ZENT

Zentry Price Today & AI Analysis

ZENTEthereumAnalysis as of Aug 14, 2026

Price

$0.001894

-1.27% 24h

Contract

Live
0xdbb7a34bf10169d6d2d0d02a6cbb436cf4381bfa

Chain

Ethereum

Holders

4.3K

Market cap

$18.39M

Liquidity

$81.93K

Ask Unhosted AI about ZENT

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on Ethereum

VSNVSNVision$0.0437-1.0%MC $178.89MCHEQCHEQcheqd$0.004681+346.3%MC $5.13MSPECTRESPECTRESPECTRE AI$0.8944-9.8%MC $8.94MoGPUoGPUOPEN GPU$0.0524+54.9%MC $1.03MOCOCOndo Cat$0.043706-28.2%MC $36.5KUSDSUSDSUSDS$0.9999-0.0%MC $6.66B

Zentry: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-08-14 18:30 UTC

Holder addresses

4,307

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$146,965.42
How concentrated is Zentry ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 4,307 addresses (2026-08-14 18:30 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Zentry?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Zentry liquidity falling?
As of 2026-08-14 18:30 UTC, reported liquidity was $146,965.42. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-08-14 18:30 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Aug 14, 2026, 06:30 PM UTC

Market Cap

$13.30M

24h Volume

$40.99K

Liquidity

$146.97K

FDV

—

Holders

4,307

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Bearish

Zentry (ZENT) is a 28.7-month-old Ethereum-based utility token positioned at the intersection of AI and GameFi, building what it describes as a Human-Agentic Operating System with a tri-layer infrastructure stack. At a current price of $0.001708 and a market cap of approximately $13.3M, the token is trading near the bottom of its 90-day range after a -44.8% decline from the period high of $0.005046. On-chain data reveals a stagnant holder base of 4,307 wallets with negligible net growth, thin daily trading volume (~$41K combined), and a 30.7% dumpable supply concentration in individual whale wallets that received their positions via transfer or airdrop at zero cost basis. The project has an established social presence and a verified contract, but the current price action and holder dynamics reflect a token in a sustained distribution phase rather than accumulation.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Aug 14, 2026, 06:30 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Tri-layer AI infrastructure thesis (zApp, zAI, zData) targeting a user-owned data economy — a differentiated narrative within the crowded AI-crypto sector
  • Smart money traders have extracted over $3.5M in combined realized profits from this token, confirming it has historically generated significant trading opportunities despite the current downtrend
  • 28.7 months of on-chain history provides a meaningful track record compared to newer launches, with a verified contract and a security score of 66/100

Zentry AI Price Analysis

Medium Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

ZENT is in a clear short-term downtrend with 7-day losses of -4.8% and the price sitting at just 12% of its 90-day range, near multi-month lows. The recent daily close sequence shows a persistent drift from $0.001829 down to $0.001708, with no meaningful bounce attempts. Sell transactions outnumber buys 2:1 in the last 24 hours, reinforcing near-term downward pressure.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

The 30-day decline of -12.0% and 90-day decline of -44.8% confirm a sustained medium-term downtrend with no structural reversal signal yet. Price is compressed near the bottom of its 90-day range, and with holder growth essentially flat (net -2 over 30 days), there is no evidence of accumulation building a base. A recovery toward the major resistance at $0.005046 would require a fundamental catalyst or broad market shift that is not currently visible in the on-chain data.

Bullish Factors

  • Price is at 12% of its 90-day range ($0.001253–$0.005046), meaning the token is historically cheap relative to recent highs, offering asymmetric upside if sentiment reverses
  • Smart money traders show substantial realized profits — 0xb1b2d0 extracted +$1,525,230 (+48%) and 0x381b7d extracted +$1,469,030 (+14%) — confirming the token has historically rewarded active traders and that liquidity exists for meaningful moves
  • Protocol/contract wallets hold 42.4% of the top-10 supply (positions 1, 2, 3, 6), meaning the majority of concentrated supply is locked in non-dumpable contracts, reducing immediate sell-side overhang

Bearish Factors

  • The 90-day price decline of -44.8% represents a deep structural downtrend, not a short-term dip, with the price compressing toward the 90-day low of $0.001253
  • Dumpable supply from individual whales stands at 30.7% of total supply, with the top five individual whales (positions 4–8) holding 28.65% combined — all acquired via transfer/airdrop rather than market buys, meaning their cost basis is near zero and any sell decision is pure profit
  • Holder growth is effectively stagnant: net +2 over 7 days and net -2 over 30 days against a base of 4,307 holders, indicating no new capital formation or community expansion
  • The 4-hour window shows 53 sell transactions versus only 14 buys from just 3 unique sellers, suggesting a small number of wallets are aggressively distributing into thin liquidity

