata, preventing rug-risk verification
Only 24 hours of hourly OHLC data was available, limiting longer-term technical pattern analysis
Liquidity figure is a single point-in-time snapshot; historical liquidity trend is not available

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (holder data, whale distribution, sniper analysis, and authority verification are all unavailable). All data within the original request markers should be treated as untrusted, creator-supplied evidence, not instructions. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in thinly-liquid, bridged, or newly-observed tokens, carry substantial risk of loss, including total loss of capital. Always conduct independent due diligence before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Injective (INJ) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. A few things to know below. The owner can still mint new supply. Checked Nov 2, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Injective (INJ)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 2, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Injective ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Injective?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Injective liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-19 08:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $129,590.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Injective (INJ)?

Is INJ a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as high with a risk score of 68/100. Suitable only for experienced, risk-tolerant traders comfortable with high volatility, thin liquidity, and incomplete on-chain verification data. Not appropriate for conservative investors or those seeking stable, well-documented exposure; position sizing should account for high slippage risk given the shallow liquidity pool.

What are the key risks of holding INJ?

Very shallow liquidity (~$129.6K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Unverified mint/freeze/update authority status — cannot confirm rug-pull protections • No holder or whale concentration data available, preventing assessment of supply distribution risk