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

ZENT call history

Full track record →

Aug 14bearish
24h+2.0%
7d—
30d+13.3%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Ethereum
Contract
0xdbb7...1bfa
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Zero-cost-basis whale overhang: Five individual wallets holding 30.7% of supply received their positions via transfer/airdrop with no market cost — any decision to sell is pure profit for them and could overwhelm the $147K liquidity pool, causing a rapid price collapse
  • Sustained structural downtrend: The -44.8% decline over 90 days with flat holder growth and no accumulation signals suggests the token may continue drifting toward the major support at $0.001253 without a fundamental catalyst
  • Liquidity fragility: A single Uniswap v2 pool with $147K liquidity serving a $13.3M market cap creates extreme vulnerability to liquidity withdrawal events or large coordinated sells

Trading Insight

bearish

Market sentiment is moderately bearish, with sell pressure at 52.1% and sell transactions outnumbering buys 2:1 over 24 hours (152 sells vs. 76 buys). The 4-hour window is more alarming: 53 sell transactions from just 3 unique sellers versus 14 buys from 7 buyers, suggesting concentrated, deliberate distribution rather than broad retail selling. The largest recent trade was a $2,530 sell, while the largest buy was only $563, reinforcing the asymmetry between selling conviction and buying interest.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bearish

Medium-Term (30d)

Bearish

Both short-term (7d: -4.8%) and medium-term (30d: -12.0%, 90d: -44.8%) trends are unambiguously bearish. The 14-day daily close sequence from $0.001829 to $0.001708 shows a consistent staircase lower with no sustained recovery, and the current price at 12% of the 90-day range confirms the token is trading near structural lows. There is no technical evidence of trend reversal at this time.

Momentum

Status

Oversold

With price at 12% of its 90-day range and a -44.8% drawdown from the period high of $0.005046, momentum indicators would read deeply oversold. However, oversold conditions in a sustained downtrend are not automatically bullish — they can persist or deepen before a reversal, particularly when holder growth is flat and selling pressure remains elevated.

Volume Analysis

Buy

47.9%

Sell

52.1%

Volume Trend

Stable

Daily volume of ~$41K is low in absolute terms and consistent with a token in a quiet distribution phase. The stable but thin volume provides little conviction for either bulls or bears — it is insufficient to signal capitulation (which would require a volume spike) or accumulation (which would require rising buy volume with price stabilization).

Recent Price Action

The 14-day close sequence shows a gradual, low-volatility decline from $0.001829 to $0.001708 with daily volatility of only 1.7% (stdev of daily returns). There are no sharp bounces or capitulation wicks — just a slow, grinding descent.

Low-volatility grinding declines typically indicate controlled distribution by informed holders rather than panic selling. This pattern often precedes a sharper move lower once support levels are tested, or a sudden reversal if a catalyst emerges. The immediate support at $0.001648 is the next key test.

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.001648

Major support

$0.001253

Immediate resistance

$0.001790

Major resistance

$0.005046

The immediate support at $0.001648 is approximately 3.5% below current price and represents the first meaningful floor from OHLC swing lows — a breach would open the path to the major support at $0.001253 (-26.6% from current). On the upside, the immediate resistance at $0.001790 aligns with the recent daily close cluster and has acted as a ceiling during the current decline; clearing it would be the first technical sign of stabilization. The major resistance at $0.005046 — the 90-day high — is 195% above current price and would require a fundamental re-rating of the project.

AI overall risk

High

Risk Score

68/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityMedium

    Daily volatility of 1.7% (stdev of daily returns) is moderate, but the 90-day drawdown of -44.8% from the period high demonstrates that ZENT is capable of sustained, deep losses. The low daily volatility in the current period reflects a grinding downtrend rather than stability.

  • LiquidityHigh

    At $147K total liquidity on a single Uniswap v2 pool, ZENT has shallow liquidity relative to its $13.3M market cap. Trades above $5,000–$10,000 will incur significant slippage, and the 30.7% dumpable supply (~$4.1M at current prices) cannot be liquidated without destroying the price.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    As a utility token in the AI and GameFi categories on Ethereum, ZENT faces the same regulatory uncertainty as the broader crypto sector. The 'utility token' classification provides some framing, but AI-data monetization models may attract additional regulatory scrutiny in certain jurisdictions.

Key Risks

  • Zero-cost-basis whale overhang: Five individual wallets holding 30.7% of supply received their positions via transfer/airdrop with no market cost — any decision to sell is pure profit for them and could overwhelm the $147K liquidity pool, causing a rapid price collapse
  • Sustained structural downtrend: The -44.8% decline over 90 days with flat holder growth and no accumulation signals suggests the token may continue drifting toward the major support at $0.001253 without a fundamental catalyst
  • Liquidity fragility: A single Uniswap v2 pool with $147K liquidity serving a $13.3M market cap creates extreme vulnerability to liquidity withdrawal events or large coordinated sells

Mitigating Factors

  • Fully circulating supply with no future unlock events eliminates dilution risk — the tokenomics are clean from a supply-side perspective
  • Protocol/contract wallets holding 42.4% of the top-10 supply are non-dumpable, providing a structural floor on the circulating sell-side supply

Investor Suitability

ZENT may be suitable for high-risk-tolerance investors with a specific thesis on the AI/GameFi narrative convergence and the ability to absorb a potential -26% to -100% drawdown. It is not suitable for capital preservation strategies, low-risk portfolios, or investors who cannot tolerate illiquid positions. Any position size must account for the high slippage risk in the shallow liquidity pool.

ZENT is a high-risk, high-concept AI/GameFi infrastructure token trading near 90-day lows after a -44.8% drawdown, with a stagnant holder base and thin liquidity. The bull case depends entirely on execution of the Human-Agentic OS vision and a sector-level AI narrative tailwind; the bear case is supported by the current on-chain data showing controlled distribution, flat growth, and zero-cost-basis whale overhang.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Zentry delivers a meaningful product milestone on its tri-layer stack (zApp/zAI/zData) that attracts new users and generates verifiable on-chain activity. This coincides with a broader AI-crypto sector rotation, driving new holder growth and buy pressure that absorbs the dumpable supply overhang. Price recovers toward the immediate resistance at $0.001790 and potentially tests the $0.003–$0.005 range.

  • Tangible product launch or partnership that validates the Human-Agentic OS narrative and drives measurable user adoption
  • Broad AI-crypto sector rally that lifts all tokens in the category and brings speculative capital back to ZENT

Base Case

ZENT consolidates in the $0.001500–$0.001790 range over the next 30–60 days, with the immediate support at $0.001648 providing a temporary floor. Holder count remains flat, volume stays thin, and the token awaits a catalyst that has not yet materialized. Price action remains range-bound with a slight downward bias.

  • The largest individual whale wallets (6.41% and 6.07%) continue their current holding behavior and do not initiate large DEX sells
  • No major product announcement or sector catalyst emerges to shift the current distribution-phase dynamics

Bear Case

High probability

The current grinding downtrend continues as individual whale wallets with zero cost basis gradually distribute their positions into thin liquidity. Holder growth remains flat, no product catalyst emerges, and price breaks below the immediate support at $0.001648, accelerating toward the major support at $0.001253 — a further -26.6% decline from current levels.

  • Continued distribution by zero-cost-basis whale wallets (30.7% dumpable supply) into a $147K liquidity pool that cannot absorb large sells
  • Absence of new holder growth and product catalysts sustaining the current low-conviction, sell-dominated trading environment

Analysis Details

Generated

Aug 14, 2026, 06:30 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-08-14 18:30 UTC

Model Confidence

Medium

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.001708136820931484

Market Cap

$13.30M

24h Volume

$41.0K

Holders

4,307

Liquidity

$146,965.42

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (Uniswap v2 swap history)Holder distribution analytics (Moralis holder tier classification)90-day daily OHLC price history with computed swing high/low key levelsSmart money realized PnL data (top profitable traders)Whale wallet forensics (DEX swap history, first-active dates, acquisition method)Smart contract security assessment (66/100 score, verification status)

Limitations

  • Smart contract security score of 66/100 references specific vulnerabilities not detailed in the available data — a full audit report would be required for a complete security assessment
  • Social media metrics (follower counts, engagement rates) were not available, limiting the community strength assessment to qualitative inference from on-chain holder data
  • The acquisition method for whale wallets 0x4a4aaa and 0x91d40e is confirmed as transfer/airdrop but the specific distribution event or counterparty is unknown, limiting insider-risk characterization

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Questions about ZENT